|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||111,529,696|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||86,163,088|
Daily river flow forecasting in a semi-arid region using twodatadriven
|مقاله 2، دوره 20، شماره 1، فروردین 2015، صفحه 11-21 اصل مقاله (2.92 M)|
|نوع مقاله: Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdesert.2015.54078|
|Mahboobeh Moatamednia* 1؛ Ahmad Nohegar2؛ Arash Malekian3؛ Hanieh Asadi4؛ Ahad Tavasoli1؛ Mahdi Safari5؛ Kamal Karimi6|
|1Range and Watershed Management Dept., Hormozgan University, Bandarabas, Iran|
|2Programming and Environment Management Dept., Environment Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran|
|3Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran|
|4Watershed Management Dept., Trabiat Modares University, Noor, Iran|
|5Faculty of Agriculture, Engineering, Bahonar Kerman University, Kerman, Iran|
|6Department of Natural Resources, Bafgh, Yazd, Iran|
|Rainfall-runoff relationship is very important in many fields of hydrology such as water supply and water resource|
management and there are many models in this field. Among these models, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was
found suitable for processing rainfall-runoff and opened various approaches in hydrological modeling. In addition,
ANNs are quick and flexible approaches which provide very promising results, and are cheaper and simpler to
implement than their physically based models. Therefore, this study evaluated the use of ANN models to forecast
daily flows in Bar watershed, a semi-arid region in the northwest Razavi Khorasan Province of Iran. Two different
neural network models, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) and the radial basis neural network (RBF), were developed
and their abilities to predict run off were compared for a period of fifty-five years from 1951 to 2006. The best
performance was achieved based on statistical criteria such as RMSE, RE and SSE. It was found that MLP showed a
good generalization of the rainfall-runoff relationship and is better than RBF. In addition, 1-day antecedent runoff
affected river flow, such that the statistical criteria decreased but the 5-day antecedent rainfall remained unaffected.
Furthermore, considering MLP, RE and RMSE, the best model produced the values 46.21 and 0.75 while the RBF
model recorded 177.60 and 0.82, respectively.
|Artificial Neural Network؛ Bar watershed؛ MLP؛ Rainfall-runoff؛ RBF|
Abrahart, R.J., L.M. See, 2007. Neural network
emulation of a rainfall-runoff model. Journal of
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4; 287–326.
Amorocho, J., W.E. Hart, 1964. A critique of current
methods in hydrology systems investigation.
Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 45;
Braddock, R.D., M.L. Kremmer. L. Sanzogni, 1998.
Feed forward artificial neural network model for
forecasting rainfall-runoff. Environmental
Sciences, 9; 419-432.
Bowden, G.J., H.R. Maier, G.C. Dandy, 2002. Optimal
division of data for neural network models in water
resources applications. Journal of Water manage,
Buch, A.M., H.S. Mazumdar, P.C. Pandey, 1993. A case
study of runoff simulation of a himalayan glacier
basin.Proceeding of International Joint Conference
on Neural Networks, Nagoya, Japan. pp. 971-974.
Campolo, M., P. Andreussi, A. Soldati, 1999. River
flood forecasting with a neural network model.
Water Resources Research 35; 1191–97.
Cannon, A.J., P.H., Whitfield, 2002. Downscaling recent
stream-flow conditions in British Columbia.
Canada Using Ensemble Neural Networks. Journal
of Hydrology, 259; 136-151.
Cheng, X., M., Noguchi, 1996. Rainfall–Runoff
modeling by a neural network approach.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Water Resources and Environmental Research,
Adelaide, Australia, pp. 143–50.
Dawson, C.W., 1996. A neural network approach to
software project effort estimation. Applications of
Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1; 229–237.
Dawson, C.W., R.L. Wilby, 2001. Hydrological
modeling using artificial neural networks. Progress
in Physical Geography, p. 80–108.
Dooge, J.C.I., 1977. Problems and methods of rainfallrunoff
modeling. In: Ciriani, T.A., U. Maione and
J.R. Wallis (Eds.). Mathematical Models for
Surface Water Hydrology: The Workshop Held at
the IBM Scientific Center, Pisa. Wiley, London,
Fernandoa, A.K., A.Y. Shamseldinb, R.J. Abrahart,
2011. Comparison of two data-driven approaches
for daily river flow forecasting, Proceedings of
19th International Congress on Modeling and
Simulation, Perth, Australia, pp.1077-1083.
Fischer, M.M., S. Gopal, 1994. Artificial neural
networks: a new approach to modeling
interregional telecommunication Flows. Journal of
regional Science, 34; 503–527.
Giustolisi, O., D. Laucelli, 2005. Improving
generalization of artificial neural networks in
rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of hydrology
Science, 50; 439-457.
Halff, A.H., H.M. Halff, M. Azmoodeh, 1993.
Predicting from rainfall using neural networks,
process engineering, Journal of Hydrology, 18;
Harun, S., N.I. Ahmat Nor, M.A.H. Kassim, 2002.
Artificial neural network model for rainfall-Runoff
Relationship. Journal of technology, 37; 1-12.
Hertz, J., A. Krogh, R.G. Palmer, 1991. Introduction to
the theory of neural computation.Journal of
Hydrology, 14; 630-645.
Hettiarachchi, P.M., J. Hall, A.W. Minns, 2005.The
extrapolation of artificial neural networks for the
modeling of rainfall–runoff relationships. Journal
of Hydro informatics, 7; 291-296.
Hjemfelt, A.T., M. Wang, 1993. Artificial neural
networks as unit hydrograph applications, process
engineering. Journal of hydrology, 10; 754–759.
Hsu, K.l., H.V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, 1995. Artificial
neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff
process. Journal of water resource manage, 31;
Huo, Z., S. Feng, S. Kang, G. Huang, F. Wang, P. Guo,
2012. Integrated neural networks for monthly river
flow estimation in arid inland basin of northwest
China. Journal of hydrology, 420–421; 159–170.
Jafari, M., M. Vafakhah, H. Abghari, A. Tavasoli, 2012.
Runoff coefficient forecasting usingartificial
neuralnetworkin Neyshabur Bar-Arieh watershed,
Iran Natural Ecosystem Journal, 2; 85-97.
Jain, S.K, D. Das, D.K. Srivastava, 1999. Application of
ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation.
Journal of Water Resources Planning and
Management, 125; 263–271.
Jain, S.K., D. Chalisgaonkar, 2000. Setting up stagedischarge
relations using ANN. Journal of
Hydrologic Engineering, 5; 428-433.
Jain, A., S. Srinivasulu, 2006. Integrated approach to
model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial
neural network and conceptual techniques. Journal
of Hydrology, 317; 291-306.
Jeong, D.I., Y-O. Kim, 2005. Rainfall-Runoff models
using artificial neural networks for ensemble
stream flow prediction, hydrological processes.
Journal of Hydrology, Published online in Wiley
Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI:
10.1002/hyp.5983.Process. 19; 3819–3835.
Kalteh, A.M., 2008. Rainfall-Runoff modeling using
artificial neural networks (ANNs): modeling and
understanding. Caspian Journal of Environmental
Sciences (CJES), 2008, 6; 53-58.
Karunanithi, N., W.J. Grenney, D. Whitley, K. Bovee,
1994. Neural network for river flow pre15 Diction.
Journal of Computing Civil Engineering, 8; 201–
Imrie, C.E., S. Dumcan, A. Korre, 2000. River flow
prediction using artificial neural networks:
generalization beyond the calibration range. Journal
of Hydrology, 233; 138-153.
Legates, D.R., G.J. McCabe, 1999. Evaluating the use of
‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydro
climatic model validation. Water Resources
Research, 35; 233–241.
Maier, H.R., G.C. Dandy, 2000, Neural networks for the
prediction and forecasting of water resources
variables: A review of modeling issues and
application, Environmental Modeling and
Software, 15; 101–124.
Minns, A.W., M.J. Hall, 1996, Artificial neural networks
as rainfall–runoff models. Hydrological Sciences
Journal, 41; 399– 417.
Mutlu, E., I. Chaubey, H. Hexmoor, S.G. Bajwa, 2008.
Comparison of artificial neural network models for
hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations
in an agricultural Watershed. Hydrological
processes, 22; 5097–5106.
Nayak, P.C., Y.R. Satyajirao, K.P. Sudheer, 2006.
Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer
using artificial neural network. Water Resources
Management, 20; 77-90.
Norgaard, M., O. Ravn, N.K. Poulsen, L.K. Hansen,
2000. Neural networks for modelling and control of
dynamic systems, Springer, UK. 3; 246.
Poggio, T., F. Girosi, 1990. Networks for approximation
and learning proceedings of the IEEE, vol 78, pp.
Rajurkar, M.P. U.C. Kothyari, U.C. Chaube, 2002.
Artificial neural networks for daily Rainfall-Runoff
modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 47; 865-877.
Sadeghi S.H.R., A. Tavasoli, H.R. Moradi, 2010.
Simulation intra-change storm of runoff coefficient
with use in factors rain for Neyshabur Bar
watershed, Iran. Journal of Science and Watershed
Management Engineering, 4; 21-33.
Sarangi, A., A.K. Bhattacharya, 2005, Comparison of
artificial neural network and regression models for
sediment loss prediction from Banha watershed in
India. Agricultural Water Management, 78; 195–
Smith, J., R.B. Eli, 1995. Neuralnetwork models of
rainfall-runoff process. Journal of water Resource
Planning and Management, 4; 232-239.
Solaimani, K., 2009. Rainfall-Runoff prediction based
on artificial neural network (A case study: Jarahi
Watershed). American-Eurasian Journal of
Agriculture and Environment Science, 5; 856-865.
Srinivasulu, S., A. Jain, 2006. A comparative analysis of
training methods for artificial neural network
rainfall–runoff models. Apply Soft Computing, 6;
Sudheer, K.P., A.K. Gosain, K.S. Ramasastri, 2002. A
data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial
neural network rainfall–runoff models.
Hydrological Process, 16; 1325–1330.
Thirumalaiah, K., M.C. Deo, 1998. Real-Time flood
forecasting using neural networks. Computer-
Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13;
Tokar, A.S. and P.A. Johnson, 1999. Rainfall-Runoff
modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal
of Hydrology Engineering, 4; 232-239.
Varoonchotikul, P., 2003. Flood forecasting using
artificial neural networks, vrijeuniversiteit unescoihe
Institute for Water Education Press.
Wilby, R.L., R.J. Abrahart, C.W. Dawson, 2003.
Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff
processes inside an artificial neural network.
Journal of Hydrology, 48; 163-181.
Wu, C.L., K.W. Chau, Y.S. Li, 2009. Methods to
improve neural network performance in daily flow
prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 372; 80–93.
Wu, C.L., K.W, Chau, 2011. Rainfall–Runoff modeling
using artificial neural network coupled with
singular spectrum analysis, Journal of Hydrology,
399 (3-4), pp. 394–409.
Zhang, B., R.S. Govindaraju, 2003. Geomorphology-
Based artificial neural networks (GANNs) for
estimation of direct runoff over watersheds.
Journal of Hydrology, 273; 18-34.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,026
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,504