پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,573 |
| تعداد مقالات | 71,037 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,513,415 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,775,252 |
تأثیر طرح‌های آبی ترکیه در بالادست حوضۀ ارس بر اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 05 بهمن 1403 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2025.364884.450165 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سید مسعود موسوی شفائی* 1؛ رضا امینی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این نوشتار طرح‌های آبی ترکیه در حوضۀ ارس را بررسی می‌کنیم؛ مسئله‌ای که می‌تواند بر زندگی بخش بزرگی از مردم شمال باختری ایران تأثیر مستقیم داشته باشد. در این نوشتار به‌دنبال پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که طرح‌های آبی ترکیه، به‌عنوان کشور بالادست حوضۀ ارس، چه تأثیری بر اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران خواهد داشت؟ این نوشتار روش استقرایی را استفاده می‌کند و رویکرد آن آینده‌پژوهانه و مبتنی بر روش تبیین و تحلیل عِلی است. این نوشتار نشان می‌دهد در ترکیه، افزون بر کانال‌های بزرگ و کوچک انتقال آب، سدهایی مانند «سد کاراکورت» در حوضۀ ارس ساخته شده است که با تکمیل شبکه‌های بهره‌برداری از آن‌ها، به صورت روزافزون از آبی که از ارس به کشورهای پایین‌دست می‌رسد، کاسته خواهد شد. بنابراین گفته شده است با توجه به تداومِ روند نگاه به سدسازی به‌عنوان عامل توسعه، تداوم روند مخالفت با «موافقت‌نامۀ بهره‌گیری غیرکشتیرانی از آب‌راه‌های بین‌الملی»، تداوم تسلط گفتمان مهندسی بر بهره‌برداری از منابع آبی، تداوم روند تعیین‌کننده‌بودن رویکرد امنیتی در بهره‌برداری از رودهای مرزگذر و تداوم روند کم‌شدن بارش برف و باران، اجرای طرح‌های آبی در بالادست حوضۀ ارس در ترکیه ادامه خواهد یافت که پیامد آن کم‌شدن فزایندۀ آب ارس برای پایین‌دست خواهد بود. از این‌رو استدلال شده است که این موضوع برای اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران مسئله‌ساز خواهد شد، از جمله اینکه سرمایه‌‌گذاری‌هایی را که از چند دهۀ پیش در دشت مغان در بخش کشاورزی شده است بی‌نتیجه می‌کند. بخش بزرگی از زمین‌های آبی ایران در حوضۀ ارس را به زمین دیم با بهره‌دهی پایین تبدیل می‌شود و فشار بیشتر بر منابع آبی زیرزمینی را در پی خواهد داشت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اقتصاد؛ کشاورزی؛ هیدروپلیتیک؛ هیدروهژمونی؛ حوضۀ ارس؛ ایران؛ ترکیه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impacts of Hydro-Power Projects of Turkey in the Upstream Aras Basin on Iran’s Agricultural Economy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee1؛ Reza Amini2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2M.A. in International Relations, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: This research aims to investigate the consequences of Turkish hydro-power projects in the upstream Aras basin on Iran's agricultural economy. To do this, after trying to show that the consequences of Turkey's DAP project (Doğu Anadolu Projesi) for Iran could be much greater than the consequences of Turkey's GAP project (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi) for Syria and Iraq, we have reviewed previous research to show that there is a research gap in terms of implications of DAP's consequences for Iran's agricultural economy. Then, we have presented the conceptual framework of the research, in which "agricultural economy" "hydro-politic" and "hydro-hegemony" are of particular importance. We then present a picture of the Aras basin to highlight its importance in Iran's agricultural economy. Then, after examining Turkey's hydro-power projects in Aras, we examined two macro/mega trends and five main trends affecting this issue and finally came to a conclusion. Research question: What are the implications of Turkish hydro-power projects in the upstream Aras basin for Iran's agricultural economy? Research hypothesis: Turkey's hydro-power projects in the upstream Aras basin will have major consequences for Iran's agricultural economy, such as the conversion of irrigated lands to (rainy) drylands in Iran’s share of the Aras basin and wasting the investments made in the agricultural sector in the northern regions of the three northwestern provinces of Iran. Methodology: Given that Turkey's hydro-power projects in the Aras basin have not yet been fully implemented, here we present an explanatory approach for future studies to solve the problem. Results and discussion: In examining the implications of hydro-power projects that Turkey has implemented or is seeking to implement in the upstream Aras basin, we argued that the two macro trends that determine Turkey's hydro-politics are global "climate change" and the "competitions between the regional powers" of the Middle East. The first macro trend is causing Turkey's climate to dry out. As a result, the country has sought to manage its consequences by building dams and controlling the water of cross-border rivers. The second macro trend, the competition between regional powers in the Middle East, has led Turkey to use water to gain political and economic benefits from other countries in the region and enhance its position in the region. For this reason, Turkey sometimes talks about exchanging water for oil with Middle Eastern oil-exporting countries and exporting water to other countries through the construction of pipelines. In addition, Turkey has tried to use the Tigris, Euphrates and Aras waters for the "development" of its southeastern and eastern provinces. These regions are less or under-developed compared to other parts of the country, especially the western part. In this framework, dam construction is a means of managing Turkey’s social, political, and ethnic problems in the target regions, which have manifested themselves in the form of Kurdish separatism. Considering the large and small dams that Turkey has built in the Aras basin so far, it can be said that the country will implement more hydro-power projects in the Aras basin, similar to what has been implemented in the Tigris and Euphrates basins. In recent years, the amount of water entering Iran from the Aras has decreased significantly and it can be predicted that the water in this river will decrease even more significantly in the future. Therefore, given the macro/mega and major trends we have discussed in this article and what we know about Turkey's hydro-political approach and hydro-hegemony strategy, it can be said that Turkey is determined to control as much of the Aras water as possible which will have numerous consequences for the countries downstream of this border-crossing river, including Iran. These consequences can manifest themselves in various forms and harm the "human security" of the people in the region. One of the components of human security is "economic security" in which agriculture plays an important role. Therefore, Turkey's dam construction in the upstream Aras basin river will have negative consequences for the agricultural economies of the countries downstream of this river. Conclusion: Our studies in this research show that the consequences of Turkey's dam construction on Iran's agricultural economy will be different: on the one hand, with the reduction of Aras water, Iran's ability to produce agricultural products will decrease especially in the three provinces of West Azerbaijan, East Azerbaijan and Ardabil - parts of which are in the Aras basin. In addition, the reduction of Aras water will definitely harm its quality, especially since a lot of urban and industrial wastewater enters the river. Therefore, agricultural products produced with the reduced water of the river will be of lower quality and may even cause health problems. This will also reduce the competitiveness of Iran's agricultural products in the market. Similarly, reducing the Aras water will waste the investments that Iran has made in its share of the Aras basin in areas such as the Mughan Plain. In addition, the construction of Turkish dams in the upstream Aras basin and the inevitable reduction in the water reaching downstream countries such as Iran will also have environmental consequences, which endangers some other components of human security for the people of the region. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Agriculture, Economy, Hydro-Politics, Hydro-Hegemony, Aras Basin, Iran, Turkey | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadipour, Zahra, Zahra Pourdast and Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee (2019), “Studying of Iran and Turkey Rivalry in Syria Crisis”, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 55, pp. 90-121, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1398.15.55.4.9) [in Persian]. Al-Muqdadi, Sameh W., Mohammed F. Omer, Rudy Abo and Alice Naghshineh (2016), “Dispute Over Water Resource Management-Iraq and Turkey”, Journal of Environmental Protection, Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 1096-1103, (doi: 10.4236/jep.2016.78098). Altinbilek, Dogan and Murat Ali Hatipoglu (2020), “Water Resources Development”, Water Resources of Turkey, Nilgun Harmancioglu and Dogan Altinbilek (ed.), Switzerland: Springer, pp. 61-84. Asah, Stanley T. (2015), “Transboundary Hydro-Politics and Climate Change Rhetoric: An Emerging Hydro-Secirity Complex in the Lake Chad Basin”, WIREs Water, 2015, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 37-45, (doi: 10.1002/wat2.1057). Bishop, Peter C. and Andy Hines (2012), Teaching about the Future, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Brown, L. Carl (2004), Diplomacy in the Middle East the International Relations of Regional and Outside Powers, London: I. B. Tauris. Cline, William R (2007), Global Warming and Agriculture Impact Estimates by Country, Washington: Center for Global Development, Daoudy, Marwa (2009), “Asymmetric Power: Negotiating Water in the Euphrates and Tigris”, International Negotiation, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 361-391, (doi: 10.1163/157180609X432860). Desai, Pranav K (2010), Agricultural Economics, Dehli: Biotech Books, Drummond, H. Evan and John W. Goodwin (2011), Agricultural Economics, Third Edition, Boston: Prentice Hall. Faraji, Mohammadreza and Vahid Ranjbar Heydari (2018), “Hydropolitics of the Middle East: a Case Study of Tigris and Euphrates, Nile and Jordan Rivers Basins”, The Socio-Cultural Research Journal of Rahbord, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 311-331, (doi: 20.1001.1.22517081.1396.6.4.11.9), [in Persian]. Ghoreishi, Seyedeh Zahra, Hojjat MIanabadi and Ebrahim Hajiani (2020), “The Dimensions of Hydraulic Mission in Turkey's Hydropolitics”, Iran – Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 304-331, (doi: 20.1001.1.17352347.1399.16.1.21.5), [in Persian]. Golmohammadi, Vali (2018), The Future of Iran and Turkey’s Relations in 2025 Horizon, Tehran: Supreme National Defence University, Center for Strategic Publications, [in Persian]. Golmohammadi, Vali, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Sajjadpour and Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee (2016), “Erdoganism and Understanding the Turkish Middle East Policy”, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 73, pp. 69-92, (doi: 20.1001.1.17350727.1395.19.73.3.4), [in Persian]. Hajihoseini, Mohammadreza, Saeid Morid, Samad Emamgholizadeh, Bahram Amirahmadian, Emad Mahjoobi and Houshang Gholami (2023), “Conflict and Cooperation in Aras International Rivers Basin: Status, Trend, and Future”, Sustainable Water Resources Management, Vol. 9, No. 28, pp. 355-376, (doi: 10.1007/s40899-022-00799-7). Hipel, Keith W. and D. Marc Kilgour (2014), “Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East”, Group Decis Negot, Vol. 23, pp. 355-376, (doi: 10.1007/s10726-012-9325-3). Houghton, John (200), Global Warming, Third Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Javadi Arjomand, Mohammad Ja'afar and Ehsan Fallahi (2015), "The Comparative Examination of Iran and Turkey’s Foreign Policy in South Caucasus with Emphasis on Azerbaijan and Armenia", Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 2011-228, (doi.org/10.22059/jcep.2015.56845) [in Persian]. Kaim, Markus (2008), Great Powers and Regional Orders the United States and the Persian Gulf, Bodmin: ASHGATE. Kibaroglu, Aysegul, Waltina Scheumann and Annika Kramer (2011), Turkey’s Walter Policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation, London: Springer. Klise, Geoffrey T, Alyssa M. Neir, Michael E. Campana. Amy Ewing, Berrin Basak Vener and Alistair Rieu-Clarke (2009), “Hydrovulnerability of West Asia”, Hydropolitcal Vulnerability and Resilience along International Waters: Asia, pp. 56-87. Available at: https://b2n.ir/r24604 (Accessed on 10/12/2023). Kura Araks Transboundary River Basin (2009), FAO AQUASTAT reports, Available at: https://b2n.ir/a03546 (Accessed on: 10/12/2023). Mianabadi Hojjat and Azam Amini (2019), “Complexity of Water, Politics, and Environment in the Euphrates and Tigris River Basins”, International Quarterly of Geopolitics, Vol. 15, No. 54, pp. 54-86, (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1398.15.54.3.6), [in Persian]. Mohammad Alipour, Farideh and Hamed Talebian (2018), "Shared Water Resources in Kura-Aras River Basin; the Promoter of Peace in South Caucasia", Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 231-246, (doi:10.22059/jcep.2018.254467.449754) [in Persian]. Mousavi Shafaee, Masoud and Vali Golmohammadi (2022), “The Regional Supremacy Trap: Disorder in the Middle East”, Middle East Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-13, (doi: 10.1111/mepo.12621). Mousavi Shafaee, Seyed Masoud, Younes Noorollahi, Ahad Rezayan Ghayahbashi , Hossein Yousefi and Ali Hossein Rezayan (2016), “Human Security and Challenges of Renewable Energy Development in Iran, with Emphasis on Environmental Security”, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 18, No. 5, 167-180, Available at: https://B2n.ir/e99504 (Accessed on: 10/12/2023), [in Persian]. Rezayan Ghayebashi, Ahad, Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee and Farzaneh Naghdi (2019), “Unsustainable Development Policies: Environmental Degradation and Threat to Human Security in Iran”, International Journal of Humanities, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 54-78, (doi: 20.1001.1.25382640.2017.24.2.4.1). Soltani Nejad, Ahmad, Rahim Slamat Azar and Ghasem Osuli (2016), "The Turkey's Divergent Role in Iran-Azerbaijan Relations", Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 289-308, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2016.60542), [in Persian]. Statistical Yearbook of Ardabil Province 1400 (1402), Ardabil: Planning and Budget Organization, Available at: https://B2n.ir/w01913 (Accessed on 12/12/2023) [in Persian]. Statistical Yearbook of West Azerbaijan Province 1400 (1402), Tabriz: Planning and Budget Organization. Available at: https://B2n.ir/w70107 (Accessede on 10/11/2023), [in Persian]. Statistical Yearbook of West Azerbaijan Province 1400 (1402), Urmia: Planning and Budget Organization, Available at: https://B2n.ir/q38168 (Accessed on 02/12/2023), [in Persian]. Turkes, Murat, M. Tufan Turp, Nazan An, Tubga Ozturk and M. Levent Kurnaz (2022), "Impacts of Climate Change on Precipitation Climatology and Variability in Turkey", Water Resources of Turkey, edited by Nilgun Harmancioglu and Dogan Altinbilek (eds.), Switzerland: Springer, pp. 467 – 491. Warner, Jeroen (2008), “Contested Hydrohegemony: Hydraulic Control and Security in Turkey”, Water Alternatives, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 271-288, Available at: https://B2n.ir/g01029 (Accessed on 10/12/2023). Watts, Robert G (2007). Global Warming and the Future of the Earth, Morgan and Claypool. Zeitoun, Mark and Jeroen F. Warner (2008), “International Relations Theory and Water Do Mix: A Response to Furlong’s Troubled Waters, Hydro-Hegemony and International Water Relations”, Political Geography, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 802-810, (doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.08.006). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 44 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 37 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب