پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,169 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,056 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 155,852,849 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 117,375,546 |
Generative AI in Digital Education: A Case Study of Content Co-Creation in a Design Thinking MOOC | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 2، اسفند 2024، صفحه 319-334 اصل مقاله (585.78 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2025.398488.1158 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hanadi Traifeh* ؛ Christoph Meinel | ||
| German University of Digital Science, Potsdam, Germany | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into educational materials development presents opportunities and challenges in education, particularly in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This study explores the role of GenAI in developing content for MOOCs using a Design Thinking MOOC as a case study. It assesses GenAI-generated instructional materials for content accuracy, depth, and engagement potential while analyzing the level of human intervention required for pedagogical quality. Using Perplexity Pro as the GenAI tool, the study finds that GenAI efficiently generates structured drafts, fictional learning scenarios, and key takeaways. However, significant limitations emerge in GenAI’s ability to differentiate complex domain specific concepts, develop high quality assessment items, and ensure pedagogical alignment. Human intervention remains fundamental for enhancing conceptual depth, refining instructional clarity, and fostering learner engagement. Based on these insights, the study proposes a Framework for GenAI-Assisted Content Creation in MOOC Design, outlining a structured approach to integrating GenAI while maintaining educational rigor. The framework highlights four interdependent phases: Content Planning & GenAI Preparation; GenAI-Generated Content Creation; Expert Review & Refinement; and Testing & Iterative Improvement. The study further presents Guidelines and Best Practices for MOOC Designers, providing practical recommendations for leveraging GenAI effectively without compromising instructional quality. This research contributes to the growing literature on AI-driven education, providing practical guidelines for MOOC designers seeking to optimize GenAI-driven content development. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Design Thinking؛ Human-AI Collaboration؛ MOOCs؛ GenAI in Education؛ Perplexity Pro | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, K. J., Lashari, A. A., & Golo, M. A. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence as an online platform for English language teaching at tertiary level. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 3(2), p.502–510. https://zenodo.org/records/14921342
Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., Chan, M. M., & Hernandez-Rizzardini, R. (2023). Combining human creativity and AI-based tools in the instructional design of MOOCS: Benefits and limitations. IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), p. 1-6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10306023
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Chou, D. C. (2018). Applying design thinking method to social entrepreneurship project. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 55, p. 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.05.001
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th). New York: Longmann.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson
Dickey, E., & Bejarano, A. (2024). GAIDE: A framework for using generative AI to assist in course content development. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), p. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12276
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), p. 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Emma, O., & Peace, P. (2024). Evaluating the impact of generative AI on personalized learning outcomes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387504736_EVALUATING_THE_IMPACT_OF_GENERATIVE_AI_ON_PERSONALIZED_LEARNING_OUTCOMES
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
Faccia, A., Ridon, M., Beebeejaun, Z., & Mosteanu, N. M. R. (2023). Advancements and challenges of generative AI in higher educational content creation: A technical perspective. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering, p. 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3641032.3641055
Ghariz, G., Seghir, H., Boucetta, N., Boubih, S., Janati-Idrissi, R., & El Alaoui, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on improving text in the process of conceptualization in biology: Case of education sector. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(13), p. 5203-5214.
Hadyaoui, A., & Cheniti-Belcadhi, L. (2024). Intelli frame: A framework for AI-driven, adaptive, and process-oriented student assessments. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, p. 441-448. https://doi.org/10.5220/0013070800003825
Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., & Zhang, N. (2020). Domain-Specific modeling languages in computer-based learning environments: A systematic approach to support science learning through computational modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(4), p. 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00209-z
Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://doi.org/10.48558/xsa6-0f24
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Design thinking for education, Springer, Singapore, p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1
Li, J., Fu, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, L., & Qian, F. (2024). Integrating more-than-human perspectives in speculative prototyping based on actor network theory. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, p. 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74353-5_33
Liu, D. (2024). The impact and prospects of AI-generated content in educational environments. Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research, 6, p. 64-71. https://doi.org/10.62051/7mewnb62
Luckin, R, & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C. & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking. Understand – improve – apply. Heidelberg: Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0
Ravarini, A., Canavesi, A., & Passerini, K. (2024). From users to allies: exploring educator and generative AI roles in shaping the future of higher education. In 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24). Valencia, p. 312-319. https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd24.2024.17345
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), p. 330–348, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074640
Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Cham: Springer.
Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. (2025). An introduction to design thinking process guide. Stanford University. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg.
Stefaniak, J. E., & Moore, S. L. (2024). The use of generative AI to support inclusivity and design deliberation for online instruction. Online Learning, 28(3), p. 181-206. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4458
Shukla, M., Goyal, I., Gupta, B., & Sharma, J. (2024). A comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, 12(4), p. 10-15. https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.4.2
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), p. 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Traifeh, H. (2023). Design thinking in the Arab world: perspectives, challenges and opportunities. Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Potsdam. https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-59891
Traifeh, H., Staubitz, T., & Meinel, C. (2019). Improving learner experience and participation in MOOCs: A design thinking approach. In 2019, IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), p. 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939623
Tuomi, I. (2024). Beyond mastery: Toward a broader understanding of AI in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), p. 20-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00343-4
White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar. A., Spencer-Smith, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv:2302.11382, Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Zhou, X., Tong, Y., Lan, X., Zheng, K., & Zhan, Z. (2021). AI education in massive open online courses: A content analysis. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE), p. 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTE53634.2021.00023
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 386 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 326 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب