پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,694 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,265 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,312,990 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,172,345 |
تأثیر مجموعه امنیتی-هیدروپلیتیکی بر سازوکارهای تعاملات آبی در حوضه رود اردن | ||
| فصلنامه سیاست | ||
| دوره 55، شماره 1، فروردین 1404، صفحه 243-215 اصل مقاله (540.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jpq.2025.384143.1008229 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| معصومه قنبری1؛ ولی گل محمدی* 2؛ سید مسعود موسوی شفائی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| حوضه آبریز اردن، به‌عنوان یکی از پیچیده‌ترین مجموعه‌های امنیتی-هیدروپلیتیکی جهان، بستر تلاقی منافع و چالش‌های متعدد است. افزایش تنش‌های ناشی از کمبود آب، رشد جمعیت و تغییرات اقلیمی، مدیریت مشترک این حوضه را با پیچیدگی‌های فزاینده روبه‌رو ساخته است. در این زمینه چالش‌های مدیریتی و تخصیص منابع آب، به‌ویژه در شرایط تنش‌های ژئوپلیتیکی منطقه، اهمیتی دوچندان یافته است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل تأثیر پویایی‌های قدرت بر تعاملات آبی در حوضه رود اردن، از چارچوب مجموعه امنیتی- هیدروپلیتیکی بهره می‌گیرد. با استفاده از روش کیفی و بررسی نظام‌مند اسناد، معاهدات و مطالعات موجود، مطالعه بازه زمانی 1991-2022، نشان می‌دهد پویایی‌های قدرت از طریق چهار سازوکار اصلی (توزیع منابع آبی، ظرفیت مدیریت مشترک، سطح اعتماد بین‌المللی و سیاست‌های آبی) بر تعاملات حوضه تأثیرگذار بوده‌اند. این سازوکار‌ها در تعامل با یکدیگر، دو الگوی متمایز را شکل داده‌اند: در حوضه رود اردن علیا، پویایی‌های قدرت و تنش‌های سیاسی در تعامل با یکدیگر، به امنیتی‌سازی مسائل آبی و تشدید منازعات منجر شده‌اند؛ درحالی‌که در حوضه رود اردن سفلی، وابستگی متقابل و میانجی‌گری بین‌المللی زمینه‌ساز همکاری‌های آبی، هرچند به‌صورت محدود، شده است. این یافته‌ها اهمیت درک ارتباط متقابل عوامل سیاسی، اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی در مدیریت منابع آب مشترک را برجسته می‌کند. همچنین نتایج پژوهش اهمیت توجه همزمان به ابعاد فنی و سیاسی در موفقیت مدیریت منابع آبی مشترک را نشان می‌دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| مجموعه امنیتی- هیدروپلیتیکی؛ پویایی‌های قدرت؛ تعاملات آبی؛ حوضه رود اردن؛ روابط عمودی و افقی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Hydro-political Security Complex Impact on Water Interaction Mechanisms in the Jordan Basin | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Masouma Qanbari1؛ Vali Golmohammadi2؛ Seyed-Masoud Mousavi-Shafaee3 | ||
| 1PhD Student in International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations. Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Humanities, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assosiated Professor, Department of International Relations. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction The Jordan Basin is recognized as one of the most complex security-hydropolitical Security Complexes the world. In addition to historical political tensions among riparian countries, it faces challenges of rapid population growth and increasing water scarcity. The paper addresses the complex challenge of transboundary water management in the Jordan River Basin, where water scarcity intersects with geopolitical tensions. It emphasizes how post-Cold War changes in international power structures created new opportunities for water cooperation while maintaining historical tensions. Methodology This study utilizes qualitative methods and analysis of credible documents to examine vertical and horizontal relationships in the basin. The theoretical framework is based on the concept of security-hydropolitical complex, which extends the regional security complex theory with a specific focus on water resources, access, and the connection between water and the security of riparian states. This framework investigates the impacts of structural levels on water interactions, geopolitical dynamics of the basin, and the interrelation between water issues, security, and climate change. Theoretical Framework Building upon Buzan's concept of Regional Security Complex, Michael Schulz introduced the "Hydropolitical Security Complex" to describe the intricate relationships between states regarding shared water resource management. This concept demonstrates how water scarcity, access, and control have profound implications for state security. Schulz identified three pillars: hydrological interdependence, political interdependence, and security interdependence, analyzable through vertical and horizontal relationships where power dynamics play a crucial role. Results and Discussion Vertical Relations: The post-Cold War transformation significantly impacted the Jordan River Basin's vertical relations. Lebanon experienced political instability and Hezbollah's growing influence, affecting its water management capabilities. Syria's position weakened after losing Soviet support, leading to engagement in peace negotiations while maintaining water-related tensions with Israel. Jordan strategically aligned with Western powers, facilitating water cooperation agreements. Israel maintained military superiority while engaging in selective cooperation, particularly with Jordan. Palestinian water rights remained constrained by power asymmetry despite recognition in the Oslo Accords. Horizontal Relations: The analysis of horizontal relations reveals complex patterns of cooperation and conflict in water management after the Cold War. The Madrid Conference initiated multilateral water negotiations, leading to the Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty (1994) with significant water provisions. The Oslo II Agreement established the Joint Water Committee for the West Bank, though power asymmetry limited its effectiveness. Lebanon's Hasbani-Wazzani projects faced strong Israeli opposition, demonstrating continued water securitization. The Red Sea-Dead Sea Water Conveyance Project and the Water-Energy Agreement (2021) exemplify limited cooperation possibilities despite political tensions. Power Dynamics Impact:The analysis reveals that power dynamics have influenced water relations in the Jordan River Basin through four interconnected mechanisms: water resource distribution and control, shaping countries' water policies, determining international cooperation levels, and joint management capabilities. These mechanisms operate within a complex geopolitical environment where military capabilities, technological advancement, and international support play crucial roles. Water resource distribution and control has been predominantly shaped by Israel's strategic advantage, particularly after the 1967 war, extending to technological superiority in water management. The shaping of water policies reflects regional power dynamics, with Jordan seeking cooperative solutions due to its dependence on transboundary waters, while Israel maintains selective cooperation while pursuing independent water policies. International cooperation levels have been influenced by geopolitical alignments and security concerns, with the Oslo Peace Process creating opportunities for water cooperation, though limited by trust deficits. Joint management capabilities reveal how power asymmetries affect institutional arrangements, with some bilateral arrangements succeeding while basin-wide management remains challenging. These mechanisms have produced two distinct patterns: a conflict pattern characterized by direct security threats and power asymmetries, particularly evident in the Israel-Lebanon border region and occupied territories; and a limited cooperation pattern based on mutual interests and shared environmental concerns, exemplified by Israel-Jordan relations. The interaction between these mechanisms and patterns has created a complex hydropolitical landscape where water issues are inextricably linked to broader security and political concerns. Conclusion The analysis reveals that post-Cold War structural changes profoundly affected power dynamics and relationship patterns in the Jordan River Basin. The weakening of Soviet influence and increased U.S. involvement facilitated peace negotiations and water discussions. However, asymmetric water control and regional conflicts continue to challenge comprehensive cooperation. Climate change and population growth further complicate existing dynamics. The findings confirm that the four identified mechanisms operate within a complex system where changes in one component affect the entire system, highlighting the intricate relationship between water management and regional geopolitics. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Hydropolitical Security Complex, Power dynamics, Water Interactions, Jordan River Basin, Vertical and Horizontal Relationships | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Karablieh, E., & Salman, A. (2016). Water Resources, Use and Management in Jordan—A Focus on Groundwater. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 3, 164-171. Al-Kharabsheh, N. M. (2022). Assessment of water resources in Yarmouk River Basin using geospatial technique during the period 1980–2020. Journal of Arid Land, 14(5), 154–166. Allan, J. A. (2001). The Middle East water question: Hydropolitics and the global economy. I.B. Tauris. Amnesty International. (2020, September 22). Lebanon protests explained. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/11/lebanon-protests-explained/. Anjan, K. S., & Mohan, S. (2021). From securitization to security complex: Climate change, water security, and the India–China relations. International Politics, 59(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00313-4 Aviram, R., Katz, D., & Shmueli, D. (2014). Desalination as a game-changer in transboundary hydro-politics. Water Policy, 16(4), 609-624. Bardon, A. (2019). The truth about denial: Bias and self-deception in science, politics, and religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190062279.001.0001 Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Viking. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Chatel, F. (2017). Water Sheikhs and Dam Builders (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1547102/water-sheikhs-and-dam-builders-stories-of-people-and-water-in-the-middle-east-pdf (Original work published 2017). Comair, G. F., McKinney, D. C., Maidment, D. R., Espinoza, G., Sangiredy, H., Fayad, A., & Salas, F. R. (2014). Hydrology of the Jordan River Basin: A GIS-Based System to Better Guide Water Resources Management and Decision Making. Water Resources Management, 28(4), 933–946. Dawisha, A. (2003). Arab Nationalism in the Twentieth Century: From Triumph to Despair. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/ j.ctt7shc6. Elmusa, S. S. (1998). Toward a unified management regime in the Jordan Basin: The Johnston Plan revisited. Yale Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin. ESCWA. (2013). Euphrates River Basin: Hydrology, Water Quality and Management. United Nations. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). (2009). EU security and defence: Core documents 2008, Volume IX. Paris, France: Institute for Security Studies European Union. Filiu, J.-P. (2014). Gaza: A History. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Fischhendler, I. (2015). Ambiguity in transboundary environmental dispute resolution: The Israeli–Jordanian water agreement. Journal of Peace Research, 45(1), 91-109. Haddadin, N. A., & Tarawneh, Z. S. (2007). Environmental issues in Jordan, solutions and recommendations. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3 (1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.3844/ ajessp. 2007.30.36 Haddadin, M. J. (2000). Jordan and Israel: Tensions and Water Cooperation in the Middle-East. Climate Diplomacy Case Studies. Retrieved from Jordan and Israel: Tensions and Water Cooperation in the Middle-East | Climسate-Diplomacy. Haddadin, M. J. (2002). Water in the Middle East peace process. Geographical Journal, 168(4), 324-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1475-4959.00058 Haddadin, M. J. (2011). Water: Triggering cooperation between former enemies. Water International, 36(2), 178-185. Human Rights Council. (2015). Report of the Human Rights Council on its 30th session. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/ regular-sessions/session30 Jägerskog, A. (2003). Why states cooperate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River Basin. Linköping University Electronic Press. Javadi Arjmand, M. J., & Moeini, A. (2023). Drivers of transformation in the Middle East security environment and the future of Iran's security [in Persian]. Journal of Political & International Studies, 53(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2023.343868.1007964. Khalidi, R. (2020). The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917-2017. Metropolitan Books. Lotfian, S. (2017). Assessment of Israel's security threats and its strategic views for the Middle East [in Persian]. Politics Quarterly, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, 47(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2017.60780. Lund, A. (2019). From Cold War to Civil War: 75 Years of Russian-Syrian Relations. UI Paper 2/2019. Swedish Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from ui.se/butiken/uis-publikationer/ui-paper/2019/ russia-in-the-middle-east. Mirumachi, Naho. (2015). Transboundary Water Politics in the Developing World. Routledge. Muller, M. F., Yoon, J., Gorelick, S. M., Avisse, N., & Tilmant, A. (2016). Impact of the Syrian refugee crisis on land use and transboundary freshwater resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (52), 14932-14937. doi:10.1073/ pnas. 1614342113. Peters, J. (1996). Pathways to Peace: The Multilateral Arab-Israeli Peace Talks. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs. Quandt, W. B. (2005). Peace Process: American Diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli Conflict Since 1967. Brookings Institution Press. Rajsekhar, D., & Gorelick, S. M. (2017). Increasing drought in Jordan: Climate change and cascading Syrian land-use impacts on reducing transboundary flow. Science Advances, 3(8), e1700581. Salamy, I. (2014). The Government and Politics of Lebanon. Routledge. Salloukh, B. F. (2017). The Syrian War: Spillover Effects on Lebanon. Middle East Policy, 24 (1). Schanzer, J. (2008). Hamas vs. Fatah: The struggle for Palestine. Palgrave Macmillan. Schultz, M. 1995. Turkey, Syria and Iraq: A Hydropolitical Security Complex, inOhlsson, L. (Ed.) Hydropolitics: Conflicts over Water as a Development Constraint. London: Zed Books Sneddon, C., & Fox, C. (2011). The Cold War, the US Bureau of Reclamation, and the technopolitics of river basin development, 1950–1970. Political Geography, 30 (8), 450-460. Statista. (2024). World population. Retrieved from https://www.statista. com/statistics. Turton, A. R. (2001). Hydropolitics in the developing world: A Southern African perspective. African Water Issues Research Unit. UNDP. (2023). Water Crisis in Syria: Challenges and Solutions. United Nations Development Programme Annual Report. Wolf, A. T. (2007). Hydropolitics along the Jordan River: Scarce water and its impact on the Arab-Israeli conflict. United Nations University Press. World Bank open data. (2023). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank. org/indicator World Bank. (2018). The World Bank Annual Report 2018. Retrieved from World Bank Annual Report 2018. World Bank. (2024). GDP per capita (current US$) [Data set]. World Development Indicators. Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. World Bank. (2024). Population, total [Data set]. World Development Indicators. Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL. Yorke, V. (2013). Politics matter: Jordan's path to water security lies through political reforms and regional cooperation. Yossef, A. (2021). The Regional Impact of the Abraham Accords. MWI Report, series 2021, no. 2. Retrieved from https://mwi.westpoint. edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/regional-impact-abraham-accords.pdf. Zeitoun, M., Eid-Sabbagh, K., Dajani, M., & Talhami, M. (2012). Hydropolitical baseline of the upper Jordan River. Zeitoun, M. (2008). Power and water in the Middle East: The hidden politics of the Palestinian-Israeli water conflict. I.B. Tauris. Zisser, E. (2002). The Return of Hizbullah. Middle East Quarterly.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 74 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 46 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب