پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 163 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,826 |
| تعداد مقالات | 73,628 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 135,014,578 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 105,330,066 |
تحلیل موقعیتی مواضع بازیگران مختلف در آلودگی رودخانۀ ارس | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 18، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 35، شهریور 1404، صفحه 163-190 اصل مقاله (984.47 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2025.382339.450258 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمودرضا رهبرقاضی* 1؛ زهرا صادقی نقدعلی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| 2دانش‌آموختۀ دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در این نوشتار به بحران آلودگی رودخانۀ ارس در مرز میان ایران، جمهوری آذربایجان و ارمنستان می‌پردازیم. با استفاده از روش پژوهش تحلیل موقعیت کلارک که یکی از رهیافت‌های نظریه‌پردازی داده‌بنیان یا همان نظریۀ گراندد است، نقش‌ها و مواضع بازیگران اصلی در این بحران محیط زیستی را بررسی می‌کنیم. داده‌ها را به‌وسیلۀ مصاحبه‌های عمیق با 21 نخبۀ دانشگاهی و افراد آگاه در زمینۀ محیط زیست منطقه و تحلیل اسناد موجود به‌عنوان منابع تکمیلی گرد‌آورده‌ایم. یافته‌های این نوشتار نشان می‌دهد که جوامع محلی، صنایع بزرگ و نهادهای بین‌المللی همراه با دولت‌های کشورهای همسایه، مسئولیت بیشتری در ایجاد و مدیریت آلودگی دارند، اما در مورد مسئولیت‌ها و راهکارهای کاهش آلودگی دیدگاه‌های متفاوتی دارند. نخست، نقش دولت‌ها در بحران آلودگی رودخانۀ ارس بیشتر بر مدیریت ناکارآمد منابع، نبود نظارت کافی بر صنایع و اجرای ناقص قوانین محیط زیستی متمرکز بوده است. همچنین دولت‌ها در ایجاد همکاری‌های منطقه‌ای و بین‌المللی برای حل بحران، به‌دلیل تضاد منافع و اولویت‌های سیاسی، عملکرد مطلوبی نداشته‌اند. دوم، صنایع محلی به‌دلیل رویکردهای ناپایدار بهره‌برداری از منابع، نقش مهمی در گسترش آلودگی دارند. سوم، چون آلودگی، بر جوامع محلی آثار مستقیم دارد، آنان خواستار مشارکت بیشتر در فرایندهای تصمیم‌گیری و سیاست‌گذاری هستند. چهارم، سازمان‌های بین‌المللی مانند سازمان ملل و نهادهای محیط زیستی جهانی تلاش می‌کنند نقش تسهیلگر را داشته باشند، اما تضاد منافع و موانع نهادی کشورها مانع همکاری مؤثر شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آلودگی؛ جوامع محلی؛ صنایع؛ همکاری‌های بین‌المللی؛ تحلیل موقعیت کلارک؛ رودخانۀ ارس | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Topical Analysis of Stakeholders' Positions on Aras River Pollution | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahmoudreza Rahbarqazi1؛ Zahra Sadeghinaghdali2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Political Science, Department of Political Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: River pollution poses environmental consequences for animals, plant communities, water systems, economic interests, and human societies. The Aras River system, located in the Caucasus, is a basin of ecological, political, and economic importance for several countries. The critical and complex factors regarding the pollution of the Aras River relate to the conflicting interests, differing perspectives, and sometimes the “ideology” behind the interests and actions of the various actors involved. Some countries emphasize potential industrial development and resource exploitation over environmental concerns. In these countries, industry, agriculture, local interests, and environmental sustainability groups hold conflicting views on pollution. These disputes increasingly complicate solutions to pollution challenges, thereby delaying effective action against polluters. While much research on river pollution has focused on "the technical aspects," the social and political nature of the conflicting interests of other influential stakeholders remains an underdeveloped area. Research question: What are the positions and roles of different actors (governments, industries, local communities, and international organizations) about the pollution of the Aras River, and how do their conflicting relationships and interests affect the management of this environmental crisis? Research hypothesis: The conflicting interests and differing positions of various actors (governments, industries, local communities, and international organizations) have complicated the dispute over the Aras River pollution crisis and created obstacles to finding practical and sustainable solutions. Methodology: This study, employing Clark's situational analysis method, a qualitative approach grounded in theory, offers new insights into the multifaceted issue of pollution in the Aras River. To identify the social and political processes that cause pollution in the river, in addition to reviewing environmental documents and reports, 21 in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted with academic experts and environmental specialists in the cities of Urmia, Tabriz, and Ardabil. Data analysis involved extracting key concepts and developing social maps through open coding and focused coding, using Clarke's grounded theory approach. To maximize validity and reliability, triangulation strategies and continuous comparative analysis were employed throughout the data analysis process. Results and discussion: The structured situational mapping, which provided information about the perspectives of actors, categorized the factors involved. The categories included humans (experts, managers, and local leaders), groups (civic organizations, non-governmental organizations, and industries), non-humans (rivers and pollution), economic groups, and political-legal groups. Interviews revealed that sectors play a significant role in pollution, partly because of their financial reliance on polluting activities and partly because of their reluctance to accept environmental organizations and regulations. Governments have also performed poorly due to internal political conflicts, weak oversight, and ineffective crisis management. Local communities, legitimate victims of pollution, have also demanded greater participation in these processes, as well as compensation for their lost rights and damages; however, their voices have been silenced and ignored. Local Governments, due to bureaucratic structures and political and organizational constraints, have often abandoned local communities in favor of job opportunities, thereby reducing their roles. International agencies and non-classical actors have provided only minor and insignificant assistance, simply due to institutional constraints. Mapping social worlds/fields identifies important social entities, including governments, industries, NGOs, local communities, and the media. Governments have limited discretion due to political or economic incentives that hinder their ability to coordinate. Short-term economic benefit assessments drive industries, and they are unwilling to take risks in changing a system. NGOs and environmental activists have created substantial public awareness and exerted tremendous pressure for change from governments and industries, but they often face difficult political obstacles. Local communities, which usually suffer from pollution, are frequently excluded from the decision-making process. The media and social media also play their role in raising public awareness and, at least indirectly, pressuring for change. Situational maps show the different perspectives of actors on responsibility and solutions for pollution reduction. Governments are handing over responsibility to industries and lack international cooperation, while industries are dismissing weak government oversight of pollution. Local communities and NGOs are holding industries and governments accountable, calling for better oversight and greater participation. In terms of possible solutions, governments envision the deployment of clean technology through international cooperation, while industries focus on financial incentives or corporate penalties. Local communities and NGOs, on the other hand, emphasize public oversight and participation, as well as the roles played by more local stakeholders. The role of international organizations as financial and technical sponsors is generally assessed positively. However, activists have highlighted inefficiencies and delays in aid delivery, as well as a lack of coordination, which have negatively impacted the effectiveness of international organizations. Conclusion: The main polluters of the Aras River are local and transnational industries. Since they resist any regulations imposed and prefer to blame their social responsibility on the weakness of government oversight, both they and the government are the primary culprits in the pollution crisis. Local communities are direct victims of this crisis and seek social justice and participation in decision-making processes that cause pollution, but are unable to bring about change due to a lack of support from government processes, inadequate local citizen participation, or insufficient institutional structures. In the field of pollution, international organizations and those working in the field of promoting, educating, and monitoring environmental governance have only a supervisory and facilitating role, and their adequate capacities have been exhausted. Media and social networks can convey messages, but the extent to which their output can catalyze citizen engagement, knowledge, and public participation remains unclear. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Pollution, Local Communities, Industries, International Cooperation, Clarke's Situational Analysis, Aras River | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع
فارسی
تابان، پریسا، کوروش کاوسی، اسماعیل کهرم و حمید گشتاسب (1392)، «بررسی تغییرات و غلظت فلز مس بر پوشش گیاهی حاشیۀ ارس با توجه به فعالیت معدن مس»، محیط زیست طبیعی، دوره 66، شماره 2، صص. 157-167، (doi: 10.22059/jne.2013.35848)
صفی‌زاده، ابراهیم، داریوش کریمی، حمیدرضا غفارزاده و سیدعباس پورهاشمی (1399)، «جنبه‌های محیط زیستی آلودگی‌های محیطی رودخانۀ ارس»، تحقیقات جغرافیایی، دوره 35، شماره 2، صص. 167-176، قابل دسترسی در : http://georesearch.ir/article-1-853-fa.html (تاریخ دسترسی :24/04/1404)
محبی، فریدون (1400)، «آلودگی‌های رودخانه و سد ارس: فعالیت‌های انسانی یا تغییرات آب و هوایی»، بوم‌شناسی منابع آبی، دوره 5، شماره 1، صص. 60-66، قابل دسترسی در: https://ewrj.areeo.ac.ir/article_127118.html(تاریخ دسترسی: 20/03/1404)
محمدعلی‌پور، فریده و حامد طالبیان (1397)، «منابع آبی مشترک در حوضۀ کورا - ارس؛ پیشران صلح در قفقاز جنوبی»، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره 11، شماره 1، ص 231-246. (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.254467.449754)
موسوی‌شفائی، سید مسعود و رضا امینی (1403)، «تأثیر طرح‌های آبی ترکیه در بالادست حوضۀ ارس بر اقتصاد کشاورزی ایران»، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره 17، شماره 2، ص 433-462. (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2025.364884.450165)
مهرعبداله‌ئی، مهرداد، علی‌اصغر روشن‌اسمعیل‌پور و بتول باهک (1403)، «تحلیل تنش‌های هیدروپلیتیکی در مناطق مرزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، پژوهش‌نامه مطالعات مرزی، دوره 12، شماره 1، ص 23-44. doi: 10.22034/bss.2024.1274136.1456))
English Brundtland, Gro Harlem (1990), Our Common Future, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, (doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5). Clarke, Adele E., Rachel Washburn, Carrie Friese (2016), Situational Analysis in Practice: Mapping Research with Grounded Theory, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. (doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315420134). Daly, Herman E. (2001), Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, United States: Beacon Press, Available at: https://www.libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1E39C675D8EC621995773C284A494182, (Accessed on: 23/8/2025). Elster, John (1986), Rational Choice, United States: NYU Press. Haas, Peter M. (2015), Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, (doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717906). Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. (2010), Environment, Scarcity, and Violence, United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, (doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822997). Kurbanova, Nazira, Zhanbossinova, Albina, Kurumbaeva, Gulnara, Khassenova, Zhazira, Karasartova, Chynarkul, Bekboeva, Alaigul, Balykova, Akkaiyn (2024), Aral Sea: Environmental Disaster and Its Consequences, E3S Web of Conferences, 539, 01003, (https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453901003). Luhmann, Niklas (1995), Social Systems, United States: Stanford University Press. Mitchell, Melanie (2011), Complexity: Guided Tour, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, (doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124415.001.0001). Myers, Norman (1993), Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Stability, Washington, DC: Island Press. Myerson, Roger B. (1997), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, United States: Harvard University Press, (doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf522). Olson, Mancur (2009), The Logic of Collective Action, Germany: Harvard University Press, (doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts). Ostrom, Elinor (2015), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316423936). Scott, W. Richard (2013), Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications. Sen, Amartya (2001), Development as Freedom, India: OUP Oxford. Strauss, Anselm, Corbin, Juliet M. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, India: SAGE Publications, (doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153). Sugiharto, Septiono Bangun, Khaidar Ali, and Muhammad Addin Rizaldi (2025), Exploring the Impact of River Pollution on Environmental Health in Central Java, Indonesia: A Narrative Literature Review and Sustainable Management Strategies, Promotor, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 450-457, (https://doi.org/10.32832/pro.v8i3.1237). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 60 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 27 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب