میز خدمت الکترونیک
دوره ویراستاری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات127
تعداد شماره‌ها7,164
تعداد مقالات76,986
تعداد مشاهده مقاله155,527,688
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله117,173,272
Mousavi, Seyed Jalil, Ghasemi, Ebrahim, Farhadian, Ali, Bameri, Ali. (1405). Examining the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographical properties of granite building stones on the stone surface quality after polishing process. , (), -. doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2026.408114.595344
Seyed Jalil Mousavi; Ebrahim Ghasemi; Ali Farhadian; Ali Bameri. "Examining the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographical properties of granite building stones on the stone surface quality after polishing process". , , , 1405, -. doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2026.408114.595344
Mousavi, Seyed Jalil, Ghasemi, Ebrahim, Farhadian, Ali, Bameri, Ali. (1405). 'Examining the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographical properties of granite building stones on the stone surface quality after polishing process', , (), pp. -. doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2026.408114.595344
Mousavi, Seyed Jalil, Ghasemi, Ebrahim, Farhadian, Ali, Bameri, Ali. Examining the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographical properties of granite building stones on the stone surface quality after polishing process. , 1405; (): -. doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2026.408114.595344

Examining the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographical properties of granite building stones on the stone surface quality after polishing process

International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 23 اردیبهشت 1405
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijmge.2026.408114.595344
نویسندگان
Seyed Jalil Mousavi1؛ Ebrahim Ghasemi* 1؛ Ali Farhadian2؛ Ali Bameri1
1Department of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
2Mining Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran.
چکیده
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of physico-mechanical and petrographic properties of building stones on their surface quality after the polishing process. To do this, a laboratory investigation was performed on 15 different types of Iranian granite building stones, including petrographic analyses, physico-mechanical evaluations, and polishing tests. Moreover, to assess the stone surface quality, surface roughness and gloss were measured before and after the polishing process, based of which three indices were proposed for quantifying the surface quality improvement, including gloss improvement index (GII), roughness improvement index (RII), and quality improvement index (QII). Then, the correlations between these three indices with the physico-mechanical and petrographic properties of stone were investigated. The results revealed that the Schmidt hammer hardness (SCH) is the main parameter that affects the proposed indices. Finally, non-linear regression analyses were applied for development of predictive equations for the GII, RII, and QII based on the SCH. Predictive equations presented very good performance with determination coefficient (R2) values between 0.747 and 0.826. These results suggest that the predictive equations are suitable for practical applications and can be employed for the rapid assessment of stone surface quality after polishing process.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Building stone properties؛ Polishing؛ Surface quality؛ Roughness؛ Gloss
مراجع
  1. Barbosa, A.R., Coelho, A., Fernandes, J.C., Amaral, P.M., Rosa, L.G. & Pereira, J.C. A contribution for an optimization of the polishing quality of stone slabs: simulation and experimental study using a single-head polishing machine. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Stone and Concrete Machining (ICSCM), Bochum, Germany, pp. 178-187 (2015). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4415.1769
  2. Coelho, A., Pereira, J.C., Amaral, P.M. & Rosa, L.G. Gloss and modelling studies of stone polishing using linear polishing machines with rotating heads. Appl. Sci. 12, 7521 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157521
  3. Farhadian, A., Ghasemi, E., Hoseinie, S.H. & Bagherpour, R. Development of a new test method for evaluating the abrasivity of granite building stones during polishing process based on weight loss of abrasive tool. Constr. Build. Mater. 303, 124497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124497
  4. Yang, H., Li, H., Zhu, C., Fang, H. & Li, J. A process parameters selection approach for trade-off between energy consumption and polishing quality. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 31, 380–395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2017.1407875
  5. Saidi, M.N., Songmene, V., Kouam, J. & Bahloul, A. Rotational and translation-free polishing of granite: surface quality and dust particles emission and dispersion. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 98, 289–303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2247-8
  6. Sanmartín, P., Silva, B. & Prieto, B. Effect of Surface Finish on Roughness, Color, and Gloss of Ornamental Granites. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23, 1239–1248 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000285
  7. Yavuz, H., Ozkahraman, T. & Demirdag, S. Polishing experiments on surface quality of building stone tiles. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 1707–1711 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.10.016
  8. Cevheroğlu Çıra, S., Dağ, A. & Karakuş, A. Investigation of the effects of marble material properties on the surface quality. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6514785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6514785
  9. Gadelmawla, E.S., Koura, M.M., Maksoud, T.M., Elewa, I.M. & Soliman, H.H. Roughness parameters. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123, 133–145 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2
  10. Ruzova, Т.А. & Haddadi, B. Surface roughness and its measurement methods-analytical review. Results Surf. Interf. 19, 100441 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100441
  11. Alhassan, M., Maawadh, A., Labban, N., Alnafaiy, S.M., Alotaibi, H.N. & BinMahfooz, A.M. Effect of different surface treatments on the surface roughness and gloss of resin-modified CAD/CAM ceramics. Appl. Sci. 12, 11972 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311972
  12. Rezaei, N., Ghasemi, E. & Nasiri Sarvi, M. A laboratory investigation for assessing the effectiveness of wastewater treatment using flocculation process in building stone processing industry on stone surface quality and abrasive tool wear. Discov. Civ. Eng. 1, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00060-4
  13. Erdogan, M. Measurement of polished rock surface brightness by image analysis method, Eng. Geol. 57, 65–72 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00148-9
  14. Ersoy, M. & Kose, H. The relationship between easiness to polishing and mechanical properties of marbles. In Proceedings of the National Marble Symposium, Afyon, Turkey, pp. 337-349 (2011).
  15. Huang, H., Li, Y., Shen, J.Y., Zhu, H.M. & Xu, X.P. Micro-structure detection of a glossy granite surface machined by the grinding process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 129, 403–407 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00702-1
  16. Karaca, Z. Relationship between the mechanical properties and the surface roughness of marble. Int. J. Mater. Res. 103, 633–637 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110728
  17. Gürcan, S., Goktan, R.M. & Yıldız, A. Effect of mineralogical and microstructural properties on surface roughness and gloss of some ornamental marbles subjected to polishing process. X‐Ray Spectrom. 43, 70–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2492
  18. Ersoy, M., Yesilkaya, L., Celik, M.Y. & Gecer, G. Investigation of the belt conveyor speed effect to the surface quality in marble polishing process. J. Polytechnic. 17, 153–160 (2014).
  19. Ozcelik, Y., Careddu, N. & Yilmazkaya, E. The effects of freeze–thaw cycles on the gloss values of polished stone surfaces. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 82, 49–55 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.05.007
  20. Careddu, N. & Marras, G. The effects of solar UV radiation on the gloss values of polished stone surfaces. Constr. Build. Mater. 49, 828–834 (2013). https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.010
  21. Vázquez, P., Luque, A., Alonso, F.J. & Grossi, C.M. Surface changes on crystalline stones due to salt crystallisation. Environ. Earth Sci. 69, 1237–1248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2003-6
  22. Sousa, L.M.O. & Gonçalves, B.M.M. Differences in the quality of polishing between sound and weathered granites. Environ. Earth Sci. 69, 1347–1359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2035-y
  23. Cevheroğlu Çıra, S., Dağ, A. & Karakuş, A. Application of response surface methodology and central composite inscribed design for modeling and optimization of marble surface quality. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2349476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2349476
  24. Sarici, D.E. Thermal deterioration of marbles: Gloss, color changes. Constr. Build. Mater. 102, 416–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.200
  25. Farhadian, A., Ghasemi, E., Hoseinie, S.H. and Bagherpour, R. Investigating the effect of operating parameters on the wear of abrasive tools in the polishing stage of granitic building stones. Lubricants 10, 321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants10110321
  26. Görgülü, K. & Ceylanoğlu, A. Evaluation of continuous grinding tests on some marble and limestone units with silicon carbide and diamond type abrasives. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 204, 264–268 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.039
  27. Gürcan, S. & Oztürk, Effect of different abrasives on polishing of some limestones. AKU J. Sci. 14, 025801 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5578/fmbd.7494
  28. Huang, S., Lu, J., Chen, S., Huang, H., Xu, X. & Cui, C. Study on the surface quality of marble tiles polished with Sol-Gel derived pads. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 91, 485–495 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05041-z
  29. Huang, S., Lu, J., Xu, X. & Cui, C. Surface evolution and potimizing strategy for polishing natural heterogeneous marble using Sol-Gel diamond pad. Appl. Sci. 14, 8314 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188314
  30. Sitzia, F., Lisci, C. & Mirao, J. The interaction between rainwater and polished building stones for flooring and cladding-Implications in architecture. J. Build. Eng. 52, 104495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104495
  31. Kelemen-Cserta, E. & Gyurika, I.G. Influencing effect of minerals composition in natural granite rocks on surface roughness. Results Mater. 21, 100504 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.100504
  32. Çetintaş, S. Polishing Performance of Muğla White Marble with Different Abrasives. Geoheritage 17, 23 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-025-01064-x
  33. International Society for Rock Mechanics. Rock characterisation, testing and monitoring. In: Brown E.T. (ed) ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon, Oxford (1981).
  34. ASTM C170. Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stone. ASTM International (2017).
  35. Ersoy, A. & Waller, M.D. Textural characterisation of rocks. Eng. Geol. 39, 123–136 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(95)00005-Z
  36. Sousa, L.M.O. The influence of the characteristics of quartz and mineral deterioration on the strength of granitic dimensional stones. Environ. Earth Sci. 69, 1333–1346 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2036-x
  37. Howarth, D.F. and Rowlands, J.C. Quantitative assessment of rock texture and correlation with drillability and strength properties. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 20, 57–85 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019511
  38. Linke, B. & Das, J. Aesthetics and gloss of ground surfaces: a review on measurement and generation. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 138, 064501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032587
  39. Grymak, A., Aarts, J.M., Ma, S., Waddell, J.N. & Choi, J.J.E. Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 115, 104270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104270
  40. SPSS 16.0. Statistical analysis software (Standard Version). SPSS Inc (2007).
  41. Jang, H., Topal, E. & Kawamura, Y. Unplanned dilution and ore loss prediction in longhole stoping mines via multiple regression and artificial neural network analyses. J. South. African Inst. Min. Metall. 115, 449–456 (2015).
  42. Bahri, M., Ghasemi, E., Kadkhodaei, M.H., Romero-Hernández, R. & Mascort-Albea, E.J. Analysing the life index of diamond cutting tools for marble building stones based on laboratory and field investigations. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 80, 7959–7971 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02381-5
  43. Yurdakul, M. & Akdas, H. Modeling uniaxial compressive strength of building stones using non-destructive test results as neural networks input parameters. Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 1010–1019 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.109
  44. Amirkiyaei, V., Ghasemi, E. and Faramarzi, L. Estimating uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate building stones based on some intact stone properties after deterioration by freeze–thaw. Environ. Earth Sci. 80, 352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09658-8.
  45. Duan, X. Assessment of resilient modulus of soil using hybrid extreme gradient boosting models. Sci. Rep. 14, 31706 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81311-3
  46. Chen, Y., Khandelwal, M., Onifade, M., Zhou, J., Lawal, A.I., Bada, S.O. and Genc, B. Predicting the Hardgrove grindability index using interpretable decision tree-based machine learning models. Fuel 384, 133953 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133953
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 27





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب