تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,534 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,526 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,138,489 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,242,718 |
ارتباط حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و حمایت اجتماعی دوستان و خودکارامدی با میزان مشارکت ورزشکاران جانباز و معلول در فعالیتهای بدنی | ||
نشریه مدیریت ورزشی | ||
دوره 12، شماره 4، بهمن 1399، صفحه 949-965 اصل مقاله (319.63 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jsm.2019.266555.2163 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سروش آریانپور* 1؛ سید رضا حسینی نیا2؛ حسن بحرالعلوم3 | ||
1کارشناسی ارشد دانشکدة تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، سمنان، ایران | ||
2استادیار، دانشکدة تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، سمنان، ایران | ||
3دانشیار، دانشکدة تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، سمنان، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی ارتباط بین حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و حمایت اجتماعی دوستان و خودکارامدی با مشارکت ورزشکاران جانباز و معلول استان خراسان رضوی در فعالیتهای بدنی است. این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی است و جامعة آماری آن را ورزشکاران جانباز و معلول استان خراسان رضوی در سال 1395 تشکیل میدهند. نمونة پژوهش 244 ورزشکار معلول بودند که بهصورت تصادفی خوشهای انتخاب شدند. برای جمعآوری دادهها، از پرسشنامههای ویژگیهای جمعیتشناختی، پرسشنامة میزان مشارکت ورزشی، پرسشنامة خودکارامدی، پرسشنامة حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و پرسشنامة حمایت اجتماعی خانواده (لی، پترسون و دیکسون، 2010) استفاده شد. دادههای پژوهش با روش آماری ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون و آزمون فریدمن با استفاده از نرمافزار SPSS نسخة 21 تجزیهوتحلیل شدند. یافتهها نشان داد بین خودکارامدی با میزان مشارکت ورزشکاران (201/0=r) و همچنین بین حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و حمایت اجتماعی دوستان با میزان مشارکت ورزشکاران (156/0=r)(221/0=r) جانباز و معلول در فعالیتهای بدنی ارتباط مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد، اما خودکارامدی، حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و حمایت اجتماعی دوستان پیشبینیکنندهة معناداری برای مشارکت ورزشکاران جانباز و معلول در فعالیتهای بدنی نیست. نتایج نشان داد بین مشارکت ورزشکاران جانباز و معلول در فعالیتهای بدنی با خودکارامدی، حمایت اجتماعی خانواده و حمایت اجتماعی دوستان ارتباط مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. همچنین جانبازان و معلولان ورزشکار بیشترین حمایت را از طریق فراهم آوردن شرایط رفتوآمد به محلهای تمرین و مسابقه و تشویق کردن و بازخورد مثبت از طرف خانواده و کمترین حمایت را نیز در نمایش نحوة درست و چگونگی حرکات ورزشی از طرف خانواده دریافت میکنند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
حمایت اجتماعی؛ حمایت دوستان؛ حمایت خانواده؛ خودکارامدی؛ ورزش معلولان | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
1. Aghahasan noosh abadi z, Zarei a, Nikaein Z. The Relationship between competitive trait Anxiety with sport performance of disabled female athletes in Certain Individual Sports in Tehran. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2015;2(7):41-52. (In Persian) 2. Jalali Farahan m. Principles, Foundations and Purposes of Disabled Sports. In: 1, editor. Disabled Sports. Tehran: Sport Science Publication; 2011. (In Persian) 3. Zaki MA. | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Soroush Arianpour1؛ Seyed Reza Hosseininia2؛ Hassan Bahrololoum3 | ||
1M.A, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahroud University of Technology, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran | ||
2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahroud University of Technology, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran | ||
3Associate Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between family social support and social support from friends and self-efficacy with the participation of veterans and disabled athletes in Khorasan Razavi province in physical activities. This research is descriptive-correlational and the statistical population is veteran and disabled athletes in Khorasan Razavi province in 2017. The sample consisted of 244 veterans and disabled athletes who were selected randomly. To collect data, demographic characteristics questionnaire, Amount Sports Partnership Questionnaire, Self-efficacy questionnaire, Family Social Support Questionnaire and Social Support from friend Questionnaire (Lee, Peterson and Dixon, 2010) was used. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis and Friedman test using by SPSS software version 21. Between self-efficacy and the athlete's participation rate (r =0/201) as well there is a positive and significant correlation between social support of the family and social support of the friends with the participation rate of athletes (r = 0/156) (r = 0/221). But self-efficacy, social support for the family and social support from friends are not significant predictors of the participation of veterans and disabled athletes in physical activity. There is a positive and significant relationship between the participation of veterans and disabled athletes in physical activities with self-efficacy, family social support and social support from friends, also veterans and disabled athletes receive the most support by providing conditions for travel to training and competition venues and encouraging and positive feedback from the family. and they also receive the least support from the family for showing how they are doing right and how to exercise. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Social Support, Friend Support, Family Support, Self-Efficacy, Sports Disabled | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Aghahasan noosh abadi z, Zarei a, Nikaein Z. The Relationship between competitive trait Anxiety with sport performance of disabled female athletes in Certain Individual Sports in Tehran. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2015;2(7):41-52. (In Persian) 2. Jalali Farahan m. Principles, Foundations and Purposes of Disabled Sports. In: 1, editor. Disabled Sports. Tehran: Sport Science Publication; 2011. (In Persian) 3. Zaki MA. Reliability and Validity of the Social Provision Scale (SPS) in the Students of Isfahan University. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2009;14(4):439-44. (In Persian) 4. Sobhani a, Andam r, Zarifi m. Study and prioritizing the factors and barriers to sport participation of Disabled people of Ahvaz city. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2015;2(6):41-8. (In Persian) 5. Arizi f, Vahida f, Parsamehr m. The Effect of Social Support on Women's Participation in Sport Activities. Quarterly Olympics. 2006;14(1):77-86. (In Persian) 6. Taylor SE, Seeman TE. Psychosocial resources and the SES‐health relationship. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999;896(1):210-25. 7. Clara IP, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Murray LT, Torgrudc LJ. Confirmatory factor analysis of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in clinically distressed and student samples. Journal of personality assessment. 2003;81(3):265-70. 8. Roberts JE, Gotlib IH. Social support and personality in depression. Sourcebook of social support and personality: Springer; 1997. p. 187-214. 9. Tell G, Mittelmark M, Hylander B, Shumaker S, Russell G, Burkart J. Social support and health-related quality of life in black and white dialysis patients. Anna journal. 1995;22(3):301-8; discussion 9-10. 10. Schulz U, Schwarzer R. Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004;23(5):716-32. 11. Cassidy T. Stress, cognition and health: Psychology Press; 1999. 12. Riahi ME, Vardinia AA, Pourhossein SZ. Examine the relationship between social support and mental health. Quarterly Journal of Social Welfare. 2009;10(39):85-121. (In Persian) 13. Drentea P, Clay OJ, Roth DL, Mittelman MS. Predictors of improvement in social support: Five-year effects of a structured intervention for caregivers of spouses with Alzheimer's disease. Social science & medicine. 2006;63(4):957-67. 14. Lee M, Peterson JJ, Dixon A. Rasch calibration of physical activity self-efficacy and social support scale for persons with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2010;31(4):903-13. 15. McAuley E. Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. Journal of behavioral medicine. 1993;16(1):103-13. 16. Wijesuriya N, Tran Y, Middleton J, Craig A. Impact of fatigue on the health-related quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2012;93(2):319-24. 17. Megan Conner CRNA M. Self-efficacy, stress, and social support in retention of student registered nurse anesthetists. AANA journal. 2015;83(2):133. 18. McCarley P. Patient empowerment and motivational interviewing: engaging patients to self-manage their own care. Nephrology nursing journal. 2009;36(4):409. 19. Inal-Ince D, Savci S, Coplu L, Arikan H. Factors determining self-efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Saudi medical journal. 2005;26(4):542-7. 20. Grau R, Salanova M, Peiró JM. Moderator effects of self-efficacy on occupational stress. Psychology in Spain. 2001;5(1):63-74. 21. Cox RH, Russell WD, Robb M. Development of a CSAI-2 short form for assessing competitive state anxiety during and immediately prior to competition. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1998;21(1):30. 22. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Macmillan; 1997. 23. Alizadeh M, Gharakhanlou R. Examined how leisure Disability (with an emphasis on sports activities). Journal of Harakat. 2000;6(6):23-39. (In Persian) 24. Khaleghi S. Participation in sporting activities in their leisure time and quality of life of active and passive disabled veterans. Amol Iran 2009. (In Persian) 25. Roberts GC, Treasure DC, Conroy DE. Understanding the dynamics of motivation in sport and physical activity: An achievement goal interpretation. 2007. 26. Smith CP, Johnson W. Psychological Functioning & changes in leisure. Life style among Individuals with chronics secondary health problems related to spinal cord injury. Therapeutic recreation journal. 2007;27(4):239-52. 27. Omar-Fauzee M, Mohd-Ali M, Geok SK, Ibrahim N. The participation motive in the Paralympics. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences. 2010;2(1):250-72. 28. Stapleton J. A systematic examination of the role of social influence on leisure time physical activity among persons with physical disabilities 2014. 29. Wickman K, Nordlund M, Holm C. The relationship between physical activity and self-efficacy in children with disabilities. Sport in Society. 2018;21(1):50-63. 30. Te Velde SJ, Lankhorst K, Zwinkels M, Verschuren O, Takken T, de Groot J, et al. Associations of sport participation with self-perception, exercise self-efficacy and quality of life among children and adolescents with a physical disability or chronic disease—a cross-sectional study. Sports medicine-open. 2018;4(1):38. 31. Kooijmans H, Post M, Motazedi E, Spijkerman D, Bongers-Janssen H, Stam H, et al. Exercise self-efficacy is weakly related to engagement in physical activity in persons with long-standing spinal cord injury. Disability and rehabilitation. 2019:1-7. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,087 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 671 |