پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,143 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,884 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 154,834,516 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 116,818,600 |
نقش میانجی وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی در رابطه اعتماد و سواد هوش مصنوعی با مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم در راستای توسعه کسبوکار اجتماعی در آموزش ابتدایی | ||
| کسب وکار اجتماعی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 3، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 68-81 اصل مقاله (778.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jsbu.2026.403103.1068 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مصطفی عزیزی* 1؛ مجتبی تجری2 | ||
| 1گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه علومتربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، گرگان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کسبوکار اجتماعی به عنوان مدلی برای حل چالشهای آموزشی با استفاده از فناوریهای نوین مانند هوش مصنوعی میتواند نقش کلیدی ایفا کند. هدف این پژوهش بررسی نقش میانجی وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی در رابطه بین اعتماد و سواد هوش مصنوعی با مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم در میان معلمان دوره ابتدایی شهرستان علیآباد استان گلستان بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی - همبستگی و جامعه آماری شامل ۴۸۶ معلم بود که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران و نمونهگیری تصادفی سیستماتیک، ۱۵۶ نفر بهعنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. دادهها با استفاده از پرسشنامههای مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم کلی و همکاران (۲۰۱۹)، اعتماد به هوش مصنوعی شاروفسکی و همکاران (۲۰۲۴)، وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی مورالس (۲۰۲۴) و سواد هوش مصنوعی گراسینی (۲۰۲۴) جمعآوری و با نرمافزار Smart-PLS و مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شد. یافتهها نشان داد اعتماد و سواد هوش مصنوعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی دارند، همچنین وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی رابطه مثبت و قوی با ابعاد مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم (ارتباطات، تفکر انتقادی، خلاقیت و همکاری) دارد. نقش میانجی وابستگی به هوش مصنوعی در رابطه بین متغیرهای مستقل (سواد و اعتماد به هوش مصنوعی) و مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم تأیید شد. به عبارت دیگر، سواد و اعتماد به هوش مصنوعی از طریق افزایش وابستگی آگاهانه و هدفمند به هوش مصنوعی، موجب تقویت مهارتهای ضروری قرن حاضر میشوند. نتایج بر لزوم توجه به سواد و اعتماد به هوش مصنوعی در راستای توسعه مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم تأکید دارد و نشان میدهد وابستگی متعادل و آگاهانه (نه افراطی) به هوش مصنوعی میتواند بهعنوان عاملی تسهیلگر در طراحی و اجرای مدلهای کسبوکار اجتماعی برای بهبود کیفیت و عدالت آموزشی عمل کند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| کسبوکار اجتماعی؛ معلمان ابتدایی؛ مهارتهای قرن بیستویکم؛ وابستگی و اعتماد؛ هوش مصنوعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Mediating Role of AI Dependency in the Relationship between AI Trust and AI Literacy with 21st-Century Skills in the Context of Developing Social Business in Primary Education | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mostafa Azizi shamami1؛ Mojtaba Tajari2 | ||
| 1Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Education, Farhangian University, Gorgan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Social business, as a model for addressing educational challenges using emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, can play a key role. This study aimed to investigate the mediating role of AI dependency in the relationship between AI trust and AI literacy with 21st-century skills among elementary school teachers in Aliabad County, Golestan Province. The research method was descriptive-correlational. The statistical population consisted of 486 teachers, from which a sample of 156 was selected using Cochran's formula and systematic random sampling. Data were collected using questionnaires on 21st-century skills (Kelley et al., 2019), AI trust (Scharowski et al., 2024), AI dependency (Morales, 2024), and AI literacy (Grassini, 2024), and analyzed using Smart-PLS software and structural equation modeling. The findings revealed that AI trust and AI literacy have a significant positive impact on AI dependency. Furthermore, AI dependency showed a strong positive relationship with the dimensions of 21st-century skills (communication, critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration). The mediating role of AI dependency in the relationship between the independent variables and 21st-century skills was confirmed. In other words, AI literacy and trust, by fostering informed and purposeful dependency on AI, contribute to the enhancement of essential 21st-century skills. The results underscore the necessity of focusing on AI literacy and trust to develop 21st-century skills and indicate that a balanced and conscious dependency on AI can act as a facilitating factor in designing and implementing social business models to improve educational quality and equity. Extended Abstract Introduction The present study was conducted with the aim of explaining the mediating role of artificial intelligence (AI) dependence in the relationship between AI literacy and AI trust with 21st-century skills (including communication, critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration) among primary school teachers. Considering the ever-increasing expansion of smart technologies in educational systems and the necessity of rethinking teachers' professional competencies, this research was designed within the framework of social business development in primary education. Social business, as an integrated model of social goals and sustainable economic mechanisms, can provide a platform for the equitable and purposeful utilization of AI in education. However, the effective exploitation of AI capacities depends on teachers possessing AI literacy and trust in this technology; these factors shape the type and extent of their dependence on intelligent systems. On the other hand, AI dependence, if conscious and balanced, can lead to the strengthening of 21st-century skills. Given the research gap in the simultaneous investigation of these variables in the Iranian educational context, this study sought to fill this gap by presenting a causal model. Method The present study was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of execution, conducted using structural equation modeling with the partial least squares (PLS-SEM) approach. The statistical population included 486 primary school teachers in Aliabad County, Golestan Province. Based on Cochran's formula, the sample size was estimated to be 215 individuals, but using systematic random sampling and considering data acceptance criteria, 156 individuals were selected as the final sample (equivalent to 73% of the predicted sample). The data collection instruments included four standardized questionnaires: 1) The 21st-Century Skills Questionnaire (Kelley et al., 2019) with four dimensions: collaboration (22 items), critical thinking (11 items), creativity (8 items), and communication (9 items); 2) The AI Trust Questionnaire (Scharowski et al., 2024) with 12 items (including 5 reverse-scored items); 3) The AI Dependence Questionnaire (Morales-García, 2024) with 5 items; 4) The AI Literacy Questionnaire (Grassini, 2024) with 6 items. The reliability of the instruments was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. Cronbach's alpha values for the components of 21st-century skills ranged from 0.959 to 0.991, for AI trust was 0.948, for AI dependence was 0.923, and for AI literacy was 0.969, all of which were at an excellent level. Convergent validity was assessed using the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) index, and its values for all variables were above 0.50. Data analysis was performed using Smart-PLS software, and path coefficients, T-values, coefficients of determination (R²), and effect sizes (f²) were calculated to test the hypotheses. Additionally, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) index was used to ensure the absence of multicollinearity, and its values were below the critical threshold of 5. Results The results showed that AI literacy has a positive, direct, and significant effect on AI dependence and possesses a considerable effect size. AI trust also showed a positive and significant effect on AI dependence, although its effect size was assessed as moderate compared to AI literacy. AI dependence, as a mediating variable, established a positive and very strong relationship with all four dimensions of 21st-century skills, such that the highest effect size was related to the dimension of collaboration, followed by communication, critical thinking, and creativity. The high R² values indicated the desirable explanatory power of the model in predicting the dependent variables. Furthermore, the indirect effects of AI literacy and AI trust on 21st-century skills through AI dependence were significant, indicating the confirmation of the mediating role of this variable. The reliability and validity indices of the measurement model were at a desirable level, and the VIF values were below the critical threshold, demonstrating the robustness of the results. Conclusion Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that the development of 21st-century skills among primary school teachers depends not only on access to modern technologies but also on enhancing AI literacy and forming professional trust in this technology. These factors, by creating a type of conscious, purposeful, and balanced dependence on AI, provide the groundwork for the effective utilization of its capacities. Therefore, AI dependence, if based on knowledge, professional judgment, and ethical considerations, is not only not a threat to teachers' professional autonomy but can also act as a facilitating mechanism in strengthening their communicative, cognitive, and creative competencies. These results have important practical implications for educational policymakers and designers of social business models in education, such that investment in AI literacy training and the creation of trust-building platforms can help reduce the digital divide, improve the quality of education, and realize educational equity. Finally, it is suggested that teacher empowerment programs be designed with an emphasis on the responsible use of AI so that, while avoiding excessive dependence, the transformative capacities of this technology can be harnessed for sustainable educational development. Funding No funding was received from any public or private entity. Authors’ Contribution All authors contributed equally to conducting the research. Conflict of Interest No conflicts of interest were reported in this study. Acknowledgments All individuals who assisted the researchers in conducting the study are sincerely thanked and acknowledged | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| 21st‑Century Skills, AI Dependency and Trust, Artificial Intelligence, Elementary School Teachers, Social Business | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi, B. N., Wu, Y., & Luo, Z. (2025). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on curriculum development in global higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13113-z Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7 Avdiu, E., Bekteshi, E., & Gollopeni, B. (2025). Learning skills for the future—implementing the 21st-century learning. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1), 2025011–2025011. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025011 Chasokela, D. (2025). Role of technology integration in the development of 21st-century skills in STEM university in Zimbabwe. Journal of Research in Education and Pedagogy, 2(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v2i1.36 Chasokela, D., & Moyo, F. (2025). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning technology implementation to address 21st-century skills: The Zimbabwean higher education context. In Insights into International Higher Education Leadership and the Skills Gap (pp. 319–344). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3443-0.ch013 Chrisnawati, G., Sanjaya, Y. R., & Utomo, A. (2026). Development of an artificial intelligence-based adaptive typing training system to improve accuracy and speed. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications, 5(2), 3035–3038. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v5i2.2093 RAND Corporation. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications to support K–12 teachers and teaching: A review of promising applications, opportunities, and challenges. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3131 Fauzi, A. L., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurlaelah, E., & Juandi, D. (2025). Computational thinking education in K–12 artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing. Journal of Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2271019 Fitria, D., Asrizal, A., & Lufri, L. (2025). Enhancing 21st-century skills through blended problem-based learning with ethnoscience integration: A mixed-methods study in Indonesian junior high schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(1), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.24 Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057 Grassini, S. (2024, October). A psychometric validation of the PAILQ‑6: Perceived artificial intelligence literacy questionnaire. In Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human‑Computer Interaction (pp. 1–10). Jia, F., Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science education (2013–2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33, 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6 Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st‑century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199 Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Han, J., & Sung, E. (2019). Creating a 21st‑century skills survey instrument for high school students. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-8-7 Khan, G. M., Ali, Z., & Khalid, A. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence‑based personalized learning on students’ motivation and self‑regulated learning. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 9(1), 595. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v9i1.595 Lasmiatun, K. M. T., & Manteghi, N. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence implementation on Islamic financial literacy and global economic changes in the banking world. Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Ethics, 2(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.24235/jiesbi.v2i1.253 Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. Mao, J., Chen, B., & Liu, J. C. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in education and its implications for assessment. TechTrends, 68, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00911-4 Morales‑García, W. C., Sairitupa‑Sanchez, L. Z., Morales‑García, S. B., & Morales‑García, M. (2024, March). Development and validation of a scale for dependence on artificial intelligence in university students. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1323898). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323898 Rahimi, A. R., & Mosalli, Z. (2025). The role of 21st‑century digital competence in shaping pre‑service language teachers’ 21st‑century digital skills: The partial least squares modeling approach (PLS‑SEM). Journal of Computers in Education, 12(1), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00307-6 Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 Scharowski, N., Perrig, S. A., Aeschbach, L. F., von Felten, N., Opwis, K., Wintersberger, P., & Brühlmann, F. (2024). To trust or distrust trust measures: Validating questionnaires for trust in AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00582. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.00582 Siddiq, F., Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., & Tomczyk, L. (2024). What will be the new normal? Digital competence and 21st‑century skills: Critical and emergent issues in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7697–7705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12067-y Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159 Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355 Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343 Wang, Q. (2026). Construction and empirical analysis of an artificial intelligence‑based educational assessment model. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.399169 Wang, Y. (2024). Emotional dependence path of artificial intelligence chatbot based on structural equation modeling. Procedia Computer Science, 247, 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.145 Xiojing, G., Tegeh, I. M., & Santyasa, I. W. (2026). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence‑based personalized feedback in teaching English as a foreign language. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 6(4), 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i4.5649 Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence learning tools in K–12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(1), 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9 Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312874 Zhang, X., Yin, M., Zhang, M., Li, Z., & Li, H. (2025). The development and validation of an artificial intelligence chatbot dependence scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 28(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0240 Zhao, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and education: End the grammar of schooling. ECNU Review of Education, 8(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265124 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 116 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 34 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب