سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,488
تعداد مقالات70,078
تعداد مشاهده مقاله123,083,286
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله96,317,926
Niknami, Roxana. (1397). The Eastern Partnership and Its Effects on Georgian Political Economy. , 1(1), 57-75.
Roxana Niknami. "The Eastern Partnership and Its Effects on Georgian Political Economy". , 1, 1, 1397, 57-75.
Niknami, Roxana. (1397). 'The Eastern Partnership and Its Effects on Georgian Political Economy', , 1(1), pp. 57-75.
Niknami, Roxana. The Eastern Partnership and Its Effects on Georgian Political Economy. , 1397; 1(1): 57-75.

The Eastern Partnership and Its Effects on Georgian Political Economy

Journal of Iran and Central Eurasia Studies
مقاله 4، دوره 1، شماره 1، مرداد 2018، صفحه 57-75    اصل مقاله (315.24 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
نویسنده
Roxana Niknami*
University of Tehran, Department of Regional Studies
چکیده
Georgia is an important partner for the European Union (EU) in the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) and its eastern dimension under the Eastern Partnership (EaP). In a wider context, the EaP supports delivery on key global policy goals set by the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. The overall framework guiding the relations between the EU and its six Eastern Partners is provided by the relevant bilateral agreements. Within the framework of the European Neighborhood Policy, the EU and Georgia signed an Association Agreement. The main objective of this study is to answer the following research question: What are the effects of the EaP on the political economy of Georgia? It is argued that the formulation of the EaP provided an impetus for the push for the Association Agreements with Georgia. Since the independence of Georgia, the influence of the EU has been slight in the implementation of the bilateral agenda of reforms, but the impact of the EU on this area has increased in recent years. The impact of the EaP can be measured in the three dimensions of the liberalization of trade, opening goods markets, and visa liberalization.  The findings indicate that the impact of the EU is slowly increasing; and moreover, the economic impact of the EaP will not be immediate. In the short-term, its implementation poses more challenges to Georgia than gains. In the long-run, Georgia hopes that the convergence to European standards will make it easier for Georgian firms to access the European market.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA)؛ European Neighborhood Policy؛ Eastern Partnership (EaP)؛ Economic Integration؛ Georgia
مراجع

Abesadze, O. (2015, December) “The Influence of European Neighbouring Policy Upon the Economic Development of Georgia,” Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 557-561.

Apriashvili, M. (2015, July 20) “Implementation of the DCFTA by Georgia,” Latvijas Ārpolitikas Institūts (Latvian Institute of International Affairs). Available at:  http://www.lai.lv/viedokli/ implementation-of-the-dcfta-by-georgia-460 (accessed 23 June 2018).

Balassa, B. (1961) Towards a Theory of Economic Integration. London: Allen & Unwin.

Chapichadze, K. (2017) “Visa Liberalization: What Does this Mean in Reality for Moldova and Georgia?” Ante Portas-Security Studies1, 8:147-152. Available at: http://anteportas.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/AP.VIII_Chapichadze.pdf (accessed 22 June 2018).

DCFTA, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia. (2018) Rules of Origin. Available at:  http://www.dcfta.gov.ge/en/dcfta-for-businness/Rules-of-Origin- (accessed 22 February 2018).

Dimitrova, A. and R. Dragneva. (2009) “Constraining External Governance: Interdependence with Russia and the CIS as Limits to the EU's Rule Transfer in the Ukraine,” Journal of European Public Policy16, 6: 853-872.

Dodini, M. and M. Fantini. (2006, September) “The EU Neighbourhood Policy: Implications for Economic Growth and Stability,” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, 3: 507-532.

Economic Policy Research Center  (EPRC). (2014) European Union’s Agreement on Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area and Georgia. Tbilisi: EPRC. Available at:  http://archive.eap-csf.eu/assets/files/Documents/EU_Eng_DCFTA-Georgia.pdf (accessed 20 June 2018).

Emerson, M. and T. Kovziridze, eds. (2016) Deepening EU-Georgian Relations: What, Why and How? London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

“EU Market Open for Georgia’s Black Sea Fish,” (2017, June 21). Available at:  http://agenda.ge/news/81871/eng (accessed 23 June 2018).

European Commission (EC). (2018, 18 April) Countries and Regions.Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/georgia(accessed 15 June 2018).

European Commission (EC) (n.d.) "EU-Georgia Trade- Making it Easier to Invest, Factsheet on Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA)," Europena Union,European External Action Service (EEAS). Available at:  http://eeas.europa.eu/ archives/delegations/georgia/documents/eap_aa/1dcfta_invest_ 2014_en.pdf(accessed 22 February 2018).

European Commission (EC), European Neighborhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations. (2017) Georgia.Available at:  https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourho od/countries/georgia_en (accessed 15 June 2018).

European Commission (EC). (n.d.) Trade Helpdesk.Available at:  http://trade.ec.europa.eu/tradehelp/georgia (accessed 20 June 2018).

European Free Trade Association (EFTA).(2018) Georgia. Available at:  http://www.efta.int/free-trade/free-trade-agreements/georgi a (accessed 22 February 2018).

European Parliament. (2002, December 10) Parliamentary Questions: The New Neighbors Initiative and Wider Europe. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP //TEXT+OQ+O-2002-0102+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&langua ge=en (accessed 12 June 2018).

Filipiak, T. (2017, June 29) “EU Visa-Liberalisation Strengthens Georgia’s Pro-Western Path,” Emerging Europe: The Gateway to the Region. Available at: http://emerging-europe.com/ voices/eu-visa-liberalisation-strengthens-georgias-pro-western-path (accessed 28 May 2018).

“Georgia’s Trade with EU Worth $211.5 million in January 2018,” (2018, 19 February).Available at:  http://agenda.ge/en/news/2018/368 (accessed 22 June 2018).

Geostat, National Statistics Office of Georgia.  (2017, September 13) External Merchandise Trade in Georgia, January-August 2017. Available at: http://www.geostat.ge/cms/site_images/_files/ english/bop/FTrade_08_2017-Eng-with%20cover.pdf (accessed 22 June 2018).

Hosny, A. (2013, May) “Theories of Economic Integration:A Survey of the Economic and Political Literature,” International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences 2, 5: 133-155.

Ilic, I. and S. Markozia. (2015) “Future Associates: An Overview of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement,” Journal of Social Sciences 4, 2:11-22.

Khurtsia, T. (2014, April 15) No Custom Tariffs, Result from Georgia-EU Free Trade. Available at:  http://agenda.ge/article/876/eng (accessed 23 June 2018).

Marinov, E. (2014, September) “Economic Integration Theories and the Developing, Counties,” In R. Dautov, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 9th Annual South-East European Doctoral Student Conference. Thessaloniki, Greece: South-East European Research Center.

Kilasonia, N. and A. Nadiradze. (2014, April) “EU-Georgia Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation Monitoring of Implementation- Final Report,” Transparency International Georgia. Available at: https://www.transparency.ge/sites/default/files/post_attach ments/Monitoring%20of%20Implementation%20of%20Viza %20Liberalization%20Action%20Plan%2008.05.2014.pdf (accessed 12 June 2018).

Putkaradze, R. (2015) “Historical Determinants of the Economic Relations of Georgia and the European Union,” Administracja i Zarządzanie (Administration and Management), Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo (Scientific Papers of the University of Natural Sciences) 107, 34:  97-105. Available at: https://repozytorium.uph.edu.pl/ bitstream/handle/11331/620/ Putkaradze_Historical_determinants_of_the_economic_relations.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 21 June 2018).

Samadashvili, S. (2014, June) “A Change of Government and the Future of EU-Georgia Relations,” European View 13, 1: 59-66.

Secrieru, S. (2017, October 25) "The Visa-Free 3D Effect: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine," European Union Institute for Security Studies. Available at: https://www.iss.europa. eu/content/visa-free-3d-effect-georgia-moldova-and-ukraine (accessed 21 June 2018).

Simao, L. (2013, June) “The Reluctant Conflict Mediator: EU-Georgia Relations under the Neighborhood Policy,”IPRIS Viewpoints, No. 126 [Instituto Português de Relações Internacionais e Segurança (IPRIS), Portuguese Institute of Internationa Relations and Security], Lisbon, Portugal. Available at: http://www.ipris.org (accessed 12 May 2018).

Snorrason, S. (2012) Asymmetric Economic Integration: Size Characteristics of Economies, Trade Costs and Welfare. Berlin: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.

Vardishvili, G. and E. Panchulidze. (2017, April) "Visa Liberalization for Georgia: What's Next?" Policy Brief #5, Georgian Institute of Politics,Tbilisi. Available at http://gip.ge/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Policy-brief-5-Giorgi-Vardishvili-Elene-Panchulidze.pdf (accessed 2 May 2018).

Whitman, R. and A. Juncos. (2011, September) “Relations with the Wider Europe,” Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 187-208.

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 347
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 269


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب