سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,501
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,101,017
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,207,851
Yahya, Farzan, Ghazali, Zahiruddin. (1396). The Moderating Role of Country-specific Characteristics on Pay-performance Relationship in Asian Markets: A Meta-Analysis Approach. , 11(1), 37-69. doi: 10.22059/ijms.2018.233899.672683
Farzan Yahya; Zahiruddin Ghazali. "The Moderating Role of Country-specific Characteristics on Pay-performance Relationship in Asian Markets: A Meta-Analysis Approach". , 11, 1, 1396, 37-69. doi: 10.22059/ijms.2018.233899.672683
Yahya, Farzan, Ghazali, Zahiruddin. (1396). 'The Moderating Role of Country-specific Characteristics on Pay-performance Relationship in Asian Markets: A Meta-Analysis Approach', , 11(1), pp. 37-69. doi: 10.22059/ijms.2018.233899.672683
Yahya, Farzan, Ghazali, Zahiruddin. The Moderating Role of Country-specific Characteristics on Pay-performance Relationship in Asian Markets: A Meta-Analysis Approach. , 1396; 11(1): 37-69. doi: 10.22059/ijms.2018.233899.672683

The Moderating Role of Country-specific Characteristics on Pay-performance Relationship in Asian Markets: A Meta-Analysis Approach

Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies)
مقاله 3، دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 2018، صفحه 37-69    اصل مقاله (325.2 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijms.2018.233899.672683
نویسندگان
Farzan Yahya* 1؛ Zahiruddin Ghazali2
1Institute of Southern Punjab, Multan, Pakistan
2Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia
چکیده
The purpose of this study is to integrate the findings of the studies related to the relationship between CEO compensation and firm performance in Asian countries. The second concern of the paper is to explore the moderating role of country-specific characteristics on the pay-performance relationship in Asian markets. In order to achieve the study’s objective, meta-analysis technique is utilized through CMA. Basically, the results are analyzed with both the fixed effect and random effect models. however, the assumption of the fixed effect model regarding same true effect size was not fulfilled. Moreover, a higher level of heterogeneity was detected. Therefore, this study ignores the results denoted by the fixed effect model and follows the results prescribed by the random effect model. After eliminating outliers, the findings from 22 studies revealed that CEO compensation in Asian markets is aligned with firm performance but with the small magnitude. Furthermore, the results from the method of moments suggested that there is a positive effect of country’s development and literacy on the pay-performance link, however, the negative effect of gender inequality and Islamic practices are evaluated. Conversely, no significant effect of corruption on the pay-performance relationship is purported in the study. As the authors find the influence of country-specific characteristics on the pay-performance relationship in Asian markets, this study confirms the need for enhancing pay-performance sensitivity in Asian markets to mitigate potential agency conflicts.
کلیدواژه‌ها
CEO compensation؛ firm performance؛ corruption؛ gender inequality؛ literacy
عنوان مقاله [English]
بررسی نقش تعدیلگری ویژگی‌های خاص کشوری بر رابطه بین پرداخت‌های مدیران و نیز عملکرد شرکت در بازارهای آسیایی با استفاده از رویکرد متاآنالیز
نویسندگان [English]
فرزان یحیی1؛ ظهیرالدین غزالی2
1موسسه پنجاب جنوبی، ملتان، پاکستان
2مدرسه کسب وکار عثمان یوپ عبدالله ، دانشگاه اوتارا مالزی، کداح، مالزی
چکیده [English]
هدف نخست از این مطالعه، تجمیع یافته­های مطالعات پیشین در مورد رابطه بین پاداش مدیر و عملکرد شرکت بوده و هدف دوم نیز بررسی نقش تعدیلگری ویژگی­های خاص کشوری در رابطه فوق و در میان شرکت­های موجود در بازارهای کشورهای آسیایی می باشد. برای این منظور نیز از رویکرد متاآنالیز جامع  (CMA)استفاده گردیده­است. هرچند در این تحقیق از هر دو روش اثرات ثابت و نیز اثرات تصادفی بهره گرفته شد، لکن با توجه به اینکه فرض اولیه در استفاده از اثرات ثابت از حیث یکسان بودن " اندازه اثر واقعی" برآورده نگردید؛ همچنین در جریان بررسی داده­ها سطح بالایی از ناهمسانی در بین مشاهدات شناسایی شد، نتایج به دست آمده از اثرات ثابت نادیده گرفته شده و صرفا نتایج حاصل از مدل اثر تصادفی ارایه گردیده­است. پس از کنار گذاشتن آن دسته از مطالعات که نتایج غیر قابل قبول ارایه­کرده­بودند، مشاهده گردید که نتایج حاصل از 22 مطالعه بیانگر تاثیر کم پرداخت پاداش به مدیران در عمکرد شرکت­ها در میان کشورهای آسیایی می باشد. علاوه بر این، نتایج نشان می­دهد که سطح توسعه و میزان باسوادی بر روی عملکرد ناشی از پرداخت­های صورت گرفته به مدیران تاثیر مثبت و معنی­داری دارند. با این حال، تاثیر منفی نابرابری جنسیتی و شیوه­های اسلامی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نکته قابل توجه در این تحقیق، عدم مشاهده رابطه معنی دار بین فساد و عملکرد ناشی از پرداخت پاداش به مدیران می باشد. مطالعه حاضر که تأثیر ویژگی­های خاص کشوری در رابطه بین عملکرد شرکت­ها و پرداخت پاداش به مدیران در بازارهای آسیایی را ارایه نموده­است، بر این نکته نیز تاکید دارد که این مطالعه نیازی به افزایش حساسیت پرداختی در بازارهای آسیا برای مقابله با اختلافات آژانس های بالقوه را تایید می­کند که با پرداخت پاداش به مدیران در این کشورها امکان کاهش هزینه­های نمایندگی وجود خواهد داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
پاداش مدیر عامل, عملکرد شرکت, فساد, نابرابری جنسیتی, سوادآموزی
مراجع
Abed, S., Suwaidan, M., & Slimani, S. (2014). The determinants of chief executive officer compensation in Jordanian industrial corporations. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(12), 110-118.

Ahn, S., & Choi, W. (2009). The role of bank monitoring in corporate governance: Evidence from borrowers’ earnings management behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 425-434.

Albanesi, S., Olivetti, C., & Prados, M. J. (2015). Gender and dynamic agency: Theory and evidence on the compensation of top executives. In Gender in the Labor Market (pp. 1-59). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Anjam, Z. (2010). Determinants of CEO compensation in Pakistan from 2007 to 2009 (Master's thesis). University of Agder.

Athar, I., Khan, M. I., & Ali, S. (2012). CEO compensation and bank Performance. American Journal of Scientific Research, 78, 93-100.

Azman, I., Alimi, A., & Rashidi, A. (2014). Effect of manager’s role in performance based pay on employee outcomes. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 4(2), 41-58.

Baker, B. (2011). World development: An essential text. New Internationalist.

Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Spamann, H. (2010). The wages of failure: Executive compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman 2000-2008. Yale Journal on Regulation., 27, 257-282.

Bell, J., Lugo, L., Cooperman, A., O’Connell, E., & Stencel, S. (2013). The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society, Pew Research Center, (202), 419-4562.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Botero, J., Ponce, A., & Shleifer, A. (2013). Education, complaints, and accountability. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56(4), 959-996.

Brannick, M. T., Yang, L. Q., & Cafri, G. (2011). Comparison of weights for meta-analysis of r and d under realistic conditions. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 587-607.

Bushman, R. M., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65-87.

Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.

Cattelan, V. (2009). From the concept of Haqq to the prohibitions of Riba, Gharar and Maysir in Islamic finance. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 2(3-4), 384-397.

Chen, H., Manning, A. K., & Dupuis, J. (2012). A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta‐analysis. Biometrics, 68(4), 1278-1284.

Cheng, S., & Firth, M. (2006). Family ownership, corporate governance, and top executive compensation. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(7), 549-561.

