تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,092,757 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,196,857 |
تحلیلی بر ادراکات بهرهبرداران مرتعی از حکمرانی مشارکتی در مراتع (مطالعه موردی: مراتع شهرستان آققلا استان گلستان) | ||
نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری | ||
دوره 75، شماره 4، دی 1401، صفحه 573-590 اصل مقاله (1.08 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrwm.2022.345089.1668 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سیده خدیجه مهدوی1؛ مائده یوسفیان* 2؛ محمدرضا شهرکی3؛ رضا اورمرز3 | ||
1استادیار گروه منابع طبیعی، واحد نور، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نور، ایران. | ||
2استادیار پژوهشی، بخش تحقیقات جنگلها و مراتع، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش | ||
3کارشناس ارشد اداره کل منابع طبیعی و آبخیزداری استان گلستان، گرگان، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
نیاز به تمرکززدایی دولت در سطوح محلی میتواند تضمینی برای مشارکت بهرهبرداران مرتعی باشد. در همین راستا تحقیق حاضر به تحلیل ادراکات بهرهبرداران مرتعی از حکمرانی مشارکتی در مراتع اینچهشورهزار استان گلستان پرداخته است. تحقیق از نوع توصیفی بوده که به روش پیمایشی انجام شد. جامعه آماری آن را 120 بهرهبردار تشکیل دادهاند که 92 نفر از آنها به عنوان حجم نمونه انتخاب شدند. پرسشنامه ابزار اصلی جمعآوری اطلاعات بود که حکمرانی مشارکتی با 32 گویه در قالب 9 مؤلفه ارزیابی شد. به طوری که روایی پرسشنامه از طریق کارشناسان و پایایی آن با محاسبۀ ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به دست آمد. محاسبات آماری بر اساس نرمافزار SPSS25 صورت گرفت. نتایج نشان داد، شاخصهای «اجرا» و «حل تعارضات» با بیشترین مقدار و دو شاخص «برنامهریزی» و «هماهنگی» با کمترین مقدار به ترتیب در بالاترین و پایینترین سطح شاخص حکمرانی در مراتع قرار گرفتند. از طرفی، با توجه به میانگین به دست آمده در شاخص حکمرانی مرتع (58/3)، تمایل حکمرانی به سمت مدیریت جامعهمحور میباشد. بین متغیرهای سابقه دامداری، تعداد دام، سن، میزان درآمد سالانه با تمایل به حکمرانی در مرتع رابطۀ مثبت و معنیداری وجود داشت. با توجه به نتایج به دست آمده و همچنین جایگاه و اهمیت حکمرانی مراتع، دخالت دادن بهرهبرداران در تهیه و تدوین طرحها و پروژههای مرتعی و استفاده از دانش غنی بومی آنها، برگزاری دورهها و کلاسهای آموزشی در راستای فعالیتهای مشارکتی بهره-برداران با اداره منابع طبیعی و آبخیزداری به عنوان نماینده دولت، از جمله مهمترین پیشنهادات تحقیق حاضر میباشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
حاکمیت؛ دولت؛ ذینفعان؛ مشارکت؛ مدیریت پایدار؛ آققلا | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
An analysis of rangeland beneficiaries' perceptions of participatory governance in rangelands (Case study: rangelands of Aq Qala city, Golestan province) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Seyedeh khadijeh Mahdavi1؛ Maedeh Yousefian2؛ Mohammad Reza Shahraki3؛ Reza Ourmaz3 | ||
1Assistant prof. of Department of Natural Resource, Nour Branch, Islamic Azad University, Nour, Iran. | ||
2Research Assistant Prof., Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran | ||
3Expert of General Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management of Golestan Province, Gorgan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The need to decentralize government at the local level can guarantee the participation of rangeland beneficiaries. So the present study has analyzed the perceptions of rangeland beneficiaries of participatory governance in Incheh salt marshes in Golestan province. The research is descriptive-survey and statistical population consists of 120 beneficiaries, 92 of whom were selected as the sample size. The questionnaire was the main tool of data collection and participatory governance was evaluated with 32 items in the form of 9 components. The validity of the questionnaire was obtained by experts and its reliability was obtained by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Statistical calculations based on SPSS25. The results showed that the "implementation" and "conflict resolution" with the highest and "planning" and "coordination" with the lowest were at the highest and lowest levels of governance index, respectively. On the other hand, according to the average obtained in the participatory governance index (3.58), the tendency of governance is toward community-oriented management. There was a positive and significant relationship between the variables of livestock history, number of livestock, age, annual income and the tendency to rule in the rangeland. According to the obtained results and also the importance of rangeland governance, the involvement of beneficiaries in the preparation of rangeland plans and projects and the use of their rich native knowledge, holding classes in line with the cooperative activities of beneficiaries with the Department of Natural Resources and Watershed Management as a representative of the government are the most important suggestions of this research. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Aq Qala, Beneficiaries, Governance, Government, Participation, Sustainable management | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Abedi Sarvestani, A. and Ingram, V. (2020). Perceptions and practices of rural council participatory forest governance: Closed co-management in Chehel-Chay, Iran. Forest Policy and Economics, 117: 102202. [2] Acuña, R.M. (2015). The politics of extractive governance: Indigenous peoples and socio-environmental conflicts. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2(1): 85-92. [3] Adam, J.N., Adams, T., Gerber, J. D. and Haller, T. (2021). Decentralization for increased sustainability in natural resource management? Two cautionary cases from Ghana. Sustainability, 13(12), 68-85. [4] Agrawal, A. and Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485-514. [5] Ahmadi, R., Heydari, Q. and khoshfar, G. (2020). Investigate the factors affecting landholders' participation in the rehabilitation and restoration of rangeland (case study: Choqakadoo rangeland in the province of Kermanshah). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 73(2), 227-238. [6] Ahmadi, R., Heydari, Q., Rastgar, S. and Mohammadi Kangrani, H. (2022). Comparison of structural indicators of social networks of rancher’s participation in summer rangeland management systems Delarstaq, Amol. Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 19(2): doi: 10.22092/ijfrpr.2021.353315.1469. [7] Alishah-Eratboni, F., Arzani, H., Javadi, S. and Farahpour, M. (2019). Investigation of factors influencing participation of ranchers in range management plans (case study: Savadkooh watershed, Mazandaran). Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 26(2), 379-387. [8] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571. [9] Arnouts, R., Van der Zouwen, M. and Arts, B. (2012). Analysing governance modes and shifts—governance arrangements in dutch nature policy. Forest policy and economics, 16, 43-50. [10] Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, L., Bebbington, D. H., Burneo, M. L. and Warnaars, X. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and change, 39(6), 887-914. [11] Bennett, N.J. and Dearden, P. (2014). Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine policy, 44, 107-116. [12] Bennett, N. J., Di Franco, A., Calò, A., Nethery, E., Niccolini, F., Milazzo, M. and Guidetti, P. (2019). Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conservation letters, 12(4), e12640. [13] Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 489-500. [14] BMZ. (2002). Decentralization and Strengthening Local Self-Government in German Development co-Operation. BMZ, Bonn. [15] Bohlooli, N., Khodaverdizadeh, Q. and Saboohi Laki, B. (2017). Good governance, the key to community development, Fourth International Congress of New Research in Management, Accounting and Economics Studies, Shiraz. [16] Brunnschweiler, C., Edjekumhene, I. and Lujala, P. (2021). Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management. Ecological Economics, 181, 106903. [17] Carlsson, L. and Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of environmental management, 75(1), 65-76. [18] Cesar, S. 2019. Earning a social license to operate in mining: A case study from Peru. Resources Policy, 64, 101482. [19] Chabwela, H. and Haller, T. (2010). Governance issues, potentials and failures of participative collective action in the Kafue Flats, Zambia. International Journal of the Commons, 4(2), 621-642. [20] Charles, M. and Le Billon, P. (2021). Corporate accountability and diplomatic liability in overseas extractive projects. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(1), 467-476. [21] Dougherty, M.L. (2019). Boom times for technocrats? How environmental consulting companies shape mining governance. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(2), 443-453. [22] Dyer, J., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Leventon, J., Nshimbi, M., Chama, F. and Syampungani, S. (2014). Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from southern Africa. Journal of environmental management, 137, 137-145. [23] Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Díaz-Reviriego, I., Guèze, M., Cabeza, M., Pyhälä, A. and Reyes-García, V. (2016). Local perceptions as a guide for the sustainable management of natural resources: empirical evidence from a small-scale society in Bolivian Amazonia. Ecology and Society: a Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability, 21(1), 1-26. [24] Ferraro, P.J. (2000). Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and the role for a permanent International Habitat Reserve. [25] Florini, A. and Pauli, M. (2018). Collaborative governance for the sustainable development goals. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(3), 583-598. [26] Fu, B. (2020). Promoting geography for sustainability. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1), 1-7. [27] Ghorbani Mehr, M. (2019). The relationship between participatory governance and urban policy-making with a meritocracy approach. Third International Conference on Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, Management and Psychology: Tehran. [28] Graham, J., Amos, B. and Plumptre, T.W. (2003). Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century (pp. 1-2). Ottawa: Institute on Governance, Governance Principles for Protected Areas. [29] Grävingholt, J., Doerr, B., Meissner, K., Pletziger, S., Rümker, J. V. and Weikert, J. (2006). Strengthening participation through decentralisation: Findings on local economic development in Kyrgyzstan, Vol. 16, p. 144, DEU. [30] Hosseini, S.K. and Nowruzi, M. (2016). The necessity of governing natural resources with emphasis on oil and gas in Iran: Explaining theories and examining experiences. Scientific Monthly of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, 133, 9-16. [31] Jannati Chenar, M.A. and Kolahy, M.A. (2018). Conflicts between ranchers and natural resources management. 7th National Conference on Rangeland and Rangeland Management of Iran: Karaj. [32] Jingling, L., Yun, L., Liya, S., Zhiguo, C. and Baoqiang, Z. (2010). Public participation in water resources management of Haihe river basin, China: the analysis and evaluation of status quo. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, 1750-1758. [33] Karimian, A. and Heidari, G. (2016). Relation of social capital in each exploitation systems and participation in range management plan performance (case study: Semnan province range management plan). Journal of Arid Biome, 6(1), 45-55. [34] Khalili, V., Mahmoodi, J., Gholami, Sh. and Nazari, M.R. (2014). Factors affecting the rate of participation of beneficiaries in the implementation range management plan (case study of summer pastures Vazroud area). Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 5(2), 105-113. [35] Khanmohammadi, M., Ariapour, A. and Razzaghi, M.H. (2012). Prioritization Of barriers To participation in range,s plans from viewpoint of experts (case study: Tehran province, Lar Moor). Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 2(3), 99-110. [36] Kurniawan, N. I., Lujala, P., Rye, S. A. and Vela-Almeida, D. (2021). The role of local participation in the governance of natural resource extraction. The Extractive Industries and Society, 101029. [37] Kushler, M., York, D. and Witte, P. (2006). Aligning utility interests with energy efficiency objectives: A review of recent efforts at decoupling and performance incentives. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. [38] Leifsen, E., Gustafsson, M.T., Guzmán-Gallegos, M.A. and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2017). New mechanisms of participation in extractive governance: between technologies of governance and resistance work. Third World Quarterly, 38(5), 1043-1057. [39] Lund, S. 2002. Community participation in natural resource management projects: a rational institutional choice? Some evidence from sand dune fixation in Mauritania. Journal for Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 1(2), 17. [40] Mahmoudi, J., Mahmoudi, A. and Gholami, S. (2020). Determination the effective factors on the participation rate of exploiters in the implementation of rangeland management projects in Kojour, Nowshahr city. Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research, 11(1), 57-70. [41] Mairomi, H.W. and Kimengsi, J.N. (2021a). Community-based actors and participation in rangeland management. Lessons from the western highlands of Cameroon. Sustainability, 13(4), 1700. [42] Mairomi, H.W. and Kimengsi, J.N. (2021b). Governance dynamics in rangelands: An evaluation of the applicability of Ostrom's principles in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Scientific African. 12, e00837. [43] Mbuvi, M.T.E. and Kungu, J.B. (2021). A transforming traditional community-based forest management: the case of Loita community forest, Kenya. Heliyon, 7(6), e07380. [44] Meinzen-Dick, R. and Knox, A. (1999). Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resource management: A conceptual framework. In Draft paper for workshop (Vol. 15). [45] Merino, R. 2018. Re-politicizing participation or reframing environmental governance? Beyond indigenous’ prior consultation and citizen participation. World Development, 111, 75-83. [46] Mohammadabadi, F. and Kolahi, M. (2022). Factors affecting people's engagement in the implemented natural resources plans at Khorasan Razavi province. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 74(4), 821-835. [47] Mohammadi, N. and Danaeefard, H. (2019). A model of collaborative governance for renewable energy development in Iran: an institutional perspective. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research. 5(3), 67-95. [48] Muriu, A.R. 2013. Decentralization, citizen participation and local public service delivery: A study on the nature and influence of citizen participation on decentralized service delivery in Kenya (Master's thesis, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam). [49] Ojha, H.R., Ford, R., Keenan, R. J., Race, D., Vega, D.C., Baral, H. and Sapkota, P. (2016). Delocalizing communities: Changing forms of community engagement in natural resources governance. World Development, 87, 274-290. [50] Osmani, S.R. 2001. Participatory governance and poverty reduction. Choices for the Poor: Lessons from National Poverty Strategies. UNDP: New York. [51] Payste, M., Kolahi, M. and Omranian khorasani, H. (2020). Criteria and indicators; requirement for cognition, applying and evaluating good governance in natural resources. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 13-22. [52] Pomeroy, R.S. and Berkes, F. (1997). Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine policy, 21(5), 465-480. [53] Ribot, J.C. 2001. Integral local development:" accommodating multiple interests" through entrustment and accountable representation. International journal of agricultural resources, governance and ecology, 1(3-4), 327-350. [54] Righettini, M.S. 2021. Framing sustainability. Evidence from participatory forums to taylor the regional 2030 Agenda to local contexts. Sustainability, 13(8), 4435. [55] Springer, J., Campese, J. and Nakangu, B. (2021). The natural resource governance framework improving governance for equitable and effective conservation. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. [56] Tarmohammadi Ghorchi, Z., Abdollahzadeh, G., Sharifzadeh, M. and Ghezel, V. (2020). Feasibility investigation of good governance in the participatory water management in Aqqal county. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 34.2(2), 287-300. [57] Teye, J.K. (2011). Ambiguities of forest management decentralization in Ghana. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 3(4), 355-369. [58] Thompson, J. (1995). Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: Facilitating the process of institutional change. World development. 23(9), 1521-1554. [59] Thondhlana, G., Shackleton, S. and Blignaut, J. (2015). Local institutions, actors, and natural resource governance in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and surrounds, South Africa. Land Use Policy, 47, 121-129. [60] Toderi, M., Francioni, M., Seddaiu, G., Roggero, P.P., Trozzo, L. and D’Ottavio, P. (2017). Bottom-up design process of agri-environmental measures at a landscape scale: Evidence from case studies on biodiversity conservation and water protection. Land Use Policy, 68, 295-305. [61] Tost, M., Hitch, M., Chandurkar, V., Moser, P. and Feiel, S. (2018). The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining. Journal of cleaner production, 182, 969-977. [62] Wilson, E. and Stammler, F. (2016). Beyond extractivism and alternative cosmologies: Arctic communities and extractive industries in uncertain times. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 1-8. [63] Yeganegi, S., Alvani, S. and Memarzadeh, G. (2016). Ranking indicators of good governance in effective organizations (Case Study: branches of Refah bank in Qazvin Province). Public Policy In Administration, 7(21), 1-9. [64] Zabihzadeh, E., Sayyad Shirkosh, S. and Haghshenas Kashani, F. (2021). Designing a collaborative governance model with a combined approach: context of electricity demand side management in Iran. Strategic Studies of public policy, 11(40), 184-208. [65] Zandrazavi, S.B., Khaniki, H., Nasrallah, A. and Bustani, D. (2018). Request for participatory governance and sustainability of water resources Qualitative study of communication perception of groundwater beneficiaries in Rafsanjan plain. Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 12(4), 66-44. [66] Ziaee, M. and Asadian Ardakani, F. (2021). A framework for leveling good governance factors in the sustainable development of tourism destinations (case study: Maybod city). Spatial Planning, 11(1), 1-26. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 272 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 288 |