ABSTRACT
This study evaluates the social criteria within urban comprehensive plans for historical cities in Iran, focusing on Tabriz, Yazd, and Shiraz cities. It identifies social indicators for these plans, considering these cities' unique cultural and historical contexts. A content analysis approach was used to evaluate the selected comprehensive plans. Social criteria and indicators were extracted based on a theoretical framework, analyzed the plans, scoring each indicator from 0 (no attention) to 2 (complete attention). Krippendorff's alpha measured the reliability of these evaluations. The findings reveal significant shortcomings in integrating social criteria across the comprehensive plans, with Tabriz performing relatively better. The criterion of quality of life received the most attention, indicating a growing awareness of its importance. However, critical areas such as social cohesion, particularly in Yazd, and equality, especially in Shiraz, were inadequately addressed. The study highlights a general lack of focus on social participation. The study concludes that despite some improvements, urban comprehensive plans in historical cities of Iran still fail to address crucial social criteria appropriately. The gap between planning theories and practices remains evident, particularly in social cohesion and equality. Greater emphasis on these aspects is necessary to ensure effective and sustainable urban development.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Social criteria have historically played a vital role in shaping the fabric of cities, particularly in historical contexts where cultural heritage must be preserved while meeting modern urban needs. These criteria, which include elements like local cultural values, social cohesion, and public participation, are essential for ensuring the sustainability and livability of cities. However, there is a noticeable gap in how urban comprehensive plans incorporate these social dimensions, especially in historical cities like Tabriz, Yazd, and Shiraz. This study focuses on identifying the key social indicators necessary for evaluating comprehensive urban plans in historical cities and assessing their integration into the urban plans of these three UNESCO-recognized cities.
Methodology
This study employed content analysis to evaluate the urban comprehensive plans of Tabriz, Yazd, and Shiraz in Iran. A thorough review of theoretical frameworks and literature led to the identification of four primary social criteria, including social cohesion, social participation, quality of life, and equality. These criteria were further divided into 21 general social indicators applicable to all urban plans and 14 specific indicators tailored to the historical context of the cities.
The comprehensive plans were analyzed by two urban planning experts who scored each plan on a scale from 0 to 2, with 0 indicating no attention, 1 indicating partial attention, and 2 indicating complete attention to the indicators. Krippendorff's alpha, a measure of coding reliability, was used to ensure reliability in the evaluation process. This methodology provided a robust framework for assessing the integration of social criteria in the urban plans of these historically significant cities.
Results and discussion
The analysis revealed significant variations in how the cities of Tabriz, Yazd, and Shiraz have integrated social criteria into their urban planning processes. Tabriz, with an average score of 1.157, showed a relatively better incorporation of social aspects compared to Yazd and Shiraz, which scored 0.743 and 0.757, respectively. Quality of life was the most consistently addressed criterion across all three cities, reflecting a growing recognition of its importance. This criterion includes indicators such as access to public services and availability of green spaces, which are crucial for enhancing the livability of urban areas.
However, the study also uncovered significant shortcomings, particularly in the areas of social participation and equality. In Yazd, the lack of attention to social cohesion was particularly concerning, given the city's rich historical fabric and the need for maintaining strong community ties. Similarly, the plan for Shiraz showed gaps in addressing equality, especially in terms of gender and intergenerational considerations. These findings indicate that while progress has been made in some areas, much work remains to ensure that comprehensive plans fully address the needs of all residents, particularly in cities with significant historical and cultural heritage.
The criterion of social participation, essential for fostering a sense of ownership and engagement among citizens, was largely neglected in the comprehensive plans. This lack of focus can lead to a disconnect between the planning process and the actual needs of the community, resulting in plans that fail to resonate with or meet the expectations of residents. The findings underscore the need for a more inclusive approach to urban planning, particularly in historical cities where community input is crucial for preserving cultural heritage.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study has highlighted the significant gaps in the integration of social criteria within the comprehensive urban plans of historical cities in Iran. While there has been some progress in addressing quality of life, other critical areas such as social participation, social cohesion, and equality remain inadequately addressed. The findings suggest that urban planners need to place greater emphasis on these aspects to ensure that comprehensive plans are not only effective in promoting sustainable development but also in preserving the cultural heritage of historical cities.
The study's results underscore the importance of adopting a more holistic approach to urban planning, one that fully integrates social criteria into the planning process. This approach should prioritize the needs of all residents, particularly vulnerable groups, and ensure that urban development plans are inclusive, equitable, and reflective of the unique cultural and historical contexts of cities like Tabriz, Yazd, and Shiraz. Moving forward, urban planners and policymakers must address these gaps and work towards creating urban environments that are not only sustainable but also socially inclusive and culturally sensitive.
The insights gained from this study can serve as a valuable resource for future research and urban planning initiatives, providing a framework for evaluating and improving the social dimensions of comprehensive urban plans in historical cities. By addressing the identified shortcomings and building on the progress made in areas like quality of life, urban planners can contribute to the creation of more resilient, vibrant, and sustainable cities that honor their historical heritage while meeting the needs of contemporary society.
Funding
There is no funding support.
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to sincerely thank Mr. Soroush Saffarzadeh for his valuable assistance with the evaluation and coding sections of this research. |
- ارباب، پارسا. (۱۴۰۰). واکاوی علل محتوایی ناکارآمدی برنامه‌ریزی شهری بر اساس رویکرد طرح‌های جامع (مطالعه موردی: طرح جامع نوشهر). مجله آمایش سرزمین، 14(1)، 61-93. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2021.332798.670267
- اسمعیل‌پور، نجما و فروغی‌نسب، فاطمه. (۱۴۰۰). برنامه‌ریزی توسعه مجدد زمین در محله‌های بافت تاریخی (مطالعههمکاران موردی: محله زرتشتی‌ها در بافت تاریخی شهر یزد). مطالعات شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 12(46)، 85-98.
- پوراحمد، احمد؛ حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین؛ زیاری، کرامت‌الله؛ فرجی‌سبکبار، حسن‌علی و وفایی، ابوذر. (۱۳۹۳). بررسی و ارزیابی کاربری اراضی شهری از منظر عدالت اجتماعی (موردمطالعه: کاشان). آمایش سرزمین، 11(6)، 179-208. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2014.53203
- پوراحمد، احمد؛ فرهودی، رحمت اله؛ زنگنه شهرکی، سعید و شفاعت قراملکی، طهورا. (۱۴۰۰). ارزیابی قابلیت‌های گردشگری بافت‌های تاریخی در جهت بازآفرینی شهری (مطالعههمکاران موردی: شهر تبریز). مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 16(53)، 201-232. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2021.50800.2293
- تایلور، نایجل. (۱۳۹۴). نظریه‌های برنامه‌ریزی شهری (از آغاز تا کنون). (محمود شورچه، مترجم) (ویرایش دوم). پرهام نقش.
- حاتمی، علی؛ مختاری ملک‌آبادی، رضا؛ برزگر، صادق و شکری فیروزجاه، پری. (۱۴۰۰). ارائه الگوی بازآفرینی بافت تاریخی شهر گرگان با رویکرد توسعه گردشگری. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 11(40)، 1-18. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.249129.3307
- عزیزی، محمدمهدی. (۱۳۹۲). تحلیلی بر رابطه سرانه کاربری‌های زمین و اندازه شهر در طرح‌های جامع شهرهای ایران. نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، 18(4)، 25-36. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2013.51679
- عزیزی، محمدمهدی و شکوهی بیدهندی، محمدصالح. (۱۳۹۴). تحلیل سیر تحول تاریخی مفهوم عدالت اجتماعی در برنامه‌های توسعه شهری ایران (1340-1390). تحقیقات تاریخ اجتماعی، 5(10)، 125-149.
- عزیزی، محمدمهدی و محمدزاده آذری، نیما. (۱۳۹۹). تحلیل رابطه گونه‌های فرم شهری و پایداری اجتماعی در محلات شهر تهران بررسی موردی: محلات چیذر، شهرک غرب، نارمک و امامزاده یحیی. نامه معماری و شهرسازی، 13(28)، 5-28. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2020.819
- فاضلی، محمد. (۱۳۸۹). ارزیابی تاثیرات اجتماعی. تهران: جامعه‌شناسان.
- کریمی، فاطمه؛ جلیلی‌صدرآباد، سمانه و خیرالدین، رضا. (۱۴۰۰). شناسایی و تحلیل ساختاری پیشران‌های تغییر در حوزه کاربری زمین (موردکاوی: محله فهادان بافت تاریخی یزد). آینده‌پژوهی ایران، 11(6)، 306-328. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2022.1298
- معاونت میراث فرهنگی وزارت میراث فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی. (۱۳۹۸ بهمن). آشنایی با میراث جهانی ایران. دفتر امور پایگاه‌های وزارت میراث فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع‌دستی.
- معرب، یاسر؛ صالحی، اسماعیل؛ امیری، محمدجواد و نارویی، بهروز. (۱۳۹۷). سنجش میزان تاب‌آوری اجتماعی-فرهنگی کاربری اراضی شهری (مطالعه موردی: منطقة 1 شهر تهران). جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 5(1 (پیاپی 8))، 113-130. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v5i1.49505
- مهندسان مشاور برنامه‌ریز، شهرساز و معمار شهر و خانه. (۱۳۸۹). بازنگری طرح جامع شهر شیراز. سازمان مسکن و شهرسازی استان فارس.
- مهندسان مشاور نقش محیط. (۱۳۹۵). طرح توسعه و عمران (جامع) شهر تبریز (طرح جامع شهر تبریز). وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی.
- نعمت‌اللهی بناب، سیمین‌دخت. (۱۳۹۴). تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی ناپایداری توسعه شهری در سکونتگاه‌های غیررسمی کلان‌شهرها (نمونه موردی شهر تبریز). مطالعات جامعه‌شناسی، 8(26)، 37-51.
- وارثی، حمیدرضا؛ تقوایی، مسعود و رضایی، نعمت‌الله. (۱۳۹۱). ساماندهی بافت فرسوده شهری (نمونه موردی: شهر شیراز). برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 2(2)، 129-156.
- وزارت راه و شهرسازی. (۱۴۰۲). سامانه مدیریت اسناد. https://archive.mrud.ir
- هیلی، پتسی. (۱۴۰۰). برنامه‌ریزی همکارانه؛ شکل‌دهی به مکان‌ها در جوامع چندپاره. (نریمان جهانزاد، مترجم) (ویرایش 1). انتشارات مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران. (نشر اثر اصلی ۱۹۹۷)
- Arbab, P. (2022). Exploring the Substantial Reasons for the Inefficiency of Urban Planning Based on Comprehensive Plans Approach (Case Study: Nowshahr’s Comprehensive Plan). Town and Country Planning, 14(1), 61-93. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2021.332798.670267 [inPersian]
- Arseh Consulting Engineers. (2009). Comprehensive Plan of Yazd City. Yazd Province Housing and Urban Development Organization. [inPersian]
- Azizi, M. M. (2013). An Analysis on the Relation Between Per Capita Land Uses and City Size in Iran Urban Comprehensive Plans. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 18(19), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2013.51679 [inPersian]
- Azizi, M. M., & Mohammadzadeh Azari, N. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship between Types of Urban Form and Social Sustainability in Neighborhoods of Tehran Case Study: Chizar, Shahrak Gharb, Narmak and Imamzadeh Yahya Neighborhoods. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 13(28), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2020.819 [inPersian]
- Azizi, M. M., & Shokouhi Bidhendi, M. S. (2016). Analysis of Historical Evolution of the Concept of Social Justice in Urban Development Plans in Iran (1340-1390). Tahqiqāt-e Tārikh-e Ejtemā’i (Social History Studies), 5(10), 125-149. [inPersian]
- Barton, H. (2009). Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Futures, 26, S115-S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.008
- Berke, P.; & Godschalk, D. (2009). Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Plan Quality Studies. Journal of Planning Literature, 23(3), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412208327014
- de Oliveira, J. A. P., & Paleo, U. F. (2016). Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan. Land Use Policy, 52, 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.023
- Deputy of Cultural Heritage of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Tourism, and Handicrafts. (2020). Iranian World Heritage Sites. Office of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts, and Tourism Bases Affairs. [inPersian]
- Esmaeilpoor, N., & Foroughinasab, F. (2022). Land Redevelopment Planning in the Urban Historical Fabrics Case study: Zartoshtiha Neighborhood in thehistorical fabric of Yazd city. Iranian Islamic City Studies, 12(46), 85-98. [inPersian]
- Fazeli, M. (2010). Social Impact Assessment. Jamee Shenasan. [in Persian]
- Glasson, J., & Wood, G. (2009). Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(4), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X480358
- Glover, T. D.; Stewart, W. P.; & Gladdys, K. (2008). Social Ethics of Landscape Change: Toward Community-Based Land-Use Planning. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407309409
- Gu, Z.; & Zhang, X. (2021). Framing social sustainability and justice claims in urban regeneration: A comparative analysis of two cases in Guangzhou. Land Use Policy, 102, 105224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105224
- Hatami, A., Mokhtari Malekabadi, R., Barzegar, S., & Shokri Firoozjah, P. (2021). Providing a model for recreating the historical context of Gorgan with a tourism development approach. Geographical Planning of Space, 11(40), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.249129.3307 [inPersian]
- Healey, P. (2021). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. (N. Jahanzad, Tran.) (1st ed.). Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center. [inPersian]
- Karimi, F., Jalilisadrabad, S., & Kheyroddin, R. (2022). Identification and Structural Analysis of Land Use Drivers (Case Study: Fahadan Neighborhood, Yazd Historical Context). Journal of Iran Futures Studies, 6(2), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2022.1298 [inPersian]
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed). Sage.
- Lotfata, A.; & Ataöv, A. (2020). Urban streets and urban social sustainability: a case study on Bagdat street in Kadikoy, Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 28(9), 1735-1755. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1656169
- Lyles, W.; & Stevens, M. (2014). Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and Contributions, Limitations, and New Directions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14549752
- Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. (2023). Document Management System. Retrieved from https://archive.mrud.ir [inPersian]
- Mitchell, R. E; & Parkins, J. R. (2011). The challenge of developing social indicators for cumulative effects assessment and land use planning. Ecology and Society, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04148-160229
- Moarrab, Y., Salehi, E., Amiri, M. J., & Narouee, B. (2018). Evaluation of Social and Cultural Resilience of Urban Land Use (Case Study: Region 1 Tehran). Geography and Urban Space Development, 5(1), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v5i1.49505 [inPersian]
- Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081
- Naghshe Mohit Consulting Engineers. (2016). Development and Construction (Comprehensive) Plan of Tabriz City. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development. [inPersian]
- Nematollahi Bonab, S. (2016). The sociological analysis of unsustanability of urban development in informal settlements of metropolis (case study of Tabriz). The Journal of Sociology Studies, 8(26), 37-51. [inPersian]
- Pourahmad, A., Farhudi, R., Zangeneh shahraki, S., & Shafaat Gharamaleki, T. (2021). Assessing the Tourism Capabilities of Historical Textures for Urban Regeneration (Case Study: Tabriz city). Tourism Management Studies, 16(53), 201-232. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2021.50800.2293 [inPersian]
- Poorahmad, A., Hataminejad, H., Ziari, K., Farajisabokbar, H., & Vafaii, A. (2014). The Evaluation and Revising of urban land use from the Point of View of social justice. (Case Study: Kashan). Town and Country Planning, 6(2), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2014.53203 [inPersian]
- Sairinen, R.. (2004). Assessing social impacts of urban land-use plans: From theory to practice. Boreal Environment Research, 9(6), 509-517.
- Serag El Din, H.; Shalaby, A.; Farouh, H. E.; & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.02.007
- Shahr-O-Khaneh Consulting Engineers. (2010). Revision of the Comprehensive Plan of Shiraz City. General Department of Road and Urban Planning Of Fars Province. [in Persian]
- Sheydayi, A.; & Dadashpoor, H. (2023). Conducting qualitative content analysis in urban planning research and urban studies. Habitat International, 139, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102878
- Shirazi, M. R.; & Keivani, R. (eds.). (2019). Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Policy and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Stevens, M. R.; Lyles, W.; & Berke, P. R. (2014). Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13513614
- Taherkhani, R.; Hashempour, N.; & Lotfi, M. (2021). Sustainable-resilient urban revitalization framework: Residential buildings renovation in a historic district. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124952
- Taylor, N. (2015). Urban Planning Theory since 1945. (M. Shoorcheh, Tran.) (2nd ed.). Parham Nagsh. [inPersian]
- UNESCO World Heritage Convention. (2024). World Heritage List. Retrieved January 15, 2024, from https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/
- Varesi, H., Taghvaei, M., & Rezaei, N. (2012). Investigating the Role of Intra-firm Characteristics in Improving Networking Interactions and their Innovation Capabilities in Tabriz Metropolitan Region. Spatial Planning, 2(2), 129-156. [inPersian]
- Wang, W. M., Lee, A. H., Peng, L. P., & Wu, Z. L. (2013). An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1092-1103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.035
- Wickes, R.; Zahnow, R.; Corcoran, J.; & Hipp, J. R. (2018). Neighbourhood social conduits and resident social cohesion. Urban Studies, 56(1), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018780617
- Zaleckis, K., Grazuleviciute Vileniske, I., Vitkuviene, J., Tranaviciutė, B., Dogan, H. A., Sinkiene, J., & Grunskis, T. (2019). Integrating content analysis into urban research: compatibility with sociotope method and multimodal graph. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019840115
|
