پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,147 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,903 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 154,911,588 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,887,446 |
تقارن پسابرگزیت-کووید بر اقتصاد بریتانیا از منظر سازهانگاری نوکارکردگرایانه | ||
| مطالعات کشورها | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 4، 1405، صفحه 827-879 اصل مقاله (736.55 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcountst.2025.403908.1385 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| طلیعه سخامنش1؛ سید عبدالعلی قوام2؛ مهدی ذاکریان* 1؛ کیهان برزگر1؛ حنان بلالا3 | ||
| 1گروه روابط بین الملل، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، دانشکدة علوم اقتصاد و سیاسی، شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3گروه کسبوکار، دانشگاه تجارت کپنهاگ، دانمارک. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در آستانة سال ۲۰۲۱م، اقتصاد بریتانیا تحت تأثیر منفی قرنطینة اجباری و اعمال محدودیتهای ملی، بهدلیل همهگیری پسابرگزیت قرارگرفت. تقارن همهگیری کووید-۱۹ و برگزیت برایند تحولی عمیق و اساسی در چشمانداز اقتصادی این کشور است که به تغییر پارادایمی چشمگیری انجامید؛ مسخ و تحولی که نیازمند بررسیهای جامع و دقیق است. بر اساس نظریة سازهانگاری نوکارکردگرایانه، در این تحلیل به تعامل میان شیوع سویههای کووید و پیامدهای اقتصادی برگزیت پرداختهایم، چراکه هر دو سناریو تداوم و تحول در پویاییهای ساختاری اقتصاد بریتانیا را موجب شدند. برای درک تأثیرات این بحرانها بر اقتصاد کشور، ضروری است به عوامل علّی این بحرانها و اقدامهای درمانی انجامشده برای برونرفت از این معضل توجه کنیم، ازجمله سیاستها و اقدامهای پیشگیرانه و مؤثر در مدیریت سلامت عمومی و نتایج اقتصادی. پیشینة پژوهشها دربارة این عوامل نشان میدهد که ماهیت اصلی این بحرانها چگونه بهوضوح بر ثبات و تابآوری اقتصادی تأثیرگذار بوده است. در این مقاله، هدف مبرهن آن است که نقش چالشهای همزمان ناشی از اختلالهای پساپاندمی را در بهوجودآمدن فضایی چالشبرانگیز برای سیاستگذاران و فشارهای ناشی از آن را برای تطابق با شرایط متحول روزافزون بررسی کنیم. از دیدگاه سازهانگاری نوکارکردگرایانه، مسئلة مورد مطالعه در قالب سازههای اجتماعی و معانی مشترک آنها تعریف شده است. در این راستا، بحران پسابرگزیت و کووید-19 رویدادهای عاملی تجربهساز، مسخکنندة ساختارهای اجتماعی و معانی مشترک مرتبط با هویت ملی، سیاستگذاری اقتصادی و روابط بینالمللی لحاظ شد و آثار این بحرانها بر معانی و ساختارهای اجتماعی و اینکه چگونه این تغییرات، پویاییهای اقتصادی و سیاستگذاری را متبلور و تبیین کرده است، هدف تحقیق حاضر و ادراک این روابط در قالب سازههای اجتماعی مشترک است. بر پایة نظریة سازهانگاری نوکارکردگرایانه بهمنزلة سنگبنای نظریة حاضر، تحت لوای این فرضیه که سیاستورزی مبتنیبر راهبرد حل مسئله راهکاری مؤثر برای خروج از این آشوب پرطمطراق لحاظ شده و ایجاد فرصتهای نوین، بهویژه در کاهش تنشهای اقتصادی، نظیر بحران اقتصادی شدید منتج از همهگیری، مسجل شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| اقتصاد پسابرگزیت بریتانیایی؛ سازهانگاری نوکارکردگرایانه؛ دولت انگلیس؛ طرح احصای شغل؛ کووید-19 | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Concurrence of Post-Covidal Brexit on Britain's economy under the light of neo-functional constructivism | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Talieh Sakhamanesh1؛ Seyyed Abdol Ali Ghavam2؛ Mehdi Zakerian1؛ Kayhan Barzegar1؛ Hanaan Balala3 | ||
| 1Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Sciences & Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | Visiting Lecturer and Administrator of IAU Innovation Centers, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2The Late Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3The Copenhagen Business College DPhil in Law, Oxford University | Visiting Researcher, The Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In the threshold of 2021, the British economy was adversely affected by the obligatory lockdown for national quarantine during the post-Brexit pandemic. The concurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit represents a profound upheaval in the United Kingdom's economic landscape, instigating a critically paradigmatic shift that warrants rigorous examination. Under the auspices of neo-functional constructivism, this analysis pertains to the interaction between the prevalence of COVID sublineages and the economic ramifications of Brexit, as both scenarios invoke an unceasing mutation of the structural dynamics within the UK economy. To discern the impacts on the UK economy, it is imperative to consider the causative agents of these crises and the therapeutic interventions ushered, including upturns and related precautions, which have been instrumental in managing public health and economy outcomes. Scholars' investigations into the affiliation of these factors concede how the pronounced nature of these conflicts have explicitly influenced economic stability and resilience. Herein, the current article aims to shed light on how the dual challenges of post-pandemic-related disruptions have engaged policymakers in a challenging milieu, pressurizing them to align with rapidly evolving conditions, and so forth. In layman's terms, on the basis of neo-functionalist constructivism as its building stone theory, the current research aims at brainstorming the idea that politics with a problem-solving strategy as an exit- way out of this chaos can flourish novel opportunities by diminishing some economic tensions at this time, such as the severe economic crisis caused by the pandemic. From the perspective of neo-functional constructivism, the statement of problem under investigation is basically conceptualized within the framework of social constructs underpinning them and the shared meanings they encompass. In the interim, the post-Brexit and COVID-19 crises are regarded as event-driven factors that metamorphosis-like have significantly reshaped social structures and the collective understandings associated with national identity, economic policymaking, and international relations. The current survey explicitly explores all avenues while unearthing the source of how these crises have influenced whole nine yards of social meanings and structures, elucidating the ways in which these transformations have embodied economic dynamics and policy adjustments. The very aim of the current research paper is to excavate interrelationships within the context of shared social constructs, thereby contributing to their underlying mechanisms and implications particularly within gray area. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Covid-19, European Union, job retention scheme, neo-functional constructivism, Post-Brexit British economy, UK government | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aje O, Chidozie F. (2020). “Regional integration and the neo-functionalist model: The Brexit narrative”. Chinese Political Science Review. 5: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-018-0116-0. Bissoondeeal RK, Binner JM, Milas C. (2023). “Brexit and coronavirus: financial perspectives and future prospects”. The European Journal of Finance. 29(16): 1825-1834. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2023.2249961. Chu TV. (2023). “The British economic situation after Brexit to the year 2023”. Foreign Studies. 39(6): 162. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5183. Clarke HD, Goodwin M, Whiteley P. (2017). Brexit, Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press CSS: Editora Civis Studio Sapientia. (2025). “United Kingdom: Finance, trade, and post-Brexit strategy: Britain’s economic future in a changing global landscape”. In Global Geopolitics: The Rule of Economics, Politics, and International Power (pp. 358). Civis Studio Sapientia Publication. Elington M, Michalski M, Milas C. (2022). “Can we hide behind Covid-19 when assessing the impact of Brexit on the UK economy?”. LSE, The London School of Economics & Political Science. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2022/06/27/can-we-hide-behind-covid-19-when-assessing-the-impact-of-brexit-on-the-uk-economy/. Ellington M, Michalski M, Milas C. (2022). “Of votes and viruses: The UK economy and economic policy uncertainty”. The European Journal of Finance. 29(16): 1849-1865. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2022.2083978. European Union. (2021). “Trade and cooperation agreement between the European Union and the European atomic energy community”. Fernandes N. (2020). “Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on various industries and countries”. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3557504. Freitas LS. (2017). The Brexit Process Understood under Neofunctionalist and Intergovernmentalist Theories of European Integration. University of Fort Hare and University of Jyväskylä. Gupta S, Montenovo L, Nguyen T, Lozano-Rojas F, Schmutte I, Simon K, et al. (2023). “Effects of social distancing policy on labor market outcomes”. Contemporary Economic Policy. 41(1): 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12582. Haas EB. (1968). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press Harrois T. (2025). “The European Union–United Kingdom summit on 19 May 2025: A milestone in the long road to Brexit”. Robert Schuman Policy Paper. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/791-the-european-union-united-kingdom-summit-on-19-may-2025-a-milestone-in-the-long-road-to-brexit. Kubalkova V. (2001). Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315291376. Lenza M, Primiceri GE. (2020). “How to estimate a VAR after March 2020”. Working Peper Series 2461. European Central Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecb/ecbwps/20202461.html. Martill B, Staiger U. (Eds.). (2018). Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352759. Meehan EJ. (1971). The Foundations of Political Analysis: Empirical and Normative. Georgetown, Ontario: Irwin-Dorsey Press. Moravcsik A. (2005). “The European Constitutional Compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy”. Journal of European Public Policy. 12(2): 349-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044215. National Institute of Economic and Social Research. (2025). “UK economic outlook – winter 2025”. https://niesr.ac.uk/publications/uk-economic-outlook-winter-2025. Niemann A, Edwards G, Jakobi P. (2021). “Still not yet obsolete? A neofunctionalist account of Brexit”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360622961_Still_Not_Yet_Obsolete_A_Neofunctionalist_Account_of_Brexit. Office for Budget Responsibility. (2024). “Economic and fiscal outlook– October 2024”. https://obr.uk/economic-and-fiscal-outlooks/. Oliver T. (2017). “Fifty shades of Brexit: Britain’s EU referendum and its implications for Europe and Britain”. The International Spectator. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1259802. Onuf N. (1998). The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge University Press. Owen J, Thimont Jack M, Iacobov A, Christensen E. (2019). “Managing migration after Brexit”. Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/report/managing-migration-after-brexit. Polatoğlu I, Oncu-Oner T, Dalman I, Ozdogan S. (2023). “COVID-19 in early 2023: Structure, replication mechanism, variants of SARS-CoV-2, diagnostic tests, and vaccine & drug development studies”. MedComm. 4(2): e228. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.228. Sangiovanni M. (2006). Debates on European Integratuin: A Reader. Palgrave Macmillan. Schelling TC. (1971). "Dynamic models of segregation". The Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1(2): 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1971.9989794. Sjursen H. (1999). The Common Foreign and Security Policy: An Emerging New Voice in International Politics. Arena Publications. Spisak A. (2022). “CER insight: Four reasons why the UK’s Northern Ireland Protocol bill is a mistake”. Centre for European Reform. https://www.cer.eu. Stojanovic A, Lloyd L, Durrant T, Christensen E, Wright G. (2019). “Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU”. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/report/negotiating-brexit-preparing-talks-uks-future-relationship-eu. Strietska-Ilina O, Tessaring M. (Eds.). (2005). Trends and Skill Needs in Tourism (Cedefop Panorama series, No. 115). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/5161_en.pdf. Szabo M. (2020). Brexit in European Integration Theory: Liberal Intergovernmentalism, Neofunctionalism and Constructivism. Master's thesis, Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies, Department of International Relations and European Studies. Tindal-Clarke E. (2020). “The impact of Brexit: A neofunctionalist perspective”. ANU Undergraduate Research Journal. 10(1): 45-55. https://studentjournals.anu.edu.au/index.php/aurj/article/view/261. TUC. (2020). Changing the world of work for good: Impact of Covid-19 and Brexit for the UK economy. Review of forecasts published between July–November 2020. https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/impact-covid-19-and-brexit-uk-economy. UK in a Changing Europe. (2023). “What is fiscal headroom?” https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-facts/what-is-fiscal-headroom. Ward M, Webb D. (2025). “Statistics on UK-EU trade”. House of Commons Library. number CBP 7851. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7851/. Weldon D. (2021). “The world ahead”. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2021/11/08/after-covid-19-brexits-impact-on-the-british-economy-will-be-clearer. Wivel A, Thorhallsson B. (2018). “Brexit and small states in Europe: Hedging, Hiding or Seeking Shelter?”. Diamond IP, Nedergaard P, Rosamond B. (red.). The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit (s. 266-277). Routledge. Routledge International Handbooks. Zakerian M, Sakhamanesh T. (2025). “Diversity in the UK under the light of a transformed civil society through Brexit”. In: Marques J. (eds). Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_12-1. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 149 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 255 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب