پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,503 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,121,260 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,228,046 |
تأثیر آبیاری تکمیلی بر عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب دو رقم کلزا | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| دوره 53، شماره 8، آبان 1401، صفحه 1773-1784 اصل مقاله (1.33 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2022.344590.669296 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رهام محتشمی* 1؛ نصرت الله حیدرپور2 | ||
| 1مربی بخش تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کهگیلویه و بویراحمد، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش | ||
| 2استادیار، موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گچساران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| آبیاری تکمیلی به‌عنوان یک ساز وکار سودمند اقتصادی در وضعیت محدودیت آب و افزایش کارایی مصرف آب، مطرح است. این پژوهش با هدف تأثیر آبیاری تکمیلی بر عملکــرد، اجزای عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب کلزا، به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی گچساران در دو سال 96- 1395 و 97- 1396 اجراء شد. رژیم‌های آبیاری در چهار سطح (بدون آبیاری (I1)، آبیاری تکمیلی در مرحله گلدهی (I2)، آبیاری تکمیلی در مرحله پرشدن دانه (I3)، آبیاری تکمیلی در مرحله گلدهی + پرشدن دانه (I4)،) در کرت اصلی، ارقام هایولا و شیرالی در کرت‌های فرعی اعمال شد. صفات مورد بررسی شامل تعداد غلاف در بوته، تعداد دانه در غلاف، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد زیستی، عملکرد دانه، شاخص برداشت عملکرد روغن و کارایی مصرف آب بودند. نتایج تجزیه آماری (ANOVA) نشان داد با آبیاری تکمیلی تعداد غلاف در بوته از 88 در شرایط دیم به 120 با دو بار آبیاری تکمیلی رسید که معادل36 درصد افزایش داشت. آبیاری تکمیلی شاخص برداشت را از 1/24 به 9/27درصد افزایش داد که معادل 4/12 درصد افزایش بود. با آبیاری تکمیلی عملکرد دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک افزایش یافت بهﻃﻮری ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ عملکرد دانه از 782 در شرایط دیم به 2378 با دو بار آبیاری تکمیلی و عملکرد بیولوژیک از 3228 به 8350 کیلوگرم در هکتار رسید. بالاترین کارایی مصرف آب (73/0 کیلوگرم در متر مکعب) از تیمار I4 و کم‌ترین آن (39/0 کیلوگرم در متر مکعب) از تیمار I1، به‌دست آمد. در مجموع نتایج نشان داد آبیاری تکمیلی عملکرد دانه، شاخص برداشت، عملکرد روغن و کارایی مصرف آب را به‌ترتیب 83، 12، 7 و 23 درصد افزایش داد. در صورت کشت کلزا در شرایط دیم با انجام آبیاری تکمیلی در دو مرحله گلدهی و پرشدن دانه می‌توان به عملکرد بالایی دست یافت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پرشدن دانه؛ دیم؛ گلدهی؛ عملکرد روغن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of supplemental Irrigation on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Two Canola Cultivars (Brassica napus L.) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| raham Mohtashami1؛ Nosratollah Haidarpour2 | ||
| 1Instructor of Seed and Plant Improvement Department, Research and Education Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources of Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization(AREEO), Yasooj, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant of Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gachsaran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Supplemental irrigation is considered as a beneficial economic mechanism in the situation of water constraint and increase water use efficiency of canola. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and water use efficiency. This research was carried out at split plots in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Gachsaran Agricultural Research Station in 2017-18 and 2018-19. Irrigation regimes applied in four levels (without irrigation (I1), supplemental irrigation at flowering stage (I2), supplemental irrigation at grain filling stage (I3), supplemental irrigation at flowering stage + grain filling (I4)) in main plot, Hyola and Shirali cultivars were sown in the subplot. The studied traits including number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 1000 seed weight, biological yield, grain yield, harvest index and water use efficiency. Results of ANOVA showed that the number of pods per plant increased from 88 in rainfed conditions to 120 with two supplemental irrigations, which increased by 36%. The supplemental irrigation increased the harvest index from 24.1 to 27.9 percent, which was an increase of 12.4 percent. Increasing the frequency of supplemental irrigation increased the grain yield and biological yield, so that the two supplemental irrigations increased the average grain yield from 782 in rainfed conditions to 2378 and increased biological yield from 3228 to 8350 kg ha-1. The highest water use efficiency (0.73 kg m3) was obtained from treatment I4 and the lowest (0.39 kg m3) was obtained from treatment I1. Overall, the results showed that supplemental irrigation increased grain yield, oil yield, harvest index and water use efficiency 83, 12, 7, and 23 percent, respectively. In case of canola cultivation in rainfed conditions, high yield can be achieved by supplemental irrigation in two stages of flowering and grain filling. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Dryland, Flowering, Grain Filling, Oil Yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ali, S., Ma, X., Jia, Q., Ahmad, I., Ahmad, S., Sha, Z. and Jia, Z. (2019). Supplemental irrigation strategy for improving grain filling, economic return, and production in winter wheat under the ridge and furrow rainwater harvesting system. Agricultural Water Management, 226, 105842. Barnabás, B., Jäger, K., and Fehér, A. (2008). The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant, Cell & Environment, 31(1), 11-38. Canola Council of Canada. (2016). Growth stages of the canola plant. Available in: http://www.canola council.org/crop production/canola grower's. Diepenbrock, W., (2011). Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Research, 67(1), 35-49. Dogan, E., Copur, O., Kahraman, A., Kirnak, H., and Guldur, M. E. (2011). Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 98(9), 1403-1408. Dogan, E. (2019). Effect of supplemental irrigation on vetch yield components. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 978-982. Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., and Huang, J. (2017). Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in plant science, 1147. Faostat, F. A. O. (2021). Statistical Databases. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/. Gajić, B., Kresović, B., Tapanarova, A., Životić, L., and Todorović, M. (2018). Effect of irrigation regime on yield, harvest index and water productivity of soybean grown under different precipitation conditions in a temperate environment. Agricultural water management, 210, 224-231. George, N., Thompson, S. E., Hollingsworth, J., Orloff, S., and Kaffka, S. (2018). Measurement and simulation of water-use by canola and camelina under cool-season conditions in California. Agricultural Water Management, 196, 15-23. Gültaş, H. T., & Ahi, Y. (2020). Supplemental irrigation impact on yield and yield quality parameters of rapeseed. Agronomy Journal, 112(5), 4207-4218. Gu, X. B., Li, Y. N., Du, Y. D., and Yin, M. H. (2017). Ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting with supplemental irrigation to improve seed yield and water use efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of integrative agriculture, 16(5), 1162-1172. Hang, A. N., and Gilliard, G. C. (1991). Water requirement for winter rapeseed in central Washington. In McGregor, DI proceedings of the eighth international rapeseed congress, saskatoon, Canada. Organizing committee, Saskatoon (pp. 1235-1240). Hao, B., Xue, Q., Marek, T. H., Jessup, K. E., Hou, X., Xu, W., and Bean, B. W. (2015). Soil water extraction, water use, and grain yield by drought-tolerant maize on the Texas High Plains. Agricultural Water Management, 155, 11-21. Hergert, G. W., Margheim, J. F., Pavlista, A. D., Martin, D. L., Isbell, T. A., and Supalla, R. J. (2016). Irrigation response and water productivity of deficit to fully irrigated spring camelina. Agricultural Water Management, 177, 46-53. Jha, P. K., Kumar, S. N., and Ines, A. V. (2018). Responses of soybean to water stress and supplemental irrigation in upper Indo-Gangetic plain: Field experiment and modeling approach. Field crops research, 219, 76-86. Katerji, N., Mastrorilli, M., and Rana, G. (2008). Water use efficiency of crops cultivated in the Mediterranean region: Review and analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 28(4), 493-507. Katuwal, K. B., Cho, Y., Singh, S., Angadi, S. V., Begna, S., and Stamm, M. (2020). Soil water extraction pattern and water use efficiency of spring canola under growth-stage-based irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management, 239, 106232. Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W., and Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042), 616-620. Mendham, N. J. and Salisbury, P. A. (1995). Physiology, crop development, growth and yield. In: Kimber, D.S.and D.I. McGregor. (Ed.). Brassica Oilseeds: Production and utilization. CAB International. London. pp: 11-64. Mohtashami, R., Dehnavi, M. M., Balouchi, H., and Faraji, H. (2020). Improving yield, oil content and water productivity of dryland canola by supplementary irrigation and selenium spraying. Agricultural Water Management, 232, 106046. Oweis, T., and Hachum, A. (2006). Water harvesting and supplemental irrigation for improved water productivity of dry farming systems in West Asia and North Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 80(1-3), 57-73. Pavlista, A. D., Hergert, G. W., Margheim, J. M., and Isbell, T. A. (2016). Growth of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) under deficit irrigation in Western Nebraska. Industrial Crops and Products, 83, 635-640. Rao, M. S. S., and Mendham, N. J. (1991). Soil–plant–water relations of oilseed rape (Brassica napus and B. campestris). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 117(2), 197-205. Safavi Fard, N., Heidari Sharif Abad, H., Shirani Rad, A.H., Majidi Heravan, E. and Daneshian, J. (2018). Effect of drought stress on qualitative characteristics of canola cultivars in winter cultivation. Industrial Crops and Products, 114, 87-92. Sinaki, J.M., Majidi Heravan, E., Shirani Rad, A.H., Noormohamadi, G. and Zarei, G. (2007). The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). American Eurasian. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 417-422. Tafteh, A., and Sepaskhah, A. R. (2012). Application of HYDRUS-1D model for simulating water and nitrate leaching from continuous and alternate furrow irrigated rapeseed and maize fields. Agricultural Water Management, 113: 19-29. Wu, S., Ning, F., Zhang, Q., Wu, X., and Wang, W. (2017). Enhancing omics research of crop responses to drought under field conditions. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 174. Soxhlet, F. (2003). Die gewichtsanalytische Bestimmung des Milchfettes. Polytechnisches Journal, 1879: 232-261. Zhang, H., Han, K., Gu, S., and Wang, D. (2019). Effects of supplemental irrigation on the accumulation, distribution and transportation of 13C-photosynthate, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 214, 1-8 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 279 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 258 |
||