Estimate of sensitivity of economic efficiency for variety in production, reproduction performances and culling rate in dairy herds in Isfahan | ||
| تولیدات دامی | ||
| Article 2, Volume 19, Issue 3, November 2017, Pages 533-543 PDF (738.96 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22059/jap.2018.231293.623176 | ||
| Author | ||
| efat nasresfahani* | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The objective of this study was to estimate and compare the sensitivity of economic efficiency to change in productive and reproductive performance as well as involuntary culling rate of dairy herds. For this purpose, A bio- economic model developed in DairyVIP software was used to analysis the registered information’s in the annual performance of dairy farms covered by Isfahan Vahdat cooperation. The net annual profit obtained 23310 × 1000 IRR when the average annual of milk yield, pregnancy rate and annual involuntary culling rate were 11588 kg, %18.6 and %18.1, respectively. The annual profit varied by 1353 × 1000 IRR per 1 kg change in the daily milk yield. While for every 1 percent change in the conception and involuntary culling rate, the annual profit varied by 564 and 321 × 1000 IRR, respectively. The breakeven of daily milk yield and pregnancy rate was too changeable to stay the annual interest, So that an increase in daily milk yield by 5 kg could tolerate a decrease in pregnancy rates up to % 8.1. Whereas pregnancy rate should be increased as much as 26.6% of basic conditions to compensate the economic losses due to a decline in daily milk yield by 5kg. Our finding can help the producers to identify the economic value of important traits in cattle annual profitability and take the optimal management decisions to improve economic benefit. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Annual profit; Breakeven; Daily milk yield; Conception rate; Involuntary culling rate | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Annual performance dairy reports covered by the technical unit of vahdat cooperative of Isfahan (1394) vahdat Cooperative farmers and animal farmers. Isfahan. pp. 161. (In Persian). 2. Beaudeau F, Seegers H, Ducrocq V, Fourichon C and Bareille N (2000) Effects of health disorders on culling in dairy cows: A reviewed critical discussion. Annals De Zootechnie. 49: 293-311. 3. Boden RF and Leaver JD (1994) A dual purpose cattle systemcombining milk and beef production. Animal Production. 5:8463- 464. 4. Cabrera V (2012) A simple formulation and solution to the replacement problem: A practical tool to assess the economic cow value, the value of a new pregnancy, and the cost of a pregnancy loss. Journal of Dairy Science. 95: 4683-4698. 5. De Haan MHA, Cassell BG and Pearson RE (1992) Relationships between net income, days of productive life, production and linear type traits in grade and registered Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science. 75: 3553-3561. 6. De Vries A (2004) Economics of delayed replacement when cow performance is seasonal. Journal of Dairy Science. 87:2947-2958. 7. De Vries A (2006) Economic Value of Pregnancy in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 89: 3876-3885. 8. De Vries A (2006) The DairyVIP program to evaluate the consequences of changes in herd management and prices on dairy farm [online]. Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. (Original publication date September 2006; Revised 9. Dobson H, Smith R, Royal M, Knight C and Sheldon I (2007) The High producing Dairy Cow and its Reproductive Performance. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 42: 17-23. 10. Fourichon C, Seegers H and Malher X (2000) Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: a meta-analysis. Theriogenology. 53: 1729-1759. 11. Laire FR and Cunningham EP (1980) Culling on low milk yield and its economic consequences for the dairy herd. Livestock Production Science.7:349-359. 12. Melendez P and Pinedo P (2007) The association between reproductive performance and milk yield in Chilean Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 90: 184-192. 13. Plaizier J, Lissemore K, Kelton D and King G (1998) Evaluation of overall reproductive performance of dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 81: 1848-1854. 14. Sadegi-Sefidmazgi A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Nejati-Javaremi A, Miraei-Ashtiani SR and Amer PR (2012) Breeding objective for Holstein dairy cattle in Iran. Journal of Dairy Science. 95: 3406-3418. 15. Sandoval-Castro CA, Anderson S and Leaver JD (2000) Production responses of tropical crossbred cattle to supplementary feeding and to different milking and restricted suckling regimes. Livestock Production Science. 66: 13-23. 16. Santos JEP, Thatcher WW, Chebel RC, Cerri RLA and Calva KN (2004) The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Animal Reproduction Science . 82-83: 513-535. 17. Smith JW, Ely LO and Chapa AM (2000) Effect of region herd size and milk production on reasons cow leave the herd. Journal of Dairy Science. 83: 2980-2987. 18. Strapak P, Candrak J and Aumann J (2005) Relationship between longevity and selected production, reproduction and type traits. Czech Journal of Animal Science. 50: 1-6. 19. Wathes DC, Bourne N, Brickell J, Swali A and Taylor VJ (2005) Relationship between production and reproduction. The 26th European Holstein and Red Holstein Conference, Prague 2005, Session 3. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 450 PDF Download: 303 |
||