پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,244 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,907 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,579,412 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,354,521 |
طراحی فرمی کیف دستی بانوان بر اساس سلایق مشترک در گروه های ادراکی کاربران | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 23، شماره 1، فروردین 1397، صفحه 125-133 اصل مقاله (1.49 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfava.2017.236533.665709 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مریم احمدی* 1؛ مهدی اصل فلاح2؛ شاهین فرهنگ3 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد طراحی صنعتی، دانشکده پردیس بین المللی فارابی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی گروه طراحی‌صنعتی، دانشکدۀ هنرهای کاربردی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استاد تمام گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه ییل، نیوهون، امریکا | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از انجام این مطالعه و پژوهش، استفاده از فرآیند های طراحانه برای منطبق سازی بیشتر محصولات با گروه های ادراکی کاربران بود. برای دستیابی به هدف مورد نظر، از مطالعات کتابخانه ای و روش پیمایش توصیفی به منظور شکل دادن به یک مدل مفهومی و اعتبار سنجی آن استفاده شد. بر اساس تعاریف و روش های شناسایی گروه های ادراکی، وبا استفاده از مشاهده و پرسشنامه، ویژگی های مشترک فرمی محصولات مورد استفاده ی یک جامعه آماری 82 نفری از خانم ها استخراج شد. بر اساس اطلاعات استخراج شده در مورد ویژگی های مشترک محصولات مورد علاقه هر یک از گروه های ادراکی، تعدادی ایده بر همین مبنا طراحی شد و تصاویر این طرح ها در قالب جلساتی توسط گروهی از خانم ها به عنوان گروه هدف مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل از این مطالعه نشان داد که انسان ها بواسطه ی گروه ادراکی که به آن تعلق دارند، دارای ویژگی ها و سلایق مشترکی در انتخاب محصولات مورد استفاده ی خود هستند و با مبنا قرار دادن این موضوع می توان به طراحی محصولی متناسب با گروه ادراکی ایشان پرداخت. یافته های این مطالعه می تواند در حال و آینده، به منظور طراحی محصولاتی متناسب تر با سلایق ادراکی کاربر انسانی استفاده شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| گروه های ادراکی؛ ویژگی های مشترک ادراکی؛ ویژگی های مشترک فرمی؛ کیف دستی بانوان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing ladies handbag based on common interests in users perceptual groups | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Maryam Ahmadi1؛ Mehdi Aslefallah2؛ Shahin Farhang3 | ||
| 1The master of Industrial Design, Farabi International campuses, University of Art, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty Member, Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Applied Arts, The University of Art, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut State, USA | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The aim of this study is investigating the effective parameters on designing of products’ appearance based on “human perceptual styles”. To achieve this target, the library study and descriptive scrolling technique were used in order to form a conceptual model, identifying a target groups perceptual styles, making some ideas based on that model and evaluating and validating them. According to the psychological studies, “a perceptual style” is a human's consistent way of responding to and interacting with the world. Researchers defines perceptual styles as the “composite of characteristics include cognitive, affective, and physiological factors that serve as stable indicators of how an individual perceives, interacts with, and responds to the environment, objects and other people”. Perceptual styles refer to a range of competing and contested theories that aim to account for differences in individuals' cognition. These theories propose that all people can be classified according to their “style of perception”; Although the various theories present differing views on how the styles should be defined and categorized, common concept is that individuals differ in how they perceive. Generally, there are four perceptions or four main ways of communicating with the environment in humans: Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (movement), & Tactile that is called “perceptual styles”, “perceptual groups” or “perceptual modalities”. In cognitive psychology, perceptual modalities or perceptual groups are combination of attention, perception and memory that forms human moods and actions. Consequently, perceptual modalities are pathways through people receive information based on their perceptions and respond due to the received information. Perception, memory, and sensation connected with the concept of modality. Usually, people use all modalities to receive and learn new information and experiences. However, according to the modality theory, one and in a few cases, two of styles are predominant in human. This dominant style defines the best way for a person to get new information by filtering what is to be captured. In this paper, the concept of “human perceptual styles” or “perceptual modalities” is used to design and evaluating a series of handbags based on target groups’ dominant styles. In the research process, according to the definition of perceptual styles and identifying methods for human dominant perceptual styles, 82 ladies were analyzed by deep interviews and some questionnaires and a number of common specifications were extracted from deep probe of their daily lifestyles and investigating of their applied products. At the next stage of the study, based on extracted data about the products common characteristics in each perceptual style, a number of ideas were designed and evaluated by the same group of ladies in some focused sessions. The results of this study showed that people in regard to their perceptual style, have common interests in selecting their products and it could be used to design products based on their perceptual classification. The findings of this study can be used by leading brands, their designers and design firms in order to plan for and design products diversities and varieties more appropriate and matched to the tastes of users based on their perceptual style. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Perceptual groups, Perceptual common features, Formal common features, Handbag | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
حورایی، سید مجتبی (۱۳۹۳)، ارتباط موثر و نفوذ به قلب دیگران، نشر مؤلف، تهران. گلدارد، دیوید (۱۳۷۴)، مفاهیم بنیادی و مباحث تخصصی در مشاوره: آموزش و کاربرد مهارتهای خرد در مشاوره ی فردی، ترجمه: سیمین حسینیان ، نشر دیدار، تهران. نورمن، دونالد آ (۱۳۹۲)، طراحی حسی، ترجمه: معصومه حق پرست، جهانبخش سادگی راد، نشر حرفه هنرمند، تهران. Dunn, R & Dunn, K (1992), Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Griggs, Sh. A (1985), Counseling Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles, ERIC Counseling and Personnel Services Clearinghouse, School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Houde, O; Kayser, D; Koenig, O; Proust, J & Rastier, F (2004), Dictionary of Cognitive Science: Neuroscience, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, and Philosophy, Routledge, New York.
Kanninen, E (2008), Learning Styles and E-Learning, Master of Science Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere.
Li, L (1999), Acton Theory and Cognitive Psychology in Industrial Design: User Models and User Interfaces, Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig, Braunschweig.
Luke, J (2012), Fast Forward Your Customer Service: 10 Steps to Achieve Exceptional Customer Satisfaction, Candid Creation Publishing, Singapore. McCune, S. K; McCune, S. L & Alexander, V. C (2014), CliffsNotes FTCE Professional Education Test, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
McGann, M )2010), Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction?, Journal of Consciousness Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, pp.72-94.
Nardi, D (2001), Multiple Intelligences & Personality Type: Tools and Strategies for Developing Human Potential, Telos Publications, West Hollywood.Nongard, R (2014), Transformational Leadership How To Lead From Your Strengths And Maximize Your Impact, Lulu.com, Tulsa.
Norman, D.A (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
Peck, J & Childers, L. T (2003), Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The “Need for Touch” Scale, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp.430–442.
Pinchot, J & Paullet, K (2013), Different Keystrokes for Different Folks: Addressing Learning Styles in Online Education, ISSN: 2167-1435.
Pye, E (2007), The power of touch: handling objects in museum and heritage contexts, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
Reid, J. M (1987) The learning style preferences of ESL students, Tesol Quarterly Jornal, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp.87- 111.
Ricketts, C & Ricketts, J (2010), Leadership: Personal Development and Career Success, Cengage Learning, Delmar.
Riding, R. J & Rayner, S (2000), Cognitive Styles, Greenwood Publishing Group, Stamford.
Schifferstein, H. N. J; Fenko, A; Desmet, P. M. A; Labbe, D & Martin, N (2013), Influence of package design on the dynamics of multisensory and emotional food experience, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp.18-25.Sywelem, M; Al-Harbi, Q; Fathema, N & Witte, E. J (2012), Learning Style Preferences of Student Teachers: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, Institute for Learning Styles Journal, Vol. 1, pp.10- 24.
Williams, J (2010), Reading Comprehension, Learning Styles, and Seventh Grade Students, A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Education, Liberty University, Lynchburg.
Wong, L (2014), Essential Study Skills, Cengage Learning, Stamford.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,225 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 937 |
||