پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,098,447 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,206,097 |
اندازه‌گیری فرسایش خاک در بازه‌های مختلف زمانی در حوضۀ آبخیز معرف خامسان با استفاده از میخ‌های فرسایش | ||
| اکوهیدرولوژی | ||
| مقاله 25، دوره 5، شماره 2، تیر 1397، صفحه 675-685 اصل مقاله (1.15 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ije.2017.227553.477 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد دریکوندی1؛ عبدالواحد خالدی درویشان* 2؛ کامران چپی3 | ||
| 1دانش آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مهندسی آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، نور | ||
| 3استادیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکدۀ منابع طبیعی دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر به منظور اندازه‌گیری مقدار فرسایش در مقیاسهای زمانی ماهانه، سهماهه، ششماهه و یکساله انجام شد. سه شبکۀ میخ فرسایش در سه جهت شیب شمالی، شمال غربی و شرقی در زیرحوضۀ آبخیز شاهد در حوضۀ آبخیز معرف خامسان به‌منظور اندازه‌گیری فرسایش طی دورۀ زمانی مهر 1394 تا شهریور 1395 انتخاب شدند. به دلیل قرائت ماهانه میخ‌های فرسایش، از امکان تحلیل فرسایش در بازه‌های زمانی کمتر از یک سال (ماهانه، سهماهه و ششماهه) برای تعیین میزان مشارکت این بازه‌های زمانی در فرسایش سالانۀ خاک استفاده شد. بنابراین، با درنظرگرفتن قرائت میخها متوسط تغییرات ارتفاع خاک و در نهایت مقدار متوسط فرسایش خاک سالانه برابر با 22/17 تن در هکتار محاسبه شد. همچنین، مشارکت مقیاسهای زمانی ماهانه، سهماهه، ششماهه در فرسایش سالانه نیز به‌ترتیب 81/5، 33/7 و 52/9 تن در هکتار برابر با 34، 43 و 55 درصد فرسایش سالانه محاسبه شد. بهرغم وجود اختلاف درخور توجه در مقدار متوسط فرسایش در بازه‌های زمانی مختلف و مشارکت آنها در فرسایش سالانه، نتایج آزمون تحلیل واریانس یکطرفه نشان داد اثر مقیاس زمانی بر فرسایش خاک معنادار نیست. دلیل اصلی نبود تفاوت معناداری فرسایش خاک در مقیاسهای زمانی مختلف، واریانس زیاد دادههای حاصل از میخ‌های فرسایش ناشی از منابع متعدد خطا در روش یادشده بود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پاشمان خاک؛ جهت شیب؛ فرسایش بینشیاری؛ مقیاس زمانی؛ میخ فرسایش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Measuring Soil Erosion at Different Time Intervals in Khamsan Representative Watershed using Erosion Pins | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Derikvandi1؛ Abdulvahed Khaledi Darvishan2؛ Kamran Chapi3 | ||
| 1Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modarres University, Noor, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modarres University, Noor, Iran. | ||
| 3Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study was conducted to calculate the amount of erosion in monthly, quarterly, six-month and one-year time scales. Three erosion pin networks in three aspects of north, northwest and eastern slopes in control subwatershed of Khamsan representative watershed were selected in order to measure erosion during the period of October 2015 to September 2016. Due to the monthly records of erosion pins, the possibility of erosion analyzing in the intervals of less than one year (monthly, quarterly, and sixth) was used to determine the contribution of these periods in annual soil erosion. Therefore, considering pin records, the average changes in the height of the soil and, finally, the average amount of annual erosion was calculated about 17.22 t ha-1. Also, the participation of monthly, quarterly, and six month intervals in annual erosion was calculated to be 5.81, 7.33 and 9.52 t ha-1, respectively which are about 34, 43 and 55% of annual erosion. Despite significant differences in the average amount of erosion in different time periods and their participation in annual erosion, the results of one-way ANOVA showed that the effect of time scale on soil erosion is not significant. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Erosion pin, Interrill erosion, Slope aspects, Soil splash, time scale | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Walling DE. Erosion and sediment yield research-some recent perspectives. Journal of Hydrology.1988; 100(1): 113-141. [2]. Chaplot V, Poesen J. Sediment, soil organic carbon and runoff delivery at various spatial scales. Catena. 2012; 88(1): 46-56. [3]. Toy TJ, Foster GR, Renard KG. Soil erosion: processes, prediction, measurement, and control. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2002. [4]. Ghimire SK, Higaki D, Bhattarai TP. Estimation of soil erosion rates and eroded sediment in a degraded catchment of the Siwalik Hills, Nepal. Land.2013; 2(3):370-391. [5]. Bradbury J, Cullen P, Dixon G, Pemberton M. Monitoring and management of streambank erosion and natural revegetation on the lower Gordon River, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Australia. Environmental Management. 1995; 19(2): 259-272. [6]. Couper P, Stott T, Maddock I. Insights into river bank erosion processes derived from analysis of negative erosion‐pin recordings: observations from three recent UK studies. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 2002; 27(1): 59-79. [7]. Shi Z, Wen A, Zhang X, Yan D. Comparison of the soil losses from 7Be measurements and the monitoring data by erosion pins and runoff plots in the Three Gorges Reservoir region, China. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2011; 69(10): 1343-1348. [8]. Pope IC, Odhiambo BK. Soil erosion and sediment fluxes analysis: a watershed study of the Ni Reservoir, Spotsylvania County, VA, USA. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2014; 186(3): 1719-1733. [9]. Palmer JA, Schilling K E, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC, Tomer MD. Streambank erosion rates and loads within a single watershed: Bridging the gap between temporal and spatial scales. Geomorphology, 2014; 209: 66-78. [10]. Navarro‐Hevia J, Lima‐Farias TR, de Araújo JC, Osorio‐Peláez C, Pando V. Soil Erosion in Steep Road Cut Slopes in Palencia (Spain). Land Degradation and Development. 2016; 27(2): 190-199. [11]. Haigh MJ. The use of erosion pins in the study of slope evolution. British Geomorphological Research Group Technical Bulletin. 1977; 18: 31-49. [12]. Hudson NW. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. Fao Soils Bulletin N; 1993. [13]. Roose E. Evaluating, monitoring and forecasting erosion. In ISCO 12 conf., Tsinghua. 2002; 1-8. [14]. Sadeghi Sh. The study and measurement of water erosion, Tarbiat Modarres University Press; 2009. [Persian] [15]. Reimann C, Filzmoser P, Garrett RG. Background and threshold: critical comparison of methods of determination. Science of the Total Environment. 2005; 346(1): 1-16. [16]. Yazdi Samadi B, Rezaei AS, Valizadeh M. statistical projects in agricultural research, Tehran University Press; 2001. [Persian] [17]. Najafinejad A, Mardian M, Varvani J, Sheikh VB. Evaluation and comparison of representative hill slope and raster based hill slope methods for computation of topography factor in USLE. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production. 2011; 1(1): 99-114. [Persian] [18]. Saeidian H, Moradi HR, Feyz Nia SA, Bahramifar N. The role of slope main aspects in some soil physical and chemical properties (case study: achsaran and aghajari formations in Kuhe Kach and Margha watershed in Izeh township. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 2011; 2013 (9): 77-64. [Persian] [19]. Croke J, Hairsine P, Fogarty P. Runoff generation and re-distribution in logged eucalyptus forests, south-eastern Australia. Journal of Hydrology. 1999; 216(1): 56-77. [20]. Hartanto H, Prabhu R, Widayat AS, Asdak C. Factors affecting runoff and soil erosion: plot-level soil loss monitoring for assessing sustainability of forest management. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003; 180(1): 361-374. [21]. Johnson CW, McArthur RP. Winter storm and flood analyses, northwest interior. In Hydraulic Engineering and the Environment. 1973; 359-369. [22]. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. Predicting rainfall erosion losses-A guide to conservation planning. Predicting rainfall erosion losses-A guide to conservation planning; 1978. [23]. McCool DK, Papendick RI, Brooks FL. Universal soil loss equation as adapted to the Pacific Northwest. PB US Natl Tech Inf Serv. 1976; 135-147. [24]. Flerchinger G N, Frasier GW, Grossman RB, Potter KN, Sharratt BS, Williams J D. Shrinking/swelling, freezing/thawing and grazing effects on infiltration. In ARS Workshop on" Real World" Infiltration. 1996; 189 p. [25]. Mutchler C, Larson C. Splash amounts from waterdrop impact on a smooth surface. Water Resources Research. 1971; 7: 195-200. [26]. Zachar D. Soil erosion. Elsevier. Bratislava, Czechoslovakia; 1982. [27]. Auerswald K. Influence of initial moisture and time since tillage on surface structure breakdown and erosion of a loessial soil. Catena Supplement. 1993; 24: 93-101. [28]. Kinnell, PIA. Raindrop-impact-induced erosion processes and prediction: a review. Hydrological Processes. 2005; 19: 2815-2844. [29]. Ghahramani A, Ishikawa Y, Gomi T, Shiraki K, Miyata Sh. Effect of ground cover on splash and sheetwash erosion over a steep forested hillslope: a plot-scale study. Catena. 2011; 85: 34-47. [30]. Khaledi Darvishan A, Sadeghi SH, Homaee M, Arabkhedri M. Measuring sheet erosion using synthetic color-contrast aggregates. Hydrological Processes. 2014; 28(15): 4463-4471. [31]. Lehrsch GA, Sojka RE, Carter DL, Jolley PM. Freezing effects on aggregate stability affected by texture, mineralogy, and organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1991; 55(5): 1401-1406. [32]. Zhao L, Gray DM, Toth B. Influence of soil texture on snowmelt infiltration into frozen [19]. soils. Canadian journal of soil science. 2002; 82(1): 75-83. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 816 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 445 |
||