تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,500 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,084,196 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,188,599 |
اثر پیش تیمار خشکی روی فعالیت آنزیم های آنتی اکسیدانی و کاهش خسارت تنش خشکی در دو گونه چمن بنت گراس خزنده Agrostis stolonifera cv. Palustris) و فستوکای پا بلند (Festuca arundinacea cv. Greystone) | ||
علوم باغبانی ایران | ||
مقاله 11، دوره 45، شماره 4، بهمن 1393، صفحه 429-440 اصل مقاله (526.52 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijhs.2015.53494 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
کامران امیری نسب1؛ محمود قاسم نژاد2؛ هدایت زکی زاده* 3؛ محمد حسن بیگلویی4 | ||
1دانشجوی سابق کارشناسی ارشد دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان | ||
2دانشیار دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان | ||
3استادیار دانشکده علوم کشاورزی دانشگاه گیلان | ||
4استادیار دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان | ||
چکیده | ||
پیشتیمار خشکی، یعنی آبیاری با تکرار کم و با فواصل طولانی، که بهمنظور گسترش سیستم ریشهای و کاهش خسارت خشکی در گیاهان استفاده میشود. در پژوهش حاضر، اثر پیشتیمار خشکی به مدت 30 روز در افزایش تحمل به خشکی دو گونه چمن بنتگراس خزنده و فستوکای پابلند ارزیابی شد. گیاهان پیشتیمارشده و شاهد سپس به مدت 50 روز در معرض تنش خشکی با سطوح مختلف نیروی مکش خاک (20ـ 23، 40ـ 43، 50ـ 53 و 70ـ 73 سانتیبار) قرار گرفتند و در پایان، بهمنظور رشد مجدد، رطوبت خاک به مدت 15 روز در حد ظرفیت زراعی حفظ شد. نتایج نشان داد که پیشتیمار خشکی سبب افزایش نسبت طول ریشه به شاخساره در دو گونه چمن شد. در پایان 50 روز تنش خشکی، میزان فعالیت آنزیمهای پراکسیداز، سوپراکسید دیسموتاز، آسکوربات پراکسیداز و کاتالاز در گیاهان پیشتیمارشده در مقایسه با گیاهان شاهد بالاتر بود. در مرحلۀ رشد مجدد، گیاهان پیشتیمارشده در بنتگراس خزنده برخلاف فستوکای پابلند، فعالیت آنزیمهای آنتیاکسیدانی بالاتری از شاهد نشان دادند. درمجموع پیشتیمار خشکی با افزایش نسبت ریشه به شاخساره و تقویت سیستم آنتیاکسیدانی، تحمل به خشکی را در هر دو گونه چمن افزایش داد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تحمل به خشکی؛ رشد مجدد؛ مقاومسازی؛ نسبت ریشه به شاخساره | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Effect of Drought Pre- conditioning on Antioxidant enzymes activity and reducing drought stress damage in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass and tall fescue | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Kamran Amiri Nasab1؛ Mahmood Ghasemnezhad2؛ Hedayat Zakizadeh3؛ Mohammad Hassan Biglouei4 | ||
1Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan | ||
2Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan | ||
3University of Guilan | ||
4Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Drought preconditioning, which is irrigation with low frequency and longer duration, could be used for extending root system and suppressing drought damage in plants. In the present study, the effect of drought preconditioning for 30 days on increasing tolerance to drought stress in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera cv.Palustris) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea cv. Greystone) was investigated. Drought preconditioning and control plants were irrigated for 50 days with different levels of soil suction (20-23,40-43, 50-53 and 70-73 centibar), and finally, plants were watered up to field capacity point for 15 days, in order to recovery. The results showed that drought preconditioning increased root to shoot length ratio in both grass species. Preconditioning in both species also showed the higher leaf peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbat peroxidase and catalase activity than control plants at the end of 50 days of drought stress treatments. At recovery stage, activity of antioxidant enzymes was higher only in preconditioned creeping bent grass compared to control plants. Overall, drought preconditioning could increase drought stress tolerance in both turfgrass species by increasing root to shoot ratio and improving enzymatic antioxidant systems. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
drought tolerance, hardening, recovery, Root to shoot ratio, water stress | ||
مراجع | ||
Alizadeh, A. (2004). Soil and plant water relations. Imam Reza University Press. Mashhad. (In Farsi)
Amiard, V., Bertrand, A.M., Billard, J.P., Huault, C., Keller, F. & Prudhomme, M. P. (2003). Fructans, but not the sucrosyl-galactosides, raffinose and loliose, are affected by drought stress in perennial ryegrass. Journal of Plant Physiology, 132, 2218-2229.
Amini, Z., Hadad, R. & Moradi, F. (2008). The effect of drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activity in reproductive growth stages (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 46, 74-65.
Aldous, D. E. & Chivers. I. H. (2002). Sports Turf and Amenity Grasses, a manual for use and identification. Landlinks Press. pp. 221.
Baillya, C., Corbineaua, F. & Van Doorn, W. G. (2001). Free radical scavenging and senescence in Iris tepals. Plant Physiology and Biochemestry, 39, 647-656.
Bian, S. & Jiang, Y. (2009). Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Scientia Horticulturae, 120, 264-270.
Breusegem, F., Van Montague, M., Van Inze, D., Van Breusegem, F. & Van Montague, M. (1998). Engineering stress tolerance in maize. Outlook Agriculture Journal, 27, 115-124.
Cesar Ferreira, L., Catarina Cataneo, A., Ramazzini Remaeh, M., Corniani, N., Fumis, T., Andreo de Souza, Y., Scavroni, J. & Jose Aparecido Soares, B. (2010). Nitric oxide reduces oxidative stress generated by lactofen in soybean plants. Pestiside Biochemistry and Physiology, 97, 47-54.
Chance, B.& Maehly, A.C. (1995). Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods in Enzymology, 2, 764-775
Cook, D., Fowler, S. & Fiehn, O. (2004). A prominent role for the CBF cold response pathway in configuring the low temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant Biology, 101, 15243-8.
Copra, R.K. & Selote, D.S. (2007). Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought – resistant than- susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environmental Experimental Botany, 60, 276-283.
Dabrowska, G., Kata, A., Goc, A., Hebda, M.S. & Skrzypek, E. (2007). Characteristics of the plant ascorbate peroxidase family. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 49, 7-17.
Fangmeier, A., Brunschon, S. & Jager, RJ. (1994). Time course of oxidant stress biomarkers in flag leaves of wheat exposed to ozone and drought stress. New Phytologist, 126, 63-69.
Fu, J. & Huang, B. (2001). Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool- season grasses to localized drought stress. Environment Experimental Botany, 45, 105-114.
Giannopolitis, C.N. & Ries, S.`K. (1977). Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 59, 309-314.
Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology Biochemistry Journal, 48, 909-930.
Guo, Z., Ou, W., Lu, S. & Zhong, Q. (2006). Differential responses of antioxidative system to chilling and drought in four rice cultivars differing in sensitivity. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 44, 828-836.
Hoffman, L., DaCosta, M., Scott Ebdon, J. & Zhao, J. (2012). Effects of drought preconditioning on freezing tolerance of perennial ryegrass. Environmental &Experimental Botany, 79, 11-20.
Jiang, Y. & Huang, B. (2001). Osmotic adjustment and root growth associated with drought preconditioning enhanced heat tolerance in Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Science, 41, 1168-1173.
Jordan, J., White, R., Vietor, D., Hale, T., Thomas, J. & Engelke, M. (2003). Effect of irrigation frequency on turf quality, shoot density and root length density of five bentgrass cultivars. Crop Science, 43, 282-287.
Kafi, M., & Kaviani, S.H. (2002). Establishment management and turf maintenance. Cultural & Artistic Institution Shaghayegh Rusta, Pp: 230. (In Farsi)
Latimer, J.G. (1992). Drought, paclobutrazol, abscisic acid, and gibberellic acid as alternatives to daminozide in tomato transplant production. Horticulture Science, 117, 243–247.
Nakano, Y.& Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidases in spinach chloroplasts. Plant cell Physiology, 22, 867-880.
Makela, P., Sainio, P. P., Jokinen, K., Pehu, E., Setala, H., Hinkkanen, R. & Somersalo, S. 1996. Uptake and translocation of foliar-applied glycinebetaine in crop plants. Plant science, 121, 221-230.
Peng, Y., Chenping, X.U., Lixin, X.U. & Hung, B. (2011). Improved heat tolerance through drought preconditioning associated with changes in lipid composition, antioxidant enzymes, and protein expression in Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Science, 2, 807-817.
Pound, W.E. & Street, J.R. (2001). Managing turfgrass under drought conditions. Horticulture & Crop Science, 61, 4028-4029.
Richardson, M.D., Karcher, D.E., Hignight, K. & Rush, D. (2008). Drought tolerance and rooting capacity of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Crop Science, 48, 2429-2436.
Roohollahi, I., Kafi, M. & Naderi, R. (2010). Drought reaction and rooting characteristics in response to plant growth regulators on Poa pratensis cv. Barimpala. International Journal Food Agriculture Environment, 8, 285-288.
Shaoyun, L., Su, W., Li, H. & Guo, H. (2009). Abscisic acid improves drought tolerance of triploid bermudagrass and involves H2O2- and NO-induced antioxidant enzyme activities. Plant Physiology & Biochemistry, 47, 132-138.
Sharma, P. & Dubey, R.S. (2005). Drought induces oxidative stress and enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regulator, 46, 209-221.
Simova –stoilova, L., Vaseva, I., Grigorova, B., Demirevska, K. & Fel1er, U. ( 2010). Proteolytic activity and cysteine protease expression in wheat leaves under severe soil drought and recovery. Plant physiology Biochemistry, 48, 200-206.
Salahvarzy, Y., Tehranfar, A., Gzanchyan, A. & Aroei, H. (2008). Physiomorphological changes under drought stress and rewatering in endemic and exotic turfgrasses. Journal of Horticultural Science, 22, 1-12. (In Farsi)
Sofo, A., Tuzio, A.C., Dichio, B. & Xiloyannis, C. (2005). Influence of water deficit and rewatering on the components of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in four interspecific Prunus hybrids. Plant Science, 169, 403–412.
Trenholm, L.E. (2000). Improving drought tolerance in your Florida lawn. Food & Agricultural Sciences. ENH57.
Wang, Z. & Huang, B. (2004). Physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress. Crop Science, 44, 1729-1736.
Zhang, J. & Kirkham, M.B. (1996). Antioxidant responses to drought in sunflower and sorghum seedlings. New Phytologist, 132, 361-373.
Zhang, J., Cui, S., Li, J. & Kirkham, M.B. (1995). Protoplasmic factors, antioxidant responses, and chilling resistance in maize. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 33,567-575.
Zhou, Li., Peng, Y. & Ma, X. (2013). Different response on drought tolerance and post-drought recovery between the small-leafed and the large-leafed white clover (Trifolium repens L.) associated with antioxidative enzyme protection and lignin metabolism. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35, 213-222.
Zhu, J. K. (2003). Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 6, 441-445. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,469 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,969 |