پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,752 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,093,096 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,841,918 |
ارزیابی و مقایسة دادههای بازکاوی‌شدة بارش جهت استفاده در ایران | ||
| پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 48، شماره 1، فروردین 1395، صفحه 33-49 اصل مقاله (1.84 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله کامل | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jphgr.2016.57026 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| قاسم عزیزی* 1؛ طاهر صفرراد2؛ حسین محمدی3؛ حسنعلی فرجی سبکبار4 | ||
| 1دانشیار اقلیم شناسی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استادیار اقلیم‌شناسی، دانشکدة علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران | ||
| 3استاد اقلیم‌شناسی، دانشکدة جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 4دانشیار جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در پژوهش پیش رو، دادههای آفرودیت، GPCC و دادههای بارش دانشگاه دی‌لور (UDel) براساس دادههای بارش ایستگاهی ارزیابی شده است. در این راستا، از تکنیک‌های RMSE، ضریب همبستگی و دیاگرام تیلور استفاده شده است. نتایج ارزیابی داده‌ها نشان داد که دیاگرام تیلور به‌دلیل ارائة تصویری جامع‌تر از رابطة هندسی بین RMSD، ضریب همبستگی و انحراف معیار سری‌های زمانی، نسبت به سایر روش‌های تک‌متغیره نظیر RMSE و ضریب تعیین، مناسب‌تر است. ترسیم میانگین بلندمدت بارش سالانة ایران بر اساس دادههای مزبور، دقت بیشتر دادههای آفرودیت و GPCC را نسبت به دادههای UDel نشان می‌دهد. دادههای آفرودیت برای مناطق شمال، شمال غرب، دامنه‌های جنوبی البرز و نواحی داخلی کشور مناسب‌تر است و دادههای GPCC در مناطق غرب، جنوب، جنوب شرق و شمال شرق کشور به نتایج بهتری منتهی می‌شود. همچنین، مشخص شد که دادههای UDel به دلیل درنظرگرفتن ارتباط فضایی داده‌ها با متغیر وابسته، مقادیر بارشِ سری‌های زمانی ناقص را بهتر از دو دادة دیگر برآورد می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| دادههای آفرودیت؛ دادههای دانشگاه دی‌لور؛ دادههای GPCC؛ دیاگرام تیلور | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluation and Comparison of Reanalysis Precipitation Data in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ghasem Azizi1؛ Taher Safarrad2؛ Hosein Mohammadi3؛ Hasanali Faraji Sabokbar4 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction There are significant differences in the spatial distribution of the Iran annual precipitation. This is resulted from spatial behavior of precipitation in the one hand and variation in the sources of precipitation on the other. The lack of adequate distribution of meteorological stations and the unavailability of long-term statistics of precipitation makes the analysis of precipitation more complicated. Precipitation data are constant inputs of research and the models related to water resources (e.g., climate, agriculture, hydrology, and environment). Most of research institutions are used to record the data and present it to different users. Different ways of interpolation of the data will cause different results. Therefore, it is a critical step to select the appropriate data based on research design. This study evaluates APHRODIATE, GPCC and Delaware University precipitation data (UDel) based on precipitation stations using RMSE, R2 and Taylor diagram techniques. Materials and Methods DATA[1] Daily gridded precipitation of APHRODITE (Asian Precipitation- Highly-Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation) is the only long-term (1951 onward) continental-scale daily product that contains a dense network of daily precipitation-gauge data for Asia including the Himalayas, South and Southeast Asia and mountainous areas in the Middle East. The number of valid stations was between 5000 and 12,000; this represents 2.3 to 4.5 times the data available through the Global Telecommunication System network, which were used for most daily grid precipitation products. The products are available on a regional basis. Key Strengths: High density and quality station network. Key Limitations: Station network changes with time and season. The Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) has been established in 1989 on request of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). It is operated by Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD, National Meteorological Service of Germany) as a German contribution to the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). The GPCC provides gridded gauge-analysis products derived from quality controlled station data. Two products are for climate: (a) the Full Data Reanalysis Product (1901-2010) is recommended for global and regional water balance studies, calibration/validation of remote sensing based precipitation estimations and verification of numerical models, and (b) the VASClimO 50-Year Data Set which is for climate variability and trend studies. Key Strengths: Large number of stations used; gauge network extends beyond GHCN Key Limitations: Variable number of stations per grid over time can be a major inhomogeneity source. Monitoring products are frequently updated but climate products are not. The Global (land) precipitation, University of Delaware (UDel) is a series of gridded temperature and precipitation data sets. The data used are including station records served as bases for the Terrestrial Air Temperature, 1900-2010 Gridded Monthly Time Series (Version 3.01) and Terrestrial Precipitation, 1900-2010 Gridded Monthly Time Series (Version 3.02). These are used to help create new gridded climatologies of monthly and annual average air temperature (T) and total precipitation (P). These two sets of station time series were drawn primarily from recent versions of the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN version 2) and the Global Surface Summary of Day (GSOD) archive. Selected averages from Legates and Willmott’s (1990a and b) long-term station averages of monthly and annual T and P were also used to help produce this new gridded archive. Key Strengths: relatively detailed global land surface temperature climatology; higher spatial resolution than comparable data sets Key Limitations: Infrequent updates. Materials and Methods In order to evaluate the data, the closest point from the mentioned precipitation data to meteorological stations (max 40 km) were identified for the period 1961-2007. Then, we used RMSE, the coefficient of determination (R2) and Taylor diagram to evaluate precipitation data. These methods are formulated as below: where and are the precipitation values provided by instrumental data and precipitation data, respectively, and are also the variance values of instrumental data and precipitation data, respectively; n indicates the number of stations. Results and Discussion Fiigure 1, shows the Taylor diagram, plotted by spatially averaged precipitation values, The diagram summarizes the relationship between testing and reference series standard deviations, correlation coefficient, and the RMSD (root mean square difference) as computed by series centered pattern, by means of a trigonometric similitude. Fig. 1. Taylor diagram obtained from spatial averaged values plotted on the basis of standard deviation values, correlation coefficients between products and reference dataset, and root mean square differences of series-centered pattern, indicated as RMSD in the plot. Aphrodite data are more accurate at, Khoi, Babolsar, Tehran and Yazd stations. GPCC data have better performance than other data at Zahedan and Bandar Abbas stations. For Shahr-e- Kord, Mashhad, and Zanjan stations, Aphrodite and GPCC data have similar RMSD. However, according to the stronger correlations between GPCC and instrumental data, the GPCC data are more appropriate than Aphrodite data. Conclusion Based on the long-term average annual precipitation, Aphrodite and GPCC data are more accurate than UDel data. Taylor diagram is based on the geometrical relationship between correlation coefficient, series standard deviation and centered mean square error. It is more useful than other uni-variable methods as RMSE and R2. Aphrodite data are better to use for the Northwest, the southern Alborz and internal areas. The GPCC data will lead to better results in the West, South, Southeast and North East Iran. As UDel data consider spatial association of data with dependent variable, it estimates precipitation time series better than other data. This type of data is useful to analyze characteristics of precipitation in the areas with short-term time series. 1. The description of the data have been driven from the following website: https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| APHRODIATE, GPCC, RMSE, Taylor Diagram, UDel | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
بارانیزاده، ا.؛ بهیار، م.ب.؛ عابدینی، ی.ع. (1390). ارزیابی برآوردهای بارندگی ماهوارةTRMM-3B43 با استفاده از مقایسه با دادههای زمینی مشاهداتی شبکه‌های بارش قدرت تفکیک بالا (APHRODIT) در ایران، دومین کنفرانس ملی پژوهش‌های کاربردی منابع آب ایران، دانشگاه زنجان، 29-28 اردیبهشت، ص8. حاجی‌میر رحیمی، م.؛ فیضی‌زاده، ب. (1387). بررسی دقت دادههای رادار زمینی و TRMM در برآورد بارش، همایش ژئوماتیک 87، تهران. حجازی‌زاده، ز.؛ علیجانی، ب.؛ ضیاییان، پ.؛ کریمی، م.؛ رفعتی، س. (1391). ارزیابی بارش ماهواره‌ای 3B43 و مقایسة آن با مقادیر حاصل از تکنیک درون‌یابی کریجینگ، مجلة سنجش از دور و GIS ایران، 4(3): 49-64. رضیئی، ط.؛ فتاحی، ا. (1390). ارزیابی کاربرد دادههای بارش NCEP/NCAR در پایش خشکسالی ایران، مجلة فیزیک زمین و فضا، 37(2): 225-247. عرفانیان، م.؛ کاظم‌پور، س.؛ حیدری، ح. (1392). ارزیابی دادههای باران ماهوارة TRMM در مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک ایران، نخستین کنفرانس ملی هواشناسی، دانشگاه تحصیلات تکمیلی صنعتی و فناوری پیشرفته، کرمان. کتیرایی بروجردی، س. (1392). مقایسة دادههای بارش ماهانة ماهواره‌ای و زمینی در شبکه‌ای با تفکیک زیاد روی ایران، مجلة ژئوفیزیک ایران، 7(4): 149-160. مسعودیان، ا. (1390). آب و هوای ایران، چاپ اول. انتشارات شریعة توس، مشهد. مسعودیان، ا.؛ کیخسروی، م.ص.؛ رعیت پیشه، ف. (1393). معرفی و مقایسة پایگاه داده اسفزاری با پایگاه‌های دادة GPCC، GPCP و CMAP. فصلنامة تحقیقات جغرافیایی، 29(1): 73-88. Andermann, C.; Bonnet, S; Gloaguen, R. (2011). Evaluation of precipitation data sets along the Himalayan front. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12(7): 1-16.
Baranizadeh, E.; Behyar, M.; Abedini, Y. (2011). Evaluation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates from TRMM-3B43 through comparison with Ground-Based data of High-Resolution Network (APHRODITE) in Iran, The second Iranian National conference on applied research in water resources, Zanjan University, May 18-19, pp. 8, (In Persian).
Chintalapudi, S.; Sharif, H.O.; Yeggina, S.; Elhassan, A. (2012). Physically Based, Hydrologic Model Results Based on Three Precipitation Products1 Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(6): 1191-1203.
Erfanian, M.; Kazempour, S.; Heidari, H. (2013). Evaluation and Calibration of TRMM Satellite Rainfall Data in a Semi-arid Region of Iran, First National Conference on Climatology of Iran, May 21 -22, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran, (In Persian).
Hajimir Rahimi, M.; Feizizade, B. (2007). Validation of TRMM Precipitation and Ground-Based Radar in estimation of precipitation, National Geomatics Conference 86 (GEO86), National Cartographic Center, Tehran, Iran, (In Persian).
Hejazizadeh Z.; Alijani B.; Zeaiean P.; Karimi M.; Rafati S. (2012). Evaluation of Satellite-based Precipitation Estimates (3B43) and Comparison with Kriging Interpolation Results, Iranian Journal of Remote Sencing & GIS, 4(3): 49-64, (In Persian).
http://www.chikyu.ac.jp.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov
IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis,Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C.A. Johnson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Javanmard, S.; Yatagai, A.; Nodzu, M.I.; BodaghJamali, J.; Kawamoto, H. (2010). Comparing high-resolution gridded precipitation data with satellite rainfall estimates of TRMM_3B42 over Iran. Advances in Geosciences, 25(25): 119-125.
Katiraie Boroujerdy, P. (2014). Comparison of high-resolution gridded monthly satellite and ground-based precipitation data over Iran, Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 7(4): 149-160, (In Persian).
Lo Conti, F.; Hsu, K.L.; Noto, L.V.; Sorooshian, S. (2014). Evaluation and comparison of satellite precipitation estimates with reference to a local area in the Mediterranean Sea. Atmospheric Research, 138: 189-204.
Masoodian, A.; Kiany, K.; Raiyatpishe, M.S. (2014). Introduction and a Comparison among Gridded Precipitation Database of Asfazari with GPCC, GPCP and CMAP, Geographical Research, 29(1): 73-88, (In Persian).
Masoodian, S.A. (2011). The climate of Iran, Sharia Toos publication, First edition, (In Persian).
Pincus, R.; Batstone, C.P.; Hofmann, R.J.P.; Taylor, K.E.; Glecker, P.J. (2008). Evaluating the present‐day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D14): 1-10.
Rahimzadeh, F.; Nassaji Zavareh, M. (2014). Effects of adjustment for non‐climatic discontinuities on determination of temperature trends and variability over Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 34(6), 2079-2096.
Raziei, T.; Daryabari, J.; Bordi, I.; Modarres, R.; Pereira, L.S. (2014). Spatial patterns and temporal trends of daily precipitation indices in Iran. Climatic Change, 124(1-2): 239-253.
Raziei, T.; Fatahi, E. (2011). Evaluation of the applicability of the NCEP/NCAR precipitation dataset for drought monitoring in Iran, Iranian Journal of Geophysics 37(2): 225-247, (In Persian).
Schneider, U.; Becker, A.; Finger, P.; Meyer-Christoffer, A.; Ziese, M.; Rudolf, B. (2014). GPCC's new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 115(1-2): 15-40.
Taylor, K.E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D7): 7183-7192.
Wehner, M.F. (2013). Very extreme seasonal precipitation in the NARCCAP ensemble: model performance and projections, Climate Dynamics, 40(1-2): 59-80.
Willmott, C.J.; Matsuura, K. (2001). Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: monthly and annual climatologies (version 3.02), Center for Climatic Research, Department of Geography, University of Delaware.
Willmott, C.J.; Robeson, S.M. (1995). Climatologically aided interpolation (CAI) of terrestrial air temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 15(2): 221-229.
Willmott, C.J.; Rowe, C.M.; Philpot, W.D. (1985). Small-scale climate maps: A sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. The American Cartographer, 12(1): 5-16.
Xie, P.; Chen, M.; Yang, S.; Yatagai, A.; Hayasaka, T.; Fukushima, Y.; Liu, C. (2007). A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8(3): 607-626
Yatagai, A.; Kamiguchi, K.; Arakawa, O.; Hamada, A.; Yasutomi, N.; Kitoh, A. (2012). APHRODITE: Constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(9): 1401-1415. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,440 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,196 |
||