پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,122,462 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,230,374 |
بررسی نقش برنامه‌ریزی مشارکتی در کاهش فقر روستایی به‌روش کیفی مطالعة موردی: روستای لزور | ||
| پژوهش های روستائی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 5، شماره 3، مهر 1393، صفحه 467-488 اصل مقاله (371.84 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2014.53175 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| بهروز قرنی آرانی* | ||
| عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| موفقیت سازمان‌های مردمی در کاهش فقر روستایی می‌تواند بیش از نهادهای غیرمردمی باشد، اما به‌دلایلی این موفقیت حاصل نمی‌شود و مزایای نهادهای مردمی بالفعل نیستند. در پژوهش حاضر، نقش مشارکت روستاییان در کاهش فقر روستایی تبیین می‌شود. ازآنجاکه کارشناسان و مدیران پروژة حبله‌رود در هدف‌گذاری، طراحی، اجرا، ارزش‌یابی و نگهداری این پروژه کوشیدند مشارکت محلی را جلب کنند و از شروع این پروژه نیز زمان زیادی می‌گذرد، از آن به‌عنوان مطالعة موردی این تحقیق استفاده شد. در پژوهش حاضر، مؤلفه‌های شاخص به‌زیستی انسان به‌عنوان سنجه برگزیده شد. تحلیل محتوای متن مصاحبه با 12 تن از آگاهان محلی روستای لزور ـ از روستاهای موفق و پایلوت این پروژه‌ـ نشان می‌دهد که مشارکت در طرح‌ها، فقر عمومی و فقر معنوی و فقر حاد و مزمن را کاهش داده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهند که پایداری، اثربخشی و پوشش پروژه‌های مشارکتی در هدف قراردادن فقر عمومی روستایی بیشتر از پروژه‌های بالا به پایین است و پروژه‌های غیرمشارکتی از هدف کاهش فقر روستایی به‌تدریج دور می‌شوند؛ حتی اگر در ظاهر یا در گام‌های اولیه سریع‌تر از پروژه‌های مشارکتی پیش بروند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| برنامه‌ریزی مشارکتی روستایی؛ کاهش فقر؛ لزور | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Study of Role of Participatory Planning on Rural Poverty Alleviation (Lazur); A Qualitative Method | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Behruz Gharani Arani | ||
| Payame Noor University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| 1- Introduction What’s rural poverty, and why urban poverty was separated in study? It said the situation dominate the villages differentiate looking to rural poverty and deprivation. Review of the dominant patterns of rural poverty alleviation displays exogenous interventions. World experience shows that wherever the poor as the subject, not the object, participate in the development process, create growth, human development and equality there. But despite the obstacles, including shortcoming of knowledge resource, how is this possible? Villagers are well acquainted with their problems and even in many cases they get use to the problem and culture of poverty, according to Lewis, have created a special lifestyle themselves. Thus, in order to overcome these barriers, if there were catalyst conditions, funds should be provided with support and participation, the current situation can be improved. But what are the facilitating conditions? Approaches in which participatory strategies are suggested, people are means and goal of development. Recently emphasized the active participation of villagers achieve through rural communities that their primary goal is pursuing and materializing of economic or social objectives. So, this article searches the role of villagers’ participation on rural poverty alleviation: this issue has the proponents and opponents and there is no straight answer for it. Opponents argue that participatory action spends much money and time, about poverty is irrelevant and luxury, is a destabilizing force in the social and political, is ideological rather than actual, and gets authorities shirk their duties toward their responsibility. Proponents believe that through participation we can make better use of the external costs, and they enumerate other virtues of participation: more effectiveness, ability to increase coverage of plans, more and better identification of target groups and their willingness to maintain the momentum of activities and to provide more opportunities for women benefits. Despite prevailing centralization of rural development programs in Iran, there are projects that the experts tried to intervene stakeholders to fulfill all or most of the project, including the Hableh-rud National Project. This project has sought to engage local participation and maximize communities’ interventions in planning and implementation of natural resource conservation projects. The main objective of the project is natural resources conservation through rural poverty alleviation and reducing the deleterious effects of unstable economic of region on resources, thus, this project seems suitable for this research. Between pilot projects in villages, Lazur was selected; the village was a pilot of Watershed Sub-project of Hableh-rud National Project. In the pilot villages, NGOs and CBOs formed to handle and monitor designing and implementing of projects. 2- Methodology Method is study of library documents. Researcher were consulted by the experts in the Forest, Range and Watershed Management Organization, and Lazur village of Watershed Hablehrud Project was selected for field research. Documents of Project Office and the village were studied to accommodate local data obtained from field method to the documents. The following components of Human Well-being Index in the evaluation of the test can be considered: nutrition, clothing, shelter and housing, employment, health, physical environment, social environment, education, social security, human freedom, social opportunities and participation activities. The index seems to be good in some aspects: it includes all monetary and non-monetary approaches; it is near to the situation of the village (the case study); it seems to be influenced directly or indirectly by the general goals of participatory projects; and the rural mentality can assess project's impact on the index. Participation is a quality issue and it retrieved from socio-economic realities of society, so that method in this study was qualitative. Local key informants’ interview is a core rapid appraisal method. The 12 informants were interviewed. Interview questionnaire guide was used in interviews. The snowball technique was used to select some local informants. All interviewees were selected from Lazur people: group 1: trained local facilitators (known as Development Contributors); Group 2: members of “Central Nucleus of Sustainable Development”; Group 3: local contractors, Group 4: members of “Coordinating Council” and Group 5: internal rural managers including members of the village council or “Dehyar” (like mayor in cities) were selected. I lived in Lazour one month, recorded men and women's experiences, and observed their participatory projects. Then data was collected in MS-Word word processor, accorded with official documents of the project. Data was analyzed through content analysis method. This method regards to replicable (objective and systematic) and valid data. According the method, key informants' sentences were spread in components of Human Well-being Index delivered in a frequency table. 3– Discussion and Conclusion Since the majority of rural projects have monetary and non-participatory approach to poverty reduction and the projects are seldom success to access to “community level”, hence Lazur was chosen for case study because this project had the possible ways to implement participatory rural planning. Lazur informants (12 people) responded to the semi-structured questionnaire and content analysis of interviews sentences showed the following results: - Reducing spiritual poverty through increased self-confidence and self-reliance in villagers, motivation, entrepreneurship and optimal utilization of human and natural resources, increasing the level of knowledge and information resources, and more attention to cultural needs; - Reducing the risk of chronic and acute poverty and increasing economic investment security and social security as a result of watershed projects and reducing the risks of natural hazards, particularly floods; - Improving rural livelihoods a result of revenue relative increasing through direct and indirect, short and long term employment, Hablehrud project and medicinal plants project (the Project is defined by the rural women); - Promoting entrepreneurial spirit and "encouragement" among the villagers, and preparing the basis for employment and development a result of rural participatory and collaborative projects; - Sustainability, efficiency and coverage of participatory projects in targeting rural mass poverty are more successful than top-down projects, non-participatory projects aimed at reducing rural poverty goals are gradually away though in appearance or in the initial steps of participatory projects go faster. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| participatory, Rural, poverty, Alleviation, Lazur | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
چمبرز، رابرت، 1378، جابه‌جایی الگوها و شیوة کار پژوهش و توسعة مشارکتی، ترجمة عبدالرسول مرتضوی، روستا و توسعه، سال 3، شمارة 3 و 4، صص. 138-119. دفتر پروژه ترسیب کربن (بی‌تا)، پروژه ترسیب کربن، سازمان جنگل‌ها، مراتع و آبخیزداری استان خراسان جنوبی (تاریخ آخرین دسترسی 22/04/1392)، http://www.ircsp.net. راندینلی، دنیس ای.؛ مک کالو، جیمز اس.؛ و جانسون، رونالد دابلیو، 1376، تحلیل سیاست‌های تمرکززدایی در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه: چارچوب اقتصاد سیاسی، ترجمة عباس حکیمی، روستا و توسعه، سال 1، شمارة 2 و 3، صص. 100-61. رضوانی، محمدرضا، 1383، مقدمه‌ای بر برنامه‌ریزی توسعة روستایی در ایران، چاپ یکم، نشر قومس، تهران. رضوی، سیدحسن، 1377، روستا؛ فقر، توسعه، جلد اول: مفاهیم، رهیافت‌ها و شاخص‌ها، مرکز تحقیقات و بررسی مسائل روستایی، سلسله انتشارات روستا و توسعه، تهران. رضوی، سیدحسن؛ موسوی‌نژاد مقدم، سیدبابک؛ رحیمی سوره، صمد؛ و شاه‌شجاعی، علی، 1382، روستا، فقر، توسعه، جلد دوم: روش‌ها و الگوهای مقابله با فقر روستایی (تجارب کشورهای آسیایی)، مرکز تحقیقات و بررسی مسائل روستایی، سلسله انتشارات روستا و توسعه، تهران. زاهدی، محمدجواد، 1382، توسعه و نابرابری، چاپ یکم، انتشارات مازیار، تهران. طهماسبی، اصغر و پویافر، امیرمسعود، 1383، عبور از برنامه‌ریزی متمرکز ازطریق توانمندسازی جوامع محلی (تجربة حبله‌رود)، مجموعه مقالات کنگرة توسعة روستایی؛ چالش‌ها و چشم‌اندازها، به‌کوشش مؤسسة توسعة روستایی ایران، مؤسسة عالی آموزش و پژوهش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی و معاونت صنایع و توسعة روستایی وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، صص. 195-181. گالبرایت، جان کنت، 1366، ماهیت فقر عمومی، ترجمة محمدحسین عادلی، چاپ یکم، انتشارات اطلاعات، تهران. همیاران غدا (بی‌تا) طرح‌های انجام‌شده مؤسسة همیاران غدا، http://www.hamyaran.org (تاریخ آخرین دسترسی 22/04/1392). هولستی، اوله، 1373، تحلیل محتوا در علوم اجتماعی و انسانی، ترجمة نادر سالارزاده امیری، انتشارات دانشگاه علامة طباطبایی، تهران. هولمن، هانس، 1377، گستردگی مفرط دولت‌های جهان‌سوم و تمرکزگرایی آنها، ترجمة بدرالدین اورعی یزدانی، روستا و توسعه، سال 2، شمارة 2، صص. 106-75. Anderson, John Ward, 2001, Iranian Village Shapes a Model of Democracy, Breaking Tradition, Residents Take Charge of Own Destiny, Washington Post Foreign Service, The Washington Post Company.
Elsasser, Peter, 2002, Rules for Participation and Negotiation and their Possible Influence on the Content of a National Forest Programme, Forest Policy and Economics 4, PP. 291–300.
Green, Maia and Hulme, David, 2005, From Correlates and Characteristics to Causes: Thinking About Poverty from a Chronic Poverty Perspective, World Development, Vol. 33, No. 6, PP. 867–879.
IFAD: International Fund for Agricultural Development, 2001, Rural Poverty Report 2001: The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
IFAD: International Fund for Agricultural Development, 2011, Rural Poverty Report 2011: New Realities, New Challenges: New Opportunities for Tomorrow’s Generation, Rome, Quintily.
Kumar, Krishna, 1993, An Overview of Rapid Appraisal Methods in Development Settings, Rapid Appraisal Method, Edited by Krishna Kumar, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Maurel, Pierre; Craps, Marc; Cernesson, Flavie; Raymond, Richard; Valkering, Pieter; and Ferrand, Nils, 2007, Concepts and Methods for Analysing the Role of Information and Communication Tools (IC-tools) in Social Learning Processes for River Basin Management, Environmental Modelling & Software Vol. 22, Issue 5, PP. 630-639.
Renn, Ortwin, 2006, Participatory Processes for Designing Environmental Policies, Land Use Policy 23, PP. 4–43.
References (in Persian)
Chambers, Robert, 2000, Paradigm Shifts and the Practice of Participatory Research and Development, Translated by Abdorrasul Mortazavi, Village and Development, Vol. 3 , No. 3-4 , PP. 119-138.
Carbon Sequestration Project Office, No Date, Carbon Sequestration Projects, http://www.ircsp.net, Southern Khorasan Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Organization (last accessed 13/07/2013).
Rondinelli, Dennis A.; McCullough, James S., And Johnson, Ronald W., 1997, Analyzing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: a political economy framework, Translated by Abbas Hakimi, Village and Development, Vol. 1, No. 2-3 , PP. 61-100.
Rezvani, Mohammad Reza, 2004, Introduction to Rural Development Planning in Iran, 1st Edition, Tehran: Ghumes Publication.
Razavi, Sayyed Hassan, 1998, Village; Poverty, Development, Volume I: Concepts, approaches and indicators, Rural Issues Research Center, Tehran: Rural Development Publication.
Razavi, Sayyed Hassan; Musavinezhad Moghaddam, Sayyed Babak; Rahimi Sureh, Samad; and Shah-shojaei, Ali, 2003, Village; Poverty, Development, Volume II: Methods and patterns of rural poverty eradication (the experience of Asian countries), Rural Issues Research Center, Tehran: Rural Development Publication.
Zahedi, Mohammad Javad, 2003, Development and Inequality, 1st Edition, Tehran: Maziyar Publication.
Tahmasebi, Asghar and Puyafar, Amir Masoud, 2004, Passing the Intensive Planning through the Empowerment of Local Communities (experience of Hablehrud), Rural development congress; challenges and perspectives, Edited by Iranian Institute for Rural Development; High Institute for Training and Research on Management and Planning; and Department of Industries and rural Development, Ministry of Jehade – Agriculture, PP. 181-195.
Galbraith, John Kenneth, 1987, The Nature of Mass Poverty, Translated by Mohammad Hossein Adeli, 1st Edition, Tehran: Ettelaat Publication.
Hamyaran Ghada, No Date, Projects of the Institute of Hamyaran Ghada, http://www.hamyaran.org (last accessed 13/07/2013).
Holsti, Ole, 1994, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Translated by Salarzadeh Amiri, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press.
Holmen, Hans, 1998, Overdevelopment and Centralization of the Third World State, Translated by Badroddin Ourei Yazdani, Village and Development, Vol. 2, No. 2, PP. 75-106. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,013 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,428 |
||