پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,573 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,036 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,505,060 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,769,138 |
تحلیل اهمیت- عملکرد نقش قطره‌چکان در کارآیی سامانه‌های آبیاری قطرهای از دیدگاه بهره برداران | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| دوره 55، شماره 6، شهریور 1403، صفحه 1017-1031 اصل مقاله (1.51 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2024.371504.669653 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین پرویزی* 1؛ حدیث حاتمی2؛ امیر پرنیان2؛ حسین بیرامی1؛ محمدحسن رحیمیان3 | ||
| 1بخش آبیاری و فیزیک خاک، مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران | ||
| 2بخش شیمی خاک و تغذیه گیاه، مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران | ||
| 3بخش آبیاری و فیزیک خاک، مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تحلیل اهمیت- عملکرد به بررسی شکاف میان اهمیت (وضع مطلوب) نقش قطره‌چکان بر کارآیی سامانه‌های آبیاری قطرهای از دیدگاه بهره‌برداران و عملکرد (وضع موجود) عوامل مرتبط با این نقش می‌پردازد. بدین منظور دیدگاه بهره‌برداران به روش جمع‌آوری اطلاعات به وسیله پرسشنامه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. روایی پرسشنامه‌ها با استفاده از شاخص روایی محتوا و پایایی آن‌ها با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ بررسی و به ترتیب در دو بعد اهمیت و عملکرد با مقادیر 83/0 و 86/0 مورد تائید قرار گرفت. اهمیت گویه‌ها، از روش وزن‌دهی بر مبنای آنتروپی شانون و در بعد عملکرد علاوه بر تعیین امتیاز نهایی، بررسی اثر وجودی معنی‌دار (وضعیت موجود) هر یک از این گویه‌ها بر روی کارآیی سامانه‌های آبیاری قطرهای و اختلاف بین اهمیت و عملکرد هر گویه نیز از طریق آزمون t انجام شد. بر اساس نتایج بیشترین تفاوت معنی‌دار بین اهمیت گویه‌ها و عملکرد آن‌ها به ترتیب مربوط به گویه‌های 4، 6 و 12 با مقادیر منفی 27/3، 19/3 و 85/2 بود که نشان‌دهنده وجود شکاف قابل‌توجهی بین آنچه از نظر بهره‌برداران مطلوب است با وضعیت موجود این گویه‌ها بود. گویه شماره 12 (گرفتگی قطره‌چکان‌ها) به عنوان با اهمیت‌ترین عامل در کارآیی سامانه آبیاری قطرهای از سوی بهره‌برداران معرفی شد. همچنین آموزش، مشاوره و راهنمایی آن‌ها قبل و بعد از اجرای طرح‌ها (گویه‌های 6 و 7) دارای اهمیت و بر کارآیی سامانه‌ها اثرگذار است در حالی که در عمل چنین چیزی وجود نداشت. بنابراین نیاز به تمرکز و توجه دارند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اهمیت؛ بهره بردار؛ عملکرد؛ قطره چکان؛ گویه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Importance– performance analysis (IPA) of emitter's role in efficiency of drip irrigation systems from the users’ point of view | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| HOSSEIN PARVIZI1؛ hadis hatami2؛ amir parnian2؛ Hossein beyrami1؛ mohammad hasan rahimian3 | ||
| 1Department of Irrigation and Soil Physics, National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yazd, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Soil Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yazd | ||
| 3Department of Irrigation and Soil Physics, National Salinity Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Yazd, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Performance-importance analysis examines the gap between the importance (ideal status) of the emitter's role on the efficiency of drip irrigation systems and the performance (status) of the factors affecting it. For this purpose, the stakeholder's perspective was investigated by means of a questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaires was checked using Content Validity Index (CVI) and their reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha in the two dimensions with the values of 0.83 (importance) and 0.86 (performance), respectively. The weighting method based on Shannon entropy was used to determine the importance of items, and in the case of performance, the significant effect of each items (current status) on the efficiency of systems was surveyed statistically. Moreover, the difference between the importance and performance of each item is also was performed through t- test. According to the results, the most statistically significant difference between the mean of importance and performance of items was observed in items 4, 6, and 12, with negative values of 3.27, 3.19, and 2.85, respectively. This result indicates that there is a significant gap between the desirable stakeholder's perspective (importance) and current status (performance) of these items. Emitters clogging (item 12) was the most important factor in the efficiency of the drip irrigation system. Furthermore, training, advice and guidance of stakeholder before and after the implementation of drip irrigation systems (items 6 and 7) are important and affect the efficiency of the systems, whereas, there was no such thing in practice. Therefore, they need focus and attention. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Emitter, Importance, Item, Performance, Stakeholder | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arif, S. S., Susanto, S., Sutiarso, L., & Jayanti, D. S. (2021, November). Information gaps between irrigation establishment and farmer set-up. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 922, No. 1, p. 012037). IOP Publishing. Deng, Wei- Jaw & Pei, W. (2009). Fuzzy Neural Based Importance Performance Analysis for Determining Critical Service Attributes. Expert System with Application: International Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 3774- 3784. Dewi, Y. A., Yulianti, A., Hanifah, V. W., Jamal, E., Sarwani, M., Mardiharini, M., & Harsanti, E. S. (2022). Farmers' knowledge and practice regarding good agricultural practices (GAP) on safe pesticide usage in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(1). Gambelli, D., Solfanelli, F., Orsini, S., & Zanoli, R. (2021). Measuring the economic performance of small ruminant farms using balanced scorecard and importance-performance analysis: A European case study. Sustainability, 13(6), 3321. Han, S. D., Yun, S. H., & Jang, D. H. (2016). An importance-performance analysis of using farmers in a rice co-nursery: Focus on the East Gunsan Agricultural Cooperative. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, 43(1), 144-151. Ho, C. L., Wang, H. Y., & Li, S, K. (2016). Applying IPA on Services Quality for Farm Irrigation Engineering - A Case Study for Kaohsiung Irrigation Association. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 5 (4), 107-113. Karami, E. (2006). Appropriateness of farmers’ adoption of irrigation methods: The application of the AHP model. Agricultural systems 87.1: 101-119. Kirnak, H., DOĞAN, E., Demir, S., & Yalçin, S. (2004). Determination of hydraulic performance of trickle irrigation emitters used in irrigation systems in the Harran Plain. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28(4), 223-230. Lamm, F. R., Ayars, J. E., & Nakayama, F. S. (2006). Micro irrigation for crop production: design, operation, and management. Elsevier. Lee, K. H., Bonn, M. A., & Cho, M. (2018). Green tea quality attributes: a cross-cultural study of consumer perceptions using importance–performance analysis (IPA). Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 21(2), 218-237. Lili, Z., Peiling, Y., Wengang, Z., Yunkai, L., Yu, L., & Chong, Z. (2021). Effects of water salinity on emitter clogging in surface drip irrigation systems. Irrigation Science, 39, 209-222. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of marketing, 41(1), 77-79. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of social research methodology, 11(4), 327-344. Senyigit, U., & Ilkhan, M. S. (2017). The effects of water temperature on discharge and uniformity parameters of emitters with different discharges, types and distances. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23(2), 223-233. Shi, K., Kong, J., Yue, H., Huang, Y., Wei, X., & Zhangzhong, L. (2022). Magnetized Water Irrigation Alleviates Emitter Clogging of a Drip Fertigation System. Agronomy, 13(1), 108. Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Zarepisheh, M. (2009). Shannon’s entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: Method and application. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5146-5150. Sukri, A. S., Bahrun, A., Hemon, T., & Syaf, H. (2020). Performance Optimization Viewing Wawotobi Irrigation Network. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 13(6), 1-9. Waltz, C.F., Strickland, O.L., & Lenz, E.R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.) New York: Springer Publishing Co. Alijani, F., Behroz, S. (2021). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Cumulative Pressure Irrigation System (Case Study of Takestan County). Agricultural Economics Research, 13(3), 42-56. (in Persian) Amirkhani, P., Rostami, F., & Geravandi, S. (2022). Strategic Planning for Improving Water Pump Station in Qomesheh Faraman Village, Kermanshah Township. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 13(2), 247-267. doi: 10.22125/iwe.2022.162638 (in Persian) Arkavazi, K., Pishbin, S. A., Hejazi, Y., & Alambeigi, A. (2023). Importance-performance matrix analysis of the agricultural knowledge-based companies of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, -. doi: 10.22059/ijaedr.2023.361344.669232 (in Persian) Danaeifard, H., Alwani, S. M., & Azar, A. (2023). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach. New edition, Tehran, Iran: Safar (Eshraghi). (in Persian) Darvish Hendi, M., & Amiri Tokaldany, E. (2024). Agricultural Water Management Challenges in Qazvin Plain Irrigation Network. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 54(12), 1945-1962. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2023.365841.669581 (in Persian) Ebrahimi, M., Sharifan, H., Hezarjaribi, A., & Hesam, M. (2015). Investigation of performance of several type of emitters while using saline water. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 9(2), 398-391. (in Persian) Ghamarnia, H., abasi, H., & Farhadi Bansouleh, B. (2023). Technical Evaluation of Drip Irrigation Systems Implemented in Salas Babajani City of Kermanshah Province. Water and Irrigation Management, 13(4), 1001-1018. doi: 10.22059/jwim.2023.361893.1087 (in Persian) Hosseini Vardanjani, S. M., Khoshravesh, M., Pourgholam-Amiji, M., Atashkhar, F., & Shamaei, G. (2022). Technical Evaluation of Modern Irrigation Systems in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province (Case Study: Shahrekord, Saman and Bon Counties). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 29(2), 69-89. doi: 10.22069/jwsc.2022.20247.3558 (in Persian) Zarifian, S., Rostami, J., & Pishbahar, E. (2020). Factors affecting the use of modern irrigation systems for Sustainable Agricultural Development (Case Study: Rural Areas of Bostan Abad City of East- Azerbayjan Province-Iran). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(3), 217-229. (in Persian) Miriyan, S., Sharifipour, M., & Nasrollahi, A. H. (2020). Effect of Irrigation Management, Flow Rate and Operating Pressure on Clogging of Pressure Regulator Emitters. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 50(9), 2227-2238. doi: 10.22059/ijswr.2019.278268.668151 (in Persian) Movahedi, R., Izadi, N., & Vahdat adab, R. (2017). Investigating Factors Affecting Farmers' Adoption of Pressurized Irrigation Technology in Asadabad County, Hamedan Province. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 31(2), 287-300. doi: 10.22092/jwra.2017.113172 (in Persian) Rezaei Rad, H., Houshmand, A., Pourgholam Amiji, M., & Dost-Mohammadi, M. M. (2023). Assessment of Acidification Effects on Drip Emitter Clogging Reduction, Drip Irrigation System Efficiency, and Soil Chemical Properties. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 17(1), 87-101. (in Persian) Sadeghi-Lari, A., salari, A., & Dastband, E. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System in the Southern Regions of Fars Province. Irrigation and Water Engineering, 13(13), 132-147. doi: 10.22125/iwe.2022.340071.1628 (in Persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 129 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 89 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب