پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,124 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,627 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 153,528,565 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 115,672,450 |
دگرگونی مفهوم صلح در پرتو سازهانگاری: گذار از صلح منفی به صلح پایدار | ||
| فصلنامه سیاست | ||
| دوره 56، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 28-1 اصل مقاله (742.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jpq.2026.396028.1008370 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا احمدی1؛ محمد رضا دهشیری* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای گروه روابط بینالملل، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه روابط بینالملل، دانشکده روابط بین الملل وزارت امور خارجه، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با وجود توجه به مفهوم صلح در روابط بینالملل، نگاه تقلیلگرایانه به صلح بهعنوان «فقدان خشونت» مانعی در درک پویای این پدیده است. این مقاله با اتکا به نظریه سازهانگاری و معرفی رویکرد «صلح ترکیبی»، چارچوبی برای حرکت به فراسوی مفاهیم صلح منفی و مثبت و بررسی صلح پایدار ارائه میدهد. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و تحلیلی، متون نظری و مطالعات موردی همچون پایان جنگ ایران و عراق و فروپاشی رژیم آپارتاید در آفریقای جنوبی را بررسی و سیاستهای بینالمللی و ابتکارات سازمان ملل را نیز در زمینه حفظ صلح تحلیل کرده است. این پژوهش با توجه به خلا پژوهشی در تحلیل جامع ابعاد فرهنگی، اجتماعی و هویتی صلح و نیاز به رویکردهای ترکیبی در تحقیقات صلح، اهمیت ویژهای دارد. یافتهها نشان میدهد که تحقق صلح پایدار مستلزم گذار از صلح منفی (صرفاً غیاب خشونت) به صلح مثبت (تأمین عدالت اجتماعی و نهادهای دموکراتیک) و در نهایت تثبیت شرایطی است که در آن ساختارهای عادلانه، هنجارهای مشترک، و مشارکت جوامع محلی بهطور پایدار درهم تنیده شدهاند. در این میان، صلح ترکیبی با پیوند دادن ارزشهای جهانی دموکراسی و نهادسازی با ظرفیتهای بومی، مدلی کارآمدتر برای ایجاد صلح ارائه میکند. در واقع، صلح پایدار فرآیندی مستمر و بازتولیدشونده است که تنها از طریق گفتوگو، آموزش و مشارکت فعال جوامع محلی قابل دستیابی است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سازهانگاری؛ صلح منفی؛ صلح مثبت؛ صلح پایدار؛ صلح ترکیبی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Evolution of the Concept of Peace from the Perspective of Constructivism: From Negative Peace to Sustainable Peace | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Ahmadi1؛ Mohammad Reza Dehshiri2 | ||
| 1Ph.D Student, Department of International Relations, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of International Relations, School of International Relations, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective This study critically explores and expands the concept of peace, challenging its traditional reductionist interpretations in international relations. It focuses specifically on the transition from negative peace—the mere absence of violence—to a more holistic understanding of sustainable peace. Using constructivist theory, the study develops a comprehensive theoretical framework that views peace as a dynamic and multifaceted process. This framework emphasizes the integration of global norms with local capacities while exploring the central role of collective identity formation and social constructs in shaping peacebuilding. Introduction In international relations, the predominant conceptualization of peace has frequently been reduced to the mere absence of violence, commonly referred to as negative peace. This perspective, however, is overly simplistic, failing to address the profound structural roots of conflict, such as inequality, injustice, and deficiencies within democratic institutions. Employing constructivist theory, this paper critiques and expands this limited understanding by introducing the notion of hybrid peace. This paradigm transcends the limitations of both negative and positive peace, emphasizing the integration of global norms—such as democracy and human rights—with local cultural capacities to achieve sustainable peace, which is understood as an ongoing and dynamic process. Methodology This research employs a qualitative and analytical approach, combining a review of theoretical literature with case studies and document analysis. It examines pivotal events such as the Iran-Iraq War and the collapse of apartheid in South Africa to illustrate the complex transition from negative to positive peace. The study also analyzes international policies and UN peacekeeping efforts, highlighting their role in shaping and sustaining peacebuilding processes. By integrating these case studies and documents through a constructivist lens, the research provides insights into the multifaceted nature of peace. Results and Discussion The study's findings indicate that sustainable peace is not a static achievement, but a dynamic and evolving process. Negative peace, which halts direct violence, often fails to address underlying causes of conflict, such as structural inequality and social injustice. This is illustrated through case studies examining the Iran-Iraq War and the collapse of apartheid in South Africa. For example, the cessation of hostilities in the Iran-Iraq War marked negative peace, yet unresolved territorial disputes and national identity issues demanded more than an end to violence. Similarly, the collapse of apartheid in South Africa brought negative peace, but persistent racial and economic inequalities necessitated a shift to positive peace. This transition requires establishing positive peace, which fosters social justice, equality, and democratic governance. However, positive peace remains insufficient if it does not adapt to evolving societal needs. In post-apartheid South Africa, for example, ongoing racial and economic disparities hindered sustainable peace despite democratic governance. Transitioning to positive peace required reconciliation efforts, the promotion of justice, and a direct address of apartheid’s legacies ingrained within social and economic structures. This research emphasizes that sustainable peace constitutes an ongoing process, requiring continuous efforts to improve social structures, promote inclusive governance, and uphold justice. Crucially, sustainable peace cannot be achieved in isolation or through external imposition. It demands active participation from local communities, alongside dialogue, education, and the development of shared norms and values to foster cooperation and mutual understanding. This principle is exemplified in the contexts of the Iran-Iraq War and apartheid South Africa, where peacebuilding was more effective when local engagement and cultural understanding were prioritized. The hybrid peace model presented in this study integrates global principles with local traditions, offering a more effective framework for post-conflict peacebuilding. By combining international practices, such as democracy promotion and human rights advocacy, with local governance structures and cultural norms, it fosters legitimacy, ownership, and resilience. This ensures peace develops in a way that aligns with local needs and values. This research addresses a significant gap in peace studies by synthesizing negative and positive peace along a continuum. It proposes the hybrid peace model as an intermediary between top-down international interventions and bottom-up local practices. Its originality lies in emphasizing shared norms and collective identity as fundamental components of sustainable peace, thereby presenting a novel constructivist framework not extensively examined in previous studies. Conclusion This research challenges traditional peacebuilding paradigms by offering a nuanced and dynamic understanding of peace, one that transcends the binary of negative and positive peace. The presented hybrid peace model advocates for an inclusive approach that integrates global norms with local capacities, emphasizing the importance of local participation. The study concludes that sustainable peace is not a fixed endpoint, but an ongoing, transformative process requiring continuous engagement, adaptation, and the active participation of both local communities and international actors. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Constructivism, Negative Peace, Positive Peace, Sustainable Peace, Hybrid Peace | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Abdelkhalek, A. A. E. (2021). The role of the Gulf Cooperation Council in conflict management, 1981–2019: a comparative study. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 9(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989211057341 Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. Ahmadian Hosseini, S. F. (2011). The role of the idea of Dialogue among Civilizations in strengthening global peace [Master’s thesis, Imam Khomeini International University]. [In Persian] Al-Ansari, Y. (2021). Economic Cooperation between Iran and Iraq: Prospects and Challenges. Journal of Middle Eastern Economics, 22(4), 56-78. Altman, D., Rojas-de-Galarreta, F., & Urdinez, F. (2021). An interactive model of democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research, 58(3), 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319883672 Anderson, R. (2004). “A Definition of Peace.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10 (2), 101. Barbarin, O. and Richter, L. (1999). Adversity and psychosocial competence of South African children… American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69(3), 319-327. Bayerlein, M., Kamin, K., & Krahmann, E. (2024). “From Negative to Positive Peace: How Norms Relate to Different Peace Dimensions.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2024.2335609 Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin. Bozorgmehri, M., & Ahmadian, F. (2013). Common components of peace in Constructivist theory and the idea of Dialogue among Civilizations. Foreign Policy, 27(3), 637–658. [In Persian] Buhaug, H., Cederman, L. E., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2014). Square pegs in round holes: Inequalities, grievances, and civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 418-431. Cahill-Ripley, A., Diane Hendrick, D. (2018). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Sustaining Peace: An Introduction. Geneva: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Quaker United Nations Office, and Lancaster University. Capistrano, D. (2020). Education and support for a culture of peace: a critical comparative analysis using survey data. Global Change, Peace & Security, 32(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020. 1707790 Caprioli, M. (2005). “Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2), 161–178. De Coning, C. (2018). Sustaining Peace: Can a New Approach Change the UN? Global Governance Spotlight 3, 1-4. Cho, S.Y. (2016). “Does Gender Equality Promote Social Trust? An Empirical Analysis.” World Development 88, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.019 Choi, S.W. (2011). “The Democratic Peace through an Interaction of Domestic Institutions and Norms: Executive Constraints and Rule of Law.” Armed Forces & Society 39 (2), 255–283. Cohen, R. A. (2018). Iran's shortsighted policies in Iraq: between inflaming and containing radical Sunni Islam: 2003–2015. Digest of Middle East Studies, 27(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/dome.12122 Collin, F. (2002). Social Reality. London: Taylor & Francis. Connolly, L., & Mincilly, L. (2019). Sustaining Peace in Liberia: New Reforms, New Opportunities? New York: International Peace Institute. Curle, A. (1990). Tools for Transformation: A Personal Study. London, UK: Hawthorn. Davenport, Ch. (2004). “The Promise of Democratic Pacification: An Empirical Assessment.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (3), 539–560. Diehl, P.F. (2016). “Exploring Peace: Looking Beyond War and Negative Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw005 Dixon, W.J. (1994). “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 88 (1), 14-32. Doe, S.G. (2010). Indigenising Post-War State Reconstruction: The Case of Liberia and Sierra Leone. PhD dissertation, University of Bradford. Doyle, M. and Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: a theoretical and quantitative analysis. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 779-801. Ebrahimzadeh, M., Soltani-Moghaddas, S., Birjandinejad, A., Omidi-Kashani, F., & Bozorgnia, S. (2014). Quality of life of veterans with chronic spinal cord injury and related variables. Archives of Trauma Research, 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5812/atr.17917 Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International organization 52 (4), 887–917. Fischer, M. (2009). The Conceptual Scaffolding of Newer Ideals of Peace. In Jane Addams and the Practice of Democracy. Urbana, US: University of Illinois Press. Galtung, J. (1964). An Editorial. Journal of Peace Research, 1(1), 1-4. Galtung, J. (1967). Theories Of Peace: A Synthetic Approach To Peace Thinking. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development and civilization. Thousand Oaks, US: SAGE Publications. Gaol, A., Widodo, P., & Malik, I. (2023). Conflict resolution: comparative analysis of separatist conflicts in papua, indonesia, and zulu, south africa. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHES), 2(6), 1849-1858. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.473 Ginty, R. M. (2010). Hybrid peace: the interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610374312 Ginty, R. M. (2014). Everyday peace: bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614550899 Griffiths, M., O’Callaghan, T., & Roach, S. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge. Guetta, S. (2017). “Peace Education.” In Beyond Bystanders. Moral Development and Citizenship Education, edited by N. Aloni and L. Weintrob, 283–294. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. Gumede, V. (2015). Political Economy of Post-apartheid South Africa. CODESRIA. Guzzini, S. (2003). ‘The Cold War is what we make of it’: When peace research meets constructivism in International Relations. In Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research (1st ed., p. 13). Routledge. Hamington, M. (2009). The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams. Urbana, US: University of Illinois Press. IEP. (2015). Positive Peace Report: Conceptualising and Measuring the Attitudes, Institutions, and Structures That Build a More Peaceful Society. Sydney: Institute for Economics and Peace. IEP. (2019). Positive Peace Report 2019: Analysing the Factors That Sustain Peace. Sydney: Institute for Economics & Peace. Ishida, T. (1969). “Beyond the Traditional Concepts of Peace in Different Cultures. Peace Research, 6(2), 133–145. Jackson, R., & Sorenson, G. (2010). Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: OUP. Jahed, Behnaz. (2023). The role of traditional norms in building sustainable peace in post-conflict societies: The case of Afghanistan [Master’s thesis, Padua Thesis, and Dissertation Archive]. Laurea magistrali. Jenkins, R. (2013). Peacebuilding: From Concept to Commission. New York, US: Routledge. John, V. (2018). Peace education in post-apartheid South Africa: needs, responses, and constraints. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 6(1), 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.18588/201805.00a048 Karimi, M. (2021). Expounding the Pattern of Peace Establishment in Europe After the Second World War. International Relations Research, 11(1), 35-69. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/irr.2021.130804 Karimi, M. and Hafeznia, M. (2018). The Role of Local State in Peace Building. Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(51), 1-30. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.17354331.1397.14.51.1.1 Krahmann, E., & Podder, S. (2025). “From Norms and Peace to Peace Norms: Moving from Norm Clusters to Norm Complexes in Peace Building.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. Krause, J., Krause, W., & Bränfors, P. (2018). “Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace.” International Interactions 44 (6), 985–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2018.1492386 Li, S., Flaxman, A. D., Lafta, R., Galway, L. P., Takaro, T. K., Burnham, G., … & Hagopian, A. (2016). A novel method for verifying war mortality while estimating Iraqi deaths for the Iran-Iraq War through Operation Desert Storm (1980-1993). Plos One, 11(10), e0164709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164709 Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. Mahmoud, Y., & Mechoulan, D. (2018). Peace Operations and Sustaining Peace: The Restoration and Extension of State Authority. New York: International Peace Institute. Mansour, R. (2018). The U.S. Role in Post-Saddam Iraq: Sectarianism and Sovereignty. Middle Eastern Studies Review, 14(2), 104-119. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969. Matambo, E. (2020). South Africa-China relations: A constructivist perspective. The Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 42(2), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v42i2.74 McCandless, E., & Donais, T. (2022). Generations of Constructing Peace: The Constructivism Paradigm and Peacebuilding. In Peacebuilding Paradigms: The Impact of Theoretical Diversity on Implementing Sustainable Peace (pp. 126-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Milstein, E. (2014). Nation-building through film in post-apartheid South Africa. Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies, 38(1), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.5070/F7381025028 Moskos, C. C. (2000). Towards a Postmodern Military? In Democratic Societies and Their Armed Forces: Israel in Comparative Context. London, UK: Frank Cass. Murithi, Tim. (2008). "African Indigenous and Endogenous Approaches to Peace and Conflict Resolution." In Peace and Conflict in Africa, edited by David Francis, 16-30. London: Zed Books. Mushonga, M. and Seloma, T. (2018). Women’s voices, women’s lives: Qwaqwa women’s experiences of the apartheid and post-apartheid eras. Journal for Contemporary History, 43(1), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.38140/sjch.v43i1.3526 Nagy, V. (2017). Narrative construction of sexual violence and rape online. International journal for crime, justice, and social democracy, 6(2), 95-108. Ndwandwe, N. D. (2024). Towards a model for incorporating peace education in south african higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(2), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-2-5722 Ohmura, H. (2011). “Termination and Recurrence of Civil War: Which Outcomes Lead to Durable Peace After Civil War?” Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (3), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810991100017X Parasiliti, A. (2003). The Causes and Timing of Iraq's Wars: A Power Cycle Assessment. International Political Science Review, 24(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512103024001010 Paris, R. (2004). At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pereira, M. (2019). The Liberal Peace and Its Contesting Universal Values: A Theoretical Approach to the Development of Hybrid Forms of Political Order in Post-Conflict Societies. Brazilian Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 427-453. https://doi.org/10.36311/2237-7743.2019.v8n2.10.p427 Richmond, O. (2010). Resistance and the post-liberal peace. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 38(3), 665-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810365017 Richmond, O. (2006). "The Problem of Peace: Understanding the 'Liberal Peace.'" Conflict, Security & Development 6(3), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800600933480 Rousseau, D.M., Sim B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt., & Camerer, C. (1998). “Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” The Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 393–404. Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the Democratic Peace. Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Rustin, C. (2021). What gender legislative reforms have meant for women in South Africa? Law, Democracy and Development, 25(spe), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2020/ldd.v25.spe3 Salehi, H. (2015). The concept of peace in Western international relations theories and Iranian-Islamic peace studies. International Relations Research, 5(15), 101–134. [In Persian] Saputra, W. N. E., Supriyanto, A., Astuti, B., Ayriza, Y., Adiputra, S., Costa, A. D., … & Ediyanto, E. (2020). The Peace Counseling Approach (PCA) is used to reduce the negative, aggressive behavior of students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 631-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080236 Shields, P. M. (2017). Limits of Negative Peace, Faces of Positive Peace. Parameters, 47(3), 5-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2868 Shields, P. M., & Travis, D. S. (2017). “Achieving Organizational Flexibility through Ambidexterity. Parameters, 47(2), 65–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2932 Söderström, J., Åkebo, M., & Jarstad, A.K. (2021). “Friends, Fellows, and Foes: A New Framework for Studying Relational Peace.” International Studies Review 23 (3), 484–508. Soltanzadeh, M. and Othman, M. R. (2013). The Iran-Iraq War and the Role of Ayatollah Khomeini. Sejarah, 22(2), 143-164. Spring, Ú. O. (2008). Peace and Environment: Towards a Sustainable Peace as Seen From the South. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. O. Spring, C. Mesjasz , J. Grin, P. Dunay , N. C. Behera, . . . P. Liotta , Globalization and Environmental Challenges (1 ed., pp. 113-126). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Stojanovski, S., & Masevski, S. (2024). Challenges of peace and sustainable development. International Scientific Journal of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of North Macedonia, 69-79. Swart, K. and Maralack, D. (2020). Black Lives Matter: Perspectives from South African Cricket. Sport in Society, 24(5), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1819693 Theys, S. (2017). Constructivism. In M. Stephen, International Relations Theory (pp. 36-41). Bristol, UK: E-International Relations. Thiessen, Chuck. (2015). "The Dilemmas of Local Ownership of Upper-Level and Grassroots Peace Processes in Afghanistan." In Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues, edited by Sung Yong Lee and Alpaslan Özerdem, 107-27. New York: Routledge. Tientcheu, V. T. L. (2021). Understanding peace: A comparison of liberalism and constructivism [Unpublished manuscript]. Critical Theories of International Relations, University of East London. Tsekpo, K. and Torto, O. (2023). The future of peace in africa: complexities of local conflict(s) and liberal peace interventions. Leadership & Developing Societies, 8(1), 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.47697/lds. 35370033 United Nations (UN). 1998. Towards a Culture of Peace. Consolidated Report Containing a Draft Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace. Paris. Viotti, P., & Kaupi, M. (2012). International Relations Theory. London: Longman Pearson. Wallis, J. (2012). A liberal-local hybrid peace project in action? The increasing engagement between the local and liberal in Timor-Leste. Review of International Studies, 38(4), 735-761. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1017/S0260210511000787 Wallis, J., & Richmond, O. (2019). From constructivist to critical engagements with peacebuilding: Implications for hybrid peace. In Hybridity in peacebuilding and development (1st ed., pp. 24). Routledge. Williams Jr, R. E., & Caldwell, D. (2006). Jus Post Bellum: Just War Theory and the Principles of Just Peace. International Studies Perspectives, 7(4), 309-320. Wu, J. (2023). The rise of South Africa’s peace diplomacy practice in the post-apartheid era—from the aspect of niche diplomacy, 320-328. Zarif, J. (2020). Iran’s Foreign Policy After the Nuclear Deal: Ideology vs. Pragmatism. International Journal of Contemporary Iranian Studies, 5(1), 25-42. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 131 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب