سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,578
تعداد مقالات71,072
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,689,440
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,918,657
Moallemi, Mozhgan, Rahjoo, Mahboobeh. (1402). The Relationship between Risk and Return Based on the Prospect Theory: Case Study of Selected Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. , 27(3), 789-821. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.322498.1007145
Mozhgan Moallemi; Mahboobeh Rahjoo. "The Relationship between Risk and Return Based on the Prospect Theory: Case Study of Selected Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange". , 27, 3, 1402, 789-821. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.322498.1007145
Moallemi, Mozhgan, Rahjoo, Mahboobeh. (1402). 'The Relationship between Risk and Return Based on the Prospect Theory: Case Study of Selected Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange', , 27(3), pp. 789-821. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.322498.1007145
Moallemi, Mozhgan, Rahjoo, Mahboobeh. The Relationship between Risk and Return Based on the Prospect Theory: Case Study of Selected Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. , 1402; 27(3): 789-821. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.322498.1007145

The Relationship between Risk and Return Based on the Prospect Theory: Case Study of Selected Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange

Iranian Economic Review
دوره 27، شماره 3، دی 2023، صفحه 789-821    اصل مقاله (1.15 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2023.322498.1007145
نویسندگان
Mozhgan Moallemi* ؛ Mahboobeh Rahjoo
Faculty of Management, Economics and Accounting, University of Payame Noor, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
In most studies, examining the relationship between risk and return, based on the theory of expected utility, an investor has always been considered as a risk-averse person. While the prospect theory considers both risk aversion and investor risk-taking based on existing realities. The innovation of this paper is to consider the separation of risk-taking behavior from rational one of investors (risk aversion). In this paper, the relationship between risk and return based on the prospect theory for companies of four selected industries during 2001-2020 by panel data and panel quantile regression method has been investigated. Investors' behavior in the prospect theory is sensitive to the reference point. In this paper, the average return on industry assets is considered as a reference point. Hence, the selected companies were divided into two groups of companies with asset returns (ROA) above and below the industry average. The result showed that the investor's behavioral model changed relative to the reference point. Investors are risky below the reference point, contrary to traditional theories of utility. Of course, at returns above the reference point, investors will still be risk-averse. Comparing the results of estimation of two methods (panel data and panel quantile) shows that this situation is also true in different risk quantiles. So that, the sign of the relationship between risk and return at the high and low levels of the reference point is compatible with the theoretical foundations. Therefore, the behavior of investors in selected companies follows the prospect theory.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Behavioral Economics؛ Prospect Theory؛ Risk؛ Return؛ Tehran Stock Exchange
مراجع

Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). Chapter 18 a Survey of Behavioral Finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1(B), 1053-1128

Barberis, N., Mukherjee, A., & Wang, B. (2016). Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test. Review of Financial Studies, 29(11), 3068-3107.

Berglind, L., & Westergren, E. (2016). The Risk-Return Relationship, can the Prospect Theory be Applied to Small Firms, Large Firms and Industries Characterized by Different Asset Tangibility? Working Paper, Received from www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:941819

Bilsen, S., V., & Laeven, R., J. (2020). Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice under Prospect Theory. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 91(c), 224-237.

Brown, Ch., & Fred, A. (2012). Sum of Perpetuities Method for Valuing Stock Prices. Journal of Economics, 38(1), 59-72.

Buddy Kane, M. (2014). Investment Management (2nd Ed., Trans. by M. Shariat Panahi, R. Farhadi, and M. Imenifar). Tehran: Bourse Publications.

Chapman, G., Milkman, K. L., Rand, D., Rogers, T., & Thaler, R. H. (2021). Nudges and Choice Architecture in Organizations: New Frontiers. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163, 1-3.

Chou, P. H., Chou, R. K., & Ko, K. Ch. (2009). Prospect Theory and the Risk-Return Paradox: some Recent Evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 33(3), 193-208.

Chung, H. Sh., & Hsiang, L. Ch. (2005). Investor Protection, Prospect Theory, and Earnings Management: An International Comparison of the Banking Industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 2675-2697.

Davino, C., Furno, M., & Vistocco, D. (2014). Quantile Regression, Theory and Application (1st Ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Dıez-Esteban, J. M., Garcıa-Gomez, C. D., Lopez-Iturriaga, F. J., & Santamarıa-Mariscal, M. (2017). Corporate Risk-taking, Returns and the Nature of Major Shareholders: Evidence from Prospect Theory. Research in International Business and Finance, Received from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.025

Do Nascimento Junior, A.J., Klotzle, M.C., Brandão, L.E.T., & Pinto, A.C.F. (2021). Prospect Theory and Narrow Faming Bias: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 90-101.

Eom, Ch., & Park, J., W. (2021). Effects of the Fat- Tail Distribution on the Relationship between Prospect Theory Value and Expected Return. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 1-41.

Esteban, J. M. D., Gómez, C. D. G., Iturriaga, F. J. L., & Mariscal, M. S. (2017). Corporate Risk-Taking, Returns and the Nature of Major Shareholders: Evidence from Prospect Theory. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 900-911.

Fiegenbaum, A. (1990). Prospect Theory and the Risk-Return Association an Empirical Examination in 85 Industries. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14, 187- 203.

Frantz, R. (2004). The Behavioral Economics of George Akerloff and Harvey Leibenstein. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 29-44.

Gujarati, D. (2012). Principles of Econometrics (8th Ed., Trans. by H. Abrishami). Tehran: University of Tehran Pub.

Iqbal, M., & Zulfiqar Ali Shah, S. (2015). Negative Relationship between Risk and Return: A Contrary View. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(2), 336-343.

---------- (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory, Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 5, 297-323.

Mosleh Shirazi, A. N., Namazi, M., Mohammadi, A., & Rajabi, A. (2013). Prospect Theory and Modeling of Decision-Making Model of Industrial Managers. Industrial Management Perspective, 10, 33-90.

Ohk, S., & Ju, B-Ghi. (2020). Capitalizing on Prospect Theory Value: The Asian Developed Stock Markets. Japan and the World Economy, 54, 1-20.

Pitcher, A. (2008). Investigation of a Behavioral Model for Financial Decision Making (Unpublished Master's Thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford.

Saghafi, A., Farhadi, R., Taghavi Fard, M., & Barzideh, F. (2015). Predicting Investors' Trading Behavior: Evidence of Prospect Theory. Quarterly Journal of Investment Knowledge, 4(15), 1-29.

Shams, Sh., Yahya Zadeh far, M., & Emami, A. (2010). Investigating the Relationship between Disposition Effect with Cash Flows and Performance of Investment Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Research, 12(30), 95-116.

Son, T., S., & Nguyen, N., M. (2019). Prospect Theory Value and Idiosyncratic Volatility: Evidence from the Korean Stock Market. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 21, 113-122.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 169
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 234





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب