Comparison Between Discrete and Analog Semantic Differential Scales Accuracies in Kansei Engineering (Case Study: Reception Chairs) | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 1، شهریور 2024، صفحه 47-56 اصل مقاله (635.54 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2025.388565.1137 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Dasmeh1؛ Nasser Koleini Mamaghani* 2؛ Peyman Hassani-Abharian3 | ||
| 1Human Development Studies, Max Planck Institute, Berlin, Germany. | ||
| 2Industrial Design Department, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Cognitive Psychology and Rehabilitation, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aims to compare the distribution of semantic differential scale results, both discrete and analog, used in Kansei Engineering studies. Previous research shows that observers have a tendency to choose the extreme ends of Likert or discrete semantic differential rating scales. Conventionally, the discrete semantic differential rating scale is used in Kansei Engineering and the above-mentioned tendency may affect the result of studies. Non-normality of the distribution can be an indicator of the presence of error and bias in that method and mitigate its validity. The data was collected through a Kansei Engineering process using a real-world case study of reception chairs. The distribution of the results for both rating scales can be considered normal, hence, the previous researches’ achievements are not valid in the field of Kansei Engineering. This may be due to the ability to compare each answer with others, even implicitly, which is possible in the Kansei form. The results show that the difference between the average scores of the two rating scales is significant (t-test, p < 0.05), warranting further investigation. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Likert Scale؛ Kansei Engineering؛ Rating Scale؛ Normal Distribution؛ Reception Chair | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,383 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 432 |
||