پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,238 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,638 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 161,190,096 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 120,834,810 |
ارزیابی برخی معادلات تجربی و نیمهتجربی نفوذ آب به خاک در گروههای مختلف بافتی در منطقه نیمهخشک | ||
| تحقیقات آب و خاک ایران | ||
| دوره 57، شماره 5، مرداد 1405، صفحه 1039-1054 اصل مقاله (1.32 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijswr.2026.411816.670107 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی رضا واعظی1؛ مرتضی یاوری* 2؛ محمدصادق عسکری1 | ||
| 1گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2گروه خاکشناسی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نفوذ آب به خاک یکی از فرآیندهای کلیدی در چرخه هیدرولوژیکی بوده و نقش تعیینکنندهای در مدیریت منابع آب و مهار رواناب دارد. هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی کارایی برخی معادلات تجربی و نیمهتجربی نفوذ آب در گروههای مختلف بافت خاک (درشت، متوسط و ریز) در منطقه نیمهخشک در استان زنجان بود. بدینمنظور، آزمایش صحرایی نفوذ در 68 نقطه با استفاده از روش حلقه دوگانه انجام شد. پس از انجام نمونهبرداری، برخی ویژگیهای خاکها اندازهگیری شدند. دادههای نفوذ اندازهگیریشده با چهار مدل تجربی (کوستیاکوف، کوستیاکوف–لوئیس، SCS و سایهاگ) و دو مدل نیمهتجربی (هورتون و میشرا–سینگ ) برازش داده شدند. ارزیابی عملکرد مدلها با استفاده از شاخصهای آماری ضریب تعیین (R²)، ریشه میانگین مربعات خطا (RMSE)، میانگین انحراف مطلق (MAD) و میانگین درصد خطای مطلق (MAPE) انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد مدل کوستیاکوف–لوئیس در هر سه گروه بافتی و بهویژه در خاکهای ریزبافت (R² = 0.999, MAPE = 3.05%, MAD = 0.17, RMSE = 23) بهترین عملکرد را داشت. مدل کوستیاکوف نیز عملکردی بسیار دقیق و پایدار بهویژه در خاکهای درشتبافت (R² = 0.999, MAPE = 6.38%, MAD = 0.34, RMSE = 0.42) و ریزبافت داشت (R²= 0.999, MAPE= 7.01%, MAD=0.27, RMSE = 0.34) داشت و درمقابل مدل سایهاگ ضعیفترین عملکرد را نشان داد. مدلهای نیمهتجربی هورتون و میشرا–سینگ نیز عملکرد بینابینی داشتند. بهطورکلی، نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که مدلهای تجربی سادهتر، بهدلیل ساختار ریاضی ساده و وابستگی کمتر به ضرایب از دقت بالاتری برخوردار بودند و مناسبترین مدلها برای شبیهسازی نفوذ آب در خاکهای منطقهنیمه خشک مورد مطالعه هستند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| بافت خاک؛ حلقه دوگانه؛ شدت نفوذ؛ مدلسازی نفوذ؛ نفوذپذیری خاک | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation of Some Empirical and Semi-Empirical Equations for Soil Water Infiltration in Various Soil Texture Groups in a Semi-Arid Region | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Reza Vaezi1؛ Mortaza Yavari2؛ Mohammad - Sadegh Askari1 | ||
| 1Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture. University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Water infiltration into soil is one of the key processes in the hydrological cycle and plays a decisive role in water resources management and runoff control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of several empirical and semi-empirical infiltration equations in various soil texture groups (coarse, medium, and fine) of a semi-arid region in Zanjan Province. For this purpose, field infiltration experiments were conducted at 68 locations using the double-ring infiltrometer method. After soil sampling, selected soil properties were measured. The measured infiltration data were fitted using four empirical models (Kostiakov, Kostiakov–Lewis, SCS, and Sihag) and two semi-empirical models (Horton and Mishra–Singh). Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute deviation (MAD), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results indicated that the Kostiakov–Lewis model exhibited the best overall performance for all three texture classes, particularly in fine-textured soils (R²= 0.999, MAPE= 3.05%). The Kostiakov model also showed highly accurate and stable performance, especially in coarse-textured soils (R²= 0.999, MAPE= 6.38%) and fine-textured soils (R²= 0.999, MAPE= 7.01%). In contrast, the Sihag model demonstrated the weakest performance. The semi-empirical Horton and Mishra–Singh models showed moderate performance. Overall, the findings of this study indicate that simpler empirical models, due to their straightforward mathematical structure and lower dependency on parameters, provided higher accuracy and were the most suitable models for simulating water infiltration in the semi-arid regions of the study area. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Double-ring, Infiltration modeling, Infiltration rate, Soil permeability, Soil texture | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Assouline, S. (2013). Infiltration into soils: Conceptual approaches and solutions. Water Resources Research, 49(4), 1755-1772. Assouline, S., & Mualem, Y. (2002). Infiltration during soil sealing: The effect of areal heterogeneity of soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research, 38(12), 22-1. ASTM (2009). D3385-09, Standard test method for infiltration rate of soils in field using double-ring infiltrometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. Batoukhteh, F., Khoshravesh, M., & Dehghanisanij, H. (2021). Evaluating Some Infiltration Models Under Different Soil Texture Classes and Land Uses. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 35(1), 73-87. Bayabil, H.K., Dile, Y.T., Tebebu, T.Y., Engda, T.A., & Steenhuis, T. S. (2019). Evaluating infiltration models and pedotransfer functions: implications for hydrologic modeling. Geoderma, 338, 159-169. Brady, N.C., & Weil, R.R. (2017). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th Edn (eBook). Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., & Larry, W. (1988). Mays. Applied Hydrology. International edition, MacGraw-Hill, Inc, 149. Collis-George N. (1977). Infiltration equations for simple soil systems. Water Resources Research 13(2): 395–403. Corwin, D.L. (2021). Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. European Journal of Soil Science, 72(2), 842-862. Culley, J.L.B. (1993). Density and compressibility. Pp. 529-539. In: Carter, M.R. & Gregorich, E.G. (Eds.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press. de Oliveira, D.B.C., de Albuquerque Soares, W., & de Holanda, M.A.C.R. (2018). Analysis of Performance of One-dimensional Soil Water Infiltration Models. Revista Águas Subterrâneas, 32(1), 35-42. Faridah, S.N., Achmad, M., Jamaluddin, T. A., & Jusmira. (2023). Infiltration model of Mediterranean soil with clay texture. Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, 383-411. Ghorbani Dashtaki, S., Homaee, M., Mahdian, M. H., & Kouchakzadeh, M. (2009). Site-dependence performance of infiltration models. Water resources management, 23(13), 2777-2790. Goodarzi, L., AKHOND, A. A. M., & Zarei, H. (2012). Evaluation and determination of infiltration models parameters in Oshtorinan plain. Hillel, D. (1998). Environmental Soil Physics Academic Press. San Diego, CA. Hillel, D. (2003). Introduction to environmental soil physics. Elsevier. Holtan, H. N. (1961). A concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering (Vol. 41). Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Horton, R. E. (1940). An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. In Soil science Society of America proceedings Vol. 5, No. 399-417, p. 24. Huggins LF, Monke EJ. (1966). The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds. Technical Report No. 1, Purdue Water Resources Research Centre, Lafayette. Huggins, L. F. (1966). The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds. Purdue University. Javadi, A., & Ostad-Ali-Askari, K. (2023). Effect of different irrigation managements on infiltration equations and their coefficients. CivilEng, 4(3), 949-965. Klein, C., & Klein, V.A. (2014). Influence of soil management on water infiltration. Revista Monografia ambiental- REMOA, 13(5), 3915-3925. Kostiakov, A. N. (1932). On the dynamics of the coefficient of water-percolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration. Trans. 6th Cong. International. Soil Science, Russian Part A, 17-21. Lewis, M. R. (1937). The rate of infiltration of water in irrigation‐practice. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 18(2), 361-368. Mesele, H., Grum, B., Aregay, G., & Berhe, G.T. (2024). Evaluation and comparison of infiltration models for estimating infiltration capacity of different textures of irrigated soils. Environmental Systems Research, 13(1), 26. Milla, K., & Kish, S. (2006). A low-cost microprocessor and infrared sensor system for automating water infiltration measurements. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 53(2), 122-129. Mishra, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (2002). SCS-CN-based hydrologic simulation package. Mishra, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (2013). Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology (Vol. 42). Springer Science & Business Media. Mishra, S.K., Tyagi, J.V., & Singh, V.P. (2003). Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrological processes, 17(13), 2629-2652. Morbidelli, R., Corradini, C., Saltalippi, C., Flammini, A., Dari, J., & Govindaraju, R.S. (2018). Rainfall infiltration modeling: A review. Water, 10(12), 1873. Morbidelli, R., Saltalippi, C., Flammini, A., Cifrodelli, M., Picciafuoco, T., Corradini, C., & Govindaraju, R.S. (2017). In situ measurements of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity: Assessment of reliability through rainfall–runoff experiments. Hydrological Processes, 31(17), 3084-3094. Muneeraa, A.S., Naba Sayelba, K. & Hatem Kamalca, A. (2020). A comparative study to assess the suitable models for predicting the infiltration rate in an arid region. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering (2020) 014–001. Overton, D.E. (1966). Muskingum flood routing of upland streamflow. Journal of Hydrology, 4, 185-200. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., & Keeney, D. R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2. Parmesan, C., Morecroft, M.D., & Trisurat, Y. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (Doctoral dissertation, GIEC). Philip, J. R. (1969). Theory of infiltration. In Advances in hydroscience (Vol. 5, pp. 215-296). Elsevier. Pinheiro, A., Teixeira, L.P., & Kaufmann, V. (2009). Capacity of infiltration of water in a soil under different uses and practices of agricultural management. Ambiente e agua, Taubaté, 4(2), 188-199. Risse, L.M., Nearing, M.A., & Savabi, M.R. (1994). Determining the Green-Ampt effective hydraulic conductivity from rainfall-runoff data for the WEPP model. Transactions of the ASAE, 37(2), 411-418. Roger E. Smith, Keith R.J. Smettem, Philip Broadbridge, D.A. Woolhiser Smith, R. E. (2002). Infiltration theory for hydrologic applications. American Geophysical Union. Rome, F. (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2017. The future of food and agriculture: trends and challenges.[Google Scholar]. Saadi-Khani, M.R., & Sohrabi, A., (2017). Effect of Land Use on the Performance of selected soil water Infiltration Models. Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 7(1), 127-138. Sadeghi, S.H., Loescher, H.W., Jacoby, P.W., & Sullivan, P.L. (2024). A simple, accurate, and explicit form of the Green–Ampt model to estimate infiltration, sorptivity, and hydraulic conductivity. Vadose Zone Journal, 23(4), e20341. Santos, T.E.D., Souza, E.R.D., & Montenegro, A.A. (2016). Modeling of soil water infiltration with rainfall simulator in different agricultural systems. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 20(6), 513-518. Seneviratne, S.I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C.,Luca, A.D., & Allan, R. (2021). Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. Sihag, P., Tiwari, N.K., and Ranjan, S. (2017a). Estimation and intercomparison of infiltration models. Water Science, Vol. 31, No. 1,pp. 34-43. Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to Soil Taxonomy (12th ed.). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Šimanský, V., & Lukac, M. (2025). Interactions between soil texture and cover crop diversity shape carbon dynamics and aggregate stability. Land, 14(10), 2044. Šimůnek, J., Van Genuchten, M.T., & Šejna, M. (2016). Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages. Vadose zone journal, 15(7), vzj2016-04. Singh, V.P., & Yu, F.X. (1990). Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116(6), 837-858. Smith, R. E. (2002). Infiltration theory for hydrologic applications. American Geophysical Union. Smith, R.E., Corradini, C., & Melone, F. (1999). A conceptual model for infiltration and redistribution in crusted soils. Water Resources Research, 35(5), 1385-1393. Swartzendruber, D. (1987). A quasi‐solution of Richards' Equation for the downward infiltration of water into soil. Water Resources Research, 23(5), 809-817. Thomas, G.W. (1996). Soil pH and soil asidity. p. 475- 490. In: D.L. Sparks et al. (eds.). Method of Soil Analysis. Part 3. 3rd ed. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. United States Department of Agriculture (USDOA). (2019, March.) Soil Infiltration [Online]. USDA, S. (1972). National engineering handbook, section 4: Hydrology. Washington, DC, 127. Soil Survey Staff. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy (13th ed.). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Vaezi, A.R. and Salehi, Y. (2020). The Efficiency of water infiltration models in different land uses of the tahamchai catchment. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 51(5), 1281-1291. Vereecken, H., Weihermüller, L., Assouline, S., Šimůnek, J., Verhoef, A., Herbst, M., & Xue, Y. (2019). Infiltration from the pedon to global grid scales: An overview and outlook for land surface modeling. Vadose Zone Journal, 18(1), 1-53. Vishwakarma, D.K., Yadav, D., Kumar, R., Kumar, R., Bhat, S.A., Mirzania, E., & Kuriqi, A. (2025). Assessing the performance of various infiltration models to improve water management practices. Paddy and Water Environment, 23(1), 77-93. Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29-38. Wang, D., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Zhou, B., Lv, T., & Li, W. (2021). Effects of soil texture on soil leaching and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum l.) growth under combined irrigation and drainage. Water, 13(24), 3614. Williams, J.R., Ying, O., Chen, J.S., & Ravi, V. (1998). Estimation of infiltration rate in the vadose zone: Application of selected mathematical models. Volume 2 (No. PB-98-147317/XAB). ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC (United States); Dynamac Corp., Ada, OK (United States); National Risk Management Research Lab., Subsurface Protection and Remediation Div., Ada, OK (United States). Yavari, M., Mohammadi, M.H., & Shahbazi, K. (2021). Comparison of some methods for measuring primary soil particle size distribution and introducing appropriate times for the four-reading method for determining soil texture. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 51(12), 2999-3015. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 55 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 83 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب