پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,124 |
| تعداد مقالات | 76,627 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 153,528,565 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 115,672,450 |
فراتحلیل نظام داناییِ زن ایرانی (مورد مطالعه؛ مقالات و پایاننامههای دانشجویی در فاصله 1395-1385) | ||
| فصلنامه سیاست | ||
| دوره 56، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 236-203 اصل مقاله (718.44 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jpq.2026.386306.1008260 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| صبریه کرمشائی* | ||
| دکترای علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تدوین و تحلیل مؤلفه های نظام دانایی زن ایرانی با تمرکز بر تعدادی از آثار نوشتاری اهداف اصلی این مقاله را شکل داده است. شاخص ها نشان می دهند؛ چه دغدغه هایی توجه زنان را بیشتر به خود معطوف می کنند، غالباً به کدام روش ها یا چارچوب های نظری گرایش دارند و رویکردهای فمینیستی در آثار آنها چگونه خود را آشکار می کنند؟ ازطریق دستگاه مفهومی سه گانه فمینیسم، پرابلماتیک و پارادایمیک، تعدادی از این آثار با عنایت به روش پژوهش و عناوین آثار مورد بررسی قرارگرفتند. این پرسش ها، به کشف احتمالی تصویری کلی از نظام دانایی ویژه زن ایرانی کمک می کنند. مقاله با داوری هنجاری اکسل هونِت درباره نظریه ارج گذاری پیوند یافته است. روش پژوهش، فراتحلیلی است که با بازخوانی و تجمیع تعدادی مقاله و رساله دانشجویی به تعداد 60 اثر، انجام گرفته است. از بین آثار مطالعه شده، 20 مورد از منظر رویکرد پارادایمیک، 17 مورد از منظر پرابلماتیک و 23 مورد در چارچوب رویکرد فمینیستی قابل تفکیک اند. نتایج مطالعه نشان می دهد؛ رویکردهای هویتی، دغدغه مندانه و فمینیستی از نظر کمّی، 40 مورد یا %67 از جهت گیری کل آثار برگزیده را به خود اختصاص می دهند. نتیجه اینکه؛ مشاهدات کمّی در بازه زمانی (1399-1387)، نشان می دهد، زنان ایرانیِ نویسنده بیشتر از منظر دغدغه های هویتی و جنسیتی اقدام به پژوهش و نوشتن می کنند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| فراتحلیل؛ نظام دانایی؛ رویکرد پرابلماتیک؛ رویکرد پارادایمی؛ رویکرد فمینیستی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Meta-analysis of Iranian woman's knowledge system (case study; student articles and theses between 2007-2017) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Sabriyeh Karamshaii | ||
| Ph.D in Political Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Humanities, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction This article analyzes the content of two types of women's writing interests. The three conceptual systems of feminism, problematic, and paradigmatic are used as analytical tools to explore what topics attract women's attention, what methods they frequently use in their analysis, and what the basic pattern of their intellectual analysis is. Through this three-part conceptual system, a number of works were examined with regard to their methods and titles. Among a multitude of theoretical methods, which theoretical approach women often use for analysis is an interesting question for discovering their intellectual structure. If we accept that the essence of thought is not the playground of dual male/female identities, but rather the realization of the sacred matter of thought in the context of education and the acquisition of thinking skills, then it is expected that women's cognitive faculties will increasingly approach the transcendental realm of thought, or philosophy. The long absence of women in the primary system of knowledge or philosophy is probably the result of a mental freezing in an atmosphere of feminist ideologies of contemporary man, because despite the greater education of contemporary women, philosophizing is still a male occupation. Therefore, if the rule of thinking is a non-sexual matter, why has the history of thinking always been the product of male thought? It seems that women's mental structure is a self-standing concern, and the teachings of modernism have also pushed them in this direction. However, a rereading of academic and public texts reminds us of the question: is the existence of a specific system of knowledge for Iranian women possible? If the answer is yes, what features of the way of thinking does this system have? Does this system of knowledge look at a specific aspect of social life, or is a specific aspect of human thought the subject of its reflections? Methodology The present article uses meta-analysis to analyze the content and structural form of a number of women's written works in order to extract possible components of the Iranian women's knowledge system. Several works by women from the last five to ten years were randomly selected. Then, the variables of subject, method, and analytical approach of the authors were analyzed from feminist, problematic, and paradigmatic perspectives. Through quantitative analysis of the indicators, it is determined which variables have attracted women's attention and thought. Although a large volume of national studies have addressed the issue of women, these works have rarely discussed women's intellectual lifestyles. The concept of a "knowledge system" has been used as an analogical concept in Iranology studies, but so far this conceptual tool has not been used to explain women's intellectual lifestyle. Therefore, meta-analysis of women's written texts, inspired by this conceptual tool, is the method used in the research. A surrealist or combined approach to written texts is likely to provide a new image of the nature and status of women's knowledge. Discussion and Results Field observations show that women often look at different areas of life from a problematic perspective, which is issue-centered. In the paradigmatic approach, by examining and analyzing thought patterns and methods in research works, some of the most frequent patterns among women are revealed, highlighting characteristics of the women's cognitive system. In fact, women's explanatory and analytical forms and patterns show where Iranian women stand within the boundaries of thought. In the problematic realm, being a woman has always been an unresolved issue, a subject both present and absent, so that every thinker, in confronting this mysterious element, exposes a manifestation of their own mind—be it heavenly or hellish—to the judgment of all. In such an atmosphere, it is as if even a woman herself cannot think about philosophy outside the realm of femininity. Therefore, a form of egoism has trapped her in the darkness of thought about the human condition. Within the paradigmatic index, the purpose is to identify which recurring thought patterns women writers tend to employ in their analysis. Are they subject-oriented or structuralist? With what theoretical methods do they analyze phenomena? In the problematic approach, an attempt is made to show that the concern driving women's writing is not philosophical ends, but rather her issue is lost dignity and rights within the scale of natural human rights. In total, through quantitative analysis of the three conceptual systems in the selected texts, the following results were obtained: In the paradigmatic approach, approximately sixty percent of the written works employ methods of discourse analysis, phenomenology, and interpretive and reflective approaches. About forty percent of the studied works were conducted using quantitative-survey, documentary, and comparative analysis and other methods. In the problematic approach, fifty-three percent of the studied works focused on individual rights and harms, and about forty-seven percent focused on women's social rights. From a feminist perspective, fifty-two percent of the works addressed identity concerns and forty-eight percent addressed gender equality.Thus, out of one hundred percent of research interests, sixty-six percent of the works tended towards indicators related to the feminist and problematic approach. Conclusion The direction to which women pay more attention, among the multitude of interests, thought patterns, and theoretical methods, laid the first foundation for discovering and designing the Iranian women's knowledge system, or epistemology. The question of what concerns motivate women's writing, what percentage of women's issues focus on their identity and status, and fundamentally whether a special type of Iranian women's knowledge system can be designed by observing written texts, provided the main motivation for this research. Observations and findings from the study of three key concepts—feminism, problematic, and paradigmatic—show that thirty-eight percent of women's writing orientation, based on the works studied, adopts a feminist approach. Twenty-nine percent of the other works were analyzed with a problematic approach, and thirty-three percent were classified as paradigmatic approaches. In other words, quantitative indicators show that problematic and feminist approaches together account for sixty-seven percent of the orientation of the total works. Therefore, in quantitative observations covering the period from 2008 to 2020, it is observed that a large part of women's research and written works are devoted to explaining concerns related to identity, status, rights, and gender identity in general. As a result, there is a possibility that problematic and feminist approaches will continue to become the dominant approaches in women's research and written texts. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Meta-Analysis, Knowledge System, Problematic Approach, Paradigmatic Approach, Feminist Approach | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Abazari, Yousef, (1998), Sociological Wisdom, first edition, Tehran: Tarh-e-No. Ahmadi, B. (2003) A Dictionary of Marx's Philosophical Terms,Tehran, first edition, Markaz Publishing.[in persian] Althusser, L. (1970), Reading Capital, Etienne Balibar, Translated by. Ben Brewser, Librairie Francois Maspero.Inthesite;https://www.google. com/search?client=firefoxd&q=%29+https%3A%2F%2Fengare.net%2Fwhat-is-problematic%2F. Ansari, M. (2023), Women, Men, and Political Philosophy: The Future of Political Philosophy That Was Male, Women's Research Journal, 14 (46), 201-221. Archini, H. and Molavi Vardanjani, I. (2020). The Formation of Political Currents in the First Decade of the Islamic Revolution and Their System of Knowledge in the Political Thought of Imam Khomeini. Islamic Revolution Studies, 60(17), 29-52. Ardebili, M. M, (2015) Problematica, https://problematica archive.com/ problematicandphilosophy. Bani Tarafi, N., & Hatampour, S. (2019). Representing the Female Effects in Sehreman by Iranian Female Writers. Research on Fictional Literature, 8(3), 1-21.[in persian] Bauman, Z. (2013), Liquid Love: About the Instability of Human Bonds, translated by Irfan Sabeti, Tehran, third edition, Qoqnoos. [in persian] Bayat, A, (2007), Dictionary of Words, Third Edition, Tehran, Andishe and Religious Culture Publications. Beigi, M., & Moeini Alamdari, J. (2019). The Consequences of the Axel Honneth’s Recognition Theory for Contemporary Radicalism. Political and International Approaches, 10 (4), 102-123. [in persian] Boudon, R. &, Bouricaud, F. (2003), Critical Dictionary of Sociology, University of Chicago Press. [in persian] Campbell, R. and Wasco, Sh. M. (2000), Feminist Approaches to Social Science:Epistemological and Methodological TenetsAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp.773-791. Dolan, K. (2011), Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 97–107. Ghaed, M. ,(2001) Diaries and forgetfulness and other articles, first edition, Tehran:Tarh-e- no. [in persian] Ghiyasvand, A. (2014). The impact of modern urban spaces on reflexivity women's gender identity. Gender and Family Studies, 2(1), 79-98. Giddens, A. (2007), structuralism and post structuralism, the production of culture, Tehran: Jihad University Press. [in persian] Gururany, Sh. (2002),Construction of Third World women’s knowledge in the development discourse, UNESCO. Published by Blackwell Publishers, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA. Hasanpour, A., & Yazdkhasti, B. (2016). The Problematic of Femininity: Representation of Gender and Construction of Female Moral Stereotypes in the Cinema of Iran. Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 16(32), 33-68.[in persian] Hassanifar, A. (2014) Discourse Analysis as a Method, Contemporary Political Essays, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 5th year, 1st issue, pp. 49-67. [in persian] Highmore,B. (2002),everyday life & Cultural Theory An Introduction, By Routledge, London, This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library,209 pages. Honneth, A. (2001) 'The Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School and the Theory of Recognition: Dialogue with Olivier Voirol', in Gabriel Rockhill, and Alfredo Gomez-Muller (eds), Politics of Culture and the Spirit of Critique: Dialogues (New York, NY, 2011; online edn, Columbia Scholarship Online, 19 Nov. 2015), https://doi.org/10.7312/ columbia/9780231151870.003.0010, accessed 21 Nov. 2024. [in persian] Jahangardi, M, (2023), An analysis of the application of the concept of paradigm in sociology, Bi-Quarterly Philosophy of Science, Year 12, Issue 2, Fall and Winter, pp. 79-103. Jamali, F, (2022) and Pourabed M. j,Bahri,Kh, Balavi,R, A Review of Educational Concepts in the “Sayyedat Al Ghamar”(Moon Women)Novel by Jokha Harithi, Women's Studies, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS), Quarterly Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 113-143. Kazemi, A. (2006). Problematic of everyday life in cultural studies and its relevance to Iranian society, Cultural and Communication Studies Quarterly, No. 4, pp. 97-122. [in persian] Khanifar, H. & al., (2017), principles and basics of qualitative research methods (a new and applied approach), vol. 1, first edition, Tehran: Negahe Danesh. [in persian] Kohn, T, (2010), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, translated by Saeed Ziba Kalam, Tehran: Samt Publications. Klein, R. D. (1991) ‘Passion and politics in Women's Studies in the 1990s’, in Aaron, Jane and Walby, Sylvia (Eds) Out of the Margins: Women's Studies in the Nineties , London, Falmer. Kopal A, Nouri Partov, A, & Mostafavi Sh.M. (2023). The Encounter of the Iranian-Greek Knowledge System in the Narratives of Medea and Sohrab Based on Michel Foucault's Discourse on Power, Journal: Mystical and Mythological Literature (Persian Language and Literature) : Volume:19, Issue:73, pp155-185.[in persian] Kristeva, J. (2023), against national depression, translated by Mehrdad Parsa, 7th edition, Tehran:Shavand. [in persian]. Lukacs,G.(1999), History and Class Consciousness, translated by Mohammad Jafar Pouyandeh, Tehran:Tajrobeh. [in persian] Macdonell, D. (2001).Theories of discourse: an introduction, translated by Hossein Ali Nozari, Tehran: Farhang Goftman.[in persian] Mirdamadi, S. M. H. (2023). Sadra's system of knowledge, a platform for creating a divine civilization. Quarterly Journal of Theorizing, 2(1), pp.81-98. Moss, D. & Pryke,J. (2007) Creating space and time for feminist approaches in higher education, Women's Studies International Forum 30 p.p.367-379. Moghadam Heidari, G. H, (2006) Incommensurability of scientific paradigms, Tehran: Nashre Ney. Najmabadi, A. (2005), Aqandar and representation, review of women's activities during Reza Shah's period, Narasheh magazine, No. 44, pp. 151-121, this article was presented in a seminar held on September 19 and 20, 2003 in Amsterdam; With the title: (Authority and Agenuy Re-Visiting Women᾿s Activisim during Riza shah᾿s Period). [in persian] Nowzari, H. A. and Sheikhlar,K (2010), Methodology and Epistemology in the Post modern Approach, Political Science Quarterly, No. 12, Autumn, pp. 35-55. Presbey, G. M. (2003),The Struggle for Recognition in the Philosophy of Axel Honneth, Applied to the Current South African Situation and its Call for an `African Renaissance, Philosophy & Social CrItIcism • vol 29 no 5 • pp. 537–561. Pishgahi Fard, Z.& Ghodsi, A.(2010), Cultural theories of feminism and its implications for Iranian society. Women in Culture and Art, 3(1), 109-132. Ritzer, G. (2002), Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era, 6th edition, Tehran, Scientific Publications. [in persian] Saraei, H., Fathi,S. Zare, Z. (2008), Qualitative Method in Social Studies, Journal of Social Sciences, 2nd year, 3rd issue, pp. 105-83. [in persian] Sinafar, H.(2022), Feminism: (History, waves, trends and positive and negative effects of movements), 10th International Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran, September 14, University of Tehran. Tabatabaei Vaez, B., Zarghani, S. M., Yahaghi, M. J. (2020). Typology of Women's Press Writings in the Constitutional Era, Bi-Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Persian Literature, 10(1), 211-231. Tajik, M. R. , (1998), Pretend Text and Discourse Analysis, Tehran, Discourse, first year, first issue, p.6-15. [in persian] Vaheddoost M, Sheykholeslami F.(2013) Manifestations of Feminine Thoughts in Forugh Farrokhzad’s Poetry, Journal of Fiction and Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(17), 133-153. Zanganeh, P., Athari, S. H., Eslami, R., and Reza Nasiri, H. (2023), The relationship between the subject and structured authority in the views of Althusser and Lacan, Bi-Quarterly Journal of Theoretical Politics Research, No. 34, Winter and Autumn, pp. 1-27. Zarvandi, N., (2007) A critique of common feminist views and an explanation of their consequences, Women and Family Cultural-Defense Quarterly, Year 2, Issue 8, pp. 76-106. Zeimaran, M., (1999) Michel Foucault, Knowledge and Power, Tehran: Hermes. [in persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 106 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 53 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب