پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,149,600 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,909,137 |
A Fully Integrated Approach for Better Determination of Fracture Parameters Using Streamline Simulation; A gas condensate reservoir case study in Iran | ||
| Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 47، شماره 2، اسفند 2013، صفحه 83-94 اصل مقاله (2.88 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jchpe.2013.3895 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Amir Abbas Askari؛ Turaj Behrouz | ||
| Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Many large oil and gas fields in the most productive world regions happen to be fractured. The exploration and development of these reservoirs is a true challenge for many operators. These difficulties are due to uncertainties in geological fracture properties such as aperture, length, connectivity and intensity distribution. To successfully address these challenges, it is paramount to improve the approach of characterization and simulation of fractured reservoirs. In this study, a fully integration of all available data and methods have been used for generating stochastic discrete fracture network (DFN)such as outcrop study, core description, petrophysical and image logs and also for better result validation, streamline simulation has been conducted. In this comprehensive process a real gas condensate fractured carbonate reservoir has been used. Firstly, three main fracture sets were defined that have fold-related fractures, then the fracture intensity and DFN model using fracture drivers correlation were generated. After that, permeability of the developed DFNs was calibrated with available well test permeability. Then, a streamline simulation was used because of its high computational speed, high accuracy and good visualization for the repeated nature of history matching of a dual porosity model in the gas condensate reservoir. So, with running streamline simulation, three realizations (High, Medium and Low) ranked based on the objective function values. These three realizations are common realization that are well known with optimistic, most likely and pessimistic scenarios. Finally, comprehensive history matching was done for all the three-selected realizations. The overall goal is to develop a representative fluid flow simulation model for improving gas cycling procedure in gas condensate reservoir. This method has great application in the high resolution fractured reservoir modeling due to using actual fracture parameters. Also, it can be used for model ranking, screening and optimum dynamic model calibration for reduction of the history matching complexity without being manipulated by reservoir engineer. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Fracture parameters؛ DFN model؛ Fast history matching؛ Streamline simulation؛ DST matching | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Aguilera, R. (2003). Geologic and Engineering Aspects of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysics Recorder (February), pp. 44-49.
[2] Acuna, J.A., Ershaghi, I. and Yortsos, Y.C. (1995). “Practical application of fractal pressure-transient analysis in naturally fractured reservoirs.” SPEFE 173; Trans., AIME,299.
[3] Christie, M., Subbey. S., Sambridge, M. and Thiele, M. (2002). Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty in Reservoir Modeling Using Streamline Simulation. 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference June 2-5, 2002, Columbia University, New York, NY.
[4] Datta-Gupta, A. (2000). Streamline Simulation: A Technology Update. JPT 68.
[5] Di Donato, G., Huang, W. and Blunt, M.J. “Streamline-based dual porosity simulation of fractured reservoirs." Paper SPE 84036 presented at the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, 5-8 October.
[6] Dershowitz, W., et al. (2003). “Integration of discrete fracture network methods with conventional simulator approaches,” SPE Res. Eval. & Eng., pp. 165-170, (April 2000).
[7] Guerreiro, L. et al. (2000). “Integrated reservoir characterization of a fractured carbonate reservoir.” SPE 58995, SPE Inter. Petroleum Conf. and Exhib., Villahermosa, Mexico.
[8] Gilman, J.R. et al. (2002). “Statistical ranking of stochastic geomodels using streamline simulation: A field application.” paper SPE 77374 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September–2 October.
[9] Idrobo, E. A. (1999): “Characterization and ranking of reservoir models using geostatistics and streamline simulation.” PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University.
[10] Haldorsen, H.H. and Damsleth, E. (1993), Challenges in reservoir characterization.AAPG Bulletin, 77(4), pp. 541-551.
[11] Kazemi, H., Atan, S., Al-Matrook, M., Dreier J. and Ozkan, E. (2005). Multilevel Fracture Network Modeling of naturally fractured Reservoirs. SPE 77741 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas U.S.A, Jan. 31-Feb. 2.
[12] King, M. J. and Datta-Gupta, A. (1998). "Streamline simulation: A current perspective." In Situ,22(1): pp. 91-140.
[13] Guttormsen, Li, B., Tran, J. and Hoi, V. (2004). Characterizing Permeability for the Fractured Basement Reservoirs. SPE 88478 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 18–20 October.
[14] Milliken, W. J., Emanuel, A. S. and Chakravarty, A. (2001). Applications of 3D Streamline Simulationto Assist History Matching. SPE 74712, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 4 (6), December, 502-507.
[15] Nelson, R. A. (1985). Geological Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, GulfPublishing Company, Houston.
[16] Reynolds, A. C., He, N. and Oliver, D.S. (1997). “Reducing uncertainty in geostatistical description with well testing pressure data.” in Proc., International Reservoir Characterization Conference, Houston, 2-4 March.
[17] Baker, R.O., Kuppe, F., Chugh, S., Bora, R., Stojanovic, S. and Batycky, R. (2002). “Full- field modeling using streamline-based simulation: Four case studies.” SPE Reservoir Eval.& Eng., 5 (2).
[18] Tamagawa, T., Matsuura, T., Anraku, T., Tezuka, K. and Namikawa, T. (2002), “Construction of fracture network model using static and dynamic data.” SPE 77741 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Sept 29-Oct. 2.
[19] Verga, F.M., Giglio, G., Politecnico di Torino, Masserano, F. and Ruvo, L. (2002). Validation of Near-Wellbore Fracture-Network Models with MDT. April 2002 SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering.
[20] Wang, Y. and Kovscek, A.R. (2000). “Streamline approach for history matching production data.” SPE Journal, (4), pp. 353-362.
[21] Zubiri, M. and Silvestro, J. (2007). "Fracture modeling in a dual porosity volcaniclastic reservoir: A case study of the precuyo group in cupen mahuida field, Neuquén, Argentina. AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California, April 1-4.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,490 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,301 |
||