پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,523 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,429 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 123,968,803 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,098,732 |
تهیۀ نقشۀ پراکنش جغرافیایی مناطق مناسب دفن پسماند جامد شهری (مطالعۀ موردی: مراتع نازلوچای ارومیه) | ||
| نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 70، شماره 2، مرداد 1396، صفحه 309-317 اصل مقاله (1.48 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jne.2017.205139.1139 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رویا جنگی دغدغان1؛ حمیدرضا ممتاز2؛ مهشید سوری* 3 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی خاکشناسی، دانشگاه ارومیه | ||
| 2استادیار دانشکدۀ مهندسی کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه | ||
| 3استادیار پژوهشی بخش مرتع، موسسۀ تحقیقات جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| افزایش رو به رشد جمعیت و به تبع آن افزایش روزافزون پسماندهای جامد شهری و روستایی اهمیت مدیریت پسماندهای جامد را دو چندان می‌کند. مکان‌یابی صحیح و اصولی پسماندها تأثیر بسزایی در مدیریت آن‌ها دارد. بنابراین، دراین پژوهش به منظور اولویت‌بندی مکان‌های مناسب دفن پسماند در مراتع نازلوچای ارومیه از سیستم‌های پشتیبانی تصمیم‌گیری شامل روش TOPSIS و AHP استفاده شد. مراحل این تحقیق شامل تعیین معیارهای مؤثر، تهیۀ نقشه‌های معیارها، تشکیل ماتریس تصمیم-گیری، تعیین وزن معیارها، محاسبۀ نرخ ناسازگاری، محاسبۀ راه حل ایده‌آل مثبت و راه حل ایده‌آل منفی، محاسبۀ نزدیکی نسبی به راه حل ایده آل مثبت، رتبه بندی زیرحوضه های مراتع نازلوچای ارومیه و در نهایت تهیۀ نقشۀ پراکنش جغرافیایی مناطق مناسب دفن پسماند جامد شهری بود. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از بسته‌‌های نرم افزاری & TOPSIS EXPERT CHOISE و ARC GIS صورت گرفت. نتایج حاصل از تحقیق نشان داد که زیرحوضۀ B11 اولویت مناسب اول، زیرحوضۀ ABCDE-INT1 اولویت دوم و زیرحوضه‌های AFGH-INT،C1 ،B1-INT به ترتیب در اولویت‌های مناسب سوم تا پنجم قرار گرفتند و زیرحوضه های J3، J111 وJ11-INT با اولویت‌های چهل و یکم تا چهل و سوم، کمترین تناسب را جهت دفن پسماند داشتند. زیرحوضۀ B11 بیشترین میزان عمق خاک و عمق آب‌های زیرزمینی و کمترین میزان بارش، تعداد چاه، تراکم آب‌های سطحی، شیب و ارتفاع را نسبت به سایر حوضه‌ها دارد. همچنین بافت خاک این حوضه متوسط و کاربری فعلی آن رها شده است. در حالی‌که زیرحوضۀ J11-INT شرایط عکس را دارا است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پراکنش جغرافیایی؛ دفن پسماند؛ TOPSIS؛ AHP؛ مراتع نازلوچای ارومیه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Mapping the geographic distribution of suitable sites for waste landfill in Nazloochaei Urmia Rangeland | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| 1 11؛ 1 12؛ Mahshid Souri3 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Increased population growth and consequent increasing rural and urban solid waste increases the importance of solid waste management. Site selection have an important influence on the waste management.Therefore ,in this study to prioritize suitable sites landfill Urmia Basin Nazloochaei Rangeland, decision-making support systems including TOPSIS and AHP method was used. Stages of this research consisted of the following processes including: determining effective criteria , provide maps of criteria , provide decision making matrix , weighting of criteria , calculating the rate of incompatibility, calculate the ideal solution both positive and negative ideal solution , calculated relative proximity to positive ideal solution, ranking of sub watersheds and ultimately Mapping the geographic distribution of suitable sites for municipal solid waste landfill in Nazloochaei Urmia Basin. This research was used by ARC GIS software, TOPSIS & EXPERT CHOISE. The results showed that the first appropriate priority and the second priority were B11 and ABCDE-INT1. The AFGH-INT, C1, B1-INT third to fifth respectively in the appropriate priorities were. J3, J111 and J11-INT with the priorities forty -first and forty -third, were the least fit to landfill. B11 have maximum depth of soil and groundwater and least amount of rainfall, the number of wells, surface water density, slope and height than the other sub watersheds. B11 soil texture is average and its current use is inutile. While J11-INT has the opposite conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Geographical distribution, Landfill Map, TOPSIS, AHP, Urmia Nazloochaei Rangeland | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azar, A., RajabZadeh, A., 2008. The decision applied (approach MADM). Published by knowledge look. Amiri, F., Arzani, H., 2012. Determination of site priority for apiculture by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Iranian journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 19(1), 159-177. Imani, N., 2014. Locate suitable sites for biological treatment of rangeland reform Qushchi Urmia mountain pass. Master's thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Urmia University . PourAhmad, A., Habibi, K., MohammadZahrayi, S., NazariAdli, S., 2007. Using fuzzy algorithms and GIS for mapping urban equipment (case study:Babolsar City). Journal of Environmental Studies, 42. Tork, Kh., 2013. Locate suitable locations for dams stone mortars in the following critical areas. Master's thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Urmia University. Tavangar, Sh., AsadOllahi, Z., DoustiSiab, A., Kabiri, A., 2012. Identify priorities executive dams Gabion using Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP). Eighth National Congress of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, Lorestan University. Jafari, H., Rafiyi, Y., RamazaniMehrian, M., Nasiri, H., 2012. Municipal waste landfill site selection using AHP and SAW in GIS (Case Study:Fars province). journal of Ecology, 38(131), 140-161. KhorshidDoust, M.A., 2009. The use of analytic hierarchy process to find a place BONAB city landfill. Journal of Ecology, 35(11), p 120. Souri, M., Jafari, M., Azarnivand, H., Mahdavi, S.KH., 2012. Site selection of pitting projects by using of spatial decision support systems (Case Study:Kermanshah province). Journal of Range and Desert Research, 21(1), 95-108. Souri, M., Jafari, M., Azarnivand, H., FarrokhZadeh, B., 2012. Site selection of water harvesting projects by using of AHP and GIS (Case Study:Kermanshah province). Journal of Range and Desert Research, 97, 92-103. Farhoudi, R., Habibi, K., ZandiBakhtiari, P., 2005. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site using fuzzy logic in the GIS (Case Study:Sanandaj). Journal of College of Fine Arts, 23, p 21. Ghanvati, A., TaghaviMoghaddam, A., MasahiKhouraskani, M., 2011. Application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in priority zones for Solid Waste (Case:Sabzevar City). Journal of Geographical Studies arid Tehran, 2(5). Matkan, A., Shakib, A., Pourali, H., 2009. Urban Waste Iandfill Site Selection by GIS (Case Study:Tabriz City). Journal of Enviromental Sciences, 6(2), 121-132. Moeinaddini, N., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., 2011. Siting MSW Landfill using Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSIS methodology (case study:karaj). Journal of Natural Environment, Iranian Journal of Natural 167 Resources, 64(2), 155-167. NirAbadi, H., 2007. Application of GIS techniques for locating landfills in Tabriz. Master's thesis, Department of Natural Resources, University of Tabriz. Adeli, Z., Khorshiddoust, A., 2011. Application of geomorphology in urban planning: Case study in landfill site selection. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 662–667. AhmadHalilu, A., ZainuraZainon, N., Rafiu, Y., MohdFadhil, D., MohdAriffin, A., 2013. Assessing environmental impacts of municipal solid waste of johor by analytical hierarchy process. Conservation and Recycling, 73, 188-196. Andana, J., 2007. Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 39, 534-544. Aragones, P., Aznar, J., Ferries, J., Garica, M., 2006. Valuation of urban industrial land: an analytical network process approach. European journal of operation research, 185, 322-339. Belfiore, S., 2003. The growth of integrated coastal management and the role of indicator in integrated coastal management: introducation to the special issue. Ocean Coast Manage, 46(3-4), 225-234. Chen, C., 2006. Applying the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach to convention site selection. Travel Research, 45, 167-174. Chang, G. et al., 2008. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(1), 139-153. Cimren, E., Catay, B., Budak, E., 2007. Development of a Machine Tool Selection System Using AHP. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 363–376. Duk, J.M., Hyde, R.A., 2002. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Ecological Economics, 42(1-2), 131-145. Eskandari, M., Homaee, M., Mahmoodi, S., Pazira, E., Van Genuchten, M., 2015. Optimizing landfill site selection by using classification maps. Environment Science Pollut Res, 944. Eskandari, M., Homaee, M., Mahmoodi, S., Pazira, E., VanGenuchten, M., 2012. An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical & socio-cultural area. Waste Management, 32(8), 1528-1538. Gemitzi, A., Tsihritzis, V.A., Voudrias, E., Petalas, C., Stravodimos, G., 2007. Combining geographic information system, multicriteria evaluation techniques & fuzzy logic in siting MSW landfills. Environ Geod, 5, 797-811. Guiqin, W., Li, Q., Guoxue, L., Lijun, C., 2009. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2414-2421. Kontos, T.D., Komilis, D.P., Halvadakis, C.P., 2005. Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology. Waste Management, 25, 818-832. MorenoJimenez, J., 2005. A spread sheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP- group decision making. Group decision & Negotiation, 14, 89-108. Nouri, N., Poorhashemi, S.A., Monavari, S.M., Dabiri, F., Hassani, A. H., 2011. Legal Criteria and Executive Standards of Solid Waste Disposal Subjected to Solid Waste Management Act. International Journal of Environmental Res., 5(4), 971-980. Onut, S., Soner, S., 2008. Transshipment site selection using the AHP & TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28, 1552–1559. Palvas, M., Tous, M., Bebar, L, Stehlik, P., 2010. Wase to energy -An evaluation of environmental impact. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30, 2326-2332. Piresa, A., Chang, N., Martinhoa, M., 2011. An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setubal Peninsula, Portugal. Conservation and Recycling, 56, 7-21. Ronga, F., Zhaogui, G., Tugen, F., 2011. Analysis of Stability and Control in Landfill Sites Expansion. Procedia Engineering, 24, 667-671. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Press, New York. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., 2006. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. Springer Science press, New York, USA. Sener, S., Sener, E., Nas, B., Karaguzel, R., 2010. Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: Acase study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Management, 30, 2037-2046. Stehlík, P., 2009. Contribution to advances in waste-to-energy technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 919-931. Toledo-Aceves, T., Meave, J.A., Gonzez-Espinosa, M., Ramrez-Marcial, N., 2011. Tropical mountain cloud forests: Current threats and opportunities for their conservation and sustainable management in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 974-981. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 497 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 405 |
||