میز خدمت الکترونیک
دوره ویراستاری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات127
تعداد شماره‌ها7,196
تعداد مقالات77,227
تعداد مشاهده مقاله157,177,880
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله118,385,398
محمدپور, صابر, امیری, سارا, سلطانی, علی. (1405). تحلیل اثرات اجتماعی فناوری خودروهای خودران بر شهر: رویکردی کیفی بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات. , 14(1), 61-82. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.398118.2075
صابر محمدپور; سارا امیری; علی سلطانی. "تحلیل اثرات اجتماعی فناوری خودروهای خودران بر شهر: رویکردی کیفی بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات". , 14, 1, 1405, 61-82. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.398118.2075
محمدپور, صابر, امیری, سارا, سلطانی, علی. (1405). 'تحلیل اثرات اجتماعی فناوری خودروهای خودران بر شهر: رویکردی کیفی بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات', , 14(1), pp. 61-82. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.398118.2075
محمدپور, صابر, امیری, سارا, سلطانی, علی. تحلیل اثرات اجتماعی فناوری خودروهای خودران بر شهر: رویکردی کیفی بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات. , 1405; 14(1): 61-82. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.398118.2075

تحلیل اثرات اجتماعی فناوری خودروهای خودران بر شهر: رویکردی کیفی بر پایه مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات

پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری
مقاله 4، دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 1405، صفحه 61-82    اصل مقاله (814.14 K)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی - کاربردی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jurbangeo.2025.398118.2075
نویسندگان
صابر محمدپور* 1؛ سارا امیری1؛ علی سلطانی2
1گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
2گروه جوامع محلی سالم، دانشگاه فلیندرز، آدلاید، استرالیا
چکیده
با گسترش فناوری‌های نوین در عرصه حمل‌ونقل شهری، خودروهای خودران (Avs) به یکی از جدی‌ترین تحولات آینده در حوزه شهر هوشمند تبدیل‌شده‌اند. علی‌رغم تمرکز گسترده پژوهش‌های پیشین بر ابعاد فنی این فناوری، پیامدهای اجتماعی آن بر ساختار فضایی و انسانی شهرها همچنان کمتر موردتوجه قرارگرفته است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و بهره‌گیری از روش مرور نظام‌مند ادبیات به بررسی و تحلیل ابعاد اجتماعی فناوری AVs پرداخته است. داده‌های پژوهش بر پایه تحلیل ۱۰8 مقاله علمی بین‌المللی منتخب در بازه زمانی ۲۰۱۴ تا ۲۰۲5، با استفاده از نرم‌افزار MaxQDA و از طریق مراحل سه‌گانه کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل‌شده‌اند. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که اثرات اجتماعی AVs در سه مقوله اصلی به ترتیب اهمیت و فراوانی کدها شامل عدالت اجتماعی (با تأکید بر شمول گروه‌های آسیب‌پذیر)، سلامت عمومی (در قالب اثرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر جسم و روان شهروندان) و کیفیت زندگی شهری (با تمرکز بر زیست‌پذیری و رفاه) طبقه‌بندی می‌شوند. تحلیل نتایج حاکی از آن است که فناوری AVs  پتانسیل بالایی در بازتعریف مفاهیم مذکور دارد. بااین‌حال، تحقق این ظرفیت‌ها مستلزم طراحی و پیاده‌سازی سیاست‌های جامع، انسان‌محور و چندبخشی است که فراتر از نگاه‌های صرفاً فناورمحور، به ابعاد اجتماعی، اخلاقی و فضایی این فناوری توجه دارند. یافته‌های این مطالعه می‌تواند به‌عنوان مبنایی برای ارزیابی اجتماعی و سیاست‌گذاری فناورانه در حوزه حمل‌ونقل شهری آینده مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رشد فیزیکی شهر؛ عدالت اجتماعی؛ خودرو خودران؛ سلامت عمومی؛ شهر هوشمند؛ کیفیت زندگی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing the Social Impacts of Autonomous Vehicle Technology on Cities: A Qualitative Approach Based on Systematic Literature Review
نویسندگان [English]
Saber Mohammadpour1؛ Sara Amiri1؛ Ali Soltani2
1Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2Department of Healthy Communities, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
چکیده [English]
ABSTRACT
With the rapid advancement of emerging technologies in urban transportation, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have emerged as one of the most transformative innovations shaping the future of smart cities. Despite the extensive focus of previous studies on the technical aspects of this technology, its social implications for the spatial and human structure of cities remain relatively underexplored. This study adopts a qualitative approach and employs a systematic literature review method to examine and analyze the social dimensions of autonomous vehicle technology. The research data were derived from the analysis of 102 selected international scientific articles published between 2014 and 2024. Utilizing MaxQDA software, the data were analyzed through a three-stage coding process: open, axial, and selective coding. The findings reveal that the social impacts of AVs can be categorized into three main themes: social equity (with an emphasis on the inclusion of vulnerable groups), public health (encompassing both direct and indirect effects on the physical and mental well-being of citizens), and urban quality of life (focusing on livability and overall well-being). The analysis suggests that AV technology holds significant potential to redefine these key concepts. However, realizing this potential requires the development and implementation of comprehensive, human-centered, and multidisciplinary policies that go beyond purely technology-driven perspectives to incorporate the social, ethical, and spatial dimensions of the technology. The findings of this study can serve as a foundation for social impact assessments and technological policymaking in the realm of future urban transportation.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The ongoing evolution of urban transportation systems is increasingly shaped by emerging technologies, among which autonomous vehicles (AVs) have garnered significant attention as a potentially transformative force in the future of smart cities. These vehicles, capable of operating with little or no human intervention, promise to redefine how people move through and interact with urban environments. While a substantial body of literature has focused on the technical, engineering, and operational aspects of AVs—such as navigation systems, safety algorithms, and infrastructure requirements—their broader societal and spatial implications have remained relatively underexplored. In particular, the social consequences of AV adoption and integration, including issues of equity, health, and urban livability, require deeper scholarly investigation within the context of urban planning and development.
This study responds to this critical research gap by systematically reviewing and analyzing existing literature on the social impacts of autonomous vehicles. It seeks to uncover how the widespread implementation of AV technology might influence urban social structures, public health, spatial justice, and overall quality of life. The central research question guiding this investigation is: What are the key social dimensions affected by the introduction of AVs, and how can urban policy and planning frameworks respond effectively to these changes?
 
Methodology
To address this question, a qualitative research approach was adopted, drawing upon systematic literature review (SLR) methodology. This method enables a structured and comprehensive examination of peer-reviewed academic work, ensuring a rigorous synthesis of current knowledge and trends. A total of 102 international scholarly articles, published between 2014 and 2024, were selected based on relevance, academic quality, and alignment with the research objectives. Databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were used to gather the initial pool of publications, which was then filtered through predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The selected studies were imported into MaxQDA for in-depth qualitative analysis. The coding process followed the classic three-phase model of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding as described by Strauss and Corbin. This framework allowed for the identification of core categories and interrelations among recurring themes across the dataset. By focusing specifically on the social implications of AVs rather than technical or economic aspects, the study maintained a clear alignment with its urban planning perspective.
 
Results and discussion
The analysis yielded three principal thematic categories representing the social impacts of AV technology:

Social Equity: The introduction of AVs presents both opportunities and challenges for promoting social inclusion. On one hand, AVs have the potential to enhance mobility for vulnerable populations, including the elderly, disabled individuals, and low-income communities. However, concerns persist regarding accessibility, affordability, and algorithmic bias. If AV deployment is driven purely by market forces without regulatory oversight, there is a risk that marginalized groups may be further excluded from the benefits of this technology.
Public Health: The health-related implications of AVs can be categorized into direct and indirect effects. Directly, AVs are expected to reduce traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities due to their superior reaction times and elimination of human error. Indirectly, their impact on physical activity, mental health, and urban air quality must be considered. For instance, increased vehicle use may discourage walking and cycling, while reduced congestion and emissions from electric AVs may lead to better respiratory health. Moreover, changes in travel behavior and land use patterns could influence stress levels, social cohesion, and overall well-being.
Urban Quality of Life: AVs are poised to reshape urban form and livability in profound ways. Potential reductions in parking demand could free up urban land for green spaces, housing, or public facilities. At the same time, if not properly planned, AVs could exacerbate urban sprawl by making longer commutes more convenient. The technology could either enhance or diminish the vibrancy of public spaces, depending on how it is integrated with public transit and pedestrian infrastructure. Therefore, urban planners must proactively engage with these possibilities to steer outcomes toward improved urban life.

In addition to these three categories, the study emphasizes the importance of ethical governance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and citizen participation in shaping AV-related policies. It argues that focusing solely on technological efficiency undermines the broader social mission of urban planning. A human-centered and context-sensitive approach is needed to ensure that AVs contribute to more just, healthy, and livable cities.
 
Conclusion
Autonomous vehicle technology represents more than just a technical advancement; it is a disruptive force with far-reaching consequences for the social fabric of cities. This study highlights that while AVs have the potential to contribute positively to urban equity, public health, and quality of life, realizing these benefits is contingent upon deliberate, inclusive, and forward-thinking policy interventions. It is crucial for urban planners, policymakers, and researchers to move beyond techno-centric narratives and engage with the complex social, ethical, and spatial dimensions of AV integration.
By offering a comprehensive synthesis of current research, this study provides a foundation for future work in urban policy design, impact assessment frameworks, and technology governance in the era of autonomous mobility. As cities navigate the uncertainties of AV adoption, such research becomes essential for aligning innovation with public interest and sustainability.
 
Funding
There is no financial support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Smart City, Autonomous Vehicle, Social Equity, Public Health, Quality of Life
مراجع
  1. Allahar, H. (2020). What are the challenges of building a smart city?. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(9).‌ 10.22215/timreview/1388
  2. Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
  3. Bezai, N. E., Medjdoub, B., Al-Habaibeh, A., Chalal, M. L., & Fadli, F. (2021). Future cities and autonomous vehicles: analysis of the barriers to full adoption. Energy and Built Environment, 2(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.002
  4. Bissell, D., Birtchnell, T., Elliott, A., & Hsu, E. L. (2020). Autonomous automobilities: The social impacts of driverless vehicles. Current Sociology, 68(1), 116-134.‌ https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118816743
  5. Bissell, D., Birtchnell, T., Elliott, A., & Hsu, E. L. (2020). Autonomous automobilities: The social impacts of driverless vehicles. Current Sociology, 68(1), 116-134.‌ https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118816743
  6. Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573-1576.‌ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation.
  8. Cavoli, C., Phillips, B., Cohen, T., & Jones, P. (2017). Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles: A literature review. UCL Transport Institute January.
  9. Chen, F., Song, M., & Ma, X. (2020). A lateral control scheme of autonomous vehicles considering pavement sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120669
  10. Colldahi, C. Frey, S. &Kelemen, J. E. (2013). Smart Cities: Strategic Sustainable Development for an Urban World. (Master thesis). Karlskronauniversity. Sweden.
  11. Collingwood, L. (2017). Privacy implications and liability issues of autonomous vehicles. Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1269871
  12. Colonna, C., (2012), “Autonomous Cars and Tort Liability”, J.L. Tech. & Internet, 4(4), pp. 81-131. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2325879
  13. Correia, D., Teixeira, L., & Marques, J. L. (2022). Study and analysis of the relationship between smart cities and Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. International Journal of technology management & sustainable development, 21(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00051_1
  14. Creutzig, F., Jochem, P., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Mattauch, L., Vuuren, D. P. V., McCollum, D., & Minx, J. (2015). Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation?. Science, 350(6263), 911-912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8033
  15. Czech, P., Turoń, K., & Barcik, J. (2018). Autonomous vehicles: basic issues. Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport/Politechnika Śląska. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2018.100.2
  16. Dirks, S., & Keeling, M. (2009). A vision of smarter cities: How cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Institute for business Value, 8(2), 1-17.‌
  17.  
  18. Duffy, S. H., & Hopkins, J. P., (2014), “Sit, Stay, Drive: The Future of Autonomous Car Liability”, SMU Science & Technology Law Review, 16, pp 101-123. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2379697
  19. Duhl, L. J., & Hancock, T. (1986). Promoting healthy cities: A manual for municipal leaders. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  20. Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
  21. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Polity Press.
  22. Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H. (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?. ACE: architecture, city and environment, 4(12), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483
  23. Harb, M., Xiao, Y., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Walker, J. L. (2018). Projecting travelers into a world of self-driving vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 94, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.024
  24. Litman, T. (2003). Integrating public health objectives in transportation decision-making. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.103
  25. Mallik, S. (2014). Intelligent transportation system. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(4), 367-372. http://www.ripublication.com/ijcer.htm
  26. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J. C., Lenz, B., & Winner, H. (2016). Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer Nature.‌
  27. Milakis, D., & Müller, S. (2021). The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: Towards a research agenda. Cities, 113, 103144.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103144
  28. Mohanty, S. P., Choppali, U., & Kougianos, E. (2016). Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The Internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(3), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Enhancing the contribution of digitalisation to the smart cities of the future. Paris: OECD Publications; 2019.
  30. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
  31. Pettigrew, S., & Cronin, S. L. (2019). Stakeholder views on the social issues relating to the introduction of autonomous vehicles. Transport policy, 81, 64-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.004
  32. Porter, L., Stone, J., Legacy, C., Curtis, C., Harris, J., Fishman, E., ... & Stilgoe, J. (2018). The autonomous vehicle Revolution: Implications for planning/The driverless city?/autonomous vehicles–a planner’s response/autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, challenges and the need for government action/three signs autonomous vehicles will not lead to less car ownership and less car use in car dependent cities–a case study of Sydney, Australia/planning for autonomous vehicles? Questions of purpose, place and pace/ensuring good governance: The role of planners in the development of autonomous vehicles .... Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 753-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1537599
  33. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
  34. Schwarting, W., Pierson, A., Alonso-Mora, J., Karaman, S., & Rus, D. (2019). Social behavior for autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50), 24972-24978.‌ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820676116
  35. Singh, T., Solanki, A., Sharma, S. K., Nayyar, A., & Paul, A. (2022). A Decade Review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3184710
  36. van Twist, A., Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2022). Smart cities & citizen discontent: A systematic review of the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101799
  37. Vinkhuyzen, E., & Cefkin, M. (2016, November). Developing socially acceptable autonomous vehicles. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, pp. 522-534).‌ https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01108
  38. Wolf, J., Borges, M., Marques, J. L., & Castro, E. (2019). Smarter decisions for smarter cities: Lessons learned from strategic plans. New Paths of Entrepreneurship Development: The Role of Education, Smart Cities, and Social Factors, 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96032-6_2
  39. Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European journal of information systems, 22(1), 45-55.‌ https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 147
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 41





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب