سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,501
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,105,124
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,210,685
محمدی, سیما, قنبری موحد, رضوان, عالی نژادیان بیدآبادی, افسانه, کریمی, فاطمه, اختیاریان, سحر. (1401). عوامل روانشناختی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد. , 53(4), 1085-1101. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2022.336399.669118
سیما محمدی; رضوان قنبری موحد; افسانه عالی نژادیان بیدآبادی; فاطمه کریمی; سحر اختیاریان. "عوامل روانشناختی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد". , 53, 4, 1401, 1085-1101. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2022.336399.669118
محمدی, سیما, قنبری موحد, رضوان, عالی نژادیان بیدآبادی, افسانه, کریمی, فاطمه, اختیاریان, سحر. (1401). 'عوامل روانشناختی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد', , 53(4), pp. 1085-1101. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2022.336399.669118
محمدی, سیما, قنبری موحد, رضوان, عالی نژادیان بیدآبادی, افسانه, کریمی, فاطمه, اختیاریان, سحر. عوامل روانشناختی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد. , 1401; 53(4): 1085-1101. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2022.336399.669118

عوامل روانشناختی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد

تحقیقات اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی ایران
دوره 53، شماره 4، دی 1401، صفحه 1085-1101    اصل مقاله (1.21 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijaedr.2022.336399.669118
نویسندگان
سیما محمدی* 1؛ رضوان قنبری موحد2؛ افسانه عالی نژادیان بیدآبادی1؛ فاطمه کریمی3؛ سحر اختیاریان3
1استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
2استادیار گروه توسعه روستایی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران
چکیده
فرسایش زمین های کشاورزی به عنوان یک مشکل جدی زیست محیطی و اقتصادی در بسیاری از کشورهای در حال توسعه در نظر گرفته شده است. مخصوصا در ایران که نرخ فرسایش خاک سه برابر بیشتر از سایر کشورهای آسیایی است. کشاورزان، به عنوان ذینفعان مستقیم نقش مهمی در روند حفاظت از زمین‌های کشاورزی بازی می‌کنند. رفتار کشاورزان در حفاظت از خاک تحت تاثیر عوامل مختلفی است. بنابراین هدف از مطالعه­ حاضر بررسی عوامل روانشناسی مؤثر بر رفتار حفاظت از خاک کشاورزان شهرستان نورآباد است. برای رسیدن به این هدف از تئوری رفتار برنامه­ریزی شده به عنوان چارچوب اصلی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه کشاورزان گندمکار شهرستان نورآباد (18500N= ) بود، که با استفاده از جدول کرجسی و مورگان، حجم نمونه 375 نفر تعیین شد. برای گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه استفاده شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با به کارگیری نرم افزار AMOS24 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که میزان رفتار حفاظت از خاک در بین بیشتر کشاورزان در سطح کم بود. براساس نتایج متغیرهای قصد، نگرش، هنجار ذهنی و کنترل رفتاری درک شده رابطه معنی‌داری با رفتار کشاورزان در استفاده از روش‌های حفاظت از خاک دارند. به‌علاوه متغیرهای قصد رفتاری و نگرش بیش‌ترین اثر مثبت و غیر مستقیم را بر رفتار کشاورزان داشتند. بنابراین ایجاد نگرش مثبت نسبت به خاکورزی حفاظتی در ذهن کشاورزان، افزایش سطح آگاهی و مهارتی کشاورزان در خصوص روش‌های حفاظت از خاک و ارائه تسهیلات و اعتبارات در قالب وام‌های کم‌بهره می‎تواند باعث افزایش اتخاذ رفتار حفاظت از خاک در بین کشاورزان شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
خاکورزی حفاظتی؛ تئوری رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده؛ نگرش؛ هنجارذهنی؛ کنترل رفتاری
عنوان مقاله [English]
Psychological factors affecting the Farmers' Soil Conservation Behavior in Nurabad Township
نویسندگان [English]
Sima Mohammadi1؛ Rezvan Ghanbari Movahed2؛ Afsaneh Aalinejhadian-Bidabadi1؛ Fatemeh Karimi3؛ Sahar Ekhtiarian3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Rural Development, College of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramaba, Iran
3M.S. Student, Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran
چکیده [English]
Recently, water governance has become important due to the increasing complexities associated with water management. So that it is widely acknowledged that the world water crisis is more a crisis of governance than of water scarcity. In recent decades adopting the ‘Water Independence of Provinces’ law has created many social, environmental, economic and managerial crises in the Zayandeh-Rud basin and its two sub-basins (Isfahan and Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari) which have resulted in conflicts between the sub-basin stakeholders. The current applied study was qualitative regarding its methodology and followed a case study approach. The statistical population of the study included managers and senior experts of water governance in two sub-basins (Isfahan and Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari) and finally nine managers and experts in Isfahan sub-basin, four cases in extra-basin level, and six cases in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari sub-basin were selected as the sample population by means of snowball sampling method till theoretical saturation. Data collection was done by structured questionnaire and interview protocol. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), the empirical analysis of water governance systems in two sub-basins showed that a set of factors associated with low performance regarding climate change adaptation. Regarding performance aspect, water governance in Zayandeh-Rud basin and its two sub-basins were Centralized Rent-seeking and Centralized Coordinated, respectively. This means that both basin and sub-basins have low performance regarding climate change adaptation and ability to resilience and adaptation challenges. The reason for the difference in the type of water governance performance at the level of the Zayandeh-Rud basin and its sub-basins was the poor coordination between water related organizations in sub-basins.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Water governance, Coordination, Distribution of power, Fuzzy logic, Zayandeh-Rud basin
مراجع
  1. Abdollahzadeh, G., Leila, J., & Sharifzadeh, M. (2018). Investigating Awareness regarding Impacts of Soil Erosion and Conservative Measures in Rural Areas of Golestan’Chehel-Chay Watershed. Geography and Environmental Planning, 29(1), 1-20. [In Farsi]
  2. Agricultural Jihad Organization of Lorestan Province. (2018). Conservation agriculture in Lorestan Provience. 10-20.
  3. Ahmad, N. S. B. N., Mustafa, F. B., & Didams, G. (2020). A systematic review of soil erosion control practices on the agricultural land in Asia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 8(2), 103-115.
  4. Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Brief Description of the Theory of Planned Behavior, 1-14.
  5. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Retrieved June 27, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
  6. Ashoori, D., Bagheri, A., Allahyari, M. S., & Al-Rimawi, A. S. (2016). An examination of soil and water conservation practices in the paddy fields of Guilan province, Iran. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 88, 959-971. [In Farsi]
  7. Bazrafkan, K., Zamani, G. H., Rezae-Moghaddam, K., & Namdar, R. (2020). Behavioral Model of Crop Soil Conservation (Case Study: Wheat Growers in Marvdasht Township). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 27(4), 109-128. [In Farsi]
  8. Betela, B., & Wolka, K. (2021). Evaluating soil erosion and factors determining farmers’ adoption and management of physical soil and water conservation measures in Bachire watershed, southwest Ethiopia. Environmental Challenges, 5, 100348.
  9. Bijani, M., Ghazani, E., Valizadeh, N., & Fallah Haghighi, N. (2019). Predicting and Understanding Farmers' Soil Conservation Behavior in Mazandaran Province, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(7), 1705-1719.
  10. Borges, J. A. R., Lansink, A. G. O., Ribeiro, C. M., & Lutke, V. (2014). Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior. Livestock Science, 169, 163-174.
  11. Borges, J.A.R., Lansink, A.G.J.M.O., Ribeiro, C.M., Lutke, V., (2014). Understanding farmers' intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sci. 169, 163-174.
  12. Carlisle, L. (2016). Factors influencing farmer adoption of soil health practices in the United States: A narrative review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(6), 583-613.
  13. Chen, W. and Xie, X. (2013). Study on the mechanism of the impact of climate disasters on food security, Issues in Agricultural Economy, 1, 12-19.
  14. Dehghanpur, H., & Zibaei, M. (2020). Investigation of Factors Affecting Farmers' Motivation in Using Water and Soil Conservation Technologies. Agricultural Economics and Development, 28(110), 121-146.
  15. Di Falco, S. and Chavas, J.P. (2009). On crop biodiversity, risk exposure, and food security in the highlands of Ethiopia, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(3), 599-611
  16. Farhadi, H. A., & Fallah, V. (2017). Role of education on the application of soil conservation practices in order to sustainability of paddy in Sari County. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 69-82. [In Farsi]
  17. Fealy, S., Osmanpour, M., & Mirzaei, A. (2013). The impact of extension services on the knowledge of application of soil conservation technologies by farmers in Marivan township. Iran. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research, 6(21), 47. [In Farsi]
  18. Ghasemi, V. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling in Social Researches (using Amos Graphics). Tehran: Sociologists. [In Farsi]
  19. Gholami, M., Alibygi, A., & Papzan, A. (2020). Pathology of non-acceptance conservation agriculture in Kermanshah province by using Paradigm model. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.22 (9), 130-138. [In Farsi]
  20. Greiner, R. (2015). Motivations and attitude influence farmers' willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts. Syst. 137, 154-165.
  21. Guo, X., Zhou, L., Chen, Y., Zhao, M. and Wang, R. (2017). Perception and adaption of ecological environment change for farmers in the typical desertification area: a case of hangjin banner in the Inner Mongolia autonomous region, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 31 (3), 64-69.
  22. Jara-Rojas, R., Bravo-Ureta, B.E. and Díaz, J. (2012). Adoption of water conservation practices: a socioeconomic analysis of small-scale farmers in Central Chile, Agricultural Systems, 110, 54-62.
  23. Ji, A. (2017). Mechanism analysis and empirical model of investment behavior of soil and water conservation in donggang city farmer, Heilongjiang Hydraulic Science and Technology, 45 (8), 224-226.
  24. Karani, Z., Shiri, N., & Salehi, L. (2014). Attitude of farmers to soil conservation practices (SCPs) in Kermanshah Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research (IJAEDR), 45(1). [In Farsi]
  25. Khisa, P., Gachene, C.K., Karanja, N. and Mureithi, J. (2007). The effect of post harvest crop cover on soil erosion in a maize-legume based cropping system in gatanga, Kenya, Journal of Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics, 103, pp. 17-28.
  26. Lalani, B., Dorward, P., Holloway, G., & Wauters, E. (2016). Smallholder farmers' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making. Agricultural Systems, 146, 80-90.
  27. Lauwere, C., Asseldonk, M., Riet, J., Hoop, J., Pierick, E. (2012). Understanding farmers' decisions with regard to animal welfare: the case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows. Sci. 143, 151-161.
  28. Li, Y. (2017). Behavior mechanism analysis of farmers’ soil and water conservation in hilly areas of North China: a case study of Liaoning South ticket area, Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 25 (5), 103-105.
  29. Liu, H., & Luo, X. (2018). Understanding farmers’ perceptions and behaviors towards farmland quality change in northeast China: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 10(9), 3345.
  30. Mezbani, M., Rezaei Moghadam, M., & Hejazi, A. (2021). Assessment of soil erosion risk in land uses using Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (Case Study: Sikan Basin). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(1), 41-63. [In Farsi]
  31. Moghaddasi, M., Khodaverdizadeh, M., Hashemi Bonab, S., & Sokouti Oskoee, R. (2018). Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Soil Conservation Non-Mechanical Methods in Order to Maintain the Sustainability (Case Study: Urmia County). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4), 229-245. [In Farsi]
  32. Momeny, C.D., Dashti, G., Dashti, B., Rezaie, A., & Mohammad Rezaie, R. (2010). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Non-Mechanical Practices of Soil Conservation Among Dry Farmers: A Case Study of the Izeh Township-Iran. Journal of agricultural science and sustainable production, 20(2), 89-101. [In Farsi]
  33. Noori, H., Jamshidi, A.R., Jamshidi, M., Hedayati Moghadam, Z., & Fathi, A. (2014). Reviwing factors affecting the acceotance of soil protection measures, a step towards sustainable development of agriculture. Iranian journal of agricultural economics and development research,45(1), 195-205.
  34. Pimentel, D., & Burgess, M. (2013). Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture, 3(3), 443-463.
  35. Sabour, L., Rezaei-Moghaddam, K., & Menati-Zadeh, M. (2017). Factors Influencing Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices among Farmers in Garmsar County. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13(1), 59-73. [In Farsi]
  36. Sartori, M., Philippidis, G., Ferrari, E., Borrelli, P., Lugato, E., Montanarella, L., & Panagos, P. (2019). A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion.
  37. Savari, M., Yazdanpanah, M., & Rouzaneh, D. (2022). Factors affecting the implementation of soil conservation practices among Iranian farmers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-13.
  38. Seifi, R., Chizari, M., & Abbasi, E. (2018). Factors affecting framers' soil conservation behavior in West Azerbaijan province: a cultural approach. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 13(2), 219-234. [In Farsi]
  39. Shiri, N., Hashemi, S. M. K., Mirakzadeh, A. L. I. A. S. G. H. A. R., & Esshaghi, S. R. (2013). Factors affecting using soil conservation practices (SCDs) by farmers in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research (IJAEDR), 44(2). [In Farsi]
  40. Tohidyan Far, S., Rezaei Moghaddam, K. (2015). Attitudes of farmers toward participation in irrigation and drainage projects: the structural equations modeling analysis, Iran Agricultural Research, 34(1): 80-91. [In Farsi]
  41. Tolassa, T. B., & Jara, G. O. (2021). Factors affecting improved seed and soil conservation technology adoptions in Bore District. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-12.
  42. Wauters, E., Bielders, C., Poesen, J., Govers, G., & Mathijs, E. (2010). Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27(1), 86–94.
  43. Willy, D. K., & Holm-Müller, K. (2013). Social influence and collective action effects on farm level soil conservation effort in rural Kenya. Ecological economics, 90, 94-103.
  44. Wordofa, M. G., Okoyo, E. N., & Erkalo, E. (2020). Factors influencing adoption of improved structural soil and water conservation measures in Eastern Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 9(1), 1-11.
  45. Zhai, W. and Hang, X. (2005). Analysis on the mechanism of farm household behavior of water and soil conservation, Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 6, 112-116.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 282
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 240


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب