تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,573 |
تعداد مقالات | 71,037 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,509,150 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,772,375 |
شناسایی ویژگیهای روانشناختی اثرگذار بر مهارت حسابرسان در انجام قضاوتهای حسابرسی | ||
بررسیهای حسابداری و حسابرسی | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 21، شماره 4، دی 1393، صفحه 505-526 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/acctgrev.2014.52906 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مهناز ملانظری1؛ غریبه اسماعیلی کیا* 2 | ||
1استادیار حسابداری، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری، دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف این مطالعه شناسایی ویژگیهای روانشناختی اثرگذار بر مهارت است که درنهایت قضاوت حسابرسان را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد. بنابراین ضمن پذیرش بخشی از چارچوب حاصل از ادبیات تصمیمگیری در روانشناسی، آن را بر حسابرسی اعمال کرده است. در دیدگاه شانتیو، تصمیمگیرندگان خبره حائز چهارده ویژگی روانشناختی هستند. اهمیت هریک از این ویژگیها با استفاده از طرح تحقیق آزمایش تجربی برای 65 حسابرس از حسابرسان سازمان حسابرسی، در چهار مرحله برنامهریزی، آزمون معاملات، آزمون جزئیات ماندهها و انتشار گزارش حسابرسی، ارزیابی شده است. آزمون فرضیهها با استفاده از آزمون همبستگی، آزمون ناپارامتریک فریدمن و ماتریس همبستگی اسپیرمن انجام گرفته است. نتایج نشان داد هر چهارده ویژگی در چهار مرحلۀ حسابرسی اهمیت دارند، اما درجۀ اهمیت هر یک در مراحل گوناگون متفاوت است؛ بهگونهای که مهمترین ویژگیها در مرحلۀ اول مسئولیتپذیری و بهگزینی، در مرحلۀ دوم تمایز میان اطلاعات مرتبط و غیر مرتبط و سازگاری بود. ویژگی ادراکی / توجه در مرحلۀ سوم حسابرسی حائز بیشترین اهمیت شد و در مرحلۀ آخر حسابرسی، ویژگی خودکاری بیشترین درجة اهمیت را به خود اختصاص داد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
قضاوت حسابرس؛ مهارت؛ ویژگیهای روانشناختی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Psychological characteristics contributing to expertise in audit judgment | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mahnaz Molanazari1؛ Gharibe Esmaili Kia2 | ||
1Assistant Prof., Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics University of Alzahra, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The purpose of this study is to identify the psychological characteristics contributing to expertise which consequently have an effect on auditor judgment. Accordingly, the present paper adopts a part of the framework derived from the decision-making literature about psychology and applies it to auditing. As Shanteau proposes, expert decision-makers possess fourteen psychological characteristics. The importance of each characteristic is assessed employing the experimental method for 65 auditors from an auditing organization in four phases including planning, test of transactions, testing the details of balances, and issuing the audit report. Hypothesis-testing was made by means of correlation test, Friedman non-parametric test, as well as Spearman correlation matrix. The results revealed that all of the fourteen characteristics are important across all the four phases of the auditing; nevertheless, the degree of significance in each phase was not the same so that in the first phase the most important characteristics are Responsibility and Selectivity, and in the second phase they are distinctions between Relevant-Irrelevant Information and Adaptability. The Perceptual/Attention characteristic in the third phase of auditing comes to be the most significant and in the final phase of auditing. Automaticity has the highest degree of importance. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
auditor judgment, expertise, psychological characteristics | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdolmohammadi, M. J. (1999). A comprehensive taxonomy of audit task structure, professional rank and decision aids for behavioral research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, (11): 51-92. Abdolmohammadi, M. J.& Shanteau, J.(1992).Personal Attributes of Expert Auditors, Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53 (2): 158-172. Anderson, J. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill, Psychological Review, 89 (4): 369-406. Arens, A., Best, P. & Shailer, G. (2005). Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia: An Integrated Approach. 6th ed, Pearson Prentice-Hall: Australia. Bédard, J. & Chi, M. T. H. (1993). Expertise in auditing. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12 (Supplement): 21-45. Bédard, J. (1989). Expertise in auditing: Myth or reality? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14 (1-2): 113-131. Bonner, S. E. & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise, Journal of Accounting Research, 28: 1–20. Davis, J. S. & Solomon, I. (1989). Expertise and experience in behavioral accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 8: 150–164. Dino, G. A. & Shanteau, J. (1984). What skills do managers consider important for effective decision making? Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society meeting, San Antonio, in Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers, Acta Psychologica, 68 (1-3): 203- 215. Dino, G. A., Shanteau, J., Binkley, M. & Spenser, A. (1984). The detrimental effects of environmental stress on creativity. Technical Report, 84-2 (Kansas State University), in Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers’, Acta Psychologica, 68 (1-3): 203-215. Ettenson, R. T. (1984). A schematic approach to the examination of the search for and use of information in expert decision making .Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University. Gaumnitz, B., Nunamaker, T., Surdick, J. & Thomas, M. (1982). Auditor consensus in internal control evaluation and audit program planning, Journal of Accounting Research, 20 (2): 745-755. Gibbins, M. (1984). Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting Journal of Accounting Research, 22 (1): 103-125. Hasas Yeganeh, Y. & Maghsodi, O. (2010). The impact of Code Professional Conduct and experience on audit judgment quality, Quarterly journal of Certified Public Accountant, 9: 49-57. (in Persian) Hasas Yeganeh, Y. & Rahimian, N. (2007). Decisions Justification in audit planning, The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, (14) 1: 37-61. (in Persian). Hassas Yeganeh, Y. & Azinfar, K. (2010). Relationship between Audit Quality and Auditor Size, The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 17(61): 85-98. (in Persian). Hassas Yeghaneh, Y. & Kazempour, E. (2013). Relation between auditors expertise and ethical sensitivity and moral judgment, Quarterly empirical research in accounting, 3 (2): 53-70. (in Persian) Jacoby, J., Troutman, T., Kuss, A. & Mazursky, D. (1986). Experience and expertise in complex decision making, Advances in Consumer Research, 13 (1): 469– 472. Kent, P., Munro, L., Ambling, T. (2006). Psychological Characteristics Contributing to Expertise in Audit Judgment, International Journal of Auditing, 10 (2): 125–141. Khosh-Tinat, M. & Bostanian, J. (2007). Professional judgment in auditing, Quarterly Journal of Accounting study, (18): 25-58. (in Persian) Lee, Y., Stettler, A. & Antonakis, J. (2011). Incremental validity and indirect effect of ethical development on work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (7): 1110-1115. Libby, R. (1989). Experimental research and the distinctive features of accounting settings, Symposium on Auditing Research, University of Illinois, in Bédard, J. (1989). Expertise in auditing: Myth or reality? Accounting, organizations and Society, 14 (1-2): 113–131. Mojtahedzadeh, V. & Aghaei, P. (2004). Factors affecting the quality of the independent audit of independent auditors and users perspective, The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 11(4):53-76. (in Persian) Peecher, M. & Solomon, I. (2001). Theory and experimentations in studies of audit judgments and decisions: avoiding common research traps, International Journal of Auditing, 5 (3): 193–203. Phelps, R. (1977). Expert livestock judgment: A descriptive analysis of the development of expertise. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University. Sayrani, M., Khajavi, SH. & Noshadi, M. ( 2009),An Examination of the Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments, The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review, 16(2): 35-50. (in Persian) Shanteau, J. & Phelps, R. (1977). Judgment and swine Approaches and issues in applied judgment analysis, in Kaplan, M. & Schwartz, S. (eds), Human Judgment and Decision Processes in Applied Settings, New York: Academic Press. Shanteau, J. (1978). When does a response error become a judgment bias? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6): 579-581. Shanteau, J. (1987). Psychological characteristics of expert decision makers. in Mumpower, J., Phillips, L., Renn, O. & Uppuluri, V., Expert Judgment and Expert Systems, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 289–304. Shanteau, J. (1989). Cognitive heuristics and biases in behavioral auditing: Review, comments and observations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14 (1- 2): 165-177. Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2): 252–266. Shanteau, J., Grier, M., Johnson, J. & Berner, E. (1981). Improving decision making skills of nurses, in ORSA-TIMS Proceedings (Houston) in Shanteau, J.(1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers’, Acta Psychologica, 68(1-3): 203-215. Shelton, S.W. (1999). The Effect of Experience on the use of irrelevant Evidence in auditor Judgment. The Accounting Review, 74 (2): 217-224. Trotman, K. T. & Wright, A. (2000). Order effects and regency: where do we go from here? Accounting and Finance, 40 (2): 169-182. Wright, W. F. (1988). Audit judgment experience and consensus, in Ferris, K. R. (ed.), A Critical Analysis, Columbus, OH: Century VII Publishing Company, pp. 305–328. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,746 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 4,211 |