سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,484
تعداد مقالات70,042
تعداد مشاهده مقاله123,035,896
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله96,269,110
Beheshti-Aval, Seyed Bahram, Jahanfekr, Ehsan. (1394). Modification of Displacement Coefficient Method in Estimation of Target Displacement for Regular Concrete Bridges Based on ASCE 41-06 Standard. , 48(1), 101-120. doi: 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.008
Seyed Bahram Beheshti-Aval; Ehsan Jahanfekr. "Modification of Displacement Coefficient Method in Estimation of Target Displacement for Regular Concrete Bridges Based on ASCE 41-06 Standard". , 48, 1, 1394, 101-120. doi: 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.008
Beheshti-Aval, Seyed Bahram, Jahanfekr, Ehsan. (1394). 'Modification of Displacement Coefficient Method in Estimation of Target Displacement for Regular Concrete Bridges Based on ASCE 41-06 Standard', , 48(1), pp. 101-120. doi: 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.008
Beheshti-Aval, Seyed Bahram, Jahanfekr, Ehsan. Modification of Displacement Coefficient Method in Estimation of Target Displacement for Regular Concrete Bridges Based on ASCE 41-06 Standard. , 1394; 48(1): 101-120. doi: 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.008

Modification of Displacement Coefficient Method in Estimation of Target Displacement for Regular Concrete Bridges Based on ASCE 41-06 Standard

Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal
مقاله 8، دوره 48، شماره 1، شهریور 2015، صفحه 101-120    اصل مقاله (704.09 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Papers
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.7508/ceij.2015.01.008
نویسندگان
Seyed Bahram Beheshti-Aval* 1؛ Ehsan Jahanfekr2
1Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Hormozgan University, Bandarabas, Iran
چکیده
Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) stipulated in the ASCE 41-06 standard is becoming the preferred method for seismic rehabilitation of buildings in many high-seismic-hazard countries. Applications of the method for non-building constructions such as bridges are beyond the scope of this standard. Thus its application to this kind of structure should be approached with care. Target displacement has reasonable accuracy for buildings with strong columns and weak beams, where there is the development of plastic hinges. Due to high stiffness and strength of the deck relative to the piers in most bridges, this mechanism does not occur, and it is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of DCM for such structures. In this research, an attempt is made to evaluate the credibility of DCM in the ASCE/SEI 41-06 standard for estimating target drifts in concrete regular bridges under strong ground motions. To apply the extension of the method to bridge structures, the definition of new correction factor CB, which should be multiplied to previous coefficients, is required. This novel coefficient can improve the accuracy of the mentioned method in accessing seismic displacement demands. The coefficient is presented for soil types A to D based on NEHRP soil classification. The validity of the modified DCM is examined for several bridges with use of nonlinear dynamic analysis. Good correlation is found between both procedures.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Concrete Regular Bridge؛ correction factor؛ Displacement Coefficient Method؛ Nonlinear dynamic analysis؛ Nonlinear Static Analysis
مراجع
AASHTO, (2010). Standard specifications for highway bridges, American of state Highway and Transportation Officials Inc., Washington, DC.
ASCE/SEI 41-06, (2007). Seismic rehabilitation of existing building, American Society of Civil Engineers.
Abdollahzadeh, G. and Malekzadeh, H. (2013). “Response modification factor of coupled steel shear walls”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 46(1), 15–26.
Aviram, A., Mackie, K., and Stojadinović, B. (2008). Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 2008/03.
Chung, C. Fu. and Alayed, H. (2003). “Seismic analysis of bridges using displacement-based approach”, University of Maryland, TRB Annual Meeting.
Elgamal, A, Yan, Z. and Conte, J.P. (2008). “Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt bay bridge-foundation-ground system”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(7), 1165-1176.
Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1988) “N2 - A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings”, Proceedings of the 9th WCEE, August 2-9, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan.
FEMA 356, (2000). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
FEMA 440, (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency and Applied Technology Council, Washington, D.C., USA.
Fenves, G. L. and Ellery, M. (1998). Behavior and failure analysis of a multiple-frame highway bridges in the 1994 Northridge earthquake, Technical Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Freeman, S.A., Nicoletti, J.P. and Tyrell, J.V. (1975) “Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk– A case study of puget sound naval shipyard, Bremerton, Washington", Proceedings of the First U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Oakland, California, 113-122.
Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings (Standard No. 2800), 3rd Edition, BHRC Publication No. S–465.
Isakovic, T. and Fischinger, M. (2006). “Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(1), 95-114.
Jahanfekr, E. (2011). Comparison of loading pattern on results of nonlinear static (Pushover) analysis of bridges and suggesting for optimum loading, M.Sc. Dissertation, Faculty of Technical and Engineering, Science and Culture University, Tehran, Iran.
Lestuzzi, P., Schwab, P., Koller, M. and Lacave, C. (2004). “How to choose earthquake recordings for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, Paper No. 1241.
Lupoi, A., Franchin, P. and Pinto, P.E. (2011). "Further probing of the suitability of pushover analysis for the seismic assessment of bridge structures", University of Rome "Sapienza", Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering.
Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988). “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", Journal of the Structural Engineering, 114(ST8): 1804-1826.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., Fenves, G. L. and Jeremic, B. (2013). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees), Command language manual, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Miranda, E. (1993). “Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119(5), 1319-1338.
Paraskeva, S., Kappos, A.J. and sextos, A.G. (2006). “Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges", Earthquake 

Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(10), 1269–1293.
PEER Strong Motion Database. (2012). http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat.
Pinho, R. (2007). “Using pushover analysis for assessment of buildings and bridge”, Course Material for Advanced Earthquake Engineering Analysis- CISM, Udine Italy, 91-120.
Shayanfar, M.A. and Rezaei Abyaneh, R. (2011). “Investigation of lateral load pattern effects on nonlinear static analysis of moment resistant frames”, Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 44(5), 607-763.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Kim, H., and Kim, S. (2000). “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126(12), 1287-1295.
Yan, Z. (2006). Sensor data analysis and information extraction for structural health monitoring, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Zheng, Y., Usami, T. and Hanbin, T. (2003). “Seismic response predictions of multi-span steel bridges through pushover analysis”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(8), 1259-1274.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,688
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,200


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب