تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,117,696 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,223,417 |
Daily river flow forecasting in a semi-arid region using twodatadriven | ||
Desert | ||
مقاله 2، دوره 20، شماره 1، فروردین 2015، صفحه 11-21 اصل مقاله (2.92 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdesert.2015.54078 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mahboobeh Moatamednia* 1؛ Ahmad Nohegar2؛ Arash Malekian3؛ Hanieh Asadi4؛ Ahad Tavasoli1؛ Mahdi Safari5؛ Kamal Karimi6 | ||
1Range and Watershed Management Dept., Hormozgan University, Bandarabas, Iran | ||
2Programming and Environment Management Dept., Environment Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran | ||
4Watershed Management Dept., Trabiat Modares University, Noor, Iran | ||
5Faculty of Agriculture, Engineering, Bahonar Kerman University, Kerman, Iran | ||
6Department of Natural Resources, Bafgh, Yazd, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Rainfall-runoff relationship is very important in many fields of hydrology such as water supply and water resource management and there are many models in this field. Among these models, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was found suitable for processing rainfall-runoff and opened various approaches in hydrological modeling. In addition, ANNs are quick and flexible approaches which provide very promising results, and are cheaper and simpler to implement than their physically based models. Therefore, this study evaluated the use of ANN models to forecast daily flows in Bar watershed, a semi-arid region in the northwest Razavi Khorasan Province of Iran. Two different neural network models, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) and the radial basis neural network (RBF), were developed and their abilities to predict run off were compared for a period of fifty-five years from 1951 to 2006. The best performance was achieved based on statistical criteria such as RMSE, RE and SSE. It was found that MLP showed a good generalization of the rainfall-runoff relationship and is better than RBF. In addition, 1-day antecedent runoff affected river flow, such that the statistical criteria decreased but the 5-day antecedent rainfall remained unaffected. Furthermore, considering MLP, RE and RMSE, the best model produced the values 46.21 and 0.75 while the RBF model recorded 177.60 and 0.82, respectively. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Artificial Neural Network؛ Bar watershed؛ MLP؛ Rainfall-runoff؛ RBF | ||
مراجع | ||
Abrahart, R.J., L.M. See, 2007. Neural network emulation of a rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4; 287–326. Amorocho, J., W.E. Hart, 1964. A critique of current methods in hydrology systems investigation. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 45; 307-321. Braddock, R.D., M.L. Kremmer. L. Sanzogni, 1998. Feed forward artificial neural network model for forecasting rainfall-runoff. Environmental Sciences, 9; 419-432. Bowden, G.J., H.R. Maier, G.C. Dandy, 2002. Optimal division of data for neural network models in water resources applications. Journal of Water manage, 38; 1-11. Buch, A.M., H.S. Mazumdar, P.C. Pandey, 1993. A case study of runoff simulation of a himalayan glacier basin.Proceeding of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Nagoya, Japan. pp. 971-974. Campolo, M., P. Andreussi, A. Soldati, 1999. River flood forecasting with a neural network model. Water Resources Research 35; 1191–97. Cannon, A.J., P.H., Whitfield, 2002. Downscaling recent stream-flow conditions in British Columbia. Canada Using Ensemble Neural Networks. Journal of Hydrology, 259; 136-151. Cheng, X., M., Noguchi, 1996. Rainfall–Runoff modeling by a neural network approach. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Water Resources and Environmental Research, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 143–50. Dawson, C.W., 1996. A neural network approach to software project effort estimation. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1; 229–237. Dawson, C.W., R.L. Wilby, 2001. Hydrological modeling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography, p. 80–108. Dooge, J.C.I., 1977. Problems and methods of rainfallrunoff modeling. In: Ciriani, T.A., U. Maione and J.R. Wallis (Eds.). Mathematical Models for Surface Water Hydrology: The Workshop Held at the IBM Scientific Center, Pisa. Wiley, London, pp: 71-108. Fernandoa, A.K., A.Y. Shamseldinb, R.J. Abrahart, 2011. Comparison of two data-driven approaches for daily river flow forecasting, Proceedings of 19th International Congress on Modeling and Simulation, Perth, Australia, pp.1077-1083. Fischer, M.M., S. Gopal, 1994. Artificial neural networks: a new approach to modeling interregional telecommunication Flows. Journal of regional Science, 34; 503–527. Giustolisi, O., D. Laucelli, 2005. Improving generalization of artificial neural networks in rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of hydrology Science, 50; 439-457. Halff, A.H., H.M. Halff, M. Azmoodeh, 1993. Predicting from rainfall using neural networks, process engineering, Journal of Hydrology, 18; 760–765. Harun, S., N.I. Ahmat Nor, M.A.H. Kassim, 2002. Artificial neural network model for rainfall-Runoff Relationship. Journal of technology, 37; 1-12. Hertz, J., A. Krogh, R.G. Palmer, 1991. Introduction to the theory of neural computation.Journal of Hydrology, 14; 630-645. Hettiarachchi, P.M., J. Hall, A.W. Minns, 2005.The extrapolation of artificial neural networks for the modeling of rainfall–runoff relationships. Journal of Hydro informatics, 7; 291-296. Hjemfelt, A.T., M. Wang, 1993. Artificial neural networks as unit hydrograph applications, process engineering. Journal of hydrology, 10; 754–759. Hsu, K.l., H.V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, 1995. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Journal of water resource manage, 31; 2517-2530. Huo, Z., S. Feng, S. Kang, G. Huang, F. Wang, P. Guo, 2012. Integrated neural networks for monthly river flow estimation in arid inland basin of northwest China. Journal of hydrology, 420–421; 159–170. Jafari, M., M. Vafakhah, H. Abghari, A. Tavasoli, 2012. Runoff coefficient forecasting usingartificial neuralnetworkin Neyshabur Bar-Arieh watershed, Iran Natural Ecosystem Journal, 2; 85-97. Jain, S.K, D. Das, D.K. Srivastava, 1999. Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 125; 263–271. Jain, S.K., D. Chalisgaonkar, 2000. Setting up stagedischarge relations using ANN. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5; 428-433. Jain, A., S. Srinivasulu, 2006. Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 317; 291-306. Jeong, D.I., Y-O. Kim, 2005. Rainfall-Runoff models using artificial neural networks for ensemble stream flow prediction, hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology, Published online in Wiley Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5983.Process. 19; 3819–3835. Kalteh, A.M., 2008. Rainfall-Runoff modeling using artificial neural networks (ANNs): modeling and understanding. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences (CJES), 2008, 6; 53-58. Karunanithi, N., W.J. Grenney, D. Whitley, K. Bovee, 1994. Neural network for river flow pre15 Diction. Journal of Computing Civil Engineering, 8; 201– 220. Imrie, C.E., S. Dumcan, A. Korre, 2000. River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalization beyond the calibration range. Journal of Hydrology, 233; 138-153. Legates, D.R., G.J. McCabe, 1999. Evaluating the use of ‘goodness-of-fit’ measures in hydrologic and hydro climatic model validation. Water Resources Research, 35; 233–241. Maier, H.R., G.C. Dandy, 2000, Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and application, Environmental Modeling and Software, 15; 101–124. Minns, A.W., M.J. Hall, 1996, Artificial neural networks as rainfall–runoff models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 41; 399– 417. Mutlu, E., I. Chaubey, H. Hexmoor, S.G. Bajwa, 2008. Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural Watershed. Hydrological processes, 22; 5097–5106. Nayak, P.C., Y.R. Satyajirao, K.P. Sudheer, 2006. Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network. Water Resources Management, 20; 77-90. Norgaard, M., O. Ravn, N.K. Poulsen, L.K. Hansen, 2000. Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems, Springer, UK. 3; 246. Poggio, T., F. Girosi, 1990. Networks for approximation and learning proceedings of the IEEE, vol 78, pp. 1481-1497. Rajurkar, M.P. U.C. Kothyari, U.C. Chaube, 2002. Artificial neural networks for daily Rainfall-Runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 47; 865-877. Sadeghi S.H.R., A. Tavasoli, H.R. Moradi, 2010. Simulation intra-change storm of runoff coefficient with use in factors rain for Neyshabur Bar watershed, Iran. Journal of Science and Watershed Management Engineering, 4; 21-33. Sarangi, A., A.K. Bhattacharya, 2005, Comparison of artificial neural network and regression models for sediment loss prediction from Banha watershed in India. Agricultural Water Management, 78; 195– 208. Smith, J., R.B. Eli, 1995. Neuralnetwork models of rainfall-runoff process. Journal of water Resource Planning and Management, 4; 232-239. Solaimani, K., 2009. Rainfall-Runoff prediction based on artificial neural network (A case study: Jarahi Watershed). American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 5; 856-865. Srinivasulu, S., A. Jain, 2006. A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Apply Soft Computing, 6; 295–306. Sudheer, K.P., A.K. Gosain, K.S. Ramasastri, 2002. A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Hydrological Process, 16; 1325–1330. Thirumalaiah, K., M.C. Deo, 1998. Real-Time flood forecasting using neural networks. Computer- Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13; 101–11. Tokar, A.S. and P.A. Johnson, 1999. Rainfall-Runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology Engineering, 4; 232-239. Varoonchotikul, P., 2003. Flood forecasting using artificial neural networks, vrijeuniversiteit unescoihe Institute for Water Education Press. Wilby, R.L., R.J. Abrahart, C.W. Dawson, 2003. Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 48; 163-181. Wu, C.L., K.W. Chau, Y.S. Li, 2009. Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flow prediction. Journal of Hydrology, 372; 80–93. Wu, C.L., K.W, Chau, 2011. Rainfall–Runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis, Journal of Hydrology, 399 (3-4), pp. 394–409. Zhang, B., R.S. Govindaraju, 2003. Geomorphology- Based artificial neural networks (GANNs) for estimation of direct runoff over watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 273; 18-34. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,097 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,606 |