Cho, K. R., Huang, C. H., & Padmanabhan, P. (2014). Foreign ownership mode, executive compensation structure, and corporate governance: Has the literature missed an important link? Evidence from Taiwanese firms. International Business Review, 23(2), 371-380.

Christiansen, L., Lin, H., Pereira, J., Topalova, P. B., & Turk, R. (2016). Gender diversity in senior positions and firm performance: Evidence from Europe. IMF Working Paper, 16/50.

Claessens, S. (2006). Corporate governance and development. The World Bank Research Observer, 21(1), 91-122.

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.

Conyon, M. J., & He, L. (2011). Executive compensation and corporate governance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 1158-1175.

Cordeiro, J. J., He, L., Conyon, M., & Shaw, T. S. (2013). Informativeness of performance measures and Chinese executive compensation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 1031-1058.

Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Rusticus, T. O. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 655-687.

Correa, R., & Lel, U. (2016). Say on pay laws, executive compensation, pay slice, and firm valuation around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 500-520.

Cumming, D., Fleming, G., Johan, S., & Najar, D. (2013). Law and corruption in venture capital and private equity. In R. Cressy, D. Cumming, C. Mallin (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Finance, Governance and Ethics (pp. 87-110). Springer Netherlands.

dela Rama, M. (2012). Corporate governance and corruption: Ethical dilemmas of Asian business groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 501-519.

Devers, C. E., Cannella, A. A., Reilly, G. P., & Yoder, M. E. (2007). Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of Management, 33(6), 1016-1072.

Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.

Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2007). Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(1), 1-39.

Ellahie, A., Tahoun, A., & Tuna, I. (2017). Do common inherited beliefs and values influence ceo pay? Journal of Accounting and Economics. 64(2), 346-367.

Fallatah, Y. (2015). CEO compensation, firm performance and corporate governance, an empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian companies. Management Research Report, 3(16), 43-71.

Fallatah, Y., & Dickins, D. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance and value in Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Business Management, 6(36), 10025-10034.

Feng, X., & Johansson, A. C. (2015). Underpaid and corrupt executives in China’s state sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-14.

Feng, X., & Johansson, A. C. (2017). CEO incentives in Chinese state-controlled firms. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 65(2), 223-264.

Frumkin, P., & Keating, E. K. (2010). The price of doing good: Executive compensation in nonprofit organizations. Policy and Society, 29(3), 269-282.

Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435-443.

Ghosh, S. (2010). Firm performance and CEO pay: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 137-147.

Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (1999). An analysis of compensation in the US venture capital partnership. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(1), 3-44.

Greckhamer, T. (2016). CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country‐level institutions. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 793-815.

Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1998). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 653-691.

Hamid, M. K. (2016). A report on relationship between CEO compensation and firm performance: Evidence from the banking sector of Bangladesh (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Jahangirnagar University.

Hao, Y., & Johnston, M. (1995). Reform at the crossroads: An analysis of Chinese corruption. Asian Perspective, 19(1), 117-149.

Heyzer, N. (2010). Women in Asia and the Pacific: Challenges and priorities. Bangkok: UNESCAP.

Hill, B., Lunn, M., Morrison, W., Mueller, J., & Robertson, C. (2015). Saudi Arabia: An overview of executive compensation, board structure, and sustainability. Drake Management Review, 4(1/2), 20-33.

Hope, O. K. (2003). Firm‐level disclosures and the relative roles of culture and legal origin. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 14(3), 218-248.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334-349.

Huynh, P. (2016). Assessing the gender pay gap in Asia's garment sector. ILO Asia- Pacific Working paper series.

Iqbal, A., Khan, M. I., & Ali, S. (2012). CEO compensation and bank performance. American Journal of Scientific Research, 78, 93-100.

Iqbal, S., Faisal, B., Sulehri, F. A., Latif, U., & Aziz, B. (2016). CEO compensation and firm performance-evidence from non-financial sector. Annals of Education, 2(1), 36-48.

Ismail, S. B., Yabai, N. V., & Hahn, L. J. (2014). Relationship between CEO pay and firm performance: Evidences from Malaysia listed firms. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(6), 14-21.

Jaiswall, S. S. K., & Bhattacharyya, A. K. (2016). Corporate governance and CEO compensation in Indian firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(2), 159-175.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Jerzemowska, M. (2006). The main agency problems and their consequences. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 14(3), 9-17.

John, K., & Kedia, S. (2003). Institutions, markets, and growth: A theory of comparative corporate governance. NYU Working Paper, 6(020).

Kato, T., & Long, C. (2006). Executive compensation, firm performance, and corporate governance in China: Evidence from firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. Economic development and Cultural change, 54(4), 945-983.

Kato, T., Kim, W., & Lee, J. H. (2007). Executive compensation, firm performance, and Chaebols in Korea: Evidence from new panel data. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 15(1), 36-55.

Keig, D. L., Brouthers, L. E., & Marshall, V. B. (2015). Formal and informal corruption environments and multinational enterprise social irresponsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), 89-116.

Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55-66.

Khanna, V. (2016). Determinants of CEO Compensation. International Journal of Management Excellence, 6(2), 679-683.

Lee, S. P., & Chen, H. J. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value as determinants of CEO compensation in Taiwan: 2SLS for panel data model. Management research Review, 34(3), 252-265.

Leung, K. (2007). The glory and tyranny of citation impact: An East Asian perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 510-513.

Lin, Y. F., Liao, Y. C., & Chang, K. C. (2011). Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in high-tech businesses. Total Quality Management, 22(2), 159-172.

Lipka, M. (2017). Muslimsand Islam: Key findings in the U.S. and around the world. Pew Research Center.

Lugo, L., Cooperman, A., Bell, J., O’Connell, E., & Stencel, S. (2013). The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society. Pew Research Center.

Luo, Y. (2015). CEO power, ownership structure and pay performance in Chinese banking. Journal of Economics and Business, 82, 3-16.

Majeed, M. T., & Zainab, A. (2017). How Islamic is Islamic banking in Pakistan? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(4), 470-483.

Melgar, N., Rossi, M., & Smith, T. W. (2010). The perception of corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 120-131.

Mengistae, T., & Xu, L. C. (2004). Agency theory and executive compensation: The case of Chinese state-owned enterprises. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(3), 615-637.

Meyer, K. (2006). Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2), 119-137.

Minhat, M., & Abdullah, M. (2014). Executive compensation in government-linked companies: evidence from Malaysia. Applied Economics, 46(16), 1861-1872.

Muñoz–Bullón, F. (2010). Gender‐Compensation differences among high‐level executives in the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 49(3), 346-370.

Murphy, K. J. (2002). Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. The University of Chicago Law Review, 69(3), 847-869.

Ncube, F., & Maunganidze, L. (2014). Corporate governance and executive compensation in Zimbabwean state owned enterprises: A case of institutionalizedpredation. Management, 4(6), 131-140.

Noorbakhsh, F. (1998). A modified human development index. World Development, 26(3), 517-528.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

O'Dwyer, A. (2014). Corporate governance after the financial crisis: The role of shareholders in monitoring the activities of the board. Aberdeen Student Law Review, 5, 112-133.

Okpara, J. O. (2011). Corporate governance in a developing economy: Barriers, issues, and implications for firms. Corporate Governance: The international Journal of business in Society, 11(2), 184-199.

Paskelian, O. G., Bell, S., & Omer, K. (2012). Chinese executive compensation–Do political connections matter? The Global Journal of Finance and Economics, 9(2), 105-119.

Peng, M. W., Bhagat, R. S., & Chang, S. J. (2010). Asia and global business. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 373-376.

Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markóczy, L. (2015). Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), 117-147.

Permanyer, I. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19(2), 1-32.

Pindado, J., Queiroz, V., & Torre, C. (2015). How do country‐level governance characteristics impact the relationship between R&D and firm value? R&D Management, 45(5), 515-526.

Rahman, M. M. (2017). Determinants of CEO compensation: Empirical evidence from listed banks of Bangladesh. Proceedings from The 7th International Conference of The Japanese Accounting Review (TJAR), Rokkodai Campus of Kobe University, Japan.

Raithatha, M., & Komera, S. (2016). Executive compensation and firm performance: Evidence from Indian firms. IIMB Management Review, 28(3), 160-169.

Ramadan, I. Z. (2013). Jordanian evidence for the pay-performance relation. International Business Research, 6(3), 174-182.

Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Nordic Innovation Center.

rehman, S. S., & Askari, H. (2010). How Islamic are Islamic Countries? Global Economy Journal, 10(2), 1-37.

Riani, A. L., Arifin, T., & Abi, P. (2014). Executive compensation, bank performance and risk taking: Some Indonesian evidence. International Business Management, 8(6), 394-400.

Richard, M. (2010). Pay for performance (P4P) programs in health Services: What is the evidence? World Health Report. Background Paper, 31.

Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571-600.

Sabattini, L. (2007). The Double-Bind Dilemma for Women in Leadership: Damned if you do, doomed if you don’t. New York: Catalyst.

Sheikh, M. F., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2016). Executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance in an Emerging Economy. Proceedings from Business and Management Conferences (No. 4406477), International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

Sheikh, M. F., Shah, S. Z. A., & Akbar, S. (2017). Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in Pakistan. Applied Economics, 50(18), 2012-2027.

Sheikh, N. A., & Kareem, S. (2015). The impact of board structure, ownership concentration, and CEO remuneration on performance of Islamic commercial banks in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research, 15, 49-59.

Stromquist, N. P. (2005). The political benefits of adult literacy. Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2006: Literacy for Life.

Stulz, R. M., & Williamson, R. (2003). Culture, openness, and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 313-349.

Subramanian, A., & Chakrabarti, R. (2011). Power, compensation and corruption: Theory and evidence. Financial Institutional Center, 7(11).

Sudhir, K., & Talukdar, D. (2015). The “Peter Pan syndrome” in emerging markets: The productivity-transparency trade-off in IT adoption. Marketing Science, 34(4), 500-521.

Sun, S. L., Zhao, X., & Yang, H. (2010). Executive compensation in Asia: A critical review and outlook. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 775-802.

Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233-251.

Tosi, H. L., Werner, S., Katz, J. P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301-339.

Tricker, R. B., & Tricker, R. I. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. USA: Oxford University Press.

Troiano, E. (2013). Why diversity matters. Catalyst Knowledge Center.

Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., Brookman, J., Majadillas, M. A., & Taningco, A. (2008). Executive pay and firm performance in the Philippines. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(5), 606-623.

Usman, M., Akhter, W., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Role of board and firm performance in determination of CEO Compensation: Evidence from Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(2), 641-657.

Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 215-247.

Van Essen, M., Otten, J., & Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164-202.

Vieito, J. P., & Khan, W. A. (2012). Executive compensation and gender: S&P 1500 listed firms. Journal of Economics and Finance, 36(2), 371-399.

Wahyuni, S. (2014). Past performance and executive compensation: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 10(22), 241-246.

Wood, P. R. (2007). Comparative law of security interests and title finance (Vol. 2). Sweet & Maxwell.

Wu, X., Chandramohan, K., & Bali, A. S. (2016). Corporate governance and bribery: Evidence from the world business environment survey. In M. Dion, D. Weisstub, J. L. Richet (Eds.), Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues (pp. 219-234). Springer International Publishing.

Xiao, Z., He, R., Lin, Z., & Elkins, H. (2013). CEO compensation in China: Accounting performance, corporate governance, and the gender gap. Nankai Business Review International, 4(4), 309-328.

Yahya, F., & Ghazali, Z. (2015). Beyond the conventional mechanisms of CEO Compensation: Empirical evidence from the financial sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Business Research, 15(5), 71-84.

Yan, Y. (2015). Determinants and consequences of executive compensation: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies (Doctoral dissertation). University of Bath.

Zhou, W., Georgakopoulos, G., Sotiropoulos, I., & Vasileiou, K. Z. (2011). The impact of executive payment on firm performance of the financial enterprises in China. Asian Social Science, 7(8), 65-80.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,223
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 902


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب