پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,694 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,251 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,279,419 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,132,519 |
Investigation of Solar Events Propagation in the Interplanetary Space | ||
| فیزیک زمین و فضا | ||
| مقاله 18، دوره 50، شماره 4، اسفند 1403، صفحه 229-237 اصل مقاله (687.77 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jesphys.2025.387837.1007660 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Somaiyeh Sabri* 1؛ Stefaan Poedts2، 3 | ||
| 1Department of Space Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics, Center for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Leuven, Belgium. | ||
| 3Institute of Physics, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin, Poland. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), large-scale eruptions of plasma and magnetic field from the solar corona, have been detected as for a cause of significant space weather effects. Fundamental research on solar events complexity variations from the solar corona to 1 AU and beyond is critical to our physical understanding of the evolution and interactions of transients in the inner heliosphere. In the nonhomogeneous background solar wind flow, a three-dimensional, time-dependent numerical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is considered to study the propagation of CMEs and their interaction with the background solar wind structures. A comprehensive analysis of the period from 2 to 8 June 2023, considering the complex structure, is investigated. This study addresses the need to explore the interplanetary evolution of CMEs and especially their complexity in the inner heliosphere. To analyze the accurate impact of the solar event on Earth, the Disturbance Storm Index (Dst) calculated by the numerical EUHFORIA code, is shown and verifies a calm phase followed by a mild disturbance from 2 to 8 June 2023. In summary, it is found that CMEs that occurred between 2 and 8 of June 2023, which were not significant and lacked considerable height time development, did not experience any increase during the propagation in the interplanetary space. Overall, it is found that EUHFORIA demonstrates the potential to investigate and even predict geomagnetic storms. This enables us to protect our technologies from the enormous financial damage of solar storms. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Space-weather؛ EUHFORIA؛ Magnetohydrodynamic؛ CME؛ Solar wind؛ Interplanetary space؛ Dst؛ Geomagnetic storms | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigation of Solar Events Propagation in the Interplanetary Space | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Somaiyeh Sabri1؛ Stefaan Poedts2، 3 | ||
| 1Department of Space Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics, Center for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Leuven, Belgium.|Institute of Physics, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin, Poland. | ||
| 3Department of Mathematics, Center for mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, Leuven, Belgium.|Institute of Physics, University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska, Lublin, Poland. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), large-scale eruptions of plasma and magnetic field from the solar corona, have been detected as for a cause of significant space weather effects. Fundamental research on solar events complexity variations from the solar corona to 1 AU and beyond is critical to our physical understanding of the evolution and interactions of transients in the inner heliosphere. In the nonhomogeneous background solar wind flow, a three-dimensional, time-dependent numerical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is considered to study the propagation of CMEs and their interaction with the background solar wind structures. A comprehensive analysis of the period from 2 to 8 June 2023, considering the complex structure, is investigated. This study addresses the need to explore the interplanetary evolution of CMEs and especially their complexity in the inner heliosphere. To analyze the accurate impact of the solar event on Earth, the Disturbance Storm Index (Dst) calculated by the numerical EUHFORIA code, is shown and verifies a calm phase followed by a mild disturbance from 2 to 8 June 2023. In summary, it is found that CMEs that occurred between 2 and 8 of June 2023, which were not significant and lacked considerable height time development, did not experience any increase during the propagation in the interplanetary space. Overall, it is found that EUHFORIA demonstrates the potential to investigate and even predict geomagnetic storms. This enables us to protect our technologies from the enormous financial damage of solar storms. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Space-weather, EUHFORIA, Magnetohydrodynamic, CME, Solar wind, Interplanetary space, Dst, Geomagnetic storms | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arge, C. N., Odstrcil, D., Pizzo, V. J., & Mayer, L. R. (2003). Improved method for specifying solar wind speed near the Sun. In M. Velli, R. Bruno, F. Malara, & B. Bucci (Eds.), Solar Wind Ten, (pp. 190). American Institute of Physics. Burton, R. K., McPherron, R. L., & Russell, C. T. (1975). An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80(31), 4204–4214. Cliver, E. W., & Svalgaard, L. (2004). The 1859 solar-terrestrial disturbance and the current limits of extreme space weather activity. Solar Physics, 224, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-4980-z Cranmer, S. R., Gibson, S. E., & Riley, P. (2017). Origins of the ambient solar wind: Implications for space weather. Space Science Reviews, 212, 1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0416-y Isavnin, A. (2016). FRiED: A novel three-dimensional model of coronal mass ejections. The Astrophysical Journal, 833(2), 278. Janvier, M., Winslow, R. M., Good, S., Bonhomme, E., Demoulin, P., Dasso, S., Mostl, Ch., Lugaz, N., Amerstorfer, T., Soubrie, E., & Boakes, P.D. (2019). Generic magnetic field intensity profiles of interplanetary coronal mass ejections at Mercury, Venus, and Earth from superposed epoch analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 124, 812. Jaynes, A. N., Baker, D. N., Singer, H. J., Rodriguez, J. V., Loto’aniu, T. M., Ali, A. F., Elkington, S. R., Li, X., Kanekal, S. G., Fennell, J. F., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Kletzing, C. A., Spence, H. F., & Reeves, G. D. (2015). Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120, 7240. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021234 Jin, M., Cheung, M.C.M, DeRosa, M.L., Nitta, N.V., & Schrijver, C.J. (2022). Coronal mass ejections and dimmings: A comparative study using MHD simulations and SDO observations. The Astrophysical Journal, 928(2), 154. Kay, C., Gopalswamy, N., Reinard, A., & Opher, M. (2017). Predicting the magnetic field of Earth-impacting CMEs. The Astrophysical Journal, 835(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/117 Kay, C., Mays, M., & Verbeke, C. (2020). Identifying critical input parameters for improving drag-based CME arrival time predictions. Space Weather, 18(1), e2019SW002382. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002382 Kilpua, E. K. J., Hietala, H., Turner, D. L., Koskinen, H. E. J., Pulkkinen, T. I., Rodriguez, J. V., Reeves, G. D., Claudepierre, S. G., & Spence, H. E. (2015). Unraveling the drivers of the storm time radiation belt response. Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 3076. Lavraud, B., & Rouillard, A. (2013). Properties and processes that influence CME geo-effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 8, 273. Linker, J. A., Mikic, Z., Biesecker, D. A., Forsyth, R. J., Gibson, S. E., Lazarus, A. J., Lecinski, A., Riley, P., Szabo, A., & Thompson, B. J. (1999). Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar corona during whole Sun month. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 104, 9809. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JA900159 Manchester, W. B., & Van der Holst, B. (2014). Simulating CME eruptions from active regions. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2014, abstract id. SH51E-03. O’Brien, T., & McPherron, R. L. (2000). Forecasting the ring current index Dst in real time. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 62(14), 1295–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(00)00072-9 Odstrcil, D., & Pizzo, V. J. (1999). Three-dimensional propagation of CMEs in a structured solar wind flow: 1. CME launched within the streamer belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 104, 483. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JA900019 Paulikas, G. A., & Blake, J. B. (1979). Effect of the solar wind on magnetospheric dynamics: Energetic electrons at the synchronous orbit. American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph, 21, 180–179. Pomoell, J., & Poedts, S. (2018). EUHFORIA: European heliospheric forecasting information asset. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 8(27), A35. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018020 Riley, P., & Ben-Nun, M. (2021). On the sources and sizes of uncertainty in predicting the arrival time of interplanetary coronal mass ejections using global MHD models. Space Weather, 19, e02775. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002775 Sabri, S., & Poedts, S. (2024a). Frontiers in astronomy and space science. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11. Sabri, S., & Poedts, S. (2024b). Magnetoacoustic wave propagation in the solar corona and filament dynamics. Scientific Reports, 14, 30723. Sabri, S., & Poedts, S. (2025a). The investigation of June 21 and 25, 2015 CMEs using EUHFORIA. EGU General Assembly, under review. Sabri, S., & Poedts, S. (2025b). June 21 and 25, 2015 CMEs interaction's results on Earth's ionosphere and magnetosphere. EGU General Assembly, under review. Sabri, S., Ebadi, H., & Poedts, S. (2020). Plasmoids and resulting blobs due to the interaction of magnetoacoustic waves with a 2.5D magnetic null point. The Astrophysical Journal, 902(1), 11. Sabri, S., Ebadi, H., & Poedts, S. (2021). Alfvén wave propagation and induced perturbations in the vicinity of a 3D magnetic null-point. The Astrophysical Journal, 924(2), 126. Sabri, S., Ebadi, H., & Poedts, S. (2021). Plasma flow generation due to the nonlinear Alfvén wave propagation around a 3D magnetic null point. The Astrophysical Journal, 922(2), 123. Sabri, S., Ebadi, H., & Poedts, S. (2022). Propagation of the Alfvén wave and induced perturbations in the vicinity of a 3D proper magnetic null point. The Astrophysical Journal, 924(2), 126. Sabri, S., Poedts, S., & Ebadi, H. (2019). Plasma heating by magnetoacoustic wave propagation in the vicinity of a 2.5D magnetic null-point. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 623, A81. Sabri, S., Poedts, S., & Ebadi, H. (2023). How nonlinearity changes different parameters in the solar corona. The Astrophysical Journal, 944(2), 72. Sabri, S., Vasheghani Farahani, S., Ebadi, H., & Poedts, S. (2020). How Alfvén waves induce compressive flows in the neighborhood of a 2.5D magnetic null-point. Scientific Reports, 10, 15603. Savani, N. P., Vourlidas, A., Szabo, A., Mays, M. L., Richardson, I. G., Thompson, B. J., Pulkkinen, A., Evans, R., & Nieves-Chinchilla, T. (2015). Predicting the magnetic vectors within coronal mass ejections arriving at Earth: 1. Initial architecture. Space Weather, 13, 374. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001171 Schwenn, R. (2006). Space weather: The solar perspective. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2006-2 Scolini, C., Winslow, R. M., Lugaz, N., et al. (2022b). Causes and consequences of magnetic complexity changes within interplanetary coronal mass ejections: A statistical study. The Astrophysical Journal, 927(2), 102. Siscoe, G. (2007). Space weather forecasting historically viewed through the lens of meteorology. Space Weather, 5(6), 6003. Siscoe, G., Crooker, N. U., & Clauer, C. R. (2006). Dst of the Carrington storm of 1859. Advances in Space Research, 38, 173–179. Toth, G., De Zeeuw, D.L., Gombosi, T.I., Manchester, W.B., Ridley, A.J., Sokolov, I.V., & Roussev, I.I. (2007). Sun-to-thermosphere simulation of the 28–30 October 2003 storm with the Space Weather Modeling Framework. Space Weather, 5(6), 6003. Winslow, R. M., Lugaz, N., Scolini, C., & Galvin, A. B. (2021a). On the importance of investigating CME complexity evolution during interplanetary propagation. The Astrophysical Journal, 916(2), 94. Zhao, X., & Dryer, M. (2014). Current status of CME/shock arrival time prediction. Space Weather, 12, 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001060 Zheng, Y. (2013). Improving CME forecasting capability: An urgent need. Space Weather, 11, 641. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 248 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 162 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب