تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,500 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,084,423 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,188,700 |
Web 2.0 Business Models Taxonomy and its Relation with Web 2.0 Features | ||
Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
مقاله 9، دوره 5، شماره 3، بهمن 2013، صفحه 169-190 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2013.36509 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Ali Masoumi Lari1؛ Monireh Hosseini* 2 | ||
1M.Sc. Student in Information Technology, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Assistant Prof., IT Group, Faculty of Industrial Engineering K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Web 2.0 is not a single technology or standard but rather a set of concepts and features. Web 2.0 concepts and features call for further attention. Since, previous studies have only addressed only some of these concepts and features. In order to give a comprehensive view of Web 2.0, these features are collected through literature review and a framework of Web 2.0 features is presented. Also, due to the lack of an integrated and comprehensive classification of Web 2.0 business models and the diversity of approaches and the incompleteness of the models, this study has investigated, compared and integrated previous models and classifications using the meta-synthesis method. In this study, a new classification of Web 2.0 business models has been presented and the conceptual relationship between the characteristics of Web 2.0 and Web 2.0 business models has been proposed and the most important features of each business model have been mentioned. Finally, real examples from Iranian and international sites for each model has been presented through observation and evaluation of websites or from past research. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Web 2.0؛ Business model؛ Taxonomy؛ Meta-synthesis | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
طبقهبندی مدلهای کسبوکار وب 2.0 و ارتباط آن با ویژگیهای وب 2.0 | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
سید علی معصومی لاری1؛ منیره حسینی2 | ||
1دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران | ||
2استادیار فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
وب 2.0 تنها یک فناوری یا یک استاندارد نیست، بلکه مجموعهای از مفاهیم و ویژگیهاست. مفاهیم و ویژگیهای وب 2.0 توجه بیشتری را میطلبد؛ چراکه مطالعات گذشته تنها به برخی از این مفاهیم و ویژگیها اشاره کردهاند. برای ارائه دیدی کامل از وب 2.0، این ویژگیها از طریق مرور ادبیات جمعآوری و چارچوبی از ویژگیهای وب 2.0 ارائه میشود. همچنین با توجه به عدم وجود دستهبندی یکپارچه و کاملی از مدلهای کسبوکار وب 2.0 و تنوع رویکردها و تعداد اندک مدلها، پژوهش پیش رو با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، این مدلها را بررسی، مقایسه و یکپارچه کرده است. در این پژوهش، دستهبندی جدیدی از مدلهای کسبوکار وب 2.0 ارائه شده است و ارتباطی مفهومی بین ویژگیهای وب 2.0 و مدلهای کسبوکار وب 2.0 ایجاد کرده و مهمترین ویژگیهای هر مدل کسبوکار بیان شده است. در پایان، مثالهایی واقعی از سایتهای ایرانی و سایتهای جهانی برای هر مدل، از طریق مشاهده و بررسی سایتها یا از درون مطالعات گذشته ارائه شده است. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
وب 2.0, مدل کسبوکار, طبقهبندی, فراترکیب | ||
مراجع | ||
Afuah, A. (2003). Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach, McGraw-Hill Companies, Incorporated.
Beck, C. T. (2002). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 27(4): 214-221.
Carlsson, J. (2010). An Assessment of Social Media Business Models and Strategic Implications for Future Implementation. Diploma in Advanced Strategy, University of Oxford.
Chaffey, D. F., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Johnston, K., Mayer, R. (2006). Internet Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice, Pearson Education Limited.
Cold, S. J. (2006). Using Really Simple Syndication (RSS) to enhance student research. ACM SIGITE Newsletter, 3(1): 6-9.
Furnas, G. W., Fake, C., et al. (2006). Why do tagging systems work? CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM.
Hoegg, R., Martignoni, R., Meckel, M., Stanoevska-slabeva, K., (2006). Overview of business models for Web 2.0 communities. Proceedings of GeNeMe 2006, 23-37.
Hu, M. and Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM.
Jensen, C. Davis, J., et al. (2002). Finding others online: reputation systems for social online spaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, ACM.
Jensen, L. A. and Allen, M. N. (1994). A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qualitative Health Research, 4(4): 349-369.
Jhingran, A. (2006). Enterprise information mashups: integrating information, simply. Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on Very large data bases, VLDB Endowment.
Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., et al. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard business review, 86(12): 57-68.
Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. The journal of political economy, 822-841.
Manafy, M. (2006). Edit This-The Collective Wisdom at Work. EContent-Digital Content Strategies and Resources, 29(7): 6-6.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Web article, 30 September. O’Reilly Publishing, Sebastopol, CA
Patterson, B., Thorne, S., et al. (2003). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Nursing in Critical Care, 8(4): 184-184.
Pielstick, C. D. (1998). "The transforming leader: A meta-ethnographic analysis." Community College Review, 26(3): 15-34.
Rappa, M. (2012). Business models on the web, Retrieved from http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html.
Shang, S. S., Wu, Y.-L., et al. (2009). An analysis of business models of Web 2.0 application. Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG'09. Sixth International Conference on, IEEE.
Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2): 3-8.
Walsh, D. and Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2): 204-211.
Wielki, J. (2010). The impact of the internet on the development of Web-based business models. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 15(3).
Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., et al. (2010). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3): 272-290.
Wunsch-Vincent, S. and Vickery, G. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: Web 2.0, wikis and social networking, OECD.
Yew, J., Gibson, F., et al. (2006). Learning by tagging: group knowledge formation in a self-organizing learning community. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences, International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3): 311-318.
Zott, C., Amit, R., et al. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4): 1019-1042.
AjaxProjects.com, Web 2.0 Sites, (2010, April 29) Retrieved from http:// web2.ajaxprojects.com/web2.
Baumann, M. (2006). Caught in the Web 2.0-Here's your chance to find out about Web 2.0 from one of its original masterminds. Information today, 23(8): 38-38.
Lytras, M. D., Damiani, E., et al. (2009). Web 2.0 The Business Model, Springer.
Millard, D. E. and Ross, M. (2006). Web 2.0: hypertext by any other name? Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, ACM.
Musser, J. and O'Reilly, T. (2007). Web 2.0: Principles and best practices, O'Reilly Media Sebastopol, CA.
Wijaya, S., Spruit, M., et al. (2011). Web 2.0-based webstrategies for three different types of organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4): 1399-1407.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,851 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,233 |