رویکرد مقایسه‌ای به سیاست‌خارجی آمریکا در قبال روسیه در دور‌ه‌های ترامپ و بایدن(2024-2016)

فهرست نشریات

میز خدمت الکترونیک

دوره ویراستاری

دوره آموزشی بهره‌گیری کاربردی از هوش مصنوعی در نگارش، داوری، ویرایش و انتشار آثار علمی برگزار می‌شود

دوره تخصصی آموزش ویراستاری برگزار می‌شود.

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

فهرست مجلات علمی- پژوهشی دانشگاه تهران

نحوه ارسال مقاله برای مجله- ثبت نام در سامانه- فراموش کردن رمز عبور

تعداد نشریات	127
تعداد شماره‌ها	7,124
تعداد مقالات	76,627
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	153,528,565
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	115,672,450

	رویکرد مقایسه‌ای به سیاست‌خارجی آمریکا در قبال روسیه در دور‌ه‌های ترامپ و بایدن(2024-2016)
فصلنامه سیاست
دوره 56، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 172-145 اصل مقاله (520.06 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jpq.2026.389159.1008288
نویسندگان
محمد جمشیدی¹؛ ساحل عبداللهی‌منش^* ²
¹استادیار گروه مطالعات منطقهای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
²دانشجوی دکترای، گروه مطالعات منطقهای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
روابط متقابل آمریکا و روسیه در فضای پس از جنگ سرد، از متغیرهای مؤثر بر سیاست و روابط بینالملل محسوب شده؛ به گونهای که فراز و نشیب الگوی تعاملی یاد شده بر سیاست خارجی دیگر بازیگران در سطوح منطقهای و بینالمللی نیز تأثیرگذار بوده. این چارچوب تعاملی در سالهای پساجنگ سرد نوعی الگوی تکراری از چرخه «مذاکره و همکاری، رقابت و تعارض» را تجربه کرده ‌است. به این معنا که گویی هر یک از کابینه‌های ایالات متحده بر منحنی از «بازبینی» روابط با مسکو تا «نارضایتی» از الگوی رفتاری آن حرکت کرده و همگام با این روند، در سایه برخی تحولات، بر ضرورت مواجهه با آن پافشاری داشته‌اند. تمرکز این پژوهش بر واکاوی جایگاه روسیه در سیاست خارجی آمریکا در بازه زمانی 2016 تا 2024 بوده و بر این پایه، پرسش اصلی این نوشتار عبارتست از اینکه: وجوه افتراق و اشتراک سیاست خارجی آمریکا در مورد روسیه در دوره‌های ترامپ و بایدن کدامند؟ در پاسخ، بر این فرضیه تأکید می‌شود که: وجه مشترک سیاست خارجی آمریکا در دوره‌های رهبری ترامپ و بایدن، اعمال سیاست مبتنی بر «مدیریت تنش» میان دو دولت بود، اما در دوره ترامپ سیاست خارجی مزبور از چالش «تصمیم‌گیری مبتنی بر عناصر ناهمگن» تأثیر می‌پذیرفت و در دوره بایدن متأثر از تهاجم روسیه به اوکراین، از «تصمیم‌گیری مبتنی بر انسجام بخشی میان منابع نرم و سخت قدرت و چندجانبه‌گرایی» جهت گرفت. روش تحقیق کیفی و سازوکار پژوهش نیز مقایسهای می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بحران‌های اوکراین؛ سیاست تحریمی امریکا؛ رابطه فراآتلانتیک؛ ترامپ؛ بایدن
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Comparative Approach to U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Russia During the Trump and Biden Administrations (2016–2024)
نویسندگان [English]
Mohamad Jamshidi¹؛ Sahel Abdollahi Manesh²
¹Assistant Professor, Department of Regional Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
²PhD Candidate, Department of Regional Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction The period from 2016 to 2024 demonstrated the pivotal role of U.S.-Russia relations in shaping American foreign policy. Central to this dynamic was the challenge of managing Russia's assertive behavior, particularly under Vladimir Putin, while safeguarding U.S. national interests. Although both the Trump and Biden administrations acknowledged Russia's strategic importance, their approaches diverged significantly. The Trump administration's approach was characterized by heterogeneous decision-making elements, emphasizing transactional diplomacy and short-term strategic gains. In contrast, the Biden administration pursued a policy grounded in the integration of hard and soft power resources, coupled with multilateral engagement, reflecting a structured and principle-based foreign policy orientation. Methodology The research employs a qualitative-comparative method, analyzing foreign policy behavior through speeches, official policy documents, strategic doctrines, and international responses. Its theoretical foundation is based on John Mearsheimer’s theory of offensive neorealism, which posits that great powers, operating within an anarchic international system, seek to maximize their relative power to ensure survival. This framework is applied to assess U.S. reactions to perceived Russian revisionism and aggression, particularly in Ukraine, and to examine the strategic rationale behind each administration’s choice of policy instruments. Key Findings and Results Trump Administration: Trump's approach toward Russia was dual-track in nature, oscillating between cooperative gestures—particularly in the context of Middle East security and counterterrorism—and selective pressure, such as in sanctions and arms control decisions. His transactional and business-oriented diplomacy often placed short-term national interests above alliance commitments and normative concerns. Notable instances include the U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty and a conditional posture toward supporting Ukraine, reflecting a decision-making process shaped by heterogeneous elements rather than a coherent strategic vision. Biden Administration: Biden's policy, particularly following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, was marked by a cohesive integration of hard and soft power tools within a multilateral framework. This included extensive coordination with NATO and European partners, the imposition of targeted sanctions, and the strengthening of deterrence through sustained military assistance to Ukraine. Prior to the invasion, Biden’s foreign policy emphasized democratic values, human rights, and the restoration of proactive U.S. global leadership. His decision-making reflects strategic coherence, balancing engagement, competition, and principled action to counter Russian assertiveness. Key Results Trump’s policy resulted in ambiguity in U.S.-Russia relations, reflecting a flexible yet inconsistent stance that relied on personal diplomacy with Putin and transactional engagement. Biden’s policy reinforced multilateralism, consolidated the transatlantic security architecture, and implemented comprehensive measures to counter Russian aggression, demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating hard and soft power in strategic decision-making. The contrasting approaches illustrate that U.S. foreign policy toward Russia has been shaped by underlying decision-making frameworks: one defined by heterogeneous, transactional elements under Trump, and the other characterized by an integrated, multilateral, and principle-based approach under Biden. Conclusion The comparative analysis highlights that U.S. foreign policy toward Russia cannot be fully understood without examining the interplay between leadership decision-making style, strategic priorities, and multilateral engagement. Trump’s heterogeneous decision-making produced flexible yet inconsistent outcomes, whereas Biden’s integrative approach fostered coordinated deterrence and enhanced strategic clarity. Understanding these contrasts provides critical insight into both the continuity and divergence of American foreign policy, particularly in managing great power competition and responding to global security challenges.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Ukrainian Crises, US sanctions policy, Transatlantic Relationship, Trump, Biden

مراجع
References Åslund, A. (2019).Western Economic Sanctions on Russia over Ukraine, 2014–2019”,In:Chromeextension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/CESifo-Forum-2019-4-aslund-economic-sanctions-december.pdf Biden, Jr, Joseph, R (2020). Why America Must Lead Again Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump. Foreign affairs. Vol.99, No.2. Bugos, Sh, (2019). U.S. Completes INF Treaty Withdrawal. available at:, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-09/news/us-completes-inf-treaty-withdrawal. Bouzeghrane, M. A. (2024). US foreign policy towards Russia during Trump and Biden tenures: A comparative study (Master’s thesis, Mohamed Khider University of Biskra). https://doi.org/10. 13140/RG. 2.2.27069. 478 Brenes, M. g, Jackson, V. (2022). Great-Power Competition Is Bad for Democracy Rivalry With China and Russia Reinforces the Real Causes of American Decline. Foreign affairs. Borger, J. (2021). Biden hits Russia with new sanctions in response to election meddling. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/ world/ 2021/apr/15/joe-biden-russia-sanctions-election-interference-hacking. Bartlett, Jason, Bae Euihyun (2021), in: https://www.cnas.org/publications/ reports/sanctions-by-the-numbers-2021-year-in-review. CARROLL, O., (2018). “US ‘devaluing’ international law and institutions, says Russia’s Sergei Lavrov”, Independent, Available at:www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sergei-lavrov-us-russia-foreign-minister-start-year-conference-united-nations-donald-trump-putin-a8160076.html. Cropsey, S., & Feith, D. (2011). The Obama doctrine. Hudson Institute. https://www.hudson.org/research/9784-the-obama-doctrine. Droin, M., Grieco, k.A. g, Jacob, H. (2024, July 8). “Why NATO Should Stay Out of Asia,The Alliance Would Leave the Region Less, Not More, Secure”.Foreign affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/why-nato-should-stay-out-asia. Düben, B. A. (2023). Revising history and “gathering the Russian lands”: Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian nationhood. LSE Public Policy Review, 3(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.86. Elman, C. and Jensen, M., (2014). The Realism Reader. Routledge.Eurobarometer Survey (2022). “Key challenges of our times – the EU in 2022”, Eurobarometer Survey, June. Ettinger, Aaron (2020).” Is there an emerging left-wing foreign policy in the United States?” International Journal, Vol. 75(1) 24–48 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/ 0020702020914008 journals.sagepub.com/home/ij. Fisher, Max and Peçanha, Sergio, (2017). What the U.S. gets for defending its allies and interests abroad, New York Times, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/ 2017/01/16/world/trump-military-role-treaties-allies-nato-asia-persian-gulf.html? Frazer, Michael, Trainer, Jocelyn (2022), in: https://www.cnas.org/ publications/reports/sanctions-by-the-numbers-2022-year-in-review. Gates, Robert M., (2014). Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War. New York. Alfred Knopf. Gramer, Robbie,(2017), ‘Trump discovers Article 5 after disastrous NATO visit’, Foreign Policy, Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/ 2017/06/ 09/trump-discovers-article-5-after-disastrous-nato-visit-brussels-visit-transatlantic-relationship-europe. Greenleaf, H. (2023, April 13). “Back to basics: The transatlantic alliance and the invasion of Ukraine. University of Notre Dame”. https://eitw.nd.edu/articles/back-to-basics-the-transatlantic-alliance-and-the-invasion-of-ukraine/. Gill, T. D. (2022). The jus ad bellum and Russia’s “special military operation” in Ukraine. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 25(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-25020002 . Homeland Security Digital Library (2010), “National Security Strategy”, Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=24251 Hutchison, Kay Bailey,(2019) “How Russia Undermined Over 30 Years of Nuclear Arms Control,” New York Times, Available at: , http://nytimes.com/2019/02/10/opinion/russia-inf-treaty.html. Haggray, Syreta (2021), “What’s next for the United States? Part 4: Restoring Democracy in the United States and Abroad “,In: Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30822 Accessed: 23-11-2022 05:57 UTC. Harding, Luke (2014), “Russia is blackmailing Europe over energy, says Cheney”, The Guardian, Available at:http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2006/may/05/usa.oil. JOHNSON, ELIANA, (2018), “Trump’s rebuke of McMaster was months in the making”, available at, https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/ 20/trump-mcmaster-tension-national-security-adviser-417110 Katsy, Dmitri, Sacko, David H. and Khudoley Konstantin, (2008) , “Europe-Russia United States: Whither Are We Drifting?”, In :The United States, Russia, and China: Confronting Global Challenges in the 21^st Century, eds. Paul J. Bolt, Su Changhe, and Sharyl Cross. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. Koolaee, Elahe, Taghvai nia, Ehsan (2011). Goals and achievements of Russia from the establishment of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. [In Persian], Master’s thesis. Department of Regional Studies. Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. University of Tehran. Koolaee, Elahe, Khashe, Jafar, Rezazadeh, Habib (2011). An Analysis of Russia-United Stated Relations in light of Obama’s “Reset” Policy. [In Persian], Central Eurasia Studies.9.98-79. Keyvan Hosseini, Asghar (2008). The place of technology transfer in the American security strategy. [In Persian],Tehran: Defense Future Research Institute. Keyvan Hosseini, Asghar (2012). Soft power in US foreign policy (from the emergence to after September 11). [In Persian], Tehran: Andishe sazan noor. Karami, Jahangir (2013). Interview with Tabnak site, http://tinyurl.com/ ycarppdf. Karami, Jahangir and Sortchi, Mohammad Reza. (2023). Russia-America Strategic Competition: Preeminence and International Consequences. Central Eurasian Studies, 16(1), 295-317. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2023. 349654.450104 Lammy May, D, (2024). The Case for Progressive Realism Why Britain Must Chart a New Global Course, Foreign affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-kingdom/case-progressive-realism-david-lammy. Little, Richard (2010). The balance of power in international relations. Translation Gholam Ali Chegenizadeh, Tehran: Abrar Contemporary Cultural Institute of International Studies and Research Mankoff, Jeffrey, (2009), Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics, Rowman & Littlefield. McFaul, M. (2021). “How Biden Should Deal with Putin Summits Are Good, but Containment is better”, Foreign affairs. McFaul, M. (2021). “How to Contain Putin’s Russia A Strategy for Countering a Rising Revisionist Power”, Foreign affairs , Moghadas, Mahmoud, Dabiri, Mohamad reza (2010). After two years, has Barack Obama’s policy on Russia changed? [In Persian], Studies on Israel-US.2.67-90. Mearsheimer, John J. (2009) .The tragedy of great power politics. Translation Gholam Ali Chegenizadeh. Tehran: Institute of Political and International Studies. Mastanduno, M. (2019). Partner politics: Russia, China, and the challenge of extending US hegemony after the Cold War. Security Studies, 28(3), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604984. Maloney, S. (2014, November 21). Wary nuclear vigil for Iran’s neighbors. Council on Foreign Relations.https://www.cfr.org/interview/wary-nuclear-vigil-irans-neighbors. Nuland, V. (2020). Pinning Down Putin ,How a Confident America Should Deal With Russia, Foreign affairs, Pifer, Steven,(2014), “US-Russia Relations in the Obama Era: From Reset to Refreeze?”, In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook . Polyakova and Letsas,(2017), “On the Record”; RFE/RL, “U.S. Hits Russian Missile Designer With Export Restrictions Over Treaty Dispute”, Available at: http://rferl.org/a/russia-us-sanctions-missile-designer-inf-violations/28927654.html. Pauli, Järvenpää, (2014), “Zapad-2013 A View From Helsinki”, Washington, D.C., The JamestownFoundation, Available at:November 16, http://www.jamestown.org/uploads/media/Zapad_2013_View_ From_Helsinki_-_Full.pdf. Pomeroy, C. (2023). Hawks become us: The sense of power and militant foreign policy attitudes. Security Studies, 33(1), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2023.2252736. Pashkov, V. (2024). Contradictions in US‑Ukraine relations during the Russian aggression: A strategic interdependence analysis. Obrana a Strategie, 24 (2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.24. 2024.02. 113‑131 . Reuters. (2021, February 2). Reaction to jailing of Kremlin critic Navalny. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/reaction-jailing-kremlin-critic-navalny-2021-02-02/ . Reuters. (2021, January 18). Blinken says U.S. deeply concerned about Navalny, reviewing response to Russia. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/blinken-says-us-deeply-concerned-about-navalny-reviewing-response-to-russia idUSKBN29W2RA/. Sakwa, Richard,(2012), “Conspiracy Narratives as a Mode of Engagement in International Politics: The Case of the 2008 Russo-Georgian War,” The Russian Review, vol. 71, no. 4 Sam, Perlo-Freeman, and Carina, Solmirano, )2013( „Trends in worldmilitaryexpenditure.“ SIPRIFact Sheet. Available at: ,November 16, 2014. http://books.sipri.org/fi les/FS/SIPRIFS1304.pdf. SCHADLOW, N.,(2017), “Welcome to the Competition”, War on the Rocks, Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2017/01/welcome-to-the-competition. Stent, Angela E,(2014). The Limits of Partnership: U.S.-Russian Relations in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton University Press. Sullivan, J. (2023, October 24). “The Sources of American Power ,A Foreign Policy for a Changed World”. Foreign affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/sources-american-power-biden-jake-sullivan. Sajjadpour, Seyed Mohammad Kazem, Taftian, Fatemeh (2011). US-Russia Relations in a Neoconservative Era (2000-2008) Cooperation and Tension. [In Persian], International Research Quarterly.2.100-72. Salimi, Hossein (2005). Virtual state, wạq‘grạyy offensive , International Military, foreign policy. [In Persian], Journal of Public Law Research.17,43-19. Shad, Mohammad. (2015). Identity Origin of Tens Relationship between Russia and the USA and its Impact on Interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 18(70), 121-156. U.S. Army Europe and Africa. (2022, November 16). Press release – US Department of Defense establishes Security Assistance Group‑Ukraine in Wiesbaden. https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/ArticleViewPress Release/Article/3219717/press-release-us-department-of-defense-establishes-security-assistance-group-uk/. Vogel, Kenneth P.,(2019), “Democrats Fall Short in Russia Sanctions Vote,” New York Times, Available at: http://nytimes.com/2019/01/16/us/ politics/senate-trump-russia-sanctions.html. Vyas, A. (2025, April 18). Transactional Diplomacy and the RussiaUkraine Conflict: A U.S. Foreign Policy Shift During the Trump Era. Independent researcher specializing in geopolitical and economic strategy. Wright , G.g, Cooley, A. (2022,October,28). The Ukraine Moment in Transatlantic Relations… and Then What?. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/ukraine-moment-transatlantic-relations-and-then-what. Wertheim, S. (2017, January 3). Trump and American exceptionalism: Why a crippled America is something new. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-01-03/trump-and-american-exceptionalism Zygar, M. (2024). How Russian elites made peace with the war. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/how-russian-elites-made-peace-war. Zamfir, I., & Tóthová, L. (2021, December 21). Summit for Democracy. European Parliamentary Research Service Epthinktank. https://epthinktank.eu/2021/12/21/summit-for-democracy/.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 123 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 78

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب