پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,121,709 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,229,042 |
تجربه زنان از تقسیم کارخانگی | ||
| زن در توسعه و سیاست | ||
| دوره 22، شماره 1، فروردین 1403، صفحه 143-167 اصل مقاله (651.77 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwdp.2023.358844.1008338 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حمیده دباغی* 1؛ کوثر محمدی2؛ سمیه جمشیدی2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد، گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تقسیم کار خانگی یا توزیع مسئولیت ها و کارهای ضروری به جهت حفظ و نگهداری خانه و افراد خانواده، از زمان صنعتی شدن به بعد از نظر تاریخی، متحول شده و به عنوان یک پدیده اجتماعی در مباحث دانشگاهی- از دهه 1970 به بعد-اهمیت یافته است. زمینه های اجتماعی و اقتصادی همواره در تاریخ تحولات خانواده، بر نوع روابط و تعاملات زن و مرد و نقشهای جنسیتی آنها در خانواده اثر گذاشته و روابط میان آنها را تنظیم کرده است. این مقاله به توصیف تجربه زنان از تقسیم کار خانگی با همسر در خانواده اختصاص دارد و از مفاهیم تحلیلی مانند برابری جنسیتی در تقسیم کار خانگی، مفهوم وابستگی اقتصادی و خنثی سازی انحراف از نقشهای جنسیتی، ذیل تئوری منابع نسبی، بهره برده است. روش تحلیل تماتیک، مصاحبه های نیمه ساختمند(15 نفر زنان شاغل/خانه دار در گروههای سنی 20 تا 60 ساله) و نرم افزار Max. Q.D.A 2018 به منظور استخراج روابط زوجین در تقسیم کار خانگی بکار برده شده است. یافته ها حاکی از استخراج 2 مقوله اصلی عدم مشارکت در تقسیم کار خانگی و مشارکت در تقسیم کار خانگی، 7 مقوله فرعی شامل: زنانگی سرسختانه، مردانگی هژمونیک، اقناع، خودکفایی اجباری، مثلث سازی اقتصادی، مشارکت تدریجی مردان و تقسیم کار برابر و 228 مفهوم است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تقسیم کار خانگی"؛ منابع نسبی"؛ نقشهای جنسیتی"؛ "؛ برابری جنسیتی" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Women's Experience of Domestic Labor Division | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamideh Dabbaghi1؛ Kosar Mohammadi2؛ Somayeh Jamshidi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Women’s Studies, Faculty of Social Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2MA, Department of Women’s Studies, Faculty of Social Science,Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The division of domestic labor or the distribution of responsibilities and necessary tasks for maintaining the home and family members has historically evolved since the industrialization period and has had important as a social phenomenon in academic discussions since the 1970s. Social and economic contexts have always influenced the relationships and interactions between men and women and their gender roles in the family. They have regulated the relationships between them throughout the history of family development. This paper describes the women's experience of domestic labor division with their husbands in the family. In addition, analytical concepts such as gender equality in the division of domestic labor, economic dependency, and gender deviation neutralization (in gender roles) under the theory of relative resources have been used. Also, the thematic analysis method and semi-structured interviews with 15 women, including employed women and housewives in the age groups of 20 to 60 years used in this paper. Then interviews were analyzed by Max QDA 2018 software to extract the relationship pattern of couples in the division of domestic labor. The findings indicate the extraction of 2 main themes of non-participation in the division of domestic labor and participation in the division of domestic labor, seven sub-themes including stubborn femininity, hegemonic masculinity, favorable or unfavorable obvious challenge, economic triangulation, passive/hidden resistance, gradual participation of men. and equality in relations, and 228 concepts. stubborn femininity or hidden feminism theme refers to the power and dominance of women in the family. The second theme refers to self-sufficiency because of absence of a man at home, the man's imprisonment, the man's incapacity, or the death of a man are forced to take care of and breadwinner. In relationships based on persuasion, women accept more tasks because of some reasonable evaluation of men’s function during other areas. The economic triangulation of women is a form of the relationship between men and women when they are equal in strength and power. Women’s hidden and passive resistance gradually causes men to participate in household chores. In gradual participation, men learn to participate in household chores through socialization from the group of relatives and friends and the assignment of partial and incremental tasks from the woman to the man. The last theme of couples' relationships is based on the understanding or extensive participation of men and women in household chores which ends to equal involvement. Both men and women try to participate intellectually, emotionally, psychologically, and behaviorally and experience gender roles as much as possible. The variety of types introduced in the Iranian family shows the change and evolution in the traditional Iranian society and the agency and rethinking by women in gender roles and the division of conventional domestic work.However, regarding the causes and contexts of the formation of this ideal relationship between the studied couples, it is not possible to refer to foreign studies and the experiences of women in other countries, such as Eastern European countries and France, which are based on egalitarian ideas through the promotion of women's participation in the workforce or countries with family policies such as Norway and gender ideology, he said. Instead, the ethnic, cultural, and social diversity under the macro-policy strategies in the field of the Iranian family under Islamic thought and influenced by the characteristic of collectivism in the Iranian culture creates a different experience for Iranian women and can be a debatable issue in future studies. But what can be accepted without a doubt is that Iranian women are entering a process of rethinking the division of work and power in the family and the beginning of the process of redistributing family responsibilities. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Division of Domestic Labor&rdquo, Relative resources&rdquo, Gender Roles&rdquo, &ldquo, Gender Equality&rdquo | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghajani, N. (2002). Participation of family members. Strategic Studies, 16. (In Persian) Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (1956). Family Socialization and Interaction Process. London: Routledge. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In book: APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Edition: First Chapter: Thematic analysis. Publisher: American Psychological Association. Editors: H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K. J. Sher. Buber, I. (2002). The influence of the distribution of household and childrearing tasks between men and women on childbearing intentions in Austria. Working paper of the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Rostock, Germany. Bulanda, R. E. (2004). Paternal involvement with children: The influence of gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 40-45. Burton, M. L., Brudner, L. A., & White, D. R. (1977). A model of the sexual division of labor. American Ethnologist, 4(2), 227-252. Carlson, M. W., & Hans, J. D. (2020). Maximizing benefits and minimizing impacts: Dual-earner couples’ perceived division of household labor decision-making process. Journal of Family Studies, 26(2), 208–225. Charrad, M. M. (2010, November). Women’s agency across cultures: Conceptualizing strengths and boundaries. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 517-522). Pergamon. Collis, M. (1999). Marital conflict and men's leisure: how women negotiate male power in a small mining community. Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 60-76. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1344-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00769.x Crompton, R. (2006) Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family life in Contemporary Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Dabbaghi, H. (2021). Academic Women and Conflict of Work and Family. Woman in Development and Politics, 19(2), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2021.320310.1007974 (In Persian) Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labour: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1272–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00092.x Ghobadi, K., Dehghani, M., Mansour, L., & Abbasi, M. (2011). Division of Household Labor, Perceived Justice (Fairness), and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Research, 7(2), 207-222. (In Persian) Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and family, 62(2), 322-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00322.x Hook, J. L. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state: Sex segregation in housework, 1965-2003. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1480-1523. Kitterød, R. H., & Pettersen, S. V. (2006). Making up for mothers’ employed working hours? Housework and childcare among Norwegian fathers. Work, Employment & Society, 20, 473-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017006066997 Lobodzinska, B. (1995). Family, women and employment in Central-Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Lui, L. (2013). Re-negotiating Gender: Household Division of Labour when She Earns More than He Does. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London. Mahdavi, M., & Sabouri Khosrowshahi, H. (2003). Examining the power structure in the family. Women's Studies Quarterly, 2. (In Persian) Malmir, M., & Ebrahimi, M. (2022). Typology of Power Structure in The Iranian Family. Strategic Studies of Women, 22(87), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.22095/jwss.2020.220454.2273 (In Persian). Mannino, C. A., & Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles, 56, 309-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9181-1 Nakamura, M., & Akiyoshi, M. (2015). What determines the perception of fairness regarding household division of labor between spouses?. PLoS One, 10(7), e0132608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132608 Perales, F., Baxter, J., & Tai, T. O. (2015). Gender, justice and work: A distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness. Social Science Research, 51, 51-63. Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In M. E. Pacanowsky & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 31–54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Raisi. T. Moghadas, A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between women's social capital and household work division: The case of women of 20-50. Journal of Social Science of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 8(2), 81-104. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.15949 Tomlinson, J., Olsen, W., & Purdam, K. (2009). Women returners and potential returners: employment profiles and labour market opportunities—a case study of the United Kingdom. European Sociological Review, 25(3), 349-363. Young, M., Wallace, J. E., & Polachek, A. J. (2015). Gender differences in perceived domestic task equity: A study of professionals. Journal of Family Issues, 36(13), 1751-1781. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 408 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 320 |
||
