News

Dadashpoor, H., Arasteh, M. (2018). Analysis of the Spatial Interaction between the Iranian Southern Ports and the Regional Hinterland Cities. , 10(2), 193-223. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.259135.669869
Hashem Dadashpoor; Mojtaba Arasteh. "Analysis of the Spatial Interaction between the Iranian Southern Ports and the Regional Hinterland Cities". , 10, 2, 2018, 193-223. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.259135.669869
Dadashpoor, H., Arasteh, M. (2018). 'Analysis of the Spatial Interaction between the Iranian Southern Ports and the Regional Hinterland Cities', , 10(2), pp. 193-223. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.259135.669869
Dadashpoor, H., Arasteh, M. Analysis of the Spatial Interaction between the Iranian Southern Ports and the Regional Hinterland Cities. , 2018; 10(2): 193-223. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.259135.669869

Analysis of the Spatial Interaction between the Iranian Southern Ports and the Regional Hinterland Cities

مجله علمی " آمایش سرزمین "
Article 2, Volume 10, Issue 2, October 2019, Pages 193-223    PDF (1.18 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22059/jtcp.2019.259135.669869
Authors
Hashem Dadashpoor* 1; Mojtaba Arasteh2
1Associate Professor, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Ports in most parts of the world play a great role in creating integrity between the prosperous of the regions and balancing the supply chain (production, distribution, and consumption). This article is to analyze the spatial interaction between the southern ports of Iran and local-regional hinterlands and explain the role of ports in shaping the spatial structure. For this purpose, a network analysis of commodity flows method is used in 1996, 2006 and 2015. The findings indicate that southern Iran's ports are often the importer of consumer goods in the populated centers, located in regional hinterlands, and, at best, have exported energy sources and raw materials. While urban centers, located in local hinterlands, do not play an effective role in the production and delivery of goods to ports, they are often dependent on the regional center (Shiraz) to meet their consumption needs. It revealed that although the process of spatial inequality has been moving towards greater balance over the past two decades, the development of medium-sized ports and local nodes in the contiguous hinterlands and forelands has led to a balanced monocentric spatial structure in this region.
Keywords
Port; Hinterland; network analysis; Spatial structure; Southern Regions of Iran
References
  1. احمدی فروشانی، سیدمنصور و محمودی، سیدمحمد (1389). جایگاه فرمداری زمین در آمایش سرزمین، مجلۀ آمایش سرزمین، دورۀ 2، شمارۀ 2، ۱۱۰-۹۳.
  2. داداش‌پـور، هاشـم؛ ممدوحـی، امیررضـا و آفاق‌پـور، آتوسـا (1393). سـازمان فضایـی در نظام شـهری ایران بـا اسـتفاده از تحلیـل جریـان هوایـی افـراد، مجلـۀ پژوهـش‌هـای جغرافیـای انسـانی، دورۀ 46، شمارۀ1، ۱۵۰-۱۲۵.
  3. داداش‌پور، هاشم و آفاق‌پور، آتوسا (1395). عقلانیت معرفتی و نظری نوین حاکم بر سازمان فضایی سیستم‌های شهری، مجلۀ مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، دورۀ 8، شمارۀ 2، ۲۸-۱.
  4. لطیفی، غلامرضا (1388). نگاهی اجمالی به تعدادی از نظریه‌های مکانی در برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای، کتاب ماه علوم اجتماعی، شمارۀ 20، 10۹-10۴.
  5. مرکز آمار ایران (1395). سرشماری عمومی نفوس و مسکن. تهران: انتشارات مرکز آمار ایران.
  6. شیخ‌بیگلو، رعنا (1390). شناسایی مناطق محروم ایران با استفاده از رتبه‌بندی ترکیبی، مجلۀ پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دورۀ 2، شمارۀ 7، ۷۰-۵۳.
  7. کاویانی‌راد، مراد و مالداری، حسن (1396). تأثیر موقعیت ژئوپلتیک بر راهبرد ملی (مطالعۀ موردی: جنوب شرق ایران)، مجلۀ پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، دورۀ 49، شمارۀ 4، ۸۵۵-۸۴۱.
    1. Arasteh, M., Dadashpoor, H., & Taghvaee, A. (2017). Explaining the geopolitical evolution of ports- hinterland Connections in Iran; a historical comparative approach. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 12(4), 192-218.
    2. Bird, J. H. (1963). The major seaports of the United Kingdom- Hutchinson.

10. Chapman, D., Pratt, D., Larkham, P., & Dickins, I. (2003). Concepts and definitions of corridors: evidence from England’s Midlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(3), 179-191.

11. Ducruet, C., Cuyala, S., & El Hosni, A. (2018). Maritime networks as systems of cities: The long-term interdependencies between global shipping flows and urban development (1890–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 340-355.

12. Feng, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2013). A Location-Allocation Model for Seaport-Dry Port System Optimization. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2013, 1-10.

13. Flämig, H., & Hesse, M. (2011). Placing dryports. Port regionalization as a planning challenge–The case of Hamburg, Germany, and the Süderelbe. Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 42-50.

14. Fleming, D. K. (1989). On the beaten track: a view of US West-Coast container port competition. Maritime Policy and Management, 16(2), 93-107.

15. Friedmann, J. (1972). A generalized theory of polarized development, in Hansen N. M. (Ed.), Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development, NY: The Free Press.

16. Guo, L., & Yang, Z. (2018). Evaluation of foreign trade transport accessibility for Mainland China. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(1), 34-52.

17. Hayuth, Y. (1981). Containerization and the load center concept, Economic Geography, 57, 160-176.

18. Hoare, A. G. (1986). British ports and their export hinterlands: a rapidly changing geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 68(1), 29-40.

19. Kenyon, J. B. (1970). Elements in inter-port competition in the United States. Economic Geography, 46(1), 1-24.

20. Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5), 604-632.

21. Lee, S. W., Song, D. W., & Ducruet, C. (2008). A tale of Asia’s world ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum, 39(1), 372-385.

22. Meijers, E. (2005). Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts?. Urban studies, 42(4), 765-781.

23. Merk, O., (2013(. The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report. OECD, Paris.

24. Merkel, A. (2017). Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 61, 40-47.

25. Mohamed-Chérif, F., & Ducruet, C. (2016). Regional integration and maritime connectivity across the Maghreb seaport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 280-293.

26. Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2012). Giving a direction to port regionalization. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10), 1551-1561.

27. Norcliffe, G., Bassett, K., & Hoare, T. (1996). The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront: geographical perspectives on changing relationships. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2), 123-134.

28. Notteboom, T. E. (1997). Concentration and load center development in the European container port system. Journal of transport geography, 5(2), 99-115.

29. Notteboom, T. (2002). The interdependence between liner shipping networks and intermodal networks. In IAME 2002, International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2002: conference proceedings, Panama City, 2002.

30. Notteboom, T., &Rodrigue, J. P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(3), 297-313.

31. Notteboom, T., &Winkelmans, W. (2002). Stakeholder’s relations management in ports: dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment. In IAME 2002, International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference 2002: conference proceedings, Panama City, 2002.

32. Raimbault, N., Jacobs, W., &Dongen, F. (2016). Port regionalization from a relational perspective: The rise of Venlo as Dutch international logistics hub. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 107(1), 16-32.

33. Rodrigue, J. P. (2004). Freight, gateways and mega-urban regions: The logistical integration of the Bostwash corridor. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95(2), 147-161.

34. Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind?. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 4-15.

35. Sánchez, R. J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2010). Contextual port development: A theoretical approach. In Essays on port economics (pp. 19-44). Physica, Heidelberg.

36. Taaffe, E. J., Morrill, R. L., & Gould, P. R. (1963). Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: a comparative analysis. Geographical Review, 53(4), 503-529.

37. Wang, J. J., & Cheng, M. C. (2010). From a hub port city to a global supply chain management center: a case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 104-115.

38. Wanke, P., & Falcão, B. B. (2017). Cargo allocation in Brazilian ports: An analysis through fuzzy logic and social networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 60, 33-46.

39. Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industries. University of Chicago Press.

40. Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011). Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface?. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 575-583.

41. Von Thünen, J. H. (1966). The isolated state. Wartenberg, CM trans. Translation of: Der isolierte Staat (1826).

42. Woodburn, A. (2017). An analysis of rail freight operational efficiency and mode share in the British port-hinterland container market. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 190-202.

Statistics
Article View: 985
PDF Download: 678


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb