سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,622
تعداد مقالات71,533
تعداد مشاهده مقاله126,862,193
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله99,905,018
شفیعی ثابت, ناصر, ابراهیمی پور, فائزه. (1403). تحلیل شبکه‌ای دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی برای امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار مناطق پیرا ـ شهری. , 12(3), 101-120. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380648.1977
ناصر شفیعی ثابت; فائزه ابراهیمی پور. "تحلیل شبکه‌ای دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی برای امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار مناطق پیرا ـ شهری". , 12, 3, 1403, 101-120. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380648.1977
شفیعی ثابت, ناصر, ابراهیمی پور, فائزه. (1403). 'تحلیل شبکه‌ای دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی برای امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار مناطق پیرا ـ شهری', , 12(3), pp. 101-120. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380648.1977
شفیعی ثابت, ناصر, ابراهیمی پور, فائزه. تحلیل شبکه‌ای دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی برای امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار مناطق پیرا ـ شهری. , 1403; 12(3): 101-120. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380648.1977

تحلیل شبکه‌ای دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی برای امنیت غذایی و توسعه پایدار مناطق پیرا ـ شهری

پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
دوره 12، شماره 3، آبان 1403، صفحه 101-120    اصل مقاله (1.69 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی - کاربردی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.380648.1977
نویسندگان
ناصر شفیعی ثابت* ؛ فائزه ابراهیمی پور
گروه جغرافیای انسانی و آمایش، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
تغییر کاربری زمین، به‌ویژه در مناطق حاشیه شهری، یک چالش محیط‌زیستی مهم است که با پیامدهایی مانند کاهش امنیت غذایی و عدم تعادل در توسعه پایدار همراه است. درحالی‌که مطالعات متعددی در این زمینه انجام‌شده است، یک مرور فراگیر و شبکه‌ای از این مطالعات وجود ندارد. هدف این تحقیق تحلیل شبکه دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی با استفاده از تحلیل شبکه دانش برای شناسایی شکاف‌های تحقیقاتی و ترسیم مسیرهای تحقیقاتی آینده است. این مطالعه 1491 مقاله مرتبط با تغییر کاربری اراضی را از پایگاه داده اسکوپوس جمع‌آوری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل کرد. در ادامه، شبکه دانش این مقالات با استفاده از نرم‌افزار VOSviewer تصویرسازی شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که تعداد مطالعات پژوهشی در این زمینه بین سال‌های 1991 تا 2003 بسیار محدود بوده است. از سال 2009 تا 2016 سرعت آن افزایش‌یافته و تا سال 2024 به‌تدریج بر عمق این پژوهش افزوده‌شده است. خوشه‌بندی اصطلاحات امنیت غذایی و استفاده از زمین را در هسته شبکه نشان داد که از اهداف توسعه پایدار حمایت می‌کند. این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی با علوم محیطی، کشاورزی و اجتماعی درهم‌تنیده است. این مطالعه با ارائه یک نمای کلی از شبکه دانش تغییر کاربری اراضی نشان می‌دهد که این حوزه تحقیقاتی در حال رشد و توسعه است. بااین‌حال، هنوز نیاز به تحقیقات بیشتر در زمینه‌های خاص مانند نوآوری‌های نظری و همکاری‌های جهانی وجود دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
امنیت غذایی؛ تغییر کاربری اراضی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ تحلیل علم‌سنجی؛ مناطق پیرا ـ شهری
عنوان مقاله [English]
Network analysis of land use change for food security and sustainable development of peri-urban areas
نویسندگان [English]
Naser Shafieisabet؛ faezeh ebrahimipour
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning-, Faculty of Earth Sciences,- Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]
ABSTRACT
Land use change, especially in peri-urban areas, is a significant environmental challenge associated with consequences such as reduced food security and imbalances in sustainable development. While numerous studies have been conducted in this field, a comprehensive and networked overview of these studies has been lacking. This research aims to analyze the knowledge network of land use change using knowledge network analysis to identify gaps and outline future research directions. This study collected and analyzed 1491 articles related to land use change from the Scopus database. Subsequently, the knowledge network of these articles was visualized using VOSviewer software. The findings reveal that the number of research studies on this topic was very limited between 1991 and 2003. From 2009 to 2016, it accelerated, and until 2024, the depth of this research gradually increased. The clustering of terms revealed food security and land use at the core of the network, supporting sustainable development goals. This research indicates that the knowledge of land use change is intertwined with environmental, agricultural, and social sciences. Also, the study demonstrates that this research area is growing and developing by providing a comprehensive overview of the knowledge network of land use change. However, there is still a need for further research in specific areas, such as theoretical innovations and international collaborations.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Rapid urban expansion has exerted significant pressure on the environment and natural resources. This trend has led to the destruction of agricultural land, forests, and natural habitats, reducing biodiversity and threatening food security. In other words, as human society develops, land use, particularly agricultural land, is constantly changing, which has a profound negative impact on food security. Given the growing attention and research focus of scholars and academic communities worldwide, this study aims to analyze the knowledge network of land use change and its impact on food security and sustainable development in peri-urban areas. The data for this study reveals the existing patterns, challenges, and research trends in the field, assisting researchers in predicting emerging areas and important topics. Examining co-authorship of articles also highlights international and interdisciplinary collaborations. Furthermore, it improves the quality of research and knowledge exchange, identifies weaknesses and gaps in the existing literature, and helps researchers and policymakers set and predict their research priorities.
Compared to previous studies that have evaluated changes in land use and rural ecosystems, this research, based on the literature and background of the subject, seeks to identify and analyze changes and adaptations in land use based on thoughtful planning and policy-making systems and what is observed as incongruous and unsustainable changes in land use in peri-urban areas. Accordingly, through the analysis of the knowledge network as a new and multifaceted approach, this topic can lead to a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in analyzing land use change trends, the challenges arising from the reduction of agricultural land, and its impacts on food security. Finally, many studies have separately addressed the issues of food security and land use change. There is a need for interdisciplinary approaches better to understand the complex relationships between these two issues. Addressing these gaps can be a starting point for researchers to focus on key issues and develop effective solutions for food security and sustainable development. In this regard, uncontrolled and unplanned urbanization can have many negative effects, such as reducing the quality of life, increasing pollution, traffic, and pressure on natural resources. Therefore, there is a need for effective policies and sustainable planning to manage these challenges.
 
Methodology
Based on the literature review approach, knowledge network analysis methodology was used in the current research. Therefore, the research method of this study is based on a three-level protocol of setting, monitoring, and analyzing the data set. The first step involved identification, screening, eligibility, and exclusion. In the second step, the articles, and then in the third step, the data was analyzed in the functional and network analysis framework. In line with the articles in this field and with knowledge network analysis based on previous studies, authorship, and occurrence of keywords, VOSviewer software was used.
 
Results and discussion
The findings revealed that among the keywords of all the documents published in the subject field, the searches of this field were recounted and shown in the form of a network. Searches repeated more than 50 times in scientific documents were detected using the software. The most basic queries were displayed in 5 clusters. Middle nodes represent more central questions such as food security, land use, food supply, agriculture, and climate change, and from the center to the periphery of the network, questions with smaller nodes are identified in the sense that the connection of those nodes with this field has been less studied. The subject of the research is new compared to the previous studies, and among these, the investigations that were closest to this research were conducted using the knowledge network analysis method. In 2021, Cheng et al.'s (2021) research recently mapped research knowledge about land use change and food security using VOSviewer.
 
 
Conclusion
The conceptual and thematic diversity and the interdisciplinary nature of the present research have caused various perspectives and thought frameworks to pay attention to the subject field. It should be mentioned that this research, with the knowledge network drawing method as a suitable tool for identifying the clusters and schools of thought suitable for entering into the studies of this subject field compared to the previous researches, has created a new research idea to identify its representation. Therefore, it gives researchers in the field of human geography and spatial planning the possibility to refer to new topics and the network of top authors in this field and use the findings of this research in their studies. Based on this value, the current research is a valuable resource for future research. Image analysis of the knowledge map of the literature with thematic context was performed in the database, and the research status, knowledge structure, and evolution context were examined.
 
Funding
This article is extracted from the doctoral thesis of the second author of the article. The scientific and spiritual support of Shahid Beheshti University is hereby appreciated.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Food security, Land Use Change, Sustainable Development, Peri-Urban Areas, Vosviewer
مراجع
  1. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2019). Worldwide research trends on sustainable land use in agriculture. Land use policy, 87, 104069.‌ DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104069
  2. Bastin, J-F.Y., Finegold, C., Garcia, D., Mollicone, M., Rezende, D., Routh, C.M., Zohner, T., & Crowther, W. (2019) The global tree restoration potential. Science 365(6448), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848.
  3. Beyer, R. M., Hua, F., Martin, P. A., Manica, A., & Rademacher, T. (2022). Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 49.‌ DOI:10.1038/s43247-022-00360-6
  4. Daioglou, V., Doelman, J. C., Wicke, B., Faaij, A., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 54, 88-101.‌ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338716831_Integrated_assessment_of_biomass_supply_and_demand_in_climate_change_mitigation_scenarios
  5. CEDEAO et FAO (2020). Diagnostic sur l’efficacité des politiques et stratégies nationales des pêches et de l’aquaculture pour la sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelle en Afrique de l’Ouest: Etats Membres de la CEDEAO & Mauritanie. ECOWAS. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb2033fr.
  6. Cheng, P., Tang, H., Dong, Y., Liu, K., Jiang, P., & Liu, Y. (2021). Knowledge mapping of research on land use change and food security: a visual analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13065.‌  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413065.
  7. Chen, C., Yu, L., & Choguill, C. L. (2020). “Dipiao”, Chinese approach to transfer of land development rights: The experiences of Chongqing. Land Use Policy, 99, 104870.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104870.
  8. Chigbu, U. E., Ntihinyurwa, P. D., de Vries, W. T., & Ngenzi, E. I. (2019). Why tenure responsive land-use planning matters: Insights for land use consolidation for food security in Rwanda. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(8), 1354.‌  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081354.
  9. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of business research, 109, 1-14.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039.
  10. FAO. (2018). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition, Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2300145
  11. Fader, M., Cranmer, C., Lawford, R., & Engel-Cox, J. (2018) Toward an understanding of synergies and trade-offs between water energy and food SDG targets. Front Enviro Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00112.
  12. Garden, J. G., Mcalpine, C. A., Possingham, H. P., & Jones, D. N. (2007). Habitat structure is more important than vegetation composition for local‐level management of native terrestrial reptile and small mammal species living in urban remnants: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Austral ecology, 32(6), 669-685.‌ DOI:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01750.x.
  13. Gogoi, P. P., Vinoj, V., Swain, D., Roberts, G., Dash, J., & Tripathy, S. (2019). Land use and land cover change effect on surface temperature over Eastern India. Scientific reports, 9(1), 8859.‌
    DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-45213-z.
  14. Huang, W., Hashimoto, S., Yoshida, T., Saito, O., & Taki, K. (2021). A nature-based approach to mitigate flood risk and improve ecosystem services in Shiga, Japan. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101309.‌ DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101309.
  15. He, C., Okada, N., Zhang, Q., Shi, P., & Li, J. (2008). Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and urban planning, 86(1), 79-91.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.12.010.
  16. Huang, Y. (2021). Technology innovation and sustainability: Challenges and research needs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 1663-1664.‌ DOI:10.1007/s10098-021-02152-6.
  17. Ickowitz, A., Powell, B., Rowland, D., Jones, A., & Sunderland, T. (2019). Agricultural intensification, dietary diversity, and markets in the global food security narrative. Global Food Security, 20, 9-16.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.11.002.
  18. Jiang, Y., Ritchie, B. W., & Benckendorff, P. (2019). Bibliometric visualisation: An application in tourism crisis and disaster management research. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(16), 1925-1957.‌ DOI:10.1080/13683500.2017.1408574.
  19. Long, H., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., & Tu, S. (2021). Land use transitions: Progress, challenges and prospects. Land, 10(9), 903.‌ DOI:10.3390/land10090903.
  20. Liu, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Reflections on China's food security and land use policy under rapid urbanization. Land use policy, 109, 105699.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105699.
  21. López, S., Wright, C., & Costanza, P. (2017). Environmental change in the equatorial Andes: Linking climate, land use, and land cover transformations. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 8, 291-303.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2016.11.001.
  22. Liu, L., Liu, B., Song, W., & Yu, H. (2023). The Relationship between Rural Sustainability and Land Use: A Bibliometric Review. Land, 12(8), 1617.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081617.
  23. Li, J., & Song, W. (2022). Food security review based on bibliometrics from 1991 to 2021. Foods, 11(23), 3915.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233915.
  24. Maxwell, S., & Smith, M. (1992). Household food security: a conceptual review. Household food security: Concepts, indicators, measurements, 1, 1-72.‌ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296706406_Household_Food_Insecurity_HFIS_Definitions_Measurements_Socio-Demographic_and_Economic_Aspects.
  25. Mendoza, M. E., Granados, E. L., Geneletti, D., Pérez-Salicrup, D. R., & Salinas, V. (2011). Analysing land cover and land use change processes at watershed level: a multitemporal study in the Lake Cuitzeo Watershed, Mexico (1975–2003). Applied Geography, 31(1), 237-250.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.010
  26. Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia university press.‌
  27. Putro, U. S., Novani, S., & Hendriadi, A. (2024). Reinventing sustainable food security: A problem structuring method. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3109, No. 1). AIP Publishing.‌ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205420.
  28. Plieninger, T., Draux, H., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C., Bürgi, M., Kizos, T., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). The driving forces of landscape change in Europe: A systematic review of the evidence. Land use policy, 57, 204-214.‌ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.040
  29. Pradhan, P.L., Costa, D., Rybski, W., Jürgen, L., & Kropp, P. (2017) A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth's Future 5(11), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632.
  30. Roe, S., Streck, C., Obersteiner, M., Frank, S., Griscom, B., & Drouet, L. (2019) Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat Clim Change, 9(11), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9.
  31. Skaf, L., Buonocore, E., Dumontet, S., Capone, R., & Franzese, P. P. (2020). Applying network analysis to explore the global scientific literature on food security. Ecological Informatics, 56, 101062.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101062.
  32. Shan, L., Ann, T. W., & Wu, Y. (2017). Strategies for risk management in urban–rural conflict: Two case studies of land acquisition in urbanising China. Habitat international, 59, 90-100.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.009.
  33. Schulp, C. J., Levers, C., Kuemmerle, T., Tieskens, K. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2019). Mapping and modelling past and future land use change in Europe’s cultural landscapes. Land use policy, 80, 332-344.‌ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.030
  34. Subedi, Y. R., Kristiansen, P., & Cacho, O. (2022). Drivers and consequences of agricultural land abandonment and its reutilisation pathways: A systematic review. Environmental Development, 42, 100681.‌ 10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100681.
  35. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio-Journal of Human Environment Research and Management, 36(8), 614-621.‌ https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520964297-051
  36. Scherer, L.P., Behrens, A., de Koning, R., Heijungs, B., & Tukker, S.A. (2018) Trade-offs between social and environmental sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Policy, 90, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.002.
  37. Verburg, P. H., Mertz, O., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H., & Wu, W. (2013). Land system change and food security: towards multi-scale land system solutions. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 5(5), 494-502.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.003.
  38. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2022). VOSviewer manual. Manual for VOSviewer for VOSviewer version 1.6.18. DOI: 10.4236/ijoc.2017.72009.
  39. Xie, H., Wen, Y., Choi, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). Global trends on food security research: A bibliometric analysis. Land, 10(2), 119.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020119
  40. Yang, Z. H. E. N. G., Ge, Y. U., Ping-li, Z. H. O. N. G., & You-xiao, W. A. N. G. (2018). Integrated assessment of coastal ecological security based on land use change and ecosystem services in the Jiaozhou Bay, Shandong Peninsula, China. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, 29(12). ‌ DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.035.
  41. Ustaoglu, E., & Williams, B. (2017). Determinants of urban expansion and agricultural land conversion in 25 EU countries. Environmental management, 60, 717-746.‌ 10.1007/s00267-017-0908-2.
  42. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. United Nations, New York. https://doi.org/10.11260/kenkokyoiku.19.77
  43. Zhou, Y., Li, Y., & Xu, C. (2020). Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy, 91, 104379.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104379.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 61
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 93





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب