| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,196 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,227 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 157,255,492 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 118,421,722 |
پرورش سرمایة اجتماعی در سازمان در پرتو رهبری جاننثار | ||
| مجله علمی "مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی" | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 3، مهر 1404، صفحه 289-303 اصل مقاله (858.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jscm.2025.393730.2588 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه طاهری* 1؛ علی اصغر فروتن اقلیدی2 | ||
| 1گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی دانشگاه تهران، ایران | ||
| 2گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکدة مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی دانشگاه تهران. ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: سرمایة اجتماعی، همانند پلهایی که انسانها را به یکدیگر متصل میکند، نهتنها در رساندن منابع و اطلاعات، بلکه در تقویت احساس امنیت و اعتماد در قلبهای جامعه نقش بسزایی ایفا میکند. رهبری جان نثار به عنوان یکی از موضوعهای نوین مباحث رهبری نقشی ویژه در توسعة سرمایة اجتماعی بازی میکند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف چگونگی پرورش سرمایة اجتماعی تحت حمایت رهبری جان نثار صورت پذیرفته است. روش: این پژوهش از نظر نوع و ماهیت داده ها دارای رویکرد کیفی و از نظر هدف کاربردی است. استراتژی پژوهش پدیدارشناسی توصیفی گیورکی و گیورکی بود. مشارکت کنندگان در پژوهش شامل پرستاران و سرپرستاران خدمات رسان در بیمارستانها و مراکز نگهداری از سالمندان بودند که با منطق اشباع نظری با 18 نفر مصاحبۀ عمیق انجام شد. برای حصول قابلیت اعتماد پژوهش از دو روش بازآوایی و بازتابپذیری استفاده شد. یافتهها: نتایج تحلیل داده ها نشان میدهد جوهرۀ چگونگی ایفای نقش رهبری جان نثار در پرورش سرمایة اجتماعی از 4 تم اصلی و 13 تم فرعی تشکیل شده است. تمهای اصلی شناساییشده عبارتاند از: توسعة نوع دوستی و رشد اجتماعی، تقویت ارتباطات اجتماعی و اعتمادسازی با اتکا بر حمایتهای اجتماعی، تمرکز بر تعالی اخلاقی و توسعة ارزشهای انسانی، فرهنگ سازی الگوهای فداکاری و ایثار. نتیجه: فهم بهدستآمده از رفتارهای رهبری جان نثار میتواند پرورش سرمایة اجتماعی در پرتو این سبک رهبری را برای حتی دوره های بلندمدت زندگی سازمانی تسهیل کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| پدیدارشناسی؛ جان نثار؛ رهبری؛ سرمایة اجتماعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Cultivating Social Capital in the Organization in the Light of Self-Sacrifice Leadership | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Taheri1؛ Ali Asghar Foroutan Eghlidi2 | ||
| 1Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tehran, College of Farabi, Qom | ||
| 2Department of Public Management, University of Tehran, College of Farabi | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: Social capital, like bridges that connect individuals to each other, plays a significant role not only in providing resources and information, but also in strengthening a sense of security and trust in the heart of society. Self-sacrifice leadership, as one of the new topics of leadership discussions, plays a special role in developing social capital. The present study aimed to develop social capital under self-sacrifice leadership support. Method: This study is qualitative regarding the type and nature of the data and is applied in terms of purpose. The research strategy employed was Giorgi and Giorgi descriptive phenomenology. The participants in the study included nurses and head nurses providing services in hospitals and elderly care centers, who were interviewed in depth phenomenologically with 18 people using theoretical saturation logic. To achieve the reliability of the study, two methods were used: resonance and reflectivity. Results: The results of data analysis reveal that the essence of how altruistic leadership plays a role in fostering social capital includes four main themes and thirteen sub-themes. The identified main themes are: developing altruism and social growth, strengthening social connections and building trust by relying on social supports, focusing on moral excellence and developing human values, and creating a culture of sacrifice and self-sacrifice patterns. Conclusion: Understanding the behaviors of altruistic leadership can facilitate the development of social capital in light of this leadership style, even for long periods of organizational life. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Leadership, Self-Sacrifice, Social Capital, Phenomenology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
ادیبزاده، مرضیه؛ رحیمنیا، فریبرز؛ مهارتی، یعقوب و شیرازی، علی (1402). رهبری فداکارانه، یک نگاه مشارکتی: رویکرد پدیدارشناسی. پژوهشهای مدیریت عمومی، 16(61)، 95 ـ 128.
عبداللهزاده، امیرحسین؛ مقیمی، سید محمد و مزاری (2024). مفهومپردازی رهبری ایثارگرانه در سازمانهای عمومی: رویکردی مبتنی بر نظریة دادهبنیاد. پژوهشنامة مطالعات وقف و امور خیریه، 2(1)، 203 ـ 226.
محقق، ارسلان؛ شفیعپور مطلق، فرهاد و آتشک، محمد (1398). رابطة تعهد سازمانی و کمالگرایی با رهبری اخلاقی جاننثارانه با میانجیگری خودکارآمدی. اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، 14(4)، 84 ـ 90.
Abdollahzadeh, A., Moghimi, S. M., & Mazari, E. (2024). Conceptualizing Self-Sacrifical Leadership in Public Organizations: A Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Endowment & Charity Studies, 2(1), 203-226. (in Persian)
Adibzadeh, M., Rahimnia, F., Mahratti, Y., & Shirazi, A. (2013). Spiritual Leadership, A Participatory Perspective: A Phenomenological Approach. Public Management Research, 16(61), 95-128. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2023.41928.5755. (in Persian)
Beck, C. T. (2019). Introduction to phenomenology: Focus on methodology. Sage Publications.
Burbaugh, B. & Kaufman, E. K. (2017). An examination of the relationships between leadership development approaches, networking ability, and social capital outcomes. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(4), 20-39.
Carbonell, V. (2015). Sacrifices of self. The Journal of Ethics, 19, 53-72.
Chaithanapat, P., Punnakitikashem, P., Oo, N. C. K. K., & Rakthin, S. (2022). Relationships among knowledge-oriented leadership, customer knowledge management, innovation quality and firm performance in SMEs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100162, 1-11.
Chen, X., Yuan, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, L., & Zhu, Z. (2020). Social bonding or depleting? A team‐level investigation of leader self‐sacrifice on team and leader work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 912-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12315.
Chuang, M. Y., Chen, C. J., & Lin, M. J. J. (2016). The impact of social capital on competitive advantage: The mediating effects of collective learning and absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(6), 1443-1463.
Cortes, A. F. & Herrmann, P. (2021). Strategic leadership of innovation: a framework for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 224-243.
Creswell John, W. & Creswell, J. D. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles London New Dehli Singapore: Sage Publications.
Curtin, M. & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian occupational therapy journal, 54(2), 88-94.
De Cremer, D., Mayer, D. M., van Dijke, M., Schouten, B. C., & Bardes, M. (2009). When Does Self-Sacrificial Leadership Motivate Prosocial Behavior? It Depends on Followers’ Prevention Focus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014782.
De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijke, M., & Bos, A. E. R. (2006). Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem: When collective identification matters. Group Dynamics, 10(3), 233–245.
Degli Antoni, G. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations to volunteer and social capital formation. Kyklos, 62(3), 359-370.
Dehkordi, L. F., Hossieni, M. H., Naqipourfar, V., & Torkamani, M. (2012). Studying the role of spiritual leadership in creating social capital in the organization. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(8), 7566-7571.
Ercantan, K., Eyupoglu, Ş. Z., & Ercantan, Ö. (2024). The entrepreneurial leadership, innovative behaviour, and competitive advantage relationship in manufacturing companies: a key to manufactural development and sustainable business. Sustainability, 16(6), 2407.
Giorgi, A. P. & Giorgi, B. (2008). Phenomenological psychology. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 165-178.
Harmon, J., Howard, M., & Sharrad, S. (2022). Habitus, social capital, leadership, and reflection: insights for early career nurse academics. Collegian, 29(5), 774-781.
Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International journal of information management, 33(2), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.233.
Korayim, D., Chotia, V., Jain, G., Hassan, S., & Paolone, F. (2024). How big data analytics can create competitive advantage in high-stake decision forecasting? The mediating role of organizational innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123040.
Langdrige, D. (2007). phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education.
Li, R., Zhang, Z. Y., & Tian, X. M. (2016). Can self‐sacrificial leadership promote subordinate taking charge? The mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of risk aversion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 758-781. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2068.
McKenna, R. & Brown, T. (2011). Does sacrificial leadership have to hurt? The realities of putting others first.
Mishra, M., Ghosh, K., Sharma, D., & Anand, S. (2024). How and When Leaders’ Self-Sacrifice Backfires: Examining the Impact on Subordinate Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior. American Business Review, 27(2), 13.
Mohaghegh, A., Shafipour Motlagh, F., & Atashek, M. (2019). Organizational participation and perfectionism with self-sacrificing ethical leadership mediated by self-efficacy. Ethics in Science and Technology, 14(4), 84-90. (in Persian)
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373.
Parzefall, M. R. & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2012). Understanding the antecedents, the outcomes and the mediating role of social capital: An employee perspective. Human Relations, 65(4), 447-472.
Pastoriza, D., Arino, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2008). Ethical managerial behaviour as an antecedent of organizational social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 329-341.
Putnam, R. D. (2015). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In The city reader (pp. 188-196). Routledge.
Raja, U., Bouckenooghe, D., Syed, F., & Naseer, S. (2018). Interplay between PO fit, transformational leadership and organizational social capital. Personnel Review, 47(4), 913-930.
Rožič, P. (2016). Self-sacrifice in politics and the corrective power of humility. Bogoslovni vestnik, 76(2), 361-371.
Ruggieri, S., Gagliano, M., Servidio, R., Pace, U., & Passanisi, A. (2023). The effects of leader self-sacrifice in virtual teams on prosocial behavior: The mediational role of team identification and self-efficacy. Sustainability, 15(7), 6098.
Shin, J. & Shin, H. (2022). The effect of self-sacrifice leadership on social capital and job performance in hotels. Sustainability, 14(9), 5509.
Sreejesh, S. & Mohapatra, S. (2013). Mixed method research design: an application in consumer-brand relationships (CBR). Springer Science & Business Media.
Swann Jr, W. B., Gómez, A., Huici, C., Morales, J., & Hixon, J. G. (2010). Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(5), 824.
Yan, D., Li, L., & Jeon, H. (2024). Does self-sacrificial leadership reduce the subordinate’s organizational cynicism? The mediating role of distributive justice and ethical corporate social responsibility. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(8), 1401-1416.
Yang, F., Senewiratne, S., Newman, A., Sendjaya, S., & Chen, Z. (2023). Leader self‐sacrifice: A systematic review of two decades of research and an agenda for future research. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 797-831.
Zhang, H. & Ye, M. (2016). A literature review of self-sacrificial leadership. Psychology, 7(9), 1205-1210.
Zhang, Z. & Chen, W. (2019). A systematic review of the relationship between physical activity and happiness. Journal of happiness studies, 20(4), 1305-1322.
Zhou, R., Long, L., & Hao, P. (2016). Positive affect, environmental uncertainty, and self-sacrificial leadership influence followers' self-sacrificial behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 44(9), 1515-1524.
Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, P. & Ruiz-Palomino, P. (2019). How servant leadership creates and accumulates social capital personally owned in hotel firms. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(8), 3192-3211.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 552 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 328 |
||