میز خدمت الکترونیک
دوره ویراستاری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات127
تعداد شماره‌ها7,134
تعداد مقالات76,811
تعداد مشاهده مقاله154,160,113
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله116,177,509
کریمی, عباس, کریمی, سحر, حبیبی, سینا. (1404). امکان‌سنجی انعقاد قرارداد هوشمند به‌عنوان یک قرارداد حقوقی معتبر؛ مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس. , 16(2), 695-716. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2025.384842.634694
عباس کریمی; سحر کریمی; سینا حبیبی. "امکان‌سنجی انعقاد قرارداد هوشمند به‌عنوان یک قرارداد حقوقی معتبر؛ مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس". , 16, 2, 1404, 695-716. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2025.384842.634694
کریمی, عباس, کریمی, سحر, حبیبی, سینا. (1404). 'امکان‌سنجی انعقاد قرارداد هوشمند به‌عنوان یک قرارداد حقوقی معتبر؛ مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس', , 16(2), pp. 695-716. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2025.384842.634694
کریمی, عباس, کریمی, سحر, حبیبی, سینا. امکان‌سنجی انعقاد قرارداد هوشمند به‌عنوان یک قرارداد حقوقی معتبر؛ مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس. , 1404; 16(2): 695-716. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2025.384842.634694

امکان‌سنجی انعقاد قرارداد هوشمند به‌عنوان یک قرارداد حقوقی معتبر؛ مطالعۀ تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس

مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی
دوره 16، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 32، دی 1404، صفحه 695-716    اصل مقاله (600.17 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی - پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcl.2025.384842.634694
نویسندگان
عباس کریمی1؛ سحر کریمی* 2؛ سینا حبیبی3
1استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
قراردادهای هوشمند به‌عنوان نوعی از نوآوری در حوزۀ حقوقی و فناوری اطلاعات محسوب می‌شوند، با این ‌حال در نظام‌های حقوقی مختلف در خصوص طبقه‌بندی آنها با عنوان قرارداد به معنای حقوقی آن، اختلاف ‌نظر وجود دارد و امکان انعقاد قرارداد معتبر حقوقی در قالب این‌گونه قراردادها مورد سؤال است. برای پاسخ به این دغدغه، در پژوهش حاضر پس از بررسی مفهوم قرارداد از نظر حقوقی در حقوق ایران و سوئیس، به تطبیق حالت‌های مختلف این نوع تراکنش پرداخته می‌شود. به‌نظر می‌رسد در خصوص استفاده‌ از انواع قراردادهای هوشمند، تنها آن دسته که سبب ایجاد اثر حقوقی با توافق دو یا چند طرف شده است، به معنای حقوقی در زمرۀ قراردادها محسوب می‌شود. به‌علاوه، شرایط عمومی صحت قراردادها در آنها مورد بررسی اختصاصی قرار گرفت و دیده شد که آن دسته از قراردادهای هوشمند که با هدف انشای اراده و با رعایت شرایط اساسی صحت معاملات منعقد می‌شوند، قابلیت اجرایی به‌عنوان یک قرارداد معتبر حقوقی را دارند. با این حال، ازآنجا که بهره ‌بردن از مزایای چنین قراردادی در گرو درج ماده‌ای جهت شناسایی این قراردادها و ذکر شرایط اختصاصی انعقاد آنها مانند برخورداری از امضاهای دیجیتال است، پیشنهاد شد مقررات حقوقی و فنی قراردادهای هوشمند به قانون تجارت الکترونیکی افزوده شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اجرای خودکار؛ امضای دیجیتال؛ بلاک‌چین؛ رمزارز؛ قرارداد هوشمند
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Feasibility of Smart Contract Formation as a Legally Valid Contract: A Comparative Study in Iranian and Swiss Law
نویسندگان [English]
Abbas Karimi1؛ Sahar Karimi2؛ Sina Habibi3
1Professor at the Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor at the Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3PhD Student in the Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
A smart contract is a computer program in which virtual or physical assets are exchanged for cryptocurrencies upon the fulfillment of mutually agreed conditions, verified by artificial intelligence, and automatically executed. Different legal systems have varying opinions on whether a smart contract qualifies as a legal contract. This research addresses this question by analyzing the legal concept of contracts in Iranian and Swiss law and exploring the various forms of these transactions. It seems that distinguishing whether the parties' mutual agreement precedes the smart contract or vice versa is crucial. In the former case, the smart contract is not considered a legal contract, whereas in the latter, it is classified as a legal contract and subject to general contract rules. Moreover, specific elements such as digital signatures and the use of cryptocurrencies in smart contracts differ from traditional contracts. The advantages of these contracts depend on the inclusion of provisions recognizing smart contracts, along with the specific conditions for their formation, such as the use of digital signatures in the Electronic Commerce Code. Additionally, provisions should recognize cryptocurrencies and outline the formalities for obtaining ownership of these currencies in the Monetary and Banking Code, as proposed in this research.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Digital Signature, Self-Executing, Smart Contract
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. A) Books
  2. Alberini, A., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Blockchain and Data Protection. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  3. Bashir, I. (2020). Mastering Blockchain. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.
  4. Bucher, E. (2004). Introduction to Swiss Law. Edited by F. Dessemontet & T. Ansay. 3rd ed.
  5. Carron, B. et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. How Smart Can a Contract Be?. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  6. Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., & Haapio, H. (2019). Legal Tech, Smart Contracts, and Blockchain: Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Kyushu University, Japan: Springer.
  7. Guillaume, F., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Aspects of Private International Law Related to Blockchain Transactions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Hacker, P., et al. (2019). Regulating Blockchain: Techno-Social and Legal Challenges. UK: Oxford University Press.
  9. Huber-Purtschert, T. (2022). Law of Obligation, Introduction to Swiss Law. Edited by D. Hürlimann & M. Thommen. Vol. 2. Berlin/Berne: Carl Grossmann Verlag, sui generis.
  10. Karimi, Abbas (2008). Civil Law II: Properties and Ownership, Oral Lecture Notes on Civil Law II. Tehran: University of Tehran (In Persian).
  11. Karimi, Abbas, & Karimi, Sahar (2021). New Perspectives on Contract Law. 2nd Edition. Tehran: Dadgostar Publications (In Persian).
  12. Katouzian, AmirNaser (2012). General Principles of Contracts. Volume I. 10th Edition. Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar (In Persian).
  13. Kraus, D., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Blockchains: Aspects of Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  14. Lacity, C. M. (2020). Blockchain Foundations for the Internet of Value. USA: Epic Books Publication. The University of Arkansas Press.
  15. Mignon, V., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Blockchains: Perspectives and Challenges. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  16. Naser, Mahdi (2018). Smart Contracts (A Comparative Study of Iranian and American Law). Tehran: Majd Publications (In Persian).
  17. Obrist, T., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Tax Treatment of Cryptocurrency Holders and Miners in the Era of Virtual Currencies from a Multijurisdictional and Swiss Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Picht, G., & Studen, G. (2022). Civil Law, Introduction to Swiss Law. Edited by D. Hürlimann & M. Thommen. Vol. 2. Zurich: Carl Grossmann, Verlag, sui generis.
  19. Safaei, SeyedHossein (2020). Elementary Civil Law: General Principles of Contracts. Vol. II. 32nd Edition. Tehran: Mizan Publications (In Persian).
  20. Shafie-Khah, M., et al. (2020). Blockchain-based Smart Grids. London, UK, San Diego, US: Elsevier, Academic Press.
  21. Witzig, P., et al. (2019). Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organizations and the Law. Cutting out the Middleman: A Case Study of Blockchain Technology Induced Reconfigurations in the Swiss Financial Services Industry. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
 

  1. B) Articles
  2. Akbari, Mohammad, Karimi, Abbas, & Al-Bouyeh, Ali. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Validity Conditions of Electronic Contracts in International Commercial Instruments, Iranian Law, and Indian Law. Semi-Annual Journal of Subcontinent Studies, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, 34 (10), 23-42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22111/jsr.2018.4059 (In Persian).
  3. Bosson, K. (2019). Smart Contracts and Swiss Obligation Law. The Faculty of Law of the University of Neuchatel, 1-28. Retrieved from https://www.lextechinstitute.ch/wpcontent/uploads/2020/09/Smart-Contracts-and-Swiss-Obligation-Law_Kilian-Bosson.pdf.
  4. Dehghani-Tafti, Mojtaba, Afzalimehr, Marzieh, & Eskini, Rabeea. (2021). A Comparative Study of the Governing Law of Digital Smart Contracts from the Perspective of Private International Law in Iran and the Rome I Regulation. Semi-Annual Journal of Modern Technology Law, 4 (2), 203-225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22133/mtlj.2022.335793.1084 (In Persian).
  5. Furrer, A. (2018). The Embedding of Smart Contracts into Swiss Private Law. The Anwaltsrevue, 103-115. Retrieved from https://www.unilu.ch/news/the-embedding-of-smart-contracts-into-swiss-private-law-3592/.
  6. Hadavand, Mahdieh. (2021). Features of International Trade Contracts. Semi-Annual Journal of International Judicial Legal Research, 2 (3), 587-613 (In Persian).
  7. Huber-Purtschert, T. (2014). Introduction to Swiss Law: Part 5, Swiss Contract/Company Law (Code of Obligations). RAI-J-031, University of Zurich, 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24921/2018.94115924.12.
  8. Joneidi, Laya, & Karimi, Sahar. (2015). Time and Place of Formation of Electronic Contracts. Semi-Annual Civil Law Knowledge Journal, 4 (1), 42-54. DOI:https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23221712.1394.4.1.4.7 (In Persian).
  9. Karimi, Sahar, & Mirhosseini, Yeganeh Sadat. (2024). Dispute Resolution in Smart Contracts Considering Their Self-Executing Nature. Quarterly Journal of Legal Research, 27 (3), 219-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48308/jlr.2024.232840.2568 (In Persian).
  10. Karimi, Sahar, & Sinambari, Parisa. (2024). A Comparative Study of Digital Signatures in Smart Contracts under Iranian and U.S. Law. Quarterly Journal of Cyberspace Legal Studies, 3 (2), 1-14 (In Persian).
  11. Mafi, Homayoun, & Naser, Mahdi. (2021). Analyzing the Mechanism for Establishing the Legal Capacity of Parties in Implementing Smart Contracts in Iranian Law. Quarterly Journal of Business Research, (98), 279-320. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22034/ijts.2021.245373 (In Persian).
  12. Mansouri, Mohammad, Alsharif, Mohammad Mahdi, & Tabatabaie, Sayyed Mohammad Sadegh. (2022). Qualification of a Contract in Mixed Contracts in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and French law. Comparative Law Review 13 (1), 43-61, DOI:https://doi.org/20.1001.1.1735496.1401.13.1.3.1 (In Persian).
  13. Moss, S. (2014). The Swiss Approach to Contract Interpretation. Tokyo: Lalive, IBA Annual Conference, 21 October 2014, 1-14.
  14. Mousavi, Zahra Sadat, Zare, Mohammad, & Hojjati Marvast, Meysam. (2022). Conceptualization of Blockchain and Smart Contracts. Quarterly Journal of Modern Applied Studies in Management, Economics, and Accounting, 5 (1), 59-71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22034/nasmea.2022.176190 (In Persian).
  15. Mozaffari, Mostafa, & Naser, Mahdi. (2018). The Role of Smart Contracts in Stabilizing Property Rights. Quarterly Journal of Legal Research, (95), 253-275. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22034/jlr.2019.122103.1142 (In Persian).
  16. Naser, Mahdi, & Sadeghi, Hossein. (2019). Validation and Legal Challenges of Smart Contracts: A Comparative Study of Iranian and U.S. Legal Systems. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, 27 (7), 255-288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22054/jplr.2018.28418.1755 (In Persian).
  17. Rabbani-Mousavian, Seyed Ali. (2021). The Governing Principles of Smart Contracts in Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Legal Research, 66 (17), 178-204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22034/ijrj.2022.689984 (In Persian).
  18. Rohn, P. (2012). Revision of the Unfair Competition Act: Tougher Controls of GTC & New Regulations for E-Commerce. Switzerland, Zurich: Competition Law Newsletter, Thouvenin Rechtsanwälte, 1-3.
  19. Schuppli, B., & Jafari-Golnaz, A. (2021). Piercing the Digital Veil: A Case Study for a DAO Legal Framework under Swiss Law. JIPITEC, the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology, and Electronic Commerce Law, 1-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3951804.
  20. Shafiei-Nasab, Seyedeh Sadigheh, Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali, & Rahman-Setayesh, Mohammad Kazem. (2022). The Concept and Nature of Electronic Contracts in Islamic Jurisprudence and Iranian Law. Fiqhi Studies Journal, 3 (18), 711-731. DOI:https://doi.org/10.22059/jorr.2021.315977.1009002. (in Persian).
  21. Thalmann, A. (2004). Newsletter: New Swiss Law on Electronic Signatures. Walder Wyss & Partners Attorneys at Law, (52), 1-2. Retrieved from https://www.walderwyss.com/assets/content/publications/287.pdf.
  22. Winkler, M. (2022). Smart Contracts Work – But Do They Hold up in Court?. Lex Mundi, Pestalozzi Attorneys at Law, 1-5. Retrieved from https://pestalozzilaw.com/en/insights/news/legal-insights/smart-contracts-work-do-they-hold-court/.
  23. Woebbeking, K. M. (2019). The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology, and Electronic Commerce Law, 10, 105-112. Retrieved from https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/248/243.
 

  1. C) Rules and Regulations
  2. Council Directive of 5 April 1993, Directive 93/13/EEC on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31993L0013 (Europe).
  3. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2017) Uniform Regulation of Virtual-Currency Businesses Act (USA).
  4. The European Parliament and of the Council 23 July 2014, Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions in the Internal Market and Repealing Directive 1999/93/EC (eIDAS Regulation). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2014.257.01.0073.01.ENG (Europe).
  5. The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation (1907) Swiss Civil Code. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/24/233_245_233/en (Swiss).
  6. The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation (1911) Federal Acton the Amendment of the Swiss Civil Code(Part Five: The Code of Obligations). https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/27/317_321_377/en (Swiss).
  7. The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation (1986) Swiss Unfair Competition Act (UCA). https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/223_223_223/en (Swiss).
  8. The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation (1986), Federal Act
    on Unfair Competition (Unfair Competition Act, UCA). https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/223_223_223/en (Swiss).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 266
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 197





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب