|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||111,720,737|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||86,332,041|
Modeling and Simulation of Alternative Injections of CO2 and Water into Porous Carbonate Formations
|Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering|
|مقاله 3، دوره 47، شماره 2، اسفند 2013، صفحه 95-105 اصل مقاله (378.74 K)|
|نوع مقاله: Original Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jchpe.2013.3896|
|Amin Dehghan* 1؛ Mohammad Hosein Zareenejad2؛ Morteza Baghalha3|
|1Department of Petroleum Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran|
|2Department of Petroleum Engineering, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran|
|3Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran|
|Water alternating gas (WAG) technique is used in the petroleum industry to inject carbon dioxide (CO2) into underground formations either for sequestration or enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. CO2 injection causes reactions with formation brine or aquifer and produces carbonic acid, the acid dissolves calcite and changes flow behavior significantly. Modeling and investigating effects of CO2 injection into carbonate formations during WAG processes, investigating parameters related to chemical reactions between reservoir rock and injecting fluid and also better understanding of the process theory for future experiments are the most important goals of this paper. To achieve these experimental data were used. Changes of output calcium concentration from a calcite core sample during three WAG cycles have been studied in laboratory works. The sample is modeled as a medium consisting of a set of capillary pipes and two pore size distribution models are used. Plug flow model and mass conservation law are used for modeling and Darcy law and Hagen-Poiseuille equation are also used to determine characteristics of the porous model. The model is built for linear, miscible and one-dimensional flow. The results show that experimental and model data coincide well in the first and second cycles of both porous models however; they are not coincided in the third cycle. It is because of precipitation and dissolution that cause permeability alternations. Results of the two porous models are compared also.|
|Water alternating gas؛ carbon dioxide؛ Pore size distribution؛ Porous medium model؛ Reaction rate constant|
 Pahlavanzadeh, H. and Bakhshi, H. (2011). “Measurement and modeling of acridine solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide.” J. Chem. Petrol. Eng., University of Tehran, Vol. 45, No.2, pp. 131-140.
 Mohamed, I. M. J., He. J. and Nasr – El – Din, H. A. (2011). “Permeability change during Co2 injection in carbonate aquifer, experimental study.” Proc., Int. SPE Americans E & P Health, Safety Security and Environmental Conference, Houston, USA, SPE 140943.
 Krumhansl, J., Pawer, R., Grigg, R., Westrich, H., Warpinskil, N., Zhang, D., Jove- Colonl, C., Lichtner, P., Lorenz, J., Svec, R., Stubbs, B., Cooper, S., Brandley, C., Rutledge, J. and Byrer, C. (2002). “Geological sequestration of carbon dioxide in a depleted oil reservoir.” Proc., Int. SPE / DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Oklahoma, USA, SPE 75256.
 Izgec, O., Demiral, B., Bertin, H. and Akin, S. (2005). “Co2 injection in carbonates.”Proc., Int. SPE Western Regional Meeting, Irvine, Armenia, SPE 93773.
 Grigg, R. B. and Svec, R. K. (2008). “Injectivity changes and Co2 retention for EOR and sequestration projects.” Proc., Int. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Oklahoma, USA, SPE 110760.
 Mohamed, I. M. J., He. J., Mahmoud, M. A., and Nasr– El– Din, H. A. (2010). “Effects of pressure, Co2 volume and the Co2 to water volumetric ratio on permeability change during Co2 sequestration.” Proc., Int. at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, SPE 139394.
 Mohamed, I. M. J., He. J. and Nasr – El – Din, H. A. (2011). “Sulfate precipitation during Co2 sequestration in carbonate rock.” Proc., Int. SPE Projects and Facilities Challenges Conference, Doha, Qatar, SPE 139828.
 Smirnov,A. S., Fedorov, K. M. and Shevelev A. P. (2009). “Modeling the acidizing of a carbonate formation.” Fluid Dyn., Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 113-121.
 Lagneau, V., Pipart, A. and Catalette, H. (2005). “Reactive transport modeling of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers.” Oil & Gas Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 231-247.
 Nghiem, L., Sammon, P., Grabenstetter, J. and Ohkuma, H. (2004). “Modeling Co2 storage in aquifers with a fully-coupled geochemical EOS compositional simulation.” Proc., Int. SPE/DOE Fourteen Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
 Settari, A. and Mourits, F. M. (1998). “A coupled reservoir and geomechanical modeling system.”SPEJ, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 219-226.
 James, E., House. (2007). Principles of Chemical Kinetics. 2nd Ed. Elsevier Inc., USA.
 Ronald, W., Missen, Charles, A., Mims and Saville, B. (1999). Introduction to ChemicalReaction Engineering and Kinetics. 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, USA.
 Schmidt and Lanny, D. (1998). The Engineering of Chemical Reactions.2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
 University of Michigan website: Plug Flow Reactors, http://www.engin.umich.edu.
 Sutera, S. P. and Skalak, R. (1993). “The history of Poiseuille's law." Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 25, pp. 1-19.
 Pfitzner, J. (1976). “Poiseuille and his law.” Anesthesia, Vol. 31, Issue 2, pp. 273–275.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,337
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,337