پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,764 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,187,126 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,935,982 |
تحلیل نقش تنوع معیشتی در تاب‌آوری خانوارهای روستایی در شرایط خشکسالی مطالعة موردی: مناطق در معرض خشکسالی استان اصفهان | ||
| پژوهشهای روستائی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 5، شماره 3، مهر 1393، صفحه 639-662 اصل مقاله (329.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2014.53186 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عبدالرضا رکن الدین افتخاری1؛ سید محمد موسوی* 2؛ مهدی پورطاهری1؛ منوچهر فرج زاده اصل3 | ||
| 1استاد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس و عضو هیئت علمی مؤسسۀ پژوهشهای برنامه‌ریزی اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعة روستایی | ||
| 3استاد جغرافیای طبیعی گرایش اقلیم‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| خشکسالی طی سالیان گذشته آسیب‌های زیادی به بخش کشاورزی و جامعة روستایی وارد کرده است. در دهة اخیر، رویکرد مقابله با شرایط و رخدادهای طبیعی جای خود را به کنارآمدن و زندگی‌کردن با آنها داده است. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تنوع معیشتی به‌عنوان یکی از رویکردهای مناسب برای کنارآمدن با شرایط خشکسالی می‌پردازد. چارچوب تحلیلی استفاده‌شده در این پژوهش، چارچوب معیشت پایدار است. این چارچوب که به‌عنوان روشی برای بهبود درک معیشت فقرای روستایی به‌کار گرفته شده است، از زمینه‌های آسیب‌پذیری روستاییان آغاز می‌شود و به دستاوردهای معیشتی حاصل از سازوکار‌های مبتنی بر معیشت پایدار ختم می‌شود. روش تحقیق در این بررسی به‌صورت کمی پیمایشی است و از روش‌های توصیفی، تحلیلی و روابط همبستگی استفاده می‌کند. برای این منظور به 12 روستا در مناطق مختلف استان اصفهان، که به درجه‌های متفاوتی در معرض خشکسالی بودند و در سطوح گوناگونی از نظر برخورداری از امکانات توسعه قرار داشتند، مراجعه شد و افزون بر نهادها و خبرگان روستایی با 227 نفر از سرپرستان خانوار کشاورز روستایی مصاحبه شد. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده نشان می‌دهند که اتخاذ رویکرد تنوع معیشتی منجر به تاب‌آوری بیشتر خانوارها در شرایط خشکسالی شده است. در روستاهایی که در معرض خشکسالی شدیدتری قرار داشتند، این تنوع معیشتی بیشتر به‌چشم می‌خورد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تاب‌آوری؛ تنوع معیشتی؛ خشکسالی؛ راهبردهای معیشتی؛ سرمایه‌های معیشتی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of the role of livelihood diversity to rural household resilience in drought condition: case study of the drought exposed areas of Isfahan province | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abdoreza Roknedin eftekhari1؛ Sayed Mohammad Moosavi2؛ Mahdi Poortaheri1؛ Manochehr Farajzadeh Asl3 | ||
| 1Faculty member of Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 2Phd Student at Tarbiat Modares University and Faculty Member of Research Institute for Planning, Agricultural Economy and Rural Development | ||
| 3Faculty member of Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Iran one of the arid countries of the world that has always subjected to severe droughts. Previous studies show that in most years some parts or total areas of the country subjected to severe droughts. The present studies indicate that much of the country in recent years, experienced of severe droughts that unprecedented in severity and breadth. Drought in the past years had a lot of damage to agriculture and rural society in Iran. In recent decades, the focus of the cope with natural events and conditions, changed by adapting and live with them. This study concentrated on the diversity of living as one of the approaches for coping with drought conditions. Analytical framework used in this paper is a sustainable livelihoods framework. This framework as a way to improve understanding livelihoods and vulnerability contents of rural poor starts and ends with livelihood outcomes based on mechanisms of sustainable livelihoods. This framework can be tailored to fit with the problem of the drought-induced vulnerability and mechanisms leading to adaptation and resiliency in subsistence agricultural activities. Key concepts and variables in this framework include resilience, vulnerability, livelihood assets and livelihood strategies. This study focused of 12 villages in the Isfahan province that have been affected to varying degrees of drought and different level of development. In addition, local institutions, rural experts and 227 rural farmer households are interviewed. In each of the selected villages in proportion to the number of farmer families stay in rural areas 15 to 25 Householder were selected and interviewed by systematic random selection method. The results show that the approach adopted by the diversity of families living in drought conditions has led them to greater resilience. The