Integrated management (chemical and mechanical) of field bindweed in rotation of fallow-sugarbeet | ||
| به زراعی کشاورزی | ||
| Article 4, Volume 17, Issue 3, October 2015, Pages 607-619 PDF (623.91 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jci.2015.54373 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Faribi Meighani* 1; mohammadreza karaminejad2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Weed Science Research, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Lecturer, Department of Weed Science Research, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran – Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study was conducted in the research field of Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection in Karaj as strip split plots with three replications. The first factor: tillage and no-tillage, and the second factor: herbicide: Glyphosate 6 L/ha, 2,4-D + MCPA 2L/ha, Glyphosate + 2,4-D + MCPA (6 + 2 L/ha), Glyphosate 3 L/ha, 2,4-D + MCPA 1 L/ha, Glyphosate + 2,4-D + MCPA (3 + 1 L/ha), and control without herbicide. The number of field bindweed shoot was determined 15, 30 and 45 days after spraying and field bindweed biomass was determined 45 days after spraying. In the second year, sugarbeet was planted and the effect of herbicides was determined on sugarbeet yield. The best treatment for field bindweed density decrease was Glyphosate + 2,4-D + MCPA (6 + 2 L/ha). The same treatment and its split dose as suitable treatments caused the most decrease in field bindweed biomass. There was no significant difference between till and no-till treatments in view of their effect on field bindweed density and biomass. Under effect of no-till treatment, field bindweed biomass showed more decrease and under effect of no-till treatment, sugarbeet yield showed more increase. Overall, The best treatment for field bindweed density and biomass was Glyphosate + 2,4-D + MCPA (6 + 2 L/ha) and after that its split dose. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| chemical management; Cultivation; Herbicide; perennial weed; split dose | ||
| References | ||
|
1 . پورآذر ر و خلقانی ج (1384) کنترل علف هرز پیچک صحرایی در مزارع گندم. اولین همایش علوم علفهای هرز ایران، 6-5 بهمن‌ماه، تهران، ایران. 2 . حسن‌نژاد س و علیزاده ح (1384) بررسی کنترل شیمیایی پیچک صحرایی در آیش. اولین همایش علوم علفهای هرز ایران، 6-5 بهمن‌ماه، تهران، ایران. 3 . زند ا، رحیمیان ح، کوچکی ع، خلقانی ج، موسوی ک و رمضانی ک (١٣٨٣) اکولوژی علفهای هرز (کاربردهای مدیریتی) (ترجمه) انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد. 4 . زند ا، شیمی پ و صمدانی ب (1380) علف هرز پیچک صحرایی، از مجموعه علفهای هرز ایران. مؤسسة تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور. 5 . فرجی، م ص، بهشتیان مسگران م، عباسی ر، نصرتی ا و علیزاده ح (1384) کنترل شیمیایی پیچک صحرایی در سال آیش، بررسی دوزهای کاهش‌یافته و تأثیر مواد افزودنی. اولین همایش علوم علفهای هرز ایران، 6-5 بهمن‌ماه، تهران، ایران. 6 . نصرتی، ا، کریمی کلایه م، بهشتیان مسگران م و علیزاده ح (1384) مدیریت تلفیقی (شخم مکرر و علف‌کش) قیاق و پیچک صحرایی در شرایط آیش. اولین همایش علوم علفهای هرز ایران، 6-5 بهمن‌ماه، تهران، ایران. 7 . Americanos PG (1992) Convolvolus arvensis . In weed management for developing countries. FAO Bulletin. 120. pp. 95-99. ISSN 0259-2517.
8 . Annonymous (2013) Integrated Tactics to Control Field Bindweed (Convolvulus Arvensis) In: Small Fruit Systems. http:// horticulture.oregonstate.edu/system/files/u1473/36 Biocontrol.pdf. accessed 20 September.
9 . Banks PA, Hill LV and Santelmann PW (1979) Control of field bindweed in winter wheat with foliar and subsurface layered herbicide. Weed Science. 27: 332-335.
10 . Dekker J (1997) Weed diversity and weed management. Weed Science. 45: 357-363.
11 . Flint JL and Barrett M (1989) Effects at glyohosate combinations with 2,4-D or dicamba. Weed Science. 37: 12-18.
12 . Jurado-Expósito M, López-Granados F González-Andújar JL and Garc´ıa-Torres L (2004) Spatial and temporal analysis of Convolvulus arvensis L. populations over four growing seasons. European Journal of Agronomy. 21: 287-296.
13 . Kleifeld Y (1972) Control of annual weeds and Convolvulus arvensis in tomatoes by trifluralin. Weed Research. 12: 384-388.
14 . Kumari A, Singh K, Yadav A and Singh S (2010) Factors Affecting Seed Germination of Convolvulus arvensis and Lathyrus aphaca .Indian Journal of Weed Science. 42(3&4): 203-211.
15 . Nasir ZA and Sultan S (2006) Noxious weeds of winter crops in districh Chakwal, Pakistanian International Journal of Agricultural Research. 5: 480-487.
16 . Robert TM, Hill JC, O,Toole JJ and Swanton CJ (1993) Field bindweed control with fluroxypyr. Weed Technology. 7: 966-971.
17 . Russ OG and Anderson LE (1960) Field bind weed control by combination of cropping, cultivation, and 2.4-D. Weeds. 8: 397-401.
18 . Swan DG and Chancellor RJ (1976) Regenerative capacity of field bindweed. Weed Science. 24: 306-308.
19 . Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, Paschalidis K, Gatsis T, Zacharis K and Galanis M (2013) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) control in potato by pre- or post-emergence applied flumioxazin and sulfosulfuron. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 73(1): 24-30.
20 . Westra P, Chapman P, Stahlman PW, Miller SD and Fay PK (1992) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with various herbicides combinations. Weed Technology. 6: 949-955.
21 . Wies AF, Bean BW, Salisbury CD, Schoenhals MG and Amosson S (1997) Economic evaluation of field bindweed control. Weed Science. 45: 288-295.
22 . Wiese AF and Rea HE (1962) Factors affecting the toxocity of phenoxy herbicides to field bindweed. Weeds. 10: 58-62.
23 . Wieses AF and Lavake DE (1985) Control of field bindweed with postemergence herbicides. Weed Science. 34: 77-80.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,321 PDF Download: 884 |
||