پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 162 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,692 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,232 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 129,196,919 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 102,027,203 |
بررسی و تجزیه و تحلیل تئوریک حرفه ی طراحی صنعتی با محوریت نظریات چهار تن از نظریه پردازان مشهور این رشته | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 3، شماره 45 - شماره پیاپی 623738، آذر 1390، صفحه 63-70 اصل مقاله (404.33 K) | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| احمد ندایی فرد | ||
| استادیار گروه آموزشی طراحی صنعتی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه الزهرا(س) | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این نکته که آیا طراحی صنعتی یک تخصص است که منطبق با سیستم فکری دیگر رشته ها اعمال می گردد و یا اینکه تخصصی است که استحقاق داشتن یک متدولوژی مختص به خود را دارد، سئوالی است که بیش از دو دهه ذهن نظریه پردازان این حرفه را به خود مشغول داشته است. اکنون بنظر میرسد که زمان آن فرا رسیده باشد که طراحی صنعتی به عنوان یک حرفه، تخصص و دانش مستقل مد نظر قرار گیرد. بطور کلی یک رشته تخصصی و یا یک شاخه علمی مستقل شامل تاریخچه، نقد و نظریه می گردد و آنچه که در تبیین و تعریف ماهیت هر رشته علمی اهمیت دارد را، ارتباط و نحوه تعامل این سه بخش تشکیل می دهد. نکته بررسی چگونگی ارتباط و تعامل بین نظریه و عمل می باشد که بر اساس ویژگی های حرفه طراحی صنعتی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. در این مقاله با چنین دیدگاهی، تخصص و حرفه طراحی بطورکلی به دوحوزه ی زیر تقسیم می گردند: - حوزه تخصصی طراحی، - حوزه غیرتخصصی طراحی. همچنین از دیدگاه متدولوژی با تجزیه تحلیل نظریات چهار نظریه پرداز بنام حرفه ی طراحی صنعتی به نام های: Richard Buchanan, Victor Margolin, Nigel Cross, Guie Bonseipe، به تبیین و تعریفی دقیق مبانی نظری حرفه طراحی صنعتی از منظر این افراد پرداخته و به عنوان بخشی از متدلوژی پژوهش، واژگان کلیدی از محتوای آثار استخراج شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تئوری طراحی؛ حرفه طراحی؛ عمل طراحی؛ مطالعات طراحی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Research on Basic Concepts of Design Discipline Centering around the theories of four design scholars | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ahmad Nedaei Fard | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Whether design is in accordance with the system as a discipline, or whether design is an object that deserves a system as a discipline, has been an important subject contemplated for over the last two decades in the field of design. Now it seems to be the right time for design to stand in the stage of getting prepared to be a discipline then adjusted as an exact and solid concept. Generally speaking, a discipline consists of history, criticism and theory. Design is no exception here. What matters here, however, is the relationship among the three. We need to take primary viewpoint toward the relationship with each other, like which stands more to the center and which comes to take a supportive role. Also, a problem regarding the relationship between “practice and theory” must be clearly settled, according to the characteristic of the design field. This paper takes an aim in minutely looking into the roles of each element from understanding the inter-relationship of such elements, then ultimately going on to settle the purpose and meaning of design studies. Methodology-wise, this paper is based on the design theory analysis, focused on four scholars – Richard Buchanan, Victor Margolin, Nigel Cross and Gui Bonseipe. Another theories were additionally used, when needed according to the progress. Seen from such viewpoint, design can no longer be defined only within professional field called designer, but a requisite condition has appeared to expand concept and field to reach the sphere of public and socio-cultural viewpoint. Industrial designers cannot have direct knowledge of all the users or the situations of use of the things they design. They must, however, work with some knowledge of the likely user profile and the needs the object is meant to fulfill. The act of designing involves conjecture about how a future user will interact with something that does not yet exist. The success of a design will therefore depend to some extent on how well the designer “knows” the users and their needs. Industrial design education commonly includes study of ergonomics and marketing. These two fields of activity contribute some types of knowledge, and methods of enquiry, about users and consumers. At the same time, the goal of product usability is being added to with notions of user experience that include emotion and pleasure. Debate about the philosophical position of design research is demonstrably vigorous but its market value is often not quantified and mostly emphasised with academic arguments. It is not surprising that terms and concepts of design research feature just as frequently around undergraduate study as postgraduate study. As a result, this paper reached a conclusion that design studies, which take more various, plural and complicated form than the past concept of design, now must be understood in a whole new scholarly viewpoint. Design thus becomes one of the representative scholarly filed that characterizes the present, therefore a quintessential system of knowledge needed to judge the present to live. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Design Discipline, Design Practice, Design Studies, Design Theory | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,906 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,391 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب