سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,623
تعداد مقالات71,544
تعداد مشاهده مقاله126,896,060
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله99,943,525
ایمانی, بهرام, معدنی, جواد. (1403). شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سرعین. , 15(4), 117-138. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.372831.1914
بهرام ایمانی; جواد معدنی. "شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سرعین". , 15, 4, 1403, 117-138. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.372831.1914
ایمانی, بهرام, معدنی, جواد. (1403). 'شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سرعین', , 15(4), pp. 117-138. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.372831.1914
ایمانی, بهرام, معدنی, جواد. شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سرعین. , 1403; 15(4): 117-138. doi: 10.22059/jrur.2024.372831.1914

شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی مطالعه موردی: روستاهای شهرستان سرعین

پژوهش های روستائی
دوره 15، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 117-138    اصل مقاله (1.35 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله برگرفته از طرح پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2024.372831.1914
نویسندگان
بهرام ایمانی* 1؛ جواد معدنی2
1گروه برنامه‌ریزی شهری و روستایی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
2گروه مدیریت دولتی و گردشگری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
چکیده
توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی به‌عنوان یک پدیده چندوجهی و بسیار مهم است. امروزه اکثر کشورها سعی می‌کنند تا با استفاده از ظرفیت و پتانسیل‌های مناطق روستایی، در زمینه ایجاد توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی اقدام نمایند. اما این مقوله دارای زمینه و رویکردهای مختلفی است و عوامل متفاوتی در آن نقش دارند. هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و تبیین عوامل کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی در روستاهای شهرستان سرعین است که با استفاده از روش ترکیبی به بررسی این موضوع پرداخته‌شده است. رویکرد مورداستفاده در این تحقیق، رویکرد نسبی متوالی با وزن نابرابر  است که در دو فاز کیفی-کیفی صورت می‌پذیرد. در فاز اول با استفاده از روش کیفی مرور دامنه، شاخص‌های مربوطه را از تحقیقات مرتبط شناسایی و احصا شده‌اند و در فاز دوم، با استفاده از روش کیفی دلفی نقش‌های کارکردی و غیر کارکردی چندگانه در زمینه توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی از منظر خبرگان تبیین شده‌اند. مطابق با یافته‌های تحقیق، در فاز اول با استفاده از روش مرور دامنه، 17 تحقیق داخلی و خارجی مرتبط شناسایی و شاخص‌های تأییدی آن‌ها استخراج شدند. در فاز دوم، با برگزاری سه راند متوالی دلفی، 12 تن از خبرگان شاخص‌های کارکردی و غیر کارکردی در شش بعد و 81 شاخص دسته‌بندی کردند. مطابق با نتایج تحقیق حاضر، توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی در شهرستان سرعین، مرهون علل و عوامل مختلفی است که هریک، تأثیر و تأثرات چندگانه‌ای را در پی‌دارند. گردشگری روستایی به‌عنوان یک پتانسیل عظیم و غنی در زمینه‌های مختلف، نقش توسعه‌ای و باز سازنده را در روستاهای شهرستان سرعین دارد و توجه به عوامل کارکردی آن می‌توانند توسعه و پیشرفت همه‌جانبه روستایی را به بار آورد و اتخاذ اقدامات در قبال مدیریت و کنترل عوامل غیر کارکردی نیز از سایر مضرات و تهدیدات جلوگیری می‌نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
گردشگری؛ گردشگری روستایی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ مطالعه ترکیبی؛ سرعین
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying and Explaining Multiple Functional and Non-Functional Factors in the Field of Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism: A case study of villages of Sarein city
نویسندگان [English]
Bahram Imani1؛ Javad Madani2
1Department of Geography, Department of Urban and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, University Of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2Department of Public Administration and Tourism, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده [English]
A B S T R A C T
The sustainable development of rural tourism is a multifaceted and very important phenomenon. Today, most countries are trying to use the capacity and potential of rural areas to create sustainable development of rural tourism. However, this category has different contexts and approaches, and different factors play a role. The main goal of the current research is to identify and explain multiple functional and non-functional factors in the sustainable development of rural tourism in the villages of Sarein, which has been investigated using a mixed method. The approach used in this research is a partially mixed sequential dominant status design, which takes place in two qualitative-qualitative phases. In the first phase, using the scope review qualitative method, relevant indicators have been identified and counted from related studies, and in the second phase, using the Delphi qualitative method, multiple functional and non-functional roles in the field of sustainable development of rural tourism have been explained from the perspective of experts have become. Based on the research findings, 17 related internal and external studies were identified in the first phase, and their confirmation indicators were extracted using the scope method. In the second phase, by holding three consecutive Delphi rounds, 12 experts categorized functional and non-functional indicators into six components and 81 indicators. According to the present research results, the sustainable development of rural tourism in Sarein is due to various causes and factors, each of which has multiple impacts and impressions. Rural tourism, as a huge and rich potential in various fields, has a developmental and reconstructive role in the villages of Sarein, and paying attention to its functional components can bring all-round rural development and progress and adopting measures for management and control of non-functional components also prevent other harms and threats
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Rural tourism is one of the most popular types of tourism today, and it includes a combination of effective factors that have developed significantly in recent decades.Today, rural tourism has adopted new trends and plays an important role in the sustainable development of rural tourism communities. Rural areas are important for the development of tourism because they are ecologically attractive areas that, in addition to nature, have a rich traditional culture that is very attractive. Therefore, adopting rural tourism as an alternative development approach has become a preferred strategy to balance economic, social, cultural, and environmental regeneration and sustainable development. Thus, for most thinkers, Rural tourism has been considered an opportunity to promote local development, representing activities that cause change in rural areas. Although many studies have paid attention to the positive and negative factors affecting the sustainable development of rural tourism, research that can examine both cases together has not been done so far, and paying attention to these two important factors is the main focus. On the other hand, even though various studies have proposed components and variables in this field, there is still a lack of findings that can explain this dual role well, and from this point of view, this subject area lacks theoretical foundations. On the other hand, it can be seen that some related studies in this field often take an incomplete path that does not lead to the presentation of conclusive results or findings; for this reason, in this study, the identification and explanation of multiple functional and non-functional factors in the sustainable development of rural tourism is focused, which means that first these factors are identified and then we explain the dimensions and aspects that include them from the perspective of experts. The keyword "multiple" has been used to describe these factors in two ways, one is related to the fact that these factors have different dimensions and aspects that must be identified, and the second is that these factors can be in addition to the impact and impressions related to themselves include other consequences and this category adds to their complexity and multidimensionality. The following presents the theoretical foundations and research background, research methodology, research findings, discussion, and conclusions.
 
Methodology
The current research is applied in terms of purpose and hybrid in nature. The method used is mixed, and the approach used is a partially mixed sequential dominant status design, which takes place in two qualitative-qualitative phases. In the first phase, using the scope review qualitative method, relevant indicators have been identified and counted from related studies, and in the second phase, using the Delphi qualitative method, multiple functional and non-functional roles in sustainable development of rural tourism have been explained from the perspective of experts have become. In the first phase, where the scope review method was used, related indicators were identified and counted through various studies in this field. In the second phase of the research, which used the Delphi qualitative method, the researcher provides the items extracted from the previous phase to relevant experts to express their opinions regarding multiple functional and non-functional indicators in the sustainable development of rural tourism. In this phase, 12 experts who were well acquainted with Sarein were selected using targeted sampling. Their main expertise is in tourism, rural tourism, sustainable development, and urban and rural planning. It was geography that participated in three Delphi rounds. By reviewing the relevant theoretical literature in this field, 17 research studies related to the topic were identified and sent to the scope review stage for analysis and review.
 
Results and discussion
By reviewing the relevant theoretical literature in this field, 17 research studies related to the topic were identified and sent to the scope review stage for analysis and review. Relevant researches have different approaches and perspectives. About 192 indicators were extracted, and each was sent in a specialized form to the experts of the next stage - the Delphi method. According to experts, these indicators can be classified and analyzed as cultural and social, economic, environmental and physical, managerial and political, environmental and health, technology, and infrastructure. For this reason, each component, along with the indicators, is numbered in the related rows, the right column as main components or categories, and the left column as indicators or sub-categories. Based on the experts, these factors are the main functional and non-functional factors in the sustainable development of rural tourism in Sarein. Each case includes various dimensions and aspects, making them not one-dimensional.
 
Conclusion
According to the cultural and social components extracted from the second phase of the research, it can be concluded that in Sarein city; factors such as "continuous improvement of tourism values; improving the education and health of the rural community; ensuring the living standards of the rural people; useful cultural exchange; reducing the migration of villagers to the cities; increasing the experiences and awareness of the rural community; improving the quality and value of rural tourism" as Functional factors are in line with the sustainable development of tourism, and such factors as "unacceptance of the local community; increase in crime and delinquency; negative cultural changes; cultural conflict between the host and guest communities; the possibility of damage to the socio-cultural values of the village; values, approaches, and traditional products give way to modern products; the possibility of the phenomenon of imitating urban culture can appear as non-functional factors. This category is due to the multi-dimensionality of the consequences and subsequent effects. The non-functional factors show that the nature or traditional folk culture is still not enough for the sustainable development of rural tourism in Sarein, and since the socio-cultural component is a key factor of the local community and its attitude towards the performance of tourism in the region, attention and care should be taken. Both functional and non-functional factors have a high impact on economic components.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Tourism, Rural Tourism, Sustainable Development, Mixed Study, Sarein
مراجع
  1. ایمانی، بهرام؛ یاری حصار، ارسطو و حاجبانی، حسین. (1401). چالش‌های فراروی توسعه گردشگری روستایی، مطالعه موردی: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان مشکین‌شهر. فصلنامه جغرافیایی فضای گردشگری، 11(43)، 23-36.
  2. تقدیسی، احمد؛ گودرزی، سمیه و بیک محمدی، حسن. (1394). بررسی و تحلیل چالش‌های توسعه توریسم روستایی از دیدگاه روستائیان روستاهای هدف گردشگری استان آذربایجان غربی. برنامه‌ریزی فضائی. 5(1)، 83-100.
  3. رضوانی, محمدرضا؛ بدری، سیدعلی؛ ترابی، ذبیح‌الله؛ ملکان؛ احمد؛ عسگری، علی. (1395). ارزیابی توسعه پایدار گردشگری در مناطق روستایی حاشیه کلان‌شهر تهران (مورد مطالعه: روستای آهار). پژوهش‌های روستایی، 7(2)، 299-286. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20087373.1395.7.2.2.5
  4. مهدی نژاد، جمال‌الدین؛ شرقی، علی و اسدپور، فائزه. (1403). شناسایی مؤلفه‌های کالبدی - فضایی بافت روستاهای باارزش بومی مبتنی بر توسعه گردشگری (موردمطالعه: روستاهای کوهپایه‌ای غرب استان مازندران). پژوهش‌های روستایی، 15(1)، 31-6.
  5.  https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2023.361629.1855
  6. سقائی، محسن و علیزاده، محمد. (1393). بررسی چالش‌ها، فرصت‌ها و راهکارهای توسعه گردشگری روستایی (مورد مطالعه روستاهای بیاضه، گرمه و مصر شهرستان خور و بیابانک). تحقیقات جغرافیایی، 29(3)، 41-60.
  7. Akbarian Ronizi, S. R., Mokarram, M., & Negahban, S. (2023). Investigation of Sustainable Rural Tourism Activities With Different Risk: A GIS‐MCDM Case in Isfahan, Iran. Earth and Space Science, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002153
  8. Altieri, M. A., Farrell, J. G., Hecht, S. B., Liebman, M., Magdoff, F., Murphy, B., ... & Sikor, T. O. (2018). The agroecosystem: determinants, resources, processes, and sustainability. In Agroecology (pp. 41-68). CRC Press.‌ https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429495465-3
  9. Ammirato, S., & Felicetti, A.M. (2015). The Agritourism as a Means of Sustainable Development for Rural Communities: A Research from the Field. Int. J. Interdiscip. Environ. Stud. 2014, 3, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1621/CGP/v08i01/53305
  10. Andrei, D.R., Sandu, M., Gogonea, R.M., Chiritescu, V., & Kruszlicika, M. (2012). Modeling of rural tourism towards sustainable development from the perspective of specifically organic food. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural. Dev. 12, 7–12. https://doi.org/2d4d2476a12c87579ca015204887ec3d28169481
  11. Anup, K.C., & Parajuli, R.B.T. (2014). Tourism and Its Impact on Livelihood in Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal. Environ. Dev. Sustain, 16, 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9512-7
  12. Aref, F., Gill, S. S., & Aref, F. (2010). Tourism development in local communities: As a community development approach. Journal of american Science, 6(2), 155-161.‌ https://doi.org/281640513
  13. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International. journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.‌ https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  14. Asmelash, A. G., & Kumar, S. (2019). Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators. Tourism Management, 71, 67-83.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.020
  15. Ayhan, Ç. K., Taşlı, T. C., Özkök, F., & Tatlı, H. (2020). Land use suitability analysis of rural tourism activities: Yenice, Turkey. Tourism Management, 76, 103949.‌ https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2020-0090
  16. Ayazlar, G.; Reyhan Ayazlar, A.R. (2015). Rural Tourism: A Conceptual Approach. In Tourism, Environment and Sustainability; Avcikurt, C., Dinu, M., Hacioğlu, N., Efe, R., Eds.; St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: Sofia, Turkey, 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Goekhan-Ayazlar/publication/289451753_Rural_Tourism_A_Conceptual_Approach/links/568ce16f08ae71d5cd060c3f/Rural-Tourism-A-Conceptual-Approach.pdf
  17. Berry, S., & Ladkin, A. (1997). Sustainable Tourism: A Regional Perspective. Tour. Manag. 1997, 18, 434–440.
  18. Blakely, E. J., & Blakely, E. J., & Bradshaw Bradshaw, T. K. (2002) Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice. California: Sage Publications.
  19. Bojnec, S. (2010). Rural tourism, rural economy diversification, and sustainable development. Academica Turistica, Year, 3, 1-2.‌ https://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/2335-4194/3_1-2_7-15.pdf
  20. Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. (1995). Rural Tourism and Sustainable Rural Development. J. Sustain. Tour. 2, 1–129. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/rural-tourism-and-sustainable-rural-development
  21. Colquhoun, H. (2016). Current best practices for the conduct of scoping reviews. EQUATOR Netw.‌ https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Gerstein-Library-scoping-reviews_May-12.pdf
  22. Countryside Commission. (1995). Sustainable Rural Tourism: A Guide to Local Opportunities; Countryside Commission: Cheltenhman, UK, 1995.
  23. Ćurčić, N., Mirković Svitlica, A., Brankov, J., Bjeljac, Ž., Pavlović, S., & Jandžiković, B. (2021). The role of rural tourism in strengthening the sustainability of rural areas: The case of Zlakusa village. Sustainability, 13(12), 6747.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126747
  24. Erokhin, V. (2014). Approaches to sustainable rural development in a predominantly non-rural region. Ekon. Poljopr. 61, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1402291E
  25. European Commission. (2021). Towards Quality Tourism Rural Urban Costal. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/tourism/files/studies (accessed on 15 May 2021).
  26. Fagioli, F. F., Diotallevi, F., & Ciani, A. (2014). Strengthening the sustainability of rural areas: the role of rural tourism and agritourism. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 69(2-3), 155-169.‌ https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-16920
  27. Ferrari, G.; Vargas-Vargas, M. (2010). Environmental sustainable management of small rural tourist enterprises. Int. J. Environ. Res. 3(4), 407–414. https://doi.org/229432271
  28. Gender, E. (2012). Decent rural employment for food security: a case for action.‌ https://www.fao.org/3/i2750e/i2750e00.pdf
  29. Guresci, E. (2022). Agricultural Factors as the Root Cause of Rural Migration from a Global Perspective. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 19, 1-16.‌ https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr19.afrc
  30. Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 8-13.‌ https://doi.org/272177606
  31. Hadiwijoyo, S. S. (2012). Perencanaan pariwisata perdesaan berbasis masyarakat: Sebuah pendekatan konsep. Graha Ilmu.‌ http://grahailmu.co.id/previewpdf/978-979-756-894-8-914.pdf
  32. Hall, D.R., Roberts, L., & Mitchell, M. (2003). New Directions in Rural Tourism; Ashgate: Aldershot, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248097
  33. He, W. (2012). Sustainable Rural Tourism Development and Environment Protection. Adv. Mater. Res. 347–353, 2893–2896. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.2893
  34. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. https://books.google.com/books/about/ Content_Analysis_for_the_Social_Sciences. html?id= IMpCAAAAIAAJ
  35. Huete-Alcocer, N., & Valero-Tévar, M.Á. (2021). Impact of Information Sources on Promoting Tourism in a Rural Region: The Case of the Roman Villa of Noheda. Sustainability, 13, 8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148038
  36. Iannucci, G., Martellozzo, F., & Randelli, F. (2022). Sustainable development of rural areas: a dynamic model in between tourism exploitation and landscape decline. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 32(3), 991-1016.‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-022-00785-4
  37. Imani, B., Yari Hesar, A., & Hajbani, H. (2022). Challenges facing the development of rural tourism, case study: villages in the central part of Meshginshahr city. Geographical Journal of Tourism Space, 11(43), 23-36. [In Persian].
  38. Jünger, S., Brearley, S., Payne, S., Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K., Lynch, T., Scholten, W., & Radbruch, L. (2013). Consensus building on access to controlled medicines: a four-stage Delphi consensus procedure. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 46(6), 897-910.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.014
  39. Kabadayi, S., O’Connor, G. E., & Tuzovic, S. (2020). The impact of coronavirus on service ecosystems as service mega-disruptions. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(6), 809-817.‌ https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2020-0090
  40. Kim, S., & Jamal, T. (2018). The co-evolution of rural tourism and sustainable rural development in Hongdong, Korea: complexity, conflict and local response. In Rural Tourism (pp. 231-253). Routledge.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1022181
  41. Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M.J. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents?. Tour.Manag. 36, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.005
  42. King, N. (1998). Template analysis, in G. Symon and C. Cassell (eds.) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research, London: Sage.
  43. Korani, Z., & Shafiei, Z. (2021). In search of traces of ‘The Tourist Gaze’ on locals: An ethnographic study in Garmeh village. Iran. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 19, 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2020.1826499
  44. Lane, B. (1994). What is rural tourism?. J Sustain. Tour. 2, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510680
  45. Lane, B., Kastenholz, E., & Carneiro, M. J. (2022). Rural tourism and sustainability: A special issue, review and update for the opening years of the twenty-first century. Sustainability, 14(10), 6070.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106070
  46. Ivona, A. (2021). Sustainability of rural tourism and promotion of local development. Sustainability, 13(16), 8854.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168854
  47. Lane, B., Kastenholz, E., & Carneiro, M. J. (2022). Rural tourism and sustainability: A special issue, review and update for the opening years of the twenty-first century. Sustainability, 14(10), 6070.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106070
  48. Leco, F., Pérez, A., Hernández, J., & Campón, A. (2013). Rural tourists and their attitudes and motivations towards the practice of environmental activities such as agrotourism. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2013, 7, 255–264. https://doi.org/297380845
  49. Lekovic, K., Tomic, S., Maric, D., & Curcic, N. (2020). Cognitive Component of the Image of a Rural Tourism Destination as a Sustainable Development Potential. Sustainability, 12, 9413 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229413
  50. Li, Y., Westlund, H., & Liu, Y. (2019). Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 135-143.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
  51. Liu, Y. L., Chiang, J. T., & Ko, P. F. (2023). The benefits of tourism for rural community development. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12.‌ https://doi.org/s41599-023-01610-4
  52. Liu, C., Dou, X., Li, J., & Cai, L. A. (2020). Analyzing government role in rural tourism development: An empirical investigation from China. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 177-188.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.046
  53. López-Guzmán, T., Sánchez-Cañizares, S., & Pavón, V. (2011). Community—Based tourism in developing countries: A case study. Tour. Int. Multidiscip. J. Tour. 6, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1926100
  54. Markey, S., Halseth, G., & Manson, D. (2008). Challenging the inevitability of rural decline: Advancing the policy of place in northern British Columbia. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), 409-421.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.012
  55. McAreavey, R., & McDonagh, J. (2011). Sustainable rural tourism: Lessons for rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 51(2), 175-194.‌
  56. McAreavey, R., & McDonagh, J. (2010). Sustainable Rural Tourism: Lessons for Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00529.x
  57. Mrkša, M., & Gajić, T. (2014). Opportunities for sustainable development of rural tourism in the municipality of Vrbas. Економика пољопривреде, 61(1), 163-175.‌ https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1401163M
  58. Mvula, C.D. (2001). Fair trade in tourism to protected areas—A micro case study of wildlife tourism to South Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Int. J. Tour. Res. 3, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.349
  59. Nasa, P., Jain, R., & Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116.‌ https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
  60. Petrović, M. D., Vujko, A., Gajić, T., Vuković, D. B., Radovanović, M., Jovanović, J. M., & Vuković, N. (2018). Tourism as an approach to sustainable rural development in post-socialist countries: A comparative study of Serbia and Slovenia. Sustainability, 10(1), 54.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010054
  61. Polukhina, A., Sheresheva, M., Efremova, M., Suranova, O., Agalakova, O., & Antonov-Ovseenko, A. (2021). The concept of sustainable rural tourism development in the face of COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(1), 38.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14010038
  62. Priatmoko, S., Kabil, M., Akaak, A., Lakner, Z., Gyuricza, C., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Understanding the complexity of rural tourism business: Scholarly perspective. Sustainability, 15(2), 1193.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021193
  63. Richards, G., & Hall, D. (2003). (Eds.) Tourism and Sustainable Community Development; Routledge: New York, NY, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310327332_Tourism_and_Sustainable_Community_Development
  64. Ristić, D., Vukoičić, D., & Milinčić, M. (2019). Tourism and sustainable development of rural settlements in protected areas-Example NP Кopaonik (Serbia). Land use policy, 89, 104231.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104231
  65. Rosalina, P. D., Dupre, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). Rural tourism: A systematic literature review on definitions and challenges. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 134-149.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.03.001
  66. Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods, In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (Pp. 769-802.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://qualquant.org/wp-content/uploads/text/2000%20Ryan_Bernard.denzin.pdf
  67. Saarinen, J., & Lenao, M. (2014). Integrating tourism to rural development and planning in the developing world. Dev. South. Afr. 31, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2014.888334
  68. Saghaei, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2014). By study on the challenging and stratehes of the rural tourism development. GeoRes. 29 (3), 41-60. [In Persian].
  69. López-Sanz, J. M., Penelas-Leguía, A., Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, P., & Cuesta-Valiño, P. (2021). Rural tourism and the sustainable development goals. A study of the variables that most influence the behavior of the tourist. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722973.‌ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722973
  70. Mahdi Nejad, J., Sharghi, A., & Asadpour, F. (2024). Identifying the physical-spatial components of the valuable vernacular villages based on tourism development (Case study: foothill villages in the west of Mazandaran Province). Journal of Rural Research, 15(1), 6-31.‌ https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2023.361629.1855
  71. Rezavani, M. R., Badri, S. A., Torabi, Z., Malekan, M., & Asgary, A. (2016). Sustainable rural tourism in the margins of Tehran metropolis (From the Perspective of Ahar). Journal of Rural Research, 7(2), 286-299.‌ [In Persian].
  72. Saxena, G., & Ilbery, B. (2008). Integrated Rural Tourism. A Border Case Study. Ann. Tour. Res. 2008, 35, 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.07.010
  73. Sekayi, D., & Kennedy, A. (2017). Qualitative Delphi method: A four round process with a worked example. The Qualitative Report, 22(10), 2755-2763.‌ https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2974
  74. Serra Cantallops, A., Ramon Cardona, J., & Estades Muntaner, R. (2015). Characteristics and peculiarities of rural tourism in the Balearic Islands. Tour. Plan. Dev. 12, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2014.933121
  75. Singh, M. (2018). Development and Assessment of Tourism in Valley of Flower National Park (Uttarakhand) India. Int. J. Acad. Res. Dev. 3, 452–455. https://www.ignfa.gov.in/publications/img-3716777-valley-of-flower-report.pdf
  76. Stetic, S. (2012). Specific features of rural tourism destinations management. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 1, 131–137. https://doi.org/280051664
  77. Štreimikienė, D., Mikalauskienė, A., & Mikalauskas, I. (2016). Comparative Assessment of Sustainable Energy Development in the Czech Republic, Lithuania and Slovakia. J. Compet. 8, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.02.03
  78. Taghdisi, A., Goudarzi, S., & Beikmohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating the Challenges of Rural Tourism Development from the Viewpoints of People Living in Target Tourism Rural of West Azarbaijan Province. Spatial Planning, 5(1), 83-100.‌ [In Persian].
  79. UNWTOa: World Tourism Organization (2021). UNWTO recommendations on tourism and rural development—a guide to making tourism an effective tool for rural development. UNWTO, Madrid. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284422173.
  80. UNWTOb: United Nations Department of Economic. (2021). World social report 2021: reconsidering rural development. United Nations.‌ https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/world-social-report/2021-2.html
  81. Utami, D.D., Dhewanto, W., & Lestari, Y.D. (2023). Rural tourism entrepreneurship success factors for sustainable tourism village: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Bus. Manag. 10, 2180845. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2180845
  82. Vaishar, A., & Šťastná, M. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural tourism in Czechia Preliminary considerations. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(2), 187-191.‌ https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1839027
  83. Widawski, K., Krzemińska, A., Zaręba, A., & Dzikowska, A. (2023). A Sustainable Approach to Tourism Development in Rural Areas: The Example of Poland. Agriculture, 13(10), 2028.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13102028
  84. Wijijayanti, T., Agustina, Y., Winarno, A., Istanti, L. N., & Dharma, B. A. (2020). Rural tourism: A local economic development. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(1), 5- https://doi.org/13.‌ 10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.2
  85. Wilson, G.A. (2009). The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: A human geography perspective. Geoforum, 40, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.007
  86. Winter, T., & Kim, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between tourism and poverty using the capability approach. J. Sustain. Tour. 29, 1655–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1865385
  87. Wood, M.E. (2002). Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability; United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Paris, France, 2002. https://books.google.com/books/about/Ecotourism.html?id=TaAsAQAAMAAJ
  88. Yang, Q.-Z., & Xiang, Y. (2012). The Research on the Contribution of Rural Tourism to Peasants’ Income—Based on the Empirical Analysis of Chengdu. Econ. Probl. 2012, 9, 125–127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810440
  89. Yun, H.J., (2014). Spatial Relationships of Cultural Amenities in Rural Tourism Areas. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2014, 11, 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2014.894557.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 104
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 54





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب