پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,533 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,506 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,125,637 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,233,939 |
مقایسه روش آزمون ثبات کلی و مینیموم‌سازی نرم L1 در شبکه‌های میکروژئودزی | ||
| فیزیک زمین و فضا | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 34، شماره 4، اسفند 1387، صفحه 1-1 اصل مقاله (324.85 K) | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سیدشهرام جزائری جونقانی* | ||
| چکیده | ||
| برای محاسبه جابه‌جایی در شبکه‌های میکروژئودزی کشف نقاط پایدار و ناپایدار از اهمیت بسیار زیادی برخوردار است، چرا که در این شبکه‌ها، کشف نادرست نقاط پایدار و ناپایدار به‌صورت نقص داده ظاهر می‌شود و جابه‌جایی‌های محاسبه شده را زیرسؤال می‌برد. به منظور کشف نقاط پایدار و ناپایدار عموماً از دو روش مهم زیر استفاده می‌شود: الف- آزمون ثبات کلی درشبکه‌های میکروژئودزی ب- مینیموم‌سازی نرم L1 بردار جابه‌جایی هدف این مقاله مقایسه دو روش فوق و بیان مزیت‌ها و معایب این دو روش نسبت به هم است که در ادامه شرح دو روش و نتایج حاصل از مقایسه آنها آورده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که به‌طور کلی، استفاده از روش مینیموم‌سازی نرم L1 بردار جابه‌جایی در مقایسه با روش دیگر نتایج قابل قبولی دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شبکه‌های میکروژئودزی؛ شبکه‌های ژئودتیک؛ نقص داده؛ روش آزمون ثبات کلی؛ روش مینیموم‌سازی نرم L1؛ برآورد کمترین مربعات | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparing congruency robust method and L1 norm minimization in micro geodesy networks | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| For calculation of the displacements of points in micro geodesy networks, it is essential to discover stable and unstable points. Without knowing stable points, calculated displacements are due to datum deficiency. In this case, calculated displacements are not valid. There are two methods to discover stable and unstable points: a-Congruency robust method b- L1 Norm minimization In this study the two mentioned methods are compared and the advantages and disadvantages of both are studied. For this reason, the two methods are programmed and several networks tested by them. The results of comparing these two methods appear below: 1- The two methods similarly detect all the points moved eighteen percent. L1 norm minimization results are better than the congruency robust method by seventy four percent in detecting points moved. On the other hand, the congruency robust method detects moved points better than the other method by eight percent. 2- In the networks whose displacements of points are about a few millimeters, L1 norm minimization detects moved points much better than the other method. Some of the samples are available in the tables below. These two methods discover all points when the displacements of moved points are a few centimeters and both methods are reliable. Thus, either L1 norm minimization or congruency robust method can be used in order to detect moved points. 3- The congruency robust method is not reliable when all points or all points except one or two are moved because it cannot find all moved points in this situation. On the contrary, all points are detected by the L1 norm minimization method. Neither the norm minimization nor the congruency robust method could find moved points when we have all points moved. Generally, if we have at least two unmoved points in the network, the results are reliable. In spit of this, deformation tensors should be applied. 4- The algorithm of norm minimization is simpler and its programming is easier than that of congruency robust method. In order to discover moved and unmoved points in the network, the study suggests that the norm minimization method should be applied. Of course it is proposed that both methods be considered and the unmoved points obtained from them considered altogether as stable points. Moved points that are erroneously detected as unmoved points are discovered by a statistical test applied after calculating the displacements of unmoved points. These points are considered as unmoved points. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Micro geodesy networks, squares estimation, Geodetic Networks, L1 norm minimization, Congruency robust method, Deficiency datum, Least | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,099 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,020 |
||