تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,097,883 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,205,510 |
استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی در مدیریت تعارضات انسان و گوشتخواران بزرگجثه در پارک ملی گلستان (با تأکید بر شبکة اطلاعرسانی) | ||
نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی | ||
دوره 76، ویژه نامه مناطق تحت حفاظت، بهمن 1402، صفحه 29-43 اصل مقاله (1.07 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jne.2023.362323.2578 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
زهرا ابراهیمی منفرد1؛ سید حامد میرکریمی* 1؛ حنانه محمدی کنگرانی2؛ محمود صوفی3 | ||
1گروه علوم و مهندسی محیطزیست، دانشکدة شیلات و محیطزیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، ایران. | ||
2گروه جنگلداری، دانشکدة علوم جنگل، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، ایران. | ||
3گروه زیستشناسی حفاظت، دانشگاه جورج-آگوست گوتینگن، آلمان. | ||
چکیده | ||
تعارضات انسان و حیات وحش بهویژه گوشتخواران بزرگ جثه، یکی از چالش های اصلی حفاظت از تنوع زیستی در مناطق مختلف جهان محسوب می شود. مطالعات متعددی نشان داده اند، عوامل اقتصادی-اجتماعی نقش مهمی در تعارضات انسان و گوشتخواران دارد؛ اما از سازوکار تبادل اطلاعات در مسئلة تعارضات انسان و گوشتخواران، بین ذینفعان مختلف، اطلاعات کمی در دسترس است. بنابراین در این پژوهش با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی، نقش شبکة اطلاع رسانی بین جوامع محلی روستاهای حاشیة پارک ملی گلستان در ارتباط با تعارضات انسان و گوشتخواران بزرگجثه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. دادههای این پژوهش، با استفاده از روش پرسشنامه ساختارمند و مصاحبة رودررو با ۲۹۲ نفر از جوامع محلی، در طول ۷ ماه کار میدانی از اردیبهشت تا آبان 1401 جمع آوری شدند و با استفاده از نرمافزارهای UCINET6.528 و Netdraw مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. از ماتریس تک وجهی و دووجهی برای ترسیم شبکهها استفاده شد و از شاخصهای خرد شبکه (مرکزیت بینابینی، مرکزیت درجه و MDS) برای تفسیر شبکهها استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد، تنها ۵۷٪ از افراد برای کسب اطلاعات در مورد گوشتخواران بزرگجثه و تعارض با آنها در منطقه، در ارتباط با دیگر ذینفعان هستند و ۴۳٪، اقدامی برای کسب اطلاع در این رابطه نداشته اند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل گراف های شبکه، نشان از مرکزیت قابل توجه محیط بان و خانواده در شبکة اطلاع رسانی دارد، در حالیکه، دو گروه شورای روستا و دهیار در شبکة اطلاعرسانی، مرکزیت ندارند. همچنین، نتایج حاکی از عدم ارتباط زنان، جهت کسب اطلاع با محیط بان، شورای روستا و دهیار است. یافته های پژوهش نشان داد، لزوم بررسی شبکه های اجتماعی از جمله شبکة اطلاع رسانی در مدیریت تعارضات، ضروری است و میتوان از توانایی های این رویکرد در جهت پیشبرد و بهبود اقدامات مدیریتی کاهش تعارضات در مناطق تحت حفاظت بهره برد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
پارک ملی گلستان؛ تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی؛ تعارض انسان و گوشتخوران بزرگ جثه؛ مناطق تحت حفاظت | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Using the social network analysis approach in the management of human-large carnivores conflict in Golestan National Park (Information network) | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Zahra Ebrahimi Monfared1؛ Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi1؛ Hannaneh Mohammadi Kangarani2؛ Mahmood Soofi3 | ||
1Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran. | ||
2Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran. | ||
3Department of Conservation Biology, Georg-August University of Goettingen: Goettingen, Germany. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Human-wildlife conflicts, especially large carnivores, have become one of the main challenges of biodiversity conservation in different world regions. Multiple studies suggest that socioeconomic factors play essential roles in predicting and understanding these conflicts. However, there is very little knowledge available about the extent to which that how awareness raising and information concerning human-large carnivore conflicts are being shared among different stakeholders around the protected areas. In this study, we evaluated how information regarding human-large carnivores conflict situations is communicated between different stakeholders (e.g., local people, rangers) using a social network analysis approach in the villages around the Golestan National Park (GNP), Iran. Data were collected using structured questionnaire surveys with members of households (n= 292) from April to November 2022. We analyzed the data using UCINET6.528 and Netdraw software. One-dimensional and two-dimensional matrices were applied to draw the nodes of networks. To assess the network we used three measures of connectivity nodes i.e. the betweenness centrality, degree centrality, and multidimensional scaling. The results revealed that only 57% of local people were concerned about gaining information about conflicts with large carnivores, and 43% of the local communities have not taken any action to get information about conflicts with large carnivores. The results of the network graph analysis indicated a significant centrality of protected area rangers and families in the information network, at the same time the Village Islamic Council (showra) and village heads (Dehyar) do not have centrality in the information network. The results further showed a lack of connection between women and park rangers, village councils, and village heads. Our findings demonstrate the necessity of examining social networks, including information networks, in human-wildlife conflict management and utilizing the capabilities of this approach to advance management actions for reducing and managing human-large carnivore conflicts in protected areas. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Golestan national park, Human-large carnivores conflict, Protected areas, Social network analysis | ||
مراجع | ||
Akhani Sanjani, H., 2005. Illustrated Flora of Golestan National Park, Iran, Volume 1. University of Tehran. Akhani Sanjani, H., 2023. Illustrated Flora of Golestan National Park, Iran, Volume 1. University of Tehran. Babrgir, S., Farhadinia, M.S., Moqanaki, E.M., 2017. Socio-economic consequences of cattle predation by the Endangered Persian leopard Panthera pardus saxicolor in a Caucasian conflict hotspot, northern Iran. Oryx 51(1), 124-130. Badola, R., Ahmed, T., Gill, A.K., Dobriyal, P., Das, G.C., Badola, S., Hussain, S.A., 2021. An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1-13. Barua, M., Bhagwat, S.A., Jadhav, S., 2013. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation 157, 309-316. Bodin, Ö., Mancilla García, M., Robins, G., 2020 Reconciling conflict and cooperation in environmental governance: a social network perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 45(1), 471-95. Borg, I., Groenen, P.J., 2005. Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. Spribger Science & Business Media. Burt, R.S., 2000. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22, 345-423. Calvet-Mir, L., S. Maestre-Andrés, J. Molina., J. van den Bergh., 2015. Participation in protected areas: a social network case study in Catalonia, Spain. Ecology and Society 20(4), 45. Chapron, G., L opez-Bao, J.V., 2016. Coexistence with large carnivores informed by community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 31, 578-580. Darvishsefat, A.A., 2006. Atlas of Protected Areas of Iran. University of Tehran. (In Persian) Ehrhart, S., Soliku, O., Schraml, U., 2022. Conservation conflicts in the context of protected areas in Ghana and Germany: commonalities, differences and lessons for conflict analysis and management. GeoJournal 87(4), 2787-2803. Ghoddousi, A., Bleyhl, B., Sichau, C., Ashayeri, D., Moghadas, P., Sepahvand, P., Kh Hamidi, A., Soofi, M., Kuemmerle, T., 2020. Mapping connectivity and conflict risk to identify safe corridors for the Persian leopard. Landscape Ecology 35, 1809-1825. Ghoddousi, A., Soofi, M., Hamidi, A.K., Ashayeri, S., Egli, L., Ghoddousi, S., Speicher, J., Khorozyan, I., Kiabi, B.H. and Waltert, M., 2019. The decline of ungulate populations in Iranian protected areas calls for urgent action against poaching. Oryx 53(1), 151-158. Ghoddousi, A., Soofi, M., Kh. Hamidi, A., Lumetsberger, T., Egli, L., Khorozyan, I., Kiabi, B.H., Waltert, M., 2016. Assessing the role of livestock in big cat prey choice using spatiotemporal availability patterns. PloS One 11(4), e0153439. Ghorbani, M., Salimi Kouchi, J., Ebrahimi, P., Rasekhi, S., 2019. Using network analysis to identify key actors in local benefitiories network in the establishment of participatory management of natural resources (Case Study: Sarayan Watershed, South Khorasan Province). Iranian Journal of Range and Watershed Management 72(1), 213-226. Grossmann, C. M., Patko, L., Ortseifen, D., Kimmig, E., Cattoen, E. Schraml, U., 2020. Human-Large Carnivores Co-existence in Europe–A Comparative Stakeholder Network Analysis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, 266. Grujčič, I., Milijić, V.Nonič, D., 2008. Conflict management in protected areas: The Lazar Canyon natural monument, Eastern Serbia. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 4(4), 219-229. Hamidi AK, Ghoddousi A, Soufi M, Ghadirian T, Jowkar H, Ashayeri S., 2014. Camera Hanneman, R., 2001. Introduction to Social Network Methods, California: University of California, Riverside. Hartel, T., Scheele, B. C., Vanak, A. T., Rozylowicz, L., Linnell, J. D., and Ritchie, E. G., 2019. Mainstreaming large carnivore-human coexistence through institutional collaboration. Conserv.ation Biology 33, 1256-1265. Hesam, M., Negahban, S., 2020. Network analysis community relations of water resources beneficiaries In order to urban optimize management (Case Study: Palm Groves in the Eastern Part of the Fadami city- Darab- Fars). Journal of Human Geography Research 52(2), 501-514. Jacobsen, K.S., Linnell, J.D., 2016. Perceptions of environmental justice and the conflict surrounding large carnivore management in Norway – implications for conflict management. Biological Conservation 203, 197-206. Jahdi, R., Arabi M., 2020. Modeling of fire paths in forest-grassland ecotones in Golestan National Park. Geography and Environmental HHazard 9, 25-42. (In Persian) Johansson, M., Frank, J., Støen, O.G., Flykt, A., 2017. An Evaluation of Information Meetings as a Tool for Addressing Fear of Large Carnivores. Society & Natural Resources 30(3), 281-298. KC, B., Chapagain, B., Kelly, M., 2023. Mapping and analyzing human–wildlife conflicts communication network to promote conservation success in protected areas: evidence from Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp. 1-20. Khorozyan, I., Ghoddousi, A., Soufi, M., Soofi, M., Waltert, M., 2020. Studded leather collars are effective in protecting cattle from leopard (Panthera pardus). Ecological Solutions and Evidence 1, e12013. Khorozyan, I., Soofi, M., Ghoddousi, A., Waltert, M., 2015. The relationship between climate, diseases of domestic animals and human-carnivore conflicts. Basic and Applied Ecology 16(8), 703-713. Khorozyan, I., Soofi, M., Soufi, M., Hamidi, A.K., Ghoddousi, A., Waltert, M., 2017. Effects of shepherds and dogs on livestock depredation by leopards (Panthera pardus) in north-eastern Iran. PeerJ 5, e3049. König, H.J., Ceaus, S., Reed M., 2021. Integrated framework for stakeholder participation: Methods and tools for identifying and addressing human–wildlife conflicts. Conservation Science and Practice 3, e399. Koutsou, S., Partalidou, M., Ragkos, A., 2014. Young farmers’ social capital in Greece: Trust levels and collective actions. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 204-211. Madden, F., 2004. Creating Coexistence between Humans and Wildlife: Global Perspectives on Local Efforts to Address Human–Wildlife Conflict, Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal 9(4), 247-257. Manfredo M.J., Dayer A.A., 2004. Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9, 17-328. Manolache, S., Nita, A., Ciocanea, C. M., Popescu, V.D., Rozylowicz, L., 2018. Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania. Journal of Environmental Management 212, 54-64. Mech, L.D., Boitani, L. (Eds.), 2019. Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press. Meinecke, L., Soofi, M., Riechers, M., Khorozyan, I., Hosseini, H., Schwarze, S., Waltert, M., 2018. Crop variety and prey richness affect spatial patterns of human-wildlife conflicts in Iran’s Hyrcanian forests. Journal for Nature Conservation 43, 165-172. Mohammadi Kangarani, H., Amiri Doumari, M., 2017. Identification and Analysis of Managerial, Problems Relating Camel Driving in Hormozgan Province Using Network Analysis Approch. Applied Animal Science Reasearch Journal 24(1), 35-44. (In Persian) Mohammadi Kangarani, H., Mohammadi, E., 2014. Introduction to social network methods. Hormozgan University Press. (In Persian) Mohammadi Kangrani, H., 2012. Introduction of network analysis and its applications in natural resources management and policy-making (study of the law of the fourth development plan). Protection and Exploitation of Natural Resources 1(1). (In Persian) Mohammadi, A., Kaboli, M., Alambeigi, A., Lopez Bao, J.V., 2018. Social network analysis of human-environment conflict management based on evidence of wolf attacks in local communities of Hamadan province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 49(3), 461-472. (In Persian) Mosimane, A.W., McCool, S., Brown, P. Ingrebretson, J., 2014. Using mental models in the analysis of human–wildlife conflict from the perspective of a social-ecological system in Namibia. Oryx 48, 64-70. Mutanga, C.N., Vengesayi, S., Muboko, N., Gandiwa, E., 2015. Towards harmonious conservation relationships: A framework for understanding protected area staff-local community rela- tionships in developing countries. Journal for Nature Conservation 24, 8-16. Newman, M.E., 2010. Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press. Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M., 2011. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources pp. 501-518. Redpath, S.M., Gutiérrez, R.J., Wood, K.A., Young, J.C. (Eds.), 2015. Conflicts in conservation: navigating towards solutions. Cambridge University Press. Rizzolo, J.B., Gore, M.L., Long, B., Trung, C.T., Kempinski, J., Rawson, B., Huyẽn, H.T., Viollaz, J., 2021. Protected area rangers as cul - tural brokers? Implications for wildlife crime prevention in Viet Nam. Frontiers in Conservation Science 2, 698731. Romero, F.C., 2018. Social Network Analysis and the Study of University Industry Relations. In M. Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition (pp. 7150-7160). IGI Global. Salehi, M., Varasteh Moradi, H., Barani, H., 2022. Human-Wildlife Conflict and Local Peoples'views on Wildlife Conservation in Golestan National Park, Iran. Environmental Researches 13(25), 319-336. (In Persian) Salvatori, V., Balian, E., Blanco, J.C.,Ciucci, P., Demeter, L., Hartel, T.,Marsden, K., Redpath, S.M., von Korff, Y., Young, J.C., 2020. ApplyingParticipatory Processes to AddressConflicts Over the Conservationof Large Carnivores: UnderstandingConditions for SuccessfulManagement.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, 182. Sjölander-Lindqvist, A., Johansson, M., Sandström, C., 2015. Individual and collective responses to large carnivore management: The roles of trust, representation, knowledge spheres, communication and leadership. Wildlife Biology 21, 175-185. Soleimani, Z., Mohammadi Kangarani, H., Rezaei, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., 2021. Participatory management in desert ecosystems; Studying the cooperation network of public and government institutions in mangrove forests (Qeshm Island). Pasture and Deser Research of Iran 28(4), 787-803. (In Persian)Soofi M., Ghoddousi A., Zeppenfeld T., Shokri S., Soufi M., Jafari A., Ahmadpour M., Qashqaei A., Egli Lukas., Ghadirian T., Raeesi Chahartaghi N., Zehzad B., Kiabi., Khorozyan, I., Balkenhol, N., Waltert M., 2018. Livestock grazing in protected areas and its effects on large mammals in the Hyrcanian forest, Iran. Biological Conservation 217, 377-382. Soofi, M., Ghoddousi, A., Zeppenfeld, T., Shokri, S., Soufi, M., Egli, L., Jafari, A., Ahmadpour, M., Qashqaei, A., Ghadirian, T., Filla, M., 2019. Assessing the relationship between illegal hunting of ungulates, wild prey occurrence and livestock depredation rate by large carnivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 56(2), 365-374. Soofi, M., Soufi, M., Royle, A., Waltert, M., Khorozyan, I., 2022. Numbers and presence of guarding dogs affect wolf and leopard predation on livestock in northeastern Iran. Basic and Applied Ecology 64, 147-156. Thorn, M., Green, M., Scott, D., Marnewick, K., 2013. Characteristics and determinants of human-carnivore conflict in South African farmland. Biodiversity and Conservation 22(8), 1715-1730. Treves, A., NaughtonTreves, L.I.S.A., Harper, E.K., Mladenoff, D.J., Rose, R.A., Sickley, T.A., Wydeven, A.P., 2004. Predicting human-carnivore conflict: A spatial model derived from 25 years of data on wolf predation on livestock. Conservation Biology 18(1), 114-125. Treves, A., Wallace, R.B., Naughton-Treves, L., Morales, A., 2006. Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11, 383-96. Treves, A., Wallace, R.B., White, S., 2009. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conservation Biology 23(6), 1577-87. Von Ruschkowski, E., 2010. Causes and potential solutions for conflicts between protected area management and local people in Germany. In Rethinking Protected Areas in a Changing World: Proceedings of the 2009 George Wright Society Biennial Conference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites in Portland, Oregon (pp. 200-244). George Wright Society: Hancock, MI, USA. Weiss, K., Hamann, M., Kinney, M., Marsh, H., 2012. Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Global Environmental Change 22(1), 178-188. Wolf, C., Ripple, W.J., 2016. Prey depletion as a threat to the world’s large carnivores. Royal Society Open Science 3, 160252. Woodroffe, R., Frank, L.G., Lindsey, P.A., ole Ranah, S.M. and Romanach, S., 2007. Livestock husbandry as a tool for carnivore conservation in Africa’s community rangelands: a case–control study. Vertebrate Conservation and Biodiversity, pp. 419-434. Young, J. C., Searle, K., Butler, A., Simmons, P., Watt, A. D., Jordan, A., 2016. The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biological Conservation 195, 196-202. Zandian, F., Moradian, A., Hassanzadeh, M., 2019. Analyzing scientific collaboration among Zehzad B., Kiabi B.H., Madjnoonian H., 2002. The natural areas and landscape of Iran: an overview. Zoology in the Middle East 26, 7-10. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 361 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 197 |