سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,572
تعداد مقالات71,031
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,500,957
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,764,116
کوهکن, علیرضا, صحابی, آذین. (1397). سیاست ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا در آسیای مرکزی در دوران بوش و اوباما. , 11(1), 215-229. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.142118.449628
علیرضا کوهکن; آذین صحابی. "سیاست ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا در آسیای مرکزی در دوران بوش و اوباما". , 11, 1, 1397, 215-229. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.142118.449628
کوهکن, علیرضا, صحابی, آذین. (1397). 'سیاست ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا در آسیای مرکزی در دوران بوش و اوباما', , 11(1), pp. 215-229. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.142118.449628
کوهکن, علیرضا, صحابی, آذین. سیاست ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا در آسیای مرکزی در دوران بوش و اوباما. , 1397; 11(1): 215-229. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2018.142118.449628

سیاست ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا در آسیای مرکزی در دوران بوش و اوباما

مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی
مقاله 13، دوره 11، شماره 1، فروردین 1397، صفحه 215-229    اصل مقاله (560.52 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2018.142118.449628
نویسندگان
علیرضا کوهکن* 1؛ آذین صحابی2
1استادیار روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه علامۀ طباطبایی
2دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه علامۀ طباطبایی
چکیده
ایالات متحدۀ آمریکا پس از فروپاشی اتحاد شوروی در جایگاه هژمون نظام بین‌الملل قرار گرفت و پس از رویداد تروریستی یازده سپتامبر 2001، به‌طور مستقیم به منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی وارد شد. دستگاه سیاست خارجی کاخ سفید در دوران رؤسای جمهوریِ جمهوری‌خواه و دموکرات این کشور از سال 1991 تاکنون، هدف‌های سیاسی، اقتصادی و امنیتی متعدد خود را بر اساس راهبرد کلان این کشور و با ابزارها و روش‌های متناسب پیگیری کرده است تا هژمونی جهانی آمریکا حفظ و تقویت شود. این نوشتار با مطالعۀ مقایسه‌ای سیاست خارجی آمریکا در دوران ریاست جمهوری «جرج دبلیو بوش» و «باراک اوباما» رؤسای جمهوری جمهوری‌خواه و دموکرات این کشور پس از یازده سپتامبر 2001، در پی یافتن پاسخ این پرسش اساسی است که سیاست خارجی ایالات متحده در برابر هر یک از پنج جمهوری قزاقستان، ترکمنستان، قرقیزستان، تاجیکستان و ازبکستان به‌طور خاص و کل این منطقه به‌عنوان محل رقابت قدرت‌های بزرگ منطقه‌ای و فرامنطقه‌ای، در دوران ریاست جمهوری بوش و اوباما چه تفاوت‌ها و شباهت‌هایی داشته است؟ نتیجۀ این مطالعۀ مقایسه‌‌ای که در بستر رهیافت نظری نوینی از نظریۀ کلان لیبرالیسم انجام شده حاکی از درستی این فرضیه است که تیم بوش یک‌جانبه‌گرایانه و بر اساس خوانشی تهاجمی از لیبرالیسم، تلاش کرده است هدف‌های واشنگتن را در آسیای مرکزی با ابزارهای سخت محقق کند. دولت اوباما برای تحقق همان هدف‌ها در قالب سازوکارهای جمعی و نهادهای بین‌المللی از ابزارهای نرم بهره گرفته و به­صورت چندجانبه‌گرایانه، دیپلماسی‌محور و بر اساس خوانشی تدافعی از لیبرالیسم عمل کرده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آسیای مرکزی؛ اوباما؛ ایالات متحده؛ بوش؛ سیاست خارجی
عنوان مقاله [English]
U.S. Policy in Central Asia under Bush and Obama
نویسندگان [English]
Alireza Koohkan1؛ Azin Sahabi2
1Assistant Professor of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba'i University
2PhD Student of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده [English]
Central Asia due to its unique geopolitical features has always been the center of severe struggle for power among dominant states in different historical eras. After the Cold War and with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States as the hegemon of the international system invaded Afghanistan in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001 and has pursued its various and multi-dimensional objectives in this geostrategic region using proportionate strategies and tactics to maintain and enhance its hegemony worldwide and in the five post-soviet states of Central Asia: the republics of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, since then.
The United States' foreign policy is based on "International liberalism" and this fixed pillar has not changed since World War II. In fact, since the end of WWII in 1945, regardless of who the president of the United Stated of America is, there has been one, fixed grand strategy in the Oval Office: Preserving American Supremacy all over the world. And revolving this fixed principle have been various political, economic, military and cultural tactics altering according to fluctuating regional and international conditions in which American troops and diplomats all around the world operate in. Undoubtedly, Central Asia as a "heartland" and a region rich of natural oil and gas similar to the Persian Gulf with unique geopolitical, geo-economic and geo- cultural features has not been an exception in this regard for the policy makers of the United States' Department of State.
This study using a comparative method tries to answer this main question: What are the similarities and differences of the foreign policy of the United States of America towards Central Asian Republics during George W. Bush tenure (2001-2009) and Barack Obama's presidency (2009-2016)? The answer is that the neo-conservative Bush Administration tried to fulfill Washington foreign policy objectives in Central Asia unilaterally and mostly through hard power and by invasion and militarism. However, Barack Obama's administration pursued the same goals through multilateralism and by consultative, institutional mechanisms.
During George W. Bush's presidency, the United States built military bases in the republics of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan and many high ranking military officials travelled to the region regularly. During George Bush's presidency, the United States also tried to impose democracy and freedom of the press and the relative mechanisms to the republics of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan by force which led to the Tulip Revolution in Bishkek in 2005 and the 2005 Andijan Unrest in which many civilians were killed. America then sanctioned the Uzbek government economically and military which darkened the bilateral relations more and Uzbek government forced the U.S. troops to leave the (K2) Air Base. Given to the usage of hard power and militarism, United States' grand strategy during the Bush administration from 2001 to 2009 in Central Asia can be called "Offensive Liberalism". 
Whereas, Barack Obama who entered the White House in 2009 found Central Asia and especially Afghanistan in different conditions comparing to the year 2001, so his administration pursued American grand fixed strategy to maintain American global hegemony with some different tactics. In fact, he commenced the "Policy of Change" in order to rectify the image of the United States of America which as a result of the invasion of Afghanistan and vast military presence of American troops all over the region was damaged and impaired. In addition, the U.S. Department of State with "Hillary Clinton", tried to "reset" the bilateral relations with Russia with which during Bush's presidency was impaired. Thus, in contrary to George W. Bush, the Obama administration acted multilaterally based mostly on soft power and through business and economic apparatus. The Oval Office, first and foremost set the agenda of diminishing the number of U.S. troops on the ground in Afghanistan. On the other hand, the United Stated accepted the Kyrgyz Parliament order to withdraw U.S. troops from Manas Air Base and left this country in 2010.
 The White House in the Obama presidency also initiated "New Silk Road" and "Northern Distribution Network" (NDD) as two vast, huge business and transformational projects to enhance its non- military presence in Afghanistan nonmilitary as well as approaching China and Russia as two strategic allies and rivals in Central Asia. The United States also during Obama's presidency seriously pursued the gas and oil pipelines projects which were outside Iran and Russia's main land such as "Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline" or "Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India Pipeline" called (TAPI) and "Trans-Caspian Pipeline" in order to contain Iran and Russia economically and politically. This is based on the United States’ official stated policy and the Obama energy team pursued this policy.
The White House also signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Kazakhstan and reconciled with Uzbekistan which after 2005 Andijan Unrest had expelled American troops out of (K2) Air Base. The Obama energy team also developed significant vast bilateral relationships with the Republic of Turkmenistan as a huge natural gas container of Central Asia. Contrary to the Bush presidency, during Obama's tenure, many nonmilitary high-ranking officials traveled to the region frequently. The White House, during Obama presidency tried to peruse the U.S. grand strategy of American hegemony through multilateralism, institutionalism and in the framework of collective and consultative mechanisms. Thus, given to the more usage of economic tools, along scaling down of military presence, the United States' grand strategy during the Obama administration from 2009 to 2016 in Central Asia can be called "Defensive Liberalism".
 In sum, both George W. Bush and Barack Obama pursued one fixed goal in Central Asia which was to maintain U.S. global hegemony and primacy but due to different regional and international conditions each faced during their presidency, the former used unilateralism, hard power, sanctions and promoting democracy by force while the latter pursued the same goal through multilateral mechanisms, economic forums, gas and oil projects and political reconciliation.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Bush, Central Asia, Foreign Policy, Obama, United States
مراجع
  1. Amir Ahmadian, Bahram and Habib Rezazadeh (2014), “Internal Factors Affecting Tajik Foreign Policy”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 18, No. 80, pp. 30- 55 [in Persian].
  2. Blake, R. (2011), “The Obama Administration’s Priorities in South and Central Asia”, U.S Departement of State, Available at: http://www.state.gov/p/sca/rls/rmks/2011/155002.htm, (Accessed on: 26/11/2015).
  3. Bohr, A. (2010), “Central Asia: Responding to the Multi-Vectoring Game”, Chatham House: the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Research/Americas/us0510_bohr.pdf, (Accessed on: 1/12/2015).
  4. Brzezinski, Z. (1997), The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostartegic Imperatives, New York: Basic Books.
  5. Burghart, D. (2004), In the Tracks of the Tamerlane: Central Asia’s Path to the 21st Century, Washington D.C.: National Defense University.
  6. Clinton, H. (2011), “Remarks on India and the United States: a Vision for the 21st Century”, U.S. Department of State, Available at: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2011/07/168840.htm, (Accessed on: 27/11/2015).
  7. Cohen, A. (2005), “Bush Administration Welcomes the Kyrgyz Revolution”, Eurasianet, Available at: http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav022905.shtml, (Accessed on: 21/8/2015).
  8. Eurasianet (2015), “Turkmenistan President Orders Start to Work on TAPI Pipelin”, Available at: http://www.eurasianet.org/print/75966, (Accessed on: 24/11/2015).
  9. Gedda, G. (2006), “Bush Lavishes Nazarbayev with Praise”, The Moscow Times, Available at: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2006/10/article/bush-lavishes-nazarbayev-with-praise/202041.html, (Accessed on: 2/11/2015).
  10. Horne, A. (2015), “Five Times Former President George Bush ‘Legitimised’ Repressive Regimes”, The Independent, Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/five-times-former-president-george-bush-legitimized-repressive-regimes-10171021.html, (Accessed on: 28/7/2015).
  11. Hurriyet Daily News (2011), “US Sends First Envoy to Turkmenistan in 5 Years”, Available at: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=us-sends-first-envoy-to-turkmenistan-in-5-years-2011-05-17, (Accessed on: 1/12/2015).
  12. Jaffe, A. M. (2000), “U.S. Policy towards the Caspian Region: can the Wish List be Realized?”, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Available at: https://www.bakerinstitute.org/files/2770/, (Accessed on: 24/7/2015).
  13. Kuchins, A. (2015), Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia: U.S. Policy Interests and Recommendations, Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  14. Landler, M. (2011), “Obama will Speed Pullout from War in Afghanistan”, The New York Times, Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/world/asia/23prexy.html?hp, (Accessed on: 28/11/2015).
  15. Landler, M. (2012), “Obama Signs Pact in Kabul, Turning Page in Afghan War”, The New York Times, Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/world/asia/obama-lands-in-kabul-on-unannounced-visit.html?_r=2&ref=barackobama, (Accessed on: 29/11/2015).
  16. Laumulin, M. (2007), “U.S. Strategy and Policy in Central Asia”, Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 4, No. 46, pp. 46-56.
  17. Miller, B. (2010), “Explaining Changes in U.S. Grand Strategy: 9/11, the Rise of Offensive Liberalism, and the War in Iraq”, Security Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 26-65.
  18. Morningstar, R. (2003), “From Pipe Dream to Pipeline: The Realization of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline”, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Available at: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/Morningstar%20Summary%205.20.03.pdf, (Accessed on: 26/7/2015).
  19. Mottaghi, Ebrahim (2008), “Smart Power and American Face Off Strategy during Obama Tenure”, Basij Studies Rahbordi Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 41, pp. 55-80 [in Persian].
  20. Nichole, J. (2009), Tajikistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests, Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  21. Nichole, J. (2014), Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests, Washington D.C.: Congress Research Service.
  22. Office of Communication of Azerbaijan (2013), “Richard Morningstar: The Advancement of Negotiations on the Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline Depends on Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan”, Available at: http://ocaz.eu/en/economy/578-richard-morningstar-the-advancement-of-negotiations-on-the-trans-caspian-gas-pipeline-depends-on-azerbaijan-and-turkmenistan.html, (Accessed on: 4/12/2015).
  23. Office of the Press Secretary (2003), “National Strategy for Combating Terrorism”, Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030214-7.html, (Accessed on: 14/10/2015).
  24. Oliker, O. (2003), Faultlines of Conflict in Central Asia and the South Caucasus Implications for the U.S. Army, Washington D.C.: RAND Corporation.
  25. Rafi, Hossein and Mohsen Bakhtiari Jami (2013) “The Strategy of the United States toward Economic, Political and Security Influence of China in Central Asia”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 19, No. 83, pp. 81-106 [in Persian].
  26. Rogin, J. (2009), “Confirmed: Obama to Surge 30000 Troops to Afghanistan and Begin Withdrawal in July 2011”, Foreign Policy, Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/12/01/confirmed-obama-to-surge-30000-troops-to-afghanistan-and-begin-withdrawal-in-july-2011/, (Accessed on: 28/11/2015).
  27. Rosenberg, M. (2015), “In Reversal, Obama Says U.S. Soldiers will Stay in Aghanistan to 2017”, The New York Times, Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/16/world/asia/obama-troop-withdrawal-afghanistan.html?_r=0, (Accessed on: 30/11/2015).
  28. Russia Today (2014), “Key US Air Base Supplying Afghanistan Closes”, Available at: https://www.rt.com/usa/163276-us-leave-manas-airbase/, (Accessed on: 4/12/2015).
  29. Shojaei, Mohammad Hossein (2005), “Kyrgyz Tulip Revolution”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 4, No. 49, pp. 37- 48 [in Persian].  
  30. Socor, V. (2005), “U.S. Reviewing Options in Central Asia”, The James Town Foundation, Available at: http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=30749&no_cache=1#.VcEiILUzrKc, (Accessed on: 5/8/2015).
  31. Taghvaee Nia, Ehsan (2010), “Uzbek-US Military Cooperation”, Islamic World Science Citation Center, Available at: http://islamworld2020.persianblog.ir/post/406/, (Accessed on: 23/11/2015) [in Persian].
  32. The US Department of State (2006), “The 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Uzbekistan”, Available at: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61684.htm, (Accessed on: 5/10/2015).
  33. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2006), Available at: http://nssarchive.us/NSSR/2006.pdf, (Accessed on: 3/11/2015).
  34. Yazdani, Enayatollah (2005), “U.S. and Russia Military Presence in Central Asia: The Case of Kirghiz Republic”, Political and Economic Ettelaat, No. 217-218, pp. 94- 99 [in Persian].
  35. Yuldasheva, G. (2011), “U.S. Strategy in Central Asia: Problems and Achievements”, Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 141-151.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,894
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 734





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب