سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,230
تعداد مقالات67,766
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,223,278
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,970,413
ملک محمدی, حمیدرضا, وحدانی نیا, ولی الله. (1395). تکامل سیاستگذاری سلامت: گذار به پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت. , 2(2), 73-94. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2016.59232
حمیدرضا ملک محمدی; ولی الله وحدانی نیا. "تکامل سیاستگذاری سلامت: گذار به پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت". , 2, 2, 1395, 73-94. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2016.59232
ملک محمدی, حمیدرضا, وحدانی نیا, ولی الله. (1395). 'تکامل سیاستگذاری سلامت: گذار به پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت', , 2(2), pp. 73-94. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2016.59232
ملک محمدی, حمیدرضا, وحدانی نیا, ولی الله. تکامل سیاستگذاری سلامت: گذار به پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت. , 1395; 2(2): 73-94. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2016.59232

تکامل سیاستگذاری سلامت: گذار به پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت

سیاستگذاری عمومی
مقاله 4، دوره 2، شماره 2، شهریور 1395، صفحه 73-94    اصل مقاله (2.35 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ppolicy.2016.59232
نویسندگان
حمیدرضا ملک محمدی1؛ ولی الله وحدانی نیا* 2
1استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2دانشجوی دکتری سیاستگذاری عمومی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
در چند دهه اخیر، سلامت بعنوان هدفی اجتماعی که نیاز به همکاری همه ­جانبه دارد، توسعه طیفی از سازوکارهای سیاستی را بدنبال داشته است. یافتن، معرفی و تجزیه و تحلیل سیر تحولات مفهومی سیاستگذاری سلامت، هدف اصلی این مطالعه کیفی است؛ تا چگونگی تکامل آن را نمایان سازد و مبانی اطمینان­ بخش و مرزهای اقدام شناخته شود. نتایج بررسی نشان می­دهد؛ «اقدامات بین ­بخشی برای سلامت»، «سیاستگذاری­های عمومی سالم» و اخیراَ «سلامت درهمه سیاست­ها» سه موج اصلی سیاستگذاری هستند که همراه با تغییر پارادایم سیاسی، چشم­ انداز تازه­ ای از «حکمرانی برای سلامت» را نمایان کرده ­اند. گذار به الگوی حکمرانی شدیدا شبکه ­ای، چند سطحی و چند ذینفعی، مبتنی بر بسیج «کل ­دولت» و «کل ­جامعه» برای سلامت، همان بخش مهم تعهد سیاسی و اجتماعی برای عدالت و پیشرفت پایدار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سیاستگذاری سلامت؛ پارادایم حکمرانی برای سلامت؛ سیاست های عمومی سالم؛ سلامت در همه سیاست ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The evolution of health policy: transition to the governance paradigm for health
نویسندگان [English]
hamid reza malek mohammadi1؛ Valiallah Vahdaninia2
1Professor of political science, Tehran University
2PhD student of public policy, Tehran University
چکیده [English]
In recent decades, health as a social goal that requires cooperation, has led to develop a range of policy mechanisms.To find, introduce and analyze the concept transformation of health policy is the main purpose of this qualitative study; To reveal how it evolved and the reliability foundations and boundaries of action to be recognized. Results of the study shows; "intersectoral actions”, “healthy public policy”, “health in all policies” are The three main policy waves, that Along with political paradigm shift, appear a new perspective of "governance for health. The transition to a governance model, highly networked, multi-level and multi-stakeholder, Based on the mobilization of the "whole of government" and "whole of society" for health, is the important part of the political and social commitment to justice and sustainable development
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Health policy, governance paradigm for health, healthy public policy, health in all policies
مراجع

الف) فارسی

  1. گراهام­اسکمبلر. هابرماس؛ (1386) نظریه انتقادی وسلامت. مترجم:حسینعلی نوذری. نشر غزال،چاپ اول.

  2. وبر، ماکس؛ (۱۳۹۰). روش­شناسی علوم اجتماعی. حسن چاوشیان. تهران: مرکز.

ب) انگلیسی

Adam B, et al.(2014). Assessment of health risks of policies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 48 (2014) 47–52.

    • Álvarez AS, Pagani M, Meucci P.(2012).The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model in mental health: a research critique. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation:February 2012 - Volume 91 - Issue 13 - p S173–S180

    • (Australian)Management Advisory Committee (MAC) (2004). Connecting government: wholeof government responses to Australia’s priority challenges. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia (http://www.apsc.gov.au (

    • BAUM F, LAWLESS A, DELANY T.(2014). Evaluation of Health in All Policies: concept,theory and application. Health Promotion International, Vol. 29 No. S1.

    • Bacigalupe, A  and others(2010).Learning lessons from past mistakes:How can health in all policies fulfil its promises? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. Volume 64, Issue 6, June 2010, Pages 504-505. 2010

    • Bailey,K.D(1994).Methods of Social Research.New York:The Free Press.

    • Barbazza E, Tello J.(2014). A review of health governance: Definitions, dimensions and tools to govern. Health Policy 116 (2014) 1–11.

    • Broeder,L et al.(2015). Health in All Policies? The case of policies to promote bicycle use in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Health Policy Vol. 36, 2, 194–211.

    • Bryman,A.(1988). Quality and Quantity in Social Research. Londan:Unwin Hyman.

    • Buckett, Kevin. "Health in All Policies Adelaide 2010.International Meeting." Public Health Bulletin SA 7.2 (2010): 1-60.

    • Capra F.(1982) The turning point. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1982.

    • Capra F.(1997) The web of life: a new understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Book; 1997.

    • Chuengsatiansup.K.(2003).Spirituality and health: an initial proposal to incorporate spiritual health in health impact assessment. Health Systems Research Institute, Nonthaburi 11000,Thailand.Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23(2003)3 –15

    • Christensen T, Laegreid P (2006). The whole-of-government approach – regulation, performance, and public-sector reform. Bergen, Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies(Working paper 6–2006;http://soc.kuleuven.be).

    • Dahlgren, G & Whitehead, M(1991). Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Stockholm: Institute of Futures Studies.

    • De Leeuw E, Kickbusch I, Palmer N, Spanswick L.(2015). European Healthy Cities come to terms with health network governance. Health Promotion International, 2015, Vol. 30, No. S1 i32–i44

    • Engel GL: The need for a new medical model:a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196: 129–136

    • European Centre for Health Policy(ECHP): Gothenburg consensus paper, December 1999

    • Harris P, Spickett J.(2011) Health impact assessment in Australia: A review and directions for progress. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31 (2011) 425–432.( journal homepage: www. e lsevi e r.com/locate/eiar)

    • Hay C.(2007) Does ontology trump epistemology? Notes on the directional dependence of ontology and epistemology in political analysis.Politics 2007;27:115–8

    • Kang, E; Park, H; Kim, J. Health Impact Assessment as a Strategy for Intersectoral Collaboration, Journal of Preventive & Public Health, 2011: 44(5): 201-209.

    • Kickbusch, I.(2009). Policy Innovation for Health. (http://www.springer.com/gp/book).

    • Kickbusch I, Buckett K, editors.(2010) Implementing Health in All Policies: Adelaide 2010. Adelaide, South Australia: Department of Health, Government of South Australia.

    • Kickbusch I, Gleicher D (2012). Governance for health in the 21st century: a study conducted for the WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe(http://www.euro.who.int)

    • Kickbusch, I & Behrendt, T.(2013) Implementing a Health 2020 vision: governance for health in the 21st century. Making it happen. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    • KJÆRGARD B,et al.(2013). Health and sustainability. Health Promotion International, Vol.29 No.3.

    • Kuhn T.(1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    • Goraya,A.and Scamber,G.(1998) “From old to new public health:role tensions and contradiction”.critical public health.8,2:141-51

    • Peña, Sebastián. "Health in All Policies: The emperor’s old clothes | Healthy Policies." Healthy Policies | For A Healthier World. Web. Jan. 2013. 

    • Peake S et al. (2008). Health equity through intersectoral action: an analysis of 18 country case studies.

    • Phen S, Pongthep S.(2013).A Model of Health Impact Assessment for the Sub District Municipality: A case study of the Songkhla Lake Basin. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 91(2013)429–436.( www.sciencedirect.com)

    • Protecting children’s health in a changing environment. Report of the Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health. Copenhagen,WHO Regional Office for Europe,2010

    • Puska, P.,Vartiainen, E. et al.(2009) The North Karelia Project: from North Karelia to National Action. National Institute for Health and Welfare: Finland 2009

    • Puska P, Ståhl T (2010). Health in all policies – the Finnish initiative: background, principles, and current issues. Annual Review of Public Health, 31:27.1–27.14.

    • Rudolph L,et al.(2013). HEALTH IN ALL POLICIES; A Guide for State and Local Governments.

    • Lalonde , Mv(1974): A New perspectives on health of Canadians, Ottawa, Canada

    • Langeveld et al.(2016). Use of a knowledge broker to establish healthy public policies in a city district: a developmental evaluation. BMC Public Health (2016) 16:271

    • Lawless A, Williams C, Hurley C, Wildgoose D, Sawford A, Kickbusch I(2012): Health in all polices: evaluating the South Australian approach to Intersectoral action for Health. Can J Public Health 2012, 103(Suppl1):S15–S19.

    • Lindau,Stacy Tessler. Laumann, Edward O.Levinson, Wendy.Waite, Linda J. Synthesis of Scientific Disciplines in Pursuit of Health: The Interactive Biopsychosocial Model. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine - Volume 46, Number 3 Supplement, Summer 2003, pp. S74-S86

    • Missoni, E. (2015). Degrowth and health: local action should be linked to global policies and governance for health. Sustain Sci (2015) 10:439–450

    • Ollila E (2010). Health in all policies: from rhetoric to action. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(6 Suppl):11–18.

    • Salcito,k et al.(2015). Experience and lessons from health impact assessment for human rights impact assessment. BMC International Health and Human Rights (2015) 15:24

    • Scott-Samuel A, Birley M, Ardern K. The Merseyside guidelines for health impact assessment. Liverpool: Merseyside Health Impact Assessment Steering Group; 1998.p:5

    • Taylor KW, Athens JK, Booske BC, O’Connor CE, Jones N, Remington PL. 2008 Wisconsin County Health Rankings. University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.

    • United States Department of Health and Human Services (2010). HHS announces the nation’s new health promotion and disease prevention agenda. Washington, DC, United States Department of Health and Human Services.

    • Whitehead, M.(1990).Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health.WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.

    • WHO (1986). 1st Global Conference on Health Promotion .Ottawa.

    • WHO (1988). 2nd Global Conference on Health Promotion .Adelaide.

    • WHO (1991). 3rd Global Conference on Health Promotion .Sundsvall.

    • WHO (1997). 4th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Jakarta.

    • WHO (2000). 5th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Mexico.

    • WHO (2005). 6th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Bangkok.

    • WHO (2009). 7th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Nairobi.

    • WHO (2013). 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Helsinki.

    • WHO (2016).9th Global Conference on Health Promotion .Shanghai, China.Nov.

    • WHO (2008).Closing the gap in a generation. Health equity through action on the social determinants of health.(http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications (

    • WHO(2014). Health in All Policies (HiAP);Framework for Country Action.

    • WHO (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva, World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf(

    • WHO (1978). Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12 September 1978. Geneva, World Health Organization

    • WHO Regional Office for Europe (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe (http://www.euro.who.int).

    • WHO Regional Office for Europe (2013). Health 2020– a European policy framework supporting action across government and society for health and well-being. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe (http://www.euro.who.int).

    • WHO and the Government of South Australia. (2010) The Adelaide Statement on Health in All Policies: moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being. Health Promotion International.

    • www.CountyHealthRankings.org: County Health Rankings model ©2010 UWPHI

    • www.londonshealth.gov.uk

    • http://www.naccho.org/

    • https://nnphi.org/

    آمار
    تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,011
    تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,052


    سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب