پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,251 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,991 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 116,038,506 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,804,275 |
The Effect of A Country’s Size on the Extensive Margin of Trade in the Economic Partnership Agreement (Epa) | ||
| Iranian Economic Review | ||
| دوره 27، شماره 4، اسفند 2023، صفحه 1243-1267 اصل مقاله (958.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2023.332392.1007293 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Imad Kareem Alaamshani* 1؛ Hanny Zurina Hamzah2؛ Shivee Ranjanee Kaliappan2؛ Normaz Wana Ismail2 | ||
| 1College of Administration and Economics, University of Baghdad, Iraq, School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia | ||
| 2School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study employed the Casella (1996) model and its extension Badinger and Breuss (2006) to examine the relationship between the size of a country and the effects of trade bloc enlargement on the extensive margin of trade. Therefore, export of large and small European countries to African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries on the extensive margin were investigated to validate the effect of introducing an economic partnership agreement from 2004 to 2014. The empirical results from the fixed and random effect panel regression on HS 6 digit disaggregated data provided the evidence on the minor benefits of the small country over a large country. Hence, the interpretation of the results was in line with Casella’s (1996) hypothesis, which emphasized the importance of reducing domestic market differences between large and small countries by improving their market access. Our findings imply that the market access initiative will eventually play a vital role in helping the small countries. This in turn encourages firms in small countries to increase the quantity and diversity of the goods they produce. These findings urge the policymakers to pay more attention to the size of the country in improving the formulation of trade agreements in line with their benefits for different groups of countries. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Country Size؛ Economic Integration؛ Economic Partnership Agreement؛ Extensive Margin؛ Free Trade Agreement؛ Trade Liberalization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alcalá, F., & Ciccone, A. (2004). Trade and Productivity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 613-646. Arellano, M. (1993). On the Testing of Correlated Effects with Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 59(1-2), 87-97. Badinger, H., & Breuss, F. (2006). Country Size and the Gains from Trade Bloc Enlargement: An Empirical Assessment for the European Community. Review of International Economics, 14(4), 615-631. Badinger, H., & Breuss, F. (2009). Country size and the trade effects of the euro. Review of World Economics, 145(2), 207-223. Balassa, B. (1969). Country Size and Trade Patterns: Comment. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 201-204. Beverelli, C., Neumueller, S., & Teh, R. (2015). Export Diversification Effects of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. World Development, 76, 293-310. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A Basic Introduction to Fixed‐Effect and Random‐Effects Models for Meta‐Analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97-111. Buono, I., & Lalanne, G. (2012). The Effect of the Uruguay Round on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Trade. Journal of International Economics, 86(2), 269-283. Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397-415. Busse, M. (2010). Revisiting the ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements - The Role of Complementary Trade and Investment Policies. Intereconomics, 45(4), 249-254. Casella, A. (1996). Large Countries, Small Countries and The Enlargement of Trade Blocs. European Economic Review, 40(2), 389-415. Dalton, J. T. (2017). EU Enlargement and the New Goods Margin in Austrian Trade. Open Economies Review, 28(1), 61-78. ---------- (2014). The New Goods Margin in Japanese–Chinese Trade. Japan and the World Economy, 31, 8-13. Debaere, P., & Mostashari, S. (2010). Do Tariffs Matter For The Extensive Margin of International Trade? An Empirical Analysis. Journal of International Economics, 81(2), 163-169. Del Gatto, M., Ottaviano, G. I., & Pagnini, M. (2008). Openness to Trade and Industry Cost Dispersion: Evidence from A Panel of Italian Firms. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1), 97-129. Drukker, D. M. (2003). Testing for Serial Correlation In Linear Panel-Data Models. The Stata Journal, 3(2), 168-177. Dutt, P., Mihov, I., & Van Zandt, T. (2013). The Effect of WTO on the Extensive and the Intensive Margins of Trade. Journal of International Economics, 91(2), 204-219. Eurostat Comext European Commission. (2020). Retrieved from https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/region/details_acp-pacific-countries_en.pdf Feenstra, R. C., & Kee, H. L. (2007). Trade Liberalisation and Export Variety: A Comparison of Mexico and China. World Economy, 30(1), 5-21. Felbermayr, G. J., & Kohler, W. (2006). Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade. Review of World Economics, 142(4), 642-674. Foster, N. (2012). Preferential Trade Agreements and the Margins of Imports. Open Economies Review, 23(5), 869-889. Stender, F., Berger, A., Brandi, C., & Schwab, J. (2021). The Trade Effects Of The Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Halpern, L., Koren, M., & Szeidl, A. (2015). Imported Inputs and Productivity. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660-3703. Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The Variety and Quality of A Nation's Exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704-723. Keesing, D. B. (1968). Population and Industrial Development: Some Evidence From Trade Patterns. The American Economic Review, 58(3), 448-455. Kehoe, T. J., & Ruhl, K. J. (2013). How Important is The New Goods Margin in International Trade? Journal of Political Economy, 121(2), 358-392. Pannhausen, C. (2006). Economic Partnership Agreements and Food Security: What is at Stake for West Africa? Bonn: German Development Institute. Persson, M., & Wilhelmsson, F. (2016). EU Trade Preferences and Export Diversification. The World Economy, 39(1), 16-53. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra‐Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. Miller, S. M., & Upadhyay, M. P. (2000). The Effects of Openness, Trade Orientation, and Human Capital on Total Factor Productivity. Journal of Development Economics, 63(2), 399-423. Law, S. H. (2018). Applied Panel Data Analysis, Short Panel. Kuala Lumpur: UPM Press. Santos‐Paulino, A., & Thirlwall, A. P. (2004). The Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Exports, Imports and the Balance of Payments of Developing Countries. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F50-F72. Stevens, C., Kennan, J., & Meyn, M. (2007). The Costs to the ACP of Exporting to the EU under the GSP. London: Overseas Development Institute. Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2006). XTOVERID: Stata Module To Calculate Tests Of Overidentifying Restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg, xtivreg2, xthtaylor. Retrieved from https://sociorepec.org/publication.xml?h=repec:boc:bocode:s456779&l=en Vollmer, S., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann D. F., & Klann, N. (2009). EU-ACP Economic Partnership Agreements-Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/39956/1/39_vollmer.pdf Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press. United Nations. (2013). Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development. New York: United Nations Publications. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 84 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 121 |
||