villages with more drought condition have more household livelihood diversity level than villages with lower degree of drought. In this context, the people, especially poor people in rural areas are the center of attention, how they obtain livelihood for himself and his family. The framework is centered on livelihood resources and assets, if any, and using it for public access is provided. Access to the property is heavily affected by vulnerability. The major social, institutional and political environment effect on the composition and use of assets to achieve goals. Considering all Topics can be said that villages with less experience in the face of prolonged drought are more vulnerable because their economic and social structures are not prepared to deal with the drought and damaged their areas of livelihood assets. In the other hand villages with experience in the face of prolonged drought Structurally prepared to deal with the situation and they are in better condition. The results shows that severity of the drought increased subsistence rural livelihood diversities. These results indicate that in villages with long experience and continuous drought livelihood diversification as a key strategy adopted for dealing with drought. The highest level of resilience show in villages with severe drought conditions and if drought reduced in village level, then resilience of rural households is reduced. Also the resilience is lowest in rural areas with low drought. Villages with a longer history of vulnerability (drought) have also been more severe droughts, more resilience prepared to deal with this condition. Significant positive correlation with the severity of the drought on the one hand and livelihood diversification approach and significant negative correlation with migration and intensive agriculture represents a positive effect of livelihood diversification on increasing the resilience and negative effect of migration and intensive agriculture to rural household resilience. Indicators of livelihood assets in the five components showed significant positive correlation with the diversity of livelihoods and household resiliency while has a positive relationship to the indicators of institutional and Infrastructural development as an intermediate factor to use livelihood approach. Meanwhile, the significant negative correlation between the migration and livelihood capital assets shows while livelihood stronger assets over there potential migration of households has declined. Also significant correlation between livelihood assets and intensive agriculture was not seen. The relationships between the variables studied and the results have confirmed the role of all aspects of livelihood assets to the use of proper approach to deal with drought conditions that in this society lead them to livelihood diversification as a suitable approach and enhancing the resilience of rural households are in severe drought conditions. In the other hand the lack of livelihood diversification even in villages that are less susceptible to drought caused low resilience in the face of drought conditions and more vulnerability in these villages have caused. Based on the results the most appropriate strategy to increase the resilience of rural households in drought conditions is diversifying sources of livelihood assets for rural households. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Drought, resilience, Livelihood diversity, Livelihood Assets, Livelihood Strategies | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
سرحدی علی، سلطانی سعید، مدرس علی، 1387، ارزیابی و تحلیل گسترة خشکسالی در استان اصفهان بر پایة چهار شاخص مهم خشکسالی، نشریة دانشکدة منابع طبیعی، دورة 61، شمارة 3، صص. 570-555. سلطانی سعید، سعادتی سیده‌سارا، 1386، پهنه‌بندی خشکسالی در اصفهان با استفاده از نمایة استاندارد بارش (SPI)، مجلة علمی پژوهشی علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران، سال اول، شمارة 2. غیور حسن‌علی، 1381، دورة خشکسالی در اصفهان، دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی اصفهان (مطالعات و پژوهشهای دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی، پاییز و زمستان، 31-30، صص. 14-1. مرکز تحقیقات کم‌آبی و خشکسالی در کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، 1389، تحلیلی بر وضعیت خشکسالی کشور (سال‌های آبی 87-1386 تا 89-1388 و پیش‌بینی وضعیت سال 90-1389)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، پایگاه ملی مدیریت خشکسالی کشاورزی. مرکز[M1] تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اصفهان، پایگاه استانی مدیریت خشکسالی کشاورزی اصفهان، دسترسی در: http://adm.icrasn.com، آبان، 1391. Adger, W.N., 2000, Social and Ecological Resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3), PP. 347-364.
Caldwell, K., Boyd, 2009, Coping and Resilience in Farming Families Affected by Drought, Rural and Remote Health 9: 1088, Available at: science.naturalnews.com, (September 2012).
Carswell, G., 1997, Agricultural Intensification and Rural Sustainable Livelihoods, A “Think Piece” IDS mimeo.
Elasha, B.O. et al., 2005, Sustainable Livelihood Approach for Assessing Community Resilience to Climate Change: case studies from Sudan, AIACC Working Paper, No. 17.
Geran, Jean M., 2000, Growth, Crisis and Resilience: household responses to economic change in rural Southeast Asia Evidence from Northern Thailand, Working Paper No. 1.
Heydari[M2] G.R., 2005, The Incidence of Droughts and their Specific Features in Term of Short and Longer Term Socio-economic Impacts at Household and Community Level Covering Different Agro-ecological Systems in the Country, Consultant report to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Near East Regional Office, Cairo, Egypt.
Hussein, K. and J. Nelson, 1997, Sustainable Livelihood and Livelihood Diversification, IDS Working Paper 69.
Makoka[M3] , D., 2008, The Impact of Drought on Household Vulnerability: The case of rural Malawi, University of Bonn, Centre for Development Research (ZEF).
Mayunga, Joseph S., 2006, Understanding and Applying the Concept of Community Disaster Resilience: A capital-based approach, Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, Texas A&M University.
Moench, M., 2005, Adaptive Capacity & Livelihood Rsilience in Water Scarce Areas: Research result from south Asia and implications for the middle east, Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, Boulder, CO, USA.
Nelson Valerie, Lamboll Richard 2 and Arendse Adele, 2008, Climate Change Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Development, Discussion Paper, DSA-DFID Policy Forum.
Scoones I., 1998, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis, IDS Working Paper 72.
Tiffen, M.M. Mortimore and F. Gichuki, 1994, More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons.
Turner[M4] , B.L., II, R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell et al., 2003, A Framework for Vulnerability Analysis in Sustainability Science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8074–8079.
Twigg J., 2001, Sustainable Livelihoods and Vulnerability to Disaster, Benfield Gerig Hazard Research Centre for the Disaster Mitigation Institute (DMI).
UN/ISDR, 2004, Living with Risk –A global review of disaster reduction initiatives, Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
Reference (in Persian):
Sarhadi, Ali, Soltani, Saeed, Modares, Ali, 2003, Evaluation and Analyze Size of Drought in Isfahan Province based on Four Important Indexes, Natural resource faculty working paper, Vol. 61, No. 3, PP. 555-570.
Soltani, Saeed, Saadati, Sara, 2007, Using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) for Drought Classification in Isfahan, Journal of Sciences and Engineering of Watershed in Iran, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Ghayour, Hasanali, 2002, Periods of Drought in Isfahan, Faculty of Literature and Humanities (Studies and Research in Faculty of Literature and Humanities), Vol. 1-14, No. 30-31.
Research Centre of Low Water and Drought on Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2012, Analysis of the Drought Situation in Country (the prediction of water during the years of 2007-2008 to 2009-2010 and perception of 2011-2012), the Research, Education and Extension Agricultural organization, Database of National Management in agricultural Drought.
Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center of Isfahan, 2012, Center of agricultural Drought Management, http://adm.icrasn.com, (October, 2012).
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,735 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,088 |